The only chance for town in 2vs1vs1 is no lynching and hoping for a cross shoot. But you're so open to the idea of lynching me today when nm doesn't seem to agree with that at all.
And that's a lot of why I scumread you more.
this is accurateIn post 2466, profii wrote:Stan is an alt, I assume the original user has probably just forgot to log in.
:@
for example hereIn post 770, wilky wrote:Ugh, bbt, nm and profii are all town for me just now so by process of elimination
VOTE: Una
Willing to consider i'm wrong on at least one of the other 3 aswell.
i mean i did too but goddamn, this is practically scum claiming their shotIn post 2483, Not_Mafia wrote:I hated thisIn post 2412, UnaBombaH wrote:No idea what to think here yet.
I was certain we would have a 3p LyLo today, and with a cast that benefits profii.
Meaning that I really expected Stan to die.
I refuse to believe Stan would be a protective and a vig at the same.
Would mean that Stan is a bulletproof-SK then?
But I simply do not believe in 3v1v9. I think it would be a ridiculous setup no matter the amount PRs.
Meaning that the remaining scum either decided toNO-KILL (dislike the idea, will explain later), or there's anunclaimed protective/BP amongst Una/N_M/profii.
Now that makes me think that a BP is the likeliest.
I haven't heard of a BP-mason yet, but I'd bet it's possible.Wanna claim that N_M?
I'd consider profii or Stan claiming anything other than what they have already claimed to be a fakeclaim and confirmed BS.
So a theorized BP means that N_M was the NK-target, and I'd say that makes the most sense anyway.
I wanna hear N_M fullclaim before I speculate further..
maybe he knew you were town?In post 2485, Not_Mafia wrote:Also don't understand why scum proffii randomly defends me day 2
do you wanna no lynch because you think i might be SK or because you wanna see who the nightkill is
the fact that both of us are around to make an educated decisionIn post 2492, Not_Mafia wrote:What's the benefit of lynching today?
Damn how'd you knowIn post 2498, profii wrote:I knew it was you.In post 2477, Mathdino wrote:N_M i was never on my alt at the same time as you
i was probably on my main at the same time as you but i didn't notice
please talk to me about una because profii's behaviour these last two days is hilariously scum-indicative
profii seemed to know wilky would flip scum
and polling the dead, it looks like morality is the main una-scumreader
i'm not sure una doesn't just kill morality given that mor was unlynchable
Link me to your progression on Not_MafiaIn post 2502, profii wrote:Inferno gets triggered easilyIn post 2485, Not_Mafia wrote:Also don't understand why scum proffii randomly defends me day 2
He chastised you for tunnelling Tex
Tex flipped town (scum lolol whatever) and therefore for you to be told off for tunnelling Tex meant your win con was not lynching town. The mod literally gave it away by not PMing you that telling off
I mention inferno is triggered easily because he was daft enough to not realise the consequence of what he did so I had confidence in my theory
Also - I am a VT so by “alluding” to having a result on you might have drawn a night kill to me, but I think it was Maths slot who couldn’t let it go. A town player with the rep of BBT should have not pressed for role fishing at that point. Point in case Morality realised exactly what i was doing I think
But you called me she up until this post despite me not setting gender on that account :/In post 2453, profii wrote:I know stan is an alt and mentioned she doesn't always log into the account for this game but I once played a game where that turned out to be scum coasting through to the end.
1. I shot Morality because I thought there was a strong association with wilky and I thought he'd be much harder to lynch than aa9. His scumgame is dangerous.In post 2518, profii wrote:He can't call me scummy for wanting to keep AA9 alive to the last lylo, because he did not shoot AA9 when we lynched wilky but everyone know AA9 was scum
He claims he only just realised he was a Vig last minute, but he pre-reads his replace ins he must have known that AA9 was pretty obvious scum so at the point of replacing in so why isn't he removing scum?
I think he is a SK that knew there is likely 2-1-T setup and removing arc meant removing a contesting night kill + Arc was probably going to shoot Gus when left to her own devices so that is his win con.
I'm only voting Mathdino today.
I would vote because it's 3v1 and if I'm wrong scum can't rush, but someone will only accuse me of being reckless, however, math is a SK. Lynch today.
I didn't read town consensusIn post 2535, profii wrote:Have you got much experience of a Vig shooting rogue from the town hive mind of pretty much being set on a particular scum being a succsess? (In this case you not shooting AA9 on everyone’s behalf is almost arrogant - so I’m calling it out as anti town in a massive way)
Do the research or get mocked post-gameIn post 2539, profii wrote:Yeah, funnily enough it had masons and an odd night commuter
HOLY SHIT I'M NOT TRYING TO CONVINCE YOUIn post 2547, profii wrote:I’ll vote una when you stop throwing game mechanics around and tell me why he is scumIn post 2545, Mathdino wrote:Nm this town loses to profii in lylo anyway if we no lynch, and he's not gonna vote una
Just lynch profii, it's over
It's not unlikely there's a scum rolecop and they already know I'm not skIn post 1, Inferno390 wrote:Mafia can use their abilities and perform the NK on the same night.
no, here are the possible situations:In post 2566, profii wrote:But you would shoot me as you SR me and then win a 1v1 result with N_M
i sent this to nexus 2 hours after the deadline passedMathdino wrote:if i can still make the decision (i just got wifi back just now)
i'm going to hammer unabombah