In post 2014, Titus wrote: In post 2010, Frozen Angel wrote: In post 2007, Titus wrote: In post 2003, Frozen Angel wrote:like you're literally lying about every part of my town meta to make your point go across. There are people here who have been playing with me recently and there are players here who played with me a year ago.
Nah, you're just too proud to admit your vulnerability when I tell it straight to your face. Oh well.
Like I got flaws too and you could lay back into me to ensure I pick town. We can hash it out. Or you can pretend that my criticisms of you are worthless pointless and everything that happens is a coincidence. I'm ok with either but I prefer being honest with you.
I'm just asking you to show me my vulnerability. I really want to work on it if it's real yet you bring an example that has nothing to do with you claimed about me.
I'm trying to. Your vulnerability is you don't scrutinize people being nice to you enough. That's it in a nutshell.
Now, lay into me. What should I watch out for? What's my blind spot?
[Normally, I would do this with Drixx/Cerb but...]
This went on for way too much. As someone who is friend to both of you:
FA: You literally gave an example of exactly what Titus is trying to say about you. Math got you to back off by treating you a certain way. That's a pattern for you. I didn't see anything from Titus where it was meant to have a go at you. It is good to know the things about yourself that you might otherwise overlook.
Titus: Basically everyone active in the game is telling you to stop with the focus on just one tiny aspect of the game. At the moment it's NAI to me, because town!you would pick at this particular scab (especially with some who are intentionally antagonizing you and keeping you focused on it) and scum!you would gladly take the cover others are providing. You don't really
need
anyone else to point out where you're hurting yourself and the game state.
And if you really do ... I'm here.
In post 2015, zMuffinMan wrote:stop spamming the fucking thread with shit nobody cares about thanks
stop fucking quoting massive walls and writing 1 line responses
jesus fucking christ
This post makes it look like you don't actually want to be playing forum mafia. Like ... if you think content coming from a certain slot is worthless to you, then just scroll right on by. No need for this crap. This ends up making me wonder if you're just making posts like this for LAMIST or something.
In post 2022, zMuffinMan wrote:i'm policy lynching the shit out of titus if i'm alive tomorrow
and i won't be moving my vote either
that's a fucking promise
That would be a really good way to get me (and probably others) to decide you need to eat rope. You cannot wind someone up and keep pushing them and then invoke policy lynch on them because they took your bait. It's dirty play.
In post 2031, Toranaga wrote:titus, if you're town please talk about anything BUT the leader choice.
your leader choice was scum motivated and will likely be the main reason why you'll get lynched next gameday.
that you're even suggesting you were mostly a town motivated leadership is already outing behaviour.
your spat with FA is only clearing her further if you're scum, and tilting and antagonizing her if you're town.
This post feels like so much hedging from someone who is informed. Gut doesn't like.
In post 2039, Toranaga wrote:I don't think we should spend the whole gameday dunking on titus though. it's annoying.
titus should not talk about leader stuff and be ignored when she does for obvious reasons.
if she is town we're gonna have 2 awful gamedays because of it. I have a hard time imagining anyone else getting lynched on d3.
This coming so soon after the prior post: all I'm seeing here is a narrative slip. How do you go from trying to reason with a person to get useful content and interactions with them (while repeatedly expressing the benefit of the doubt and suggesting you are willing to posit a town!Titus) to talking about them being so obviously scum that you're concerned the day will be taken up by people "dunking" on them.
Like ...
went by.
Pick a spot. Start reading. Ask questions and make comments.
See above.
In post 2071, zMuffinMan wrote:yes, me complaining about you doing
absolutely nothing but
talking about the setup and me suggesting that it's stupid for someone like titus to have been elected due to a complete lack of co-ordination are things that are comparable
you're truly a spectacular player
@xoxoxoxox{[::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::>
In post 2130, Sando wrote: In post 2071, zMuffinMan wrote:yes, me complaining about you doing absolutely nothing but talking about the setup and me suggesting that it's stupid for someone like titus to have been elected due to a complete lack of co-ordination are things that are comparable
you're truly a spectacular player
God you're bad. I mean keep saying I did nothing but speculate on setup, but talking setup to show why someone (Titus) is scum is not the same as "talking setup".
You TR'd me all yesterday, you bitched about setup talk while ignoring actual alignment posts I was making about people, and then today want to bitch about lack of coordination.
I had something else I wanted to say, but the pissing contest is too much of a turn off. Stahp it.
