In fact, we are at 48 hours left of D1, I will pause the timer until a replacement is found
Effective now
In post 104, nonny wrote:This seems a little odd. Maybe the confidence that Oath will not be lynched prior to being able to do the promised reads? I know kmd unvoted so the risk of quick hammer is minimal (never impossible with more than one scum alive), just feels off.
Post 102 this actually makes sense. Its very unconventional but the logic seems sound. Though never like the prospect of a townie offering themself up as a mislynch, nor saying I want to go ahead and lynch him. It's very town, which could also be very WIFOM/gambit but feels genuine.
Actually you can nix my Nonny slight Town read. Because there is a huge disconnect here between saying in the first post that Oath seems genuine and then suggesting in the second that Oath is running some kind of AtE gambit which would be coming from scum.In post 111, nonny wrote:Oath....you know you're not really lynched, right?
So hey Nonny … where did this scum read come from?In post 121, nonny wrote:VOTE: Invisibility
Please elaborate on how you think Oath used that wagon to scum-hunt. I’d like clarity on what you see because I don’t see … really anything being done from that slot to sort her wagon.In post 117, Music Box wrote:I replied earlier that it was mostly a gut feeling but I'll expand that. The wagon didn't bother her and she used it to scumhunt
the "somewhat unfortunately" partIn post 76, RedCoyote wrote:Somewhat unfortunately, I didn't get anything unsavory off of Kmd's starting posts.
Because 'why RC? Why not Invisibility' without proactively GIVING the reason for Invisibility gives me very bad vibes of nonny trying to find a perceived consensus candidate and be fresh on a wagon to avoid claims of sheeping, while not actually caring about the push happening. Also this post becomesIn post 121, nonny wrote:Why RC? Why not Invisibility?In post 118, Music Box wrote:I'm not keen on any of the other wagons but if it comes down to choosing between them then I'd be voting RC.
Those voting RC (oath and hito) can you say more about why you're voting him? Went back and read the vote posts because I really couldn't recall clearly why.
How's this going?In post 99, Invisibility wrote:also i'm voting oath because she is the most scumme
i'm going to iso people tomorrow and try to get more reads
Do you have a read to share that isn't "pushing up on weak shit"? How do you feel about the posts since your claim?In post 109, Oath wrote:NOW - that's that. I'm town- go back and reevaluate all your reads and stop pushing up on weak shit.
VOTE: Invisibility
I didn't like the claim but I know that some people think that L-1 is the right time to claim and I get her point about not wanting a PR to be outed, but I didn't like the request for someone to hammer, or the self vote. It's possible that it was a ploy to get the votes off her but I don't get that feeling that's the case here.In post 119, Kmd4390 wrote: What do you think of Oath's recent posting? Specifically claiming VT before anyone gave intent to hammer and then the self vote?
Because I think RC was scummier than Invisibility.In post 121, nonny wrote:Why RC? Why not Invisibility?
I was referring to post 22 where Oath used the wagon to start to sort four players and based her vote on RC's response to it.In post 130, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Please elaborate on how you think Oath used that wagon to scum-hunt. I’d like clarity on what you see because I don’t see … really anything being done from that slot to sort her wagon.