I am in full agreement with this statement, which leads to Seth's argument...cam wrote:There really isn't even such thing as massclaim in this game, considering there is only one claim to be made really.
To which JD rightly replied...Seth wrote:I don't think JDodge is the SK finder.
He's the most vocal proponent of massclaim, repeatedly saying that the SK finder should have no reason not to claim. If he's truly 100% behind that statement, then if he were the SK finder, he should say so.
I say “rightly replied” because the logic does apply to avinas who said:JD wrote:1) Why doesn't this logic apply to avin?
Ergo, the FBI has no reason to avoid claiming at all. Avinas doesn’t just state this belief, he shows that he is 100% behind it by explaining why:avinas wrote:I agreed with him that the FBI agent has no need to false-claim.
And further demonstrates this by explicitly stating that he is continuing to stand by the argument long after the math has been conceded by JD:avinas wrote:Because then we have one confirmed townie. The math is already shown in earlier posts. One confirmed townie means a lynch has a better chance of hitting scum, from a purely statistical standpoint. Factor in human deduction, and you're on better standing.
In summary, avinas is not the FBI. Were he the FBI, he would have claimed before L-1, which he’s been at twice in the last week. Since we know he’s not the FBI, there’s no claim he can make that will stay the hammer. Therefore there is no reason to await a claim.avinas wrote:I'd like to say that I never abandoned my stance...I don't know where people got that from.
The second reason has a little something to do with Dave. He’d voiced suspicion of avinas. I figured that, with a little pressure, that suspicion would become a vote and we could move this game (which was stagnating) along. I’m glad it worked, now I can only hope that I’m right about avinas being scum.gob wrote:I'm too dense. Spell it out for me.Ythill wrote:Besides, there are other reasons for my actions that have nothing to do with Dave. Think about it.
This is a ridiculous accusation. Blackmail would be something like: I have proof that you are scum, JD, but I’ll keep it to myself if you take your vote off of me. I’ve done no such thing. I suppose you could stretch to say that's what I what I was doing with Dave, but I never gave him an ultimatum and my suspicions were stated up-front.JD wrote:This level of blackmail and forcing of hands is not in any way a pro-town action.
Nor have I forced anyone’s hand. In fact, I’ve done the opposite. I’ve given ample opportunity for anyone who
Gob says I applied a time constraint but I’ve done no such thing. Any one of those three could have unvoted but they did not. I could have simply hammered in #244 but I did not. What I applied was
Goodnight.