IT SPEAKSIn post 6048, texcat wrote:But at least I have posted content, unlike Mylo.In post 5973, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's day five and texcat still has less posts than a50. she didn't got prodded even once. posts enough content to not draw attention too much themselves
10/10 lurking
this posts makes me know that i have been on your nerves, makes me believe in my scumread even more.In post 6048, texcat wrote:But at least I have posted content, unlike Mylo.In post 5973, Scioness Sajj wrote:it's day five and texcat still has less posts than a50. she didn't got prodded even once. posts enough content to not draw attention too much themselves
10/10 lurking
you said yourself you thought I was dead and nothing was going to happen - hell, I thought I was dead tooIn post 6044, Scioness Sajj wrote:so you are saying i was the one that wanted the tex wagon to happen and i put tex and l-2 and then 'tried to convince' RG to vote tex so it could move attention from her to me, and we could get me lynched instead of tex??? im lostIn post 6039, TehBrawlGuy wrote:.In post 6034, Scioness Sajj wrote:if you are basing my scummines on that one post. i do really not gain anything from suggesting what i did. if i flip red then my only good reason to suggest what i did would be to protect tbg
and by posting that i would make not only make myself lynched but also him so
i'm losing two scum for one push on texcat
idk it's not a bad play if you and tex are both red =. tex red flip makes me look really good, your red flip a lot less so
plus scum clearly have multiple PRs, so if tex has a stronger role you really want to use tonight it's sensible
makes basically no sense if you're the only one of us three that's scum though
VOTE: sajj
if this is red we gotta lynch in me/tex tomorrow imo
In post 4017, texcat wrote:Vax has done a lot of suspicious stuff. but he's getting a pass for fake claiming vig. While I do understand that the real vig is likely to kill you and that it seems like a stupid play from scum, I'm still not willing to give him a pass for it. Especially since he did it with a wink, "NOONE counter. I aint syaing shit else". But I think there are better votes right now.In post 4012, Tchill13 wrote:I don't understand why lalendra isn't a good lynch today. She naked voted to get on the wagon. Only scum reads TBG which half the game scum reads... I haven't seen any sorting from her...I agree that we can't let someone who isn't paying attention to the game, like Lala, to the endgame. I don't think she's a horrible lynch today. But I think Myloninja is a better lynch. Mylo does seem to be paying attention to the game, as evidenced by his continued beetlejuicing. He has not contributed anything at all to the game however. I don't understand why Gamma is willing to give him another day. We've been playing to 5 weeks and Mylo's given us nothing. Why does he get another week?In post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo
In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's terrible approachIn post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo
In post 4020, texcat wrote:Why?In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's terrible approachIn post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo
In post 4025, Scioness Sajj wrote:i do. i believe i have been pretty clear how i feel about her, it didn't change since yesterday.In post 4019, wavemode wrote:so you townread lalendra?
actually, i take that back. that's scummy approach.In post 4020, texcat wrote:Why?In post 4018, Scioness Sajj wrote:that's terrible approachIn post 4003, wavemode wrote:do we want lalendra anywhere near lylo
why? there is a difference between i vote for you because i think you are scum and i vote you because i don't trust you to win the game in lylo.
do you play to lynch scum or do you play to policy people that may make the wrong decision in lylo? do you want a lynch that people have to take stances on or do you want to have no responsibility policy? are you certain that disengaged lurkers will stay disengaged? are you certain that engaged players won't flake out?
idk maybe i'm wrong but i thought we should be looking for scum, not weakest links. especially in a game like this where, if we assume i'm upper line of useless lurker, we have about 10 players that fit criterium of being a liability to our wincon. you and wave included.
In post 4026, Scioness Sajj wrote:like with argument like that we can as well lynch Ausuka since she hasn't been really paying that much attention to the game, right?
my convo with tex
So you're saying that you think there's a chance that you havent been lynched becuase of how scummy you are and how bad your reads are?In post 6049, Scioness Sajj wrote:by killed i mean eating the ropeIn post 6046, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is very self-righteousIn post 6041, Scioness Sajj wrote:idk if i have been kept alive becuase my reads are bad or i'm just that scummy though. so you will have to figure it out yourself.
what makes you think you'd get killed over the others?
i wouldn't get nked, it never happens
In post 6015, JarJarDrinks wrote:SS really posted those words guys
in this game?In post 6057, JarJarDrinks wrote:So you're saying that you think there's a chance that you havent been lynched becuase of how scummy you are and how bad your reads are?In post 6049, Scioness Sajj wrote:by killed i mean eating the ropeIn post 6046, Gamma Emerald wrote:this is very self-righteousIn post 6041, Scioness Sajj wrote:idk if i have been kept alive becuase my reads are bad or i'm just that scummy though. so you will have to figure it out yourself.
what makes you think you'd get killed over the others?
i wouldn't get nked, it never happens
So like, the scummier someone is, the less likely they are to be lynched?
FAM TEXCAT IS A MAIN WAGONIn post 6055, Golden Robster wrote:not deflecting off main wagons
Bad
dude you know how many times i have been told this game that X wagon is bad becasue my vote was on it?In post 6053, TehBrawlGuy wrote:you said yourself you thought I was dead and nothing was going to happen - hell, I thought I was dead tooIn post 6044, Scioness Sajj wrote:so you are saying i was the one that wanted the tex wagon to happen and i put tex and l-2 and then 'tried to convince' RG to vote tex so it could move attention from her to me, and we could get me lynched instead of tex??? im lostIn post 6039, TehBrawlGuy wrote:.In post 6034, Scioness Sajj wrote:if you are basing my scummines on that one post. i do really not gain anything from suggesting what i did. if i flip red then my only good reason to suggest what i did would be to protect tbg
and by posting that i would make not only make myself lynched but also him so
i'm losing two scum for one push on texcat
idk it's not a bad play if you and tex are both red =. tex red flip makes me look really good, your red flip a lot less so
plus scum clearly have multiple PRs, so if tex has a stronger role you really want to use tonight it's sensible
makes basically no sense if you're the only one of us three that's scum though
VOTE: sajj
if this is red we gotta lynch in me/tex tomorrow imo
it kind of makes sense for you to have been bussing tex for towncred assuming nothing was going to work. once I started her wagon, you didn't vote tex to give it momentum until she was at l-3 even though you were present
you taking the heat afterwards is weird as fuck, but honestly that whole series of wagon shifts is bizarre, so something weird happening does fit
tbh I'd still rather lynch tex first but i don't think that's gonna happen anymore
no it isn't your wrong
This sounds like what u were saying when you showed up and saw wheme was about to be lynched. U gonna try to derail this one too?In post 6062, Creature wrote:Oh fuck, we fell to their trap again.
Why not?In post 6073, JarJarDrinks wrote:This sounds like what u were saying when you showed up and saw wheme was about to be lynched. U gonna try to derail this one too?In post 6062, Creature wrote:Oh fuck, we fell to their trap again.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}