Mini Normal 2024 - Endgame
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
VOTE: twain
grasping at straws much?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
Wtf does this even mean. Does -1 mean confirmed scum? So your strongest read is a -0.1? Are you like trying to park a vote for parking a vote sake? Can more people please get on this guy ffs?
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I entirely agree with this. Nausi's 81 seemed really contorted. I don't like it.In post 83, Alchemist21 wrote:VOTE: Nauci
I don’t like how in the same post they give a description of irrelephant as an excellent scum player who can’t be caught by a single post only to then claim to have caught them by a single post. You gave no reference to their Town game and to me it reads like you trying to say “hey this guy’s dangerous as scum and you won’t be able to catch him, but don’t worry because I know exactly how they work and have already caught them for you!”- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I played with BBT and Alchemist like a couple years ago...
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I wishIn post 109, Tchill13 wrote:Dr. Do Little are you a tone reader? You seem to be pushing that.
But if you don't have a lot of content to work with maybe tone of the post is a good place to start.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
^ this guy is the real tone reader thoIn post 95, ejjinami wrote:And his response in 33 was tonally awful. It felt forced, as if he made the joke overly obvious so that people will understand clearly that he wasn’t trying to do anything.
And I don’t really like the fact that he didn’t take the time to seriously answer a question that
-was meant to be answered seriously.
-had the probability of creating a conversation.
It’s not that scum indicative, but fricking hell, is it really that difficult NOT to make a shitpost when people ask for content?
I'm kinda tempted to vote it even if only because of the tone of the 2-nd post, but I'm not entirely sure what would be the scum motivation there.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
why? Although I agree with you that I feel a more weak town vibe from TchillIn post 141, Rei wrote:twain is also a veeery slight town read- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
Votes on Nauci or NSG? If so why is your vote not on there yet?In post 145, Mumble wrote:So...
Can we get some votes on this?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
you immediately said that after that you also think nsg is scum so I assumed that you were agreeing with nauci...In post 161, Mumble wrote:Uhhh...Nauci. Who I am voting and whose post I quoted...- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I liked TWAIN's 213 and 233. UNVOTE:
- Is this a first order OMGUS on twain??? So you agree that he's scumreading people's plays, but also that you don't believe the reads?In post 236, Irrelephant11 wrote: The small amount of townlean I had on Twain is fading quickly. I find that last reads list the most hard to believe - you seem to be actually scumreading other people's play but because I had some typos/website issues, I deserve your vote? [...]
Townreading Nauci and nsg, and more than happy to sheep them onto someone I don't townread VOTE: Mumble
- Town reads on NSG (who's done nothing all game to get towncred)+ Nauci (a flip from an earlier scumread? for what? Nauci's post has been pretty consistent in nature, so any reads should also be consistent) and sounds like a casual excuse to go on a mumble's wagon wtf
VOTE: irrelephant- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
?? cool i guess calling someone out for misrepping you is now a town read ??In post 84, Irrelephant11 wrote:But that is a little misreppy, nauci - Notice that *my* vote is for pressure and reactions. *Her* vote is apparently because I'm scummy for not providing reasons. If that scumread expires (not super sure why it's there in the first place), I would think it would make more sense to move on, either to another scumread or to create pressure and generate discussion. Instead, she sits on me. Do her actions make sense to you?
real good to know thx.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
Why don't you elaborate your thought mechanism behind this: Assume you are town. I am scum for because instead of trying to push your wagon forward I'm actively scumhunting?In post 260, Nauci wrote:
Thisfeels like a grasping for straws case when the wagon on me lost momentum...
Nauci + Irrelephant scum you heard it here first guys.
Would also explain that terribly awkward early interaction.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
In post 294, Irrelephant11 wrote: I meanI didn't think that her misrepresentation of me is towny per se, but I also know that she's paranoid of me as town, and has done all the things I could potentially scumread her for here - when we were both town. That obviously doesn't *clear* her, but it doesn't make me suspicious in the same way it would if she were playing the same paranoid misreppy way around another player. Basically, I think the misrep was a misunderstanding in this case. Nauci doesn't need to go after me as the mislynch as scum, especially when it's gettinghermuch more negative attention.In post 294, Irrelephant11 wrote:This looks exactly like town Nauci so far- paranoid of me, anti-lurkers at first, trying to provide all her thoughts and reads when she can... We don't have many games between us atm, but I've seen her as both alignments, and nothing reminds me more of scum!nauci than town!nauci. It's possible she's putting on a performance as scum just for me, but I suspect she would want to change up her game, call it new meta, and not get so much heat for the way she plays the early game (this isn't the first time).In post 342, Irrelephant11 wrote:I feel like other players are scumreading her just for the sake of scumreading her, so I'm calling that as I see it.I also like just said I would stop defending her, because it's possible I'm wrong. But inb4 someone sees me answering your questions here and is like "oOoOoh look he'sstilldefending her, they're the team"
Spoiler: Quoting the stuff that made me feel this way
After doing this ISO though I agree her votes have mostly been pretty bad- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
oops almost forgot this gemIn post 327, Irrelephant11 wrote: Someone explain the Nauci wagon to me, becauseI really don't think she's the scummiest player so farin a game with Kop, Lalendra, twain, DDL, and lurky!NSG???
Mumble even had a particularly bad progression of "Vote: Nauci" [no reasons given] --> Nauci posted --> "Look at this post! Vote her, she's scum" [no reasons given]
I'm not convinced this wagon has a better composition than the Mumble one did when it was criticized, either.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I highlight posts, where Irrelephant flips and flops on nauci - hints that shes scum, then calls her town, then soft defends her by saying that everyone is piling on her wagon for shit reasons, and then proceeds to say "ah yeah I can she why her votes are scummy"In post 354, Rei wrote:ok but what are you trying to tell us by this
do you mean how he said he didnt find her towny but then called her towny? If so I find it strange that in the first quote you highlighted the part that makes it seem like a contradiction
because when i read the rest of the paragraph it made sense to me and he says later that her being scummy is somehow scummy
If I'm wrong about what you meant then by all means correct me
this is flip flop flipity flop at the finest
If scum-nauci, this is irrelephant soft-defending partner, but having the option to bus.
If town-nauci, this is irrelephant setting up to potentially i told you so, but still be able to vote nauci if the situtation dictates so.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
???????????????????????????In post 377, Irrelephant11 wrote:
Yeah I mean I get not wanting to lynch lynchbait (as Nauci said Lalendra is)
I also get wanting to lynch active lurkers
*shrug* yeah Lalendra could maybe be the lynch
This is terrible reason for lynching anyone fyi.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I don't have any intentions to be slipping anywhere. Feel free for anyone to scrutinize me.In post 353, Rei wrote:It's mostly gut feeling but I feel like he's somehow just slipping there, and every time someone starts to suspect him or vote him the focus switches on someone else- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I went through her posts in context. I don't think there's anything scummy in her actions. You can argue its a lack of actions that makes her scummy but I think inactivity is a relative null tell day 1.
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I'm honestly super fucking baffled at what's going on. Alchemist + BBT both voted Kop and then immediately after like 20 posts Alchemist switches to tchill and BBT gets ready for a Tchill push
Can you guys both elaborate what the fuck is going on?
Like between your lasts votes and your previous post what has changed.
Also can we get more votes on irrelephant? Please?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
Mumble see this does that change your mind?In post 385, DrDolittle wrote:
I highlight posts, where Irrelephant flips and flops on nauci - hints that shes scum, then calls her town, then soft defends her by saying that everyone is piling on her wagon for shit reasons, and then proceeds to say "ah yeah I can she why her votes are scummy"
this is flip flop flipity flop at the finest
If scum-nauci, this is irrelephant soft-defending partner, but having the option to bus.
If town-nauci, this is irrelephant setting up to potentially i told you so, but still be able to vote nauci if the situtation dictates so.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
yeah you are probably right. who are the leading wagons right now? Is it just between nauci and kop and tchill? ill try to think hard on this tomorrow. Am I missing anyone?In post 493, ejjinami wrote:@DrDoli Irrelephant is not going to get lynched today.
neither is BBT nor Alchemist imo.
So if you want to be helpful, how about you try to pick someone among the players who could actually get lynched?
Do not make your vote useless.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
In post 345, Kop wrote:
I don't generally do reads, especially on day one. You can go and review a lot of my other games that I've played on here and you'll see that I don't do reads often. I prefer to play the game by using conversations with people that gives me reads that I generally keep to myself.
Explaining reads and trying to convince other players to vote for the person you think is scum? Am I still playing mafia?In post 522, Tchill13 wrote:Why share all my raisins exactly?why let scum know if I'm on them and why I'm on them?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
No, this is a misrepresentation. I'm saying that I can see you as scum regardless of Nauci's alignment, and not relying on pre-flip associations, which are at heart terrible. Flip flop is scummy because it gives scum option value to change their reads as the game unfolds. In particular, you are not flip flopping because you are ambivalent about nauci (see my previous quotes of your action)In post 459, Irrelephant11 wrote: Lol so
if <Nauci is a player in this game> then
<Vote Irrelephant>
Why is flip flopping scummy, again?
PS I'm extremely suspicious at the nauci wagon as it dropped from 5 votes to 0 votes.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
You are backtracking. Hard. In the original post you clearly did say,In post 461, Irrelephant11 wrote:Doing some re-reading
I always struggle with OMGUS-ing as town, so please @all let me know if I'm wrong here, but this feels like DDLIn post 256, DrDolittle wrote:I liked TWAIN's 213 and 233. UNVOTE:
- Is this a first order OMGUS on twain??? So you agree that he's scumreading people's plays, but also that you don't believe the reads?In post 236, Irrelephant11 wrote: The small amount of townlean I had on Twain is fading quickly. I find that last reads list the most hard to believe - you seem to be actually scumreading other people's play but because I had some typos/website issues, I deserve your vote? [...]
Townreading Nauci and nsg, and more than happy to sheep them onto someone I don't townread VOTE: Mumble
- Town reads on NSG (who's done nothing all game to get towncred)+ Nauci (a flip from an earlier scumread? for what? Nauci's post has been pretty consistent in nature, so any reads should also be consistent) and sounds like a casual excuse to go on a mumble's wagon wtf
VOTE: irrelephantwantingto see me as scum and intentionally misrepping/overreacting. Like I clearly didn't say "I agree Twain is scumreading people's plays, but I don't believe the reads". I said "I think a lot of Twain's reads make sense, but then to vote me for such a bad reason - I can't be sure this is coming from town".
I guess it's possible I come across as JUST. THAT. SCUMMY but this whole post just feels OTT - even if he fully believes what he's saying, does it necessitate such a strong reaction?
I also wonder if "NSG (who's done nothing all game to get towncred)" is a partner slip, but this is mostly a note for later, not a reason to scumread either player."I find that last reads list the most hard to believe"What does this mean? It means, I don't believe the reads. Then you say"you seem to be actually scumreading other people's play"what does this mean? well this literally says you believe Twain is scumreading people's play.
Then you disagree with twain's vote on you, which you claim to be a bad reason, but for the record is
compared to her other scum readsAnd did you really not mean to? I now see what Nauci was warning about, these posts of yours really feel like you're putting on an act.
The one on you is clearly the strongest. So if you think that twain has good reads, then you must accept that her vote on you is not trivial and for "such a bad reason" as you claimKop - only 5 posts, but actually bothered to take part in RVS? Possible scum.
Mumble - he's made 5 reads so far, yet given no reason for any of them. Too passive. Somewhat scum.
BBT - ejjinami's case on him isn't bad, and in addition he's been tunnelling Tchill from the very beginning of the game, despite camouflaging it with reading other people. Somewhat scum, could also be lyncher.
regarding my reaction, > I'm an emotional player > that post was so slimy > I don't even think my post was that "overreactionary" as you claim...
Your reason, I presume as you spelled out is that Lalendra is an active lurker? I don't believe in the d1 lynch active lurker philosophy
@DDL what did you think was my reasoning here?In post 387, DrDolittle wrote:
???????????????????????????In post 377, Irrelephant11 wrote:
Yeah I mean I get not wanting to lynch lynchbait (as Nauci said Lalendra is)
I also get wanting to lynch active lurkers
*shrug* yeah Lalendra could maybe be the lynch
This is terrible reason for lynching anyone fyi.
It's not that they have similar reads, I'm just confused at the rapid shift of opinion.re: my 443
What part of Alchemist & BBT having similar reads is "super fucking baffl"ing?
also to the people saying that that post is town and "sharp insights", it definitely was not sharp - it was just me saying that i don't understand what was going on....- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
don't like this kop post. the scum slip was a silly read and he's really trying to push molehill into a mountaimIn post 497, Kop wrote:I'm naturally thinking the scum slip lalendra mentioned, is the fact that Tchill said what if I was town rather than knowing he is town. Or I'm reading it wrong and lalendra is going to have to expand further on it.
see previous, also feeling a bit weird that you see "scumslip" on TChill, has him as your biggest scumread and still park vote on kopIn post 503, Irrelephant11 wrote:
So here's her post. I actually see the scumslip - "what if tchill's town and [any combination of words]? I have no basis for that" suggests he doesn't believe himself to be town. Like I said I don't know if this really is one, but I enjoy when people call out scumslips, because as I mentioned I caught scum on them before. That's why I like the post. It also certainly suggests Lalendra/tchill is never S/S.In post 460, Lalendra wrote:
Scumslip? If you knew your role PM was green you'd have at least SOME basis for that statement. Also really not feeling that progression on Kop, or the hard press on the lurkers.In post 430, Tchill13 wrote:
What if tchills just town and all three of those are scum?In post 428, Alchemist21 wrote:What if Tchill’s just scum and all of Mumble, Nauci, and Kop are Town?
VOTE: Tchill
I have as much basis for my statement as you do. None.
VOTE: Tchill
yes i know you said this, but by that time tchill has a healthy wagon built up? All i see is just inconsistencies from your play that points to you being advantageous scum.(post 488) I’ll lynch anyone under “null” in my reads. Right now Kop is the bigger wagon, is all- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I N C O N S I S T E N TIn post 549, Irrelephant11 wrote:Yeah... I like his play less the further I go
But he doesn't seem to care?
Which... is a little WIFOM-y but I guess on balance townier.
My scumread has certainly been waning but I didn't want to let up pressure yet. I look forward to your thoughts on him
I think my other question was about alchemist? I don't see what either you or tchill think is scummy about him?
Actually unless NSG has a drastic turnaround before EOD she's my new fav lynch. VOTE: northsidegal
N
C
O
N
S
I
S
T
E
N
T- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
By and large I agree with this if I had to choose TChill vs Kop for today's lynch. Pref a Kop lynch by far, but hoping an irrelephant wagon could surge more last minute.In post 635, Nauci wrote:
- While I think the anti-lurker crusade hasn't been the best use of Tchill's abilities, I think that it smells of genuine town sentiments and a determination to punish lurker sentiments.TChill
- Just too many posts that have content but say nothing about this game. His reads have disappeared asKopmorecontent has poured in. Maybe he can flip this but we're running out of time- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I haven't played Mafia in 2/3 years, just started again so I don't think my meta is relevant?In post 648, Irrelephant11 wrote:I don't have intimate familiarity with your meta, but I've heard a lot about it lately for reasons. Your one spike of activity earlier this game day was entirely about whether or not Lalendra is lynchbait, and then a meta townread on Nauci. Neither of those were new thoughts, and I suspect you're parroting town to try to look like you're putting in effort.
You can call me scum all you want, but please don't say I'm not putting in effort. I've been juggling a heavy work load over the past week or so and still committing quite a couple of hours every day into the game.
+ I don't remember ever discussing Nauci's meta?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
Here you say you think I'm probably scum, but less so than Kop (am I interpretting unsure on the last one right?). Why am I scum?In post 652, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Don't forget guys that DDL is prob scum.
Kop/DDL are scum. Unsure on the last one.
Two posts later you say Kop could be town and you prefer to lynch me over Kop???In post 654, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:It could be town.
It could be scum looking for an avenue to push back on a townie? I didn't like TChill's read at all though. If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
In post 731, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
Mostly surface level scum hunting. Like, his scum hunting doesn't feel real if that makes sense?In post 664, Alchemist21 wrote:What’s your reason for scumreading Dr Dolittle?
You know what, if you disagree with my case on irrelephant, or think its shallow, then point out where it is. I think I built a solid case on how inconsistent irrelephant's reads are inconsistent and even forcing her to admit itIn post 732, Irrelephant11 wrote: Agreed with the above DDL lynch
I think whats going on instead is that you are attacking me (rather than my case) to defend irrelephant.In post 648, Irrelephant11 wrote: DDL you're not wrong that my play is kinda inconsistent. It just also happens to be town, so I guess I'll just let you get over the inconsistencies. I've already answered for my reasoning on all the play you have issue with.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I need to reread and reevaluate tonight.In post 777, ejjinami wrote:and DrDoli, what are your reads after irre's town flip?
?Tchill13 wrote:I think it's off Bbt didn't open up with a push on me
Irrelephant was an easy nk for scum. I think only one person was worried about him being scum.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I'll be completely honest, I was tunnelling irrelephant yesterday, and the flip caught me by surprise and I didn't have another strong scum read carrying over from yesterday. After rereading, my top 2.5 scum prospects are
BBT: his votes all of yesterday were very opportunistic on Nauci and on Kop. His reason on Nauci was that a post read fluff and 'safe', ignoring the fact that Nauci has been one of the leading posters and putting in effort at 163 (other than the weird 81 post praising irrel). The reason seems fake as hell, and more like an excuse to push to a lynch (Nauci was at L-3 and BBT was the 4th piling vote) Then, BBT switches to Kop as sees that wagon gaining momentum - and doesn't fully commit to Kop " If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop." as if he knows kop will flip town, meanwhile setting up a lynch on me and tchill and potentially irre.
NSG: NSG has contributed nothing so far to this game in terms of scumhunting. Her interaction with Irrelephant reads scum. I also dont like the blatant buddying up to creature (i think with potential goal that if buddied up, creatures prolific posting can balance out her lurking a bit??), and i'm inclined to believe people's meta read on lurking scum!nsg after glancing a couple of her scum game
ejjinami: his posts have been prolific and has not been seriously scrutinzied, but honestly there's not too much substance in these posts. Early game there was a couple of scum hunting, but by late, it was mostly asking questions (but not in a way that is trying to find scum - more like trying to gauge how people feel...) and commenting of gameplay style. Idk there's just smthing odd in his posts that rub me in a wrong way, but honestly more of a gut read.
VOTE: BBT- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I'm so frustrated that there are no concrete cases against me fleshed out so I can defend myself and attn can be focused on getting scum.
To recap these cases
BBT's "surface-level-hunting"
TChill's "his name has been thrown around as scum"
Rei's "He seemed really floaty tbh, and his reads were kinda shallow so i wanted to test the wagon... I feel like he's somehow just slipping there, and every time someone starts to suspect him or vote him the focus switches on someone else"
I think NSG is a solid lynch for today, but BBT has a higher chance of flipping scum.In post 831, Nauci wrote:
My bad feelings about BBT stayed the same, and I think I feel worse about NSG
This actually makes sense. However, I didn't really sr lalendra yesterday, and still rereading today I thhink she/scion is mostly null. I'm willing to give scion a couple more days to fully catch up.Tchill13 wrote:
From my pov this is you distancing from a scum partner and blaming me once that Scum partner flips.
You've pushed DDL all game.
You're gonna be insta lynched when sajj flips scum.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
to get you to post more content? yeah I tried.In post 907, Creature wrote:
Nice attempt hereIn post 905, DrDolittle wrote:
not satisfied with your content.In post 901, Creature wrote:Not satisfied with Scioness' content.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
are these weak scum reads or strong scum reads?In post 912, Scioness Sajj wrote:nsg - her iso in underwhelming i will be flipfloppy on this slot but i don't think she has posted anything game progressing mostly just commentary that didn't add much to the game. i'm waiting on her posts when she gets back here though because it could be just her disengaged self.
rei - nothing she posted early seemed town to me. her read on tchill was also weird (as i have read tchill post about townreading her as a joke but that will stay unsolved now so w/e), something felt of about her convo with mumble. she made a readlist that i like later in the day but then she came back to kop lynch and she was somewhat soft pushing him like she was afraid drawing attention to herself/knew she was pushing a mislynch.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
vla till saturday noondue to unexpected workload - but hopefully will be back earlier
I'll get to answering your qs @scion @nauci, but most of it can be found here: I'll elaborate more when I get back
In post 795, DrDolittle wrote:I'll be completely honest, I was tunnelling irrelephant yesterday, and the flip caught me by surprise and I didn't have another strong scum read carrying over from yesterday. After rereading, my top 2.5 scum prospects are
BBT: his votes all of yesterday were very opportunistic on Nauci and on Kop. His reason on Nauci was that a post read fluff and 'safe', ignoring the fact that Nauci has been one of the leading posters and putting in effort at 163 (other than the weird 81 post praising irrel). The reason seems fake as hell, and more like an excuse to push to a lynch (Nauci was at L-3 and BBT was the 4th piling vote) Then, BBT switches to Kop as sees that wagon gaining momentum - and doesn't fully commit to Kop " If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop." as if he knows kop will flip town, meanwhile setting up a lynch on me and tchill and potentially irre.
NSG: NSG has contributed nothing so far to this game in terms of scumhunting. Her interaction with Irrelephant reads scum. I also dont like the blatant buddying up to creature (i think with potential goal that if buddied up, creatures prolific posting can balance out her lurking a bit??), and i'm inclined to believe people's meta read on lurking scum!nsg after glancing a couple of her scum game
ejjinami: his posts have been prolific and has not been seriously scrutinzied, but honestly there's not too much substance in these posts. Early game there was a couple of scum hunting, but by late, it was mostly asking questions (but not in a way that is trying to find scum - more like trying to gauge how people feel...) and commenting of gameplay style. Idk there's just smthing odd in his posts that rub me in a wrong way, but honestly more of a gut read.
VOTE: BBT- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
BBT: his votes all of yesterday were very opportunistic on Nauci and on Kop. His reason on Nauci was that a post read fluff and 'safe', ignoring the fact that Nauci has been one of the leading posters and putting in effort at 163 (other than the weird 81 post praising irrel). The reason seems fake as hell, and more like an excuse to push to a lynch (Nauci was at L-3 and BBT was the 4th piling vote) Then, BBT switches to Kop as sees that wagon gaining momentum - and doesn't fully commit to Kop " If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop." as if he knows kop will flip town, meanwhile setting up a lynch on me and tchill and potentially irre.
This is a huge misrep. You can read my day 1 -it’s public. I did have no other strong reads, and after tunneling irrelephant all day. Anything I say today would be consistent since there was nothing to map to.In post 951, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:I mean, the whole lack of progression on reads thing because he was tunneling D1 doesn't set off any red flags for you?
Like, he completely avoids having to be consistent with his reads or reevaluate his play by simply stating that he was so focused on Irrelphant D1 that he literally had NOTHING ELSE to contribute to the gamestate so had to 'reset'.
Come on. Who is buying that?
Creature, Alch, please comment on this.
The nightkill was on an active towny but irre didn’t directly threaten anyone is confusing. I think what happened is that scum!BBT was setting up to strongarm a lynch today, by specifically get rid of my single scum read so that I would be confused in the beginning of the day, and he can set up a string of attack.In post 945, Nauci wrote:@DDL As I stated above, please do a reasonably detailed write up of how the irrelephant flip and other info has influenced your re-evaluations of everyone
As Tchill said
This is very much looks to me like a lynch-plan based NK.ML DDL, Lynch LALendra, ML me.. 3 other town nk'd. so thats 5 townies BBT would have taken out right there.
Also can you guys comment on BBT asking other people to provide scum reasonings of me rather than advancing them himself until much much later
BecauseIn post 952, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:His 'reasons' for scum reading me can also be applied to Alchemist, Mumble, TChill and Lalendra.
So, I'd very much like to know why I'm so special and how he has identified that I am scum over any one of those.
1- Confirmation bias. I know I’m town and that you are pushing me
2- Your movement onto Kop was strictly a momentum move. You were playing both hands trying to maneuver your way onto an easy lynch.
3- LJL at you thinking my reason applys to these other guys. TChill was very explicit about why he was voting, and even if sometimes it wasn’t for the best reason. Mumble and Lalendra didn’t nearly have the opportunistic voting and intent to vote patterns. Alch I think is town – in particular #555 is a town interaction to town!irrelephant flip. You are the only one who’s votes have been opportunistic as fuck.
If every replacement is scumreading you, after they independently perused the game, then maybe I don’t know you are scummy, and needs to be lynched.In post 993, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Interesting that every (?) replacement is scum reading me. If you're town, you need to evaluate the game-state and realise what is happening.
I'm being pushed for a reason. Ask yourself, why?
But I’m glad that you are dragging me into the spotlight. This also drags yourself into the spotlight.
This is what makes me think my wagon/potential wagon is scum heavy. There’s a lot of me-scum being thrown around, but there's hesitation of getting on my wagon. It seems like other scum partners might be looking for more momentum before hopping on.In post 1108, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Is that now 3 people scum reading DDL but not voting him?- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
quickly... this is troubling. this is the exact same post as I had in 795 that I included as reference. The fact that (I think) you didnt catch that and that you are responding as a fresh accusation means that when you said my 795 was bad you barely read it.In post 1142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
What do you define as an 'opportunistic vote'? Is every 4th vote on a wagon opportunistic? Because the only disagreement with my reasoning you have stated is that it seems 'fake as hell' which is hard to quantify and hard to dismiss. Like, how does it seem fake?In post 1139, DrDolittle wrote:BBT: his votes all of yesterday were very opportunistic on Nauci and on Kop. His reason on Nauci was that a post read fluff and 'safe', ignoring the fact that Nauci has been one of the leading posters and putting in effort at 163 (other than the weird 81 post praising irrel). The reason seems fake as hell, and more like an excuse to push to a lynch (Nauci was at L-3 and BBT was the 4th piling vote) Then, BBT switches to Kop as sees that wagon gaining momentum - and doesn't fully commit to Kop " If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop." as if he knows kop will flip town, meanwhile setting up a lynch on me and tchill and potentially irre.
You also say 'putting in effort' and 'leading poster' as if that is somehow alignment indicative and negates my reasoning for voting Nauci. Effort is not indicative of alignment and neither is posting a lot. Why is the vote on Nauci seen as opportunistic and not advancement of the game state and pushing of a scum read? Early game wagons are always beneficial - even more so if the leading wagon is a scum read. So when you actually look at your disagreement of my Nauci push it actually comes down to you looking for an angle to attack me from.
Additionally, to dilute my post/read on Nauci to 'fluff and safe' is underselling what I wrote. I responded to a particular post and discussed in detail what I didn't like about it (which was quite a lot for an early game read, 291).
As for Kop, my first mention of a dislike for Kop's play came in 291 when Kop only had one vote. In 323 I again mention my dislike for Kop's play to this point of the game. And again in 326. At this point, Kop still only has one vote. I continue to address my disliking of Kop's play in 390 and then I finally vote him in 417 when he can become the leading wagon and a real lynch candidate. At what point am I allowed to vote a scum read? How is this vote opportunistic?
Will get to the rest in a moment.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
An opportunistic vote under my read is when you throw shade on lots of people, and only start voting once it gains traction. 293 and 326 both shows your your commitment to Nauci as you repeatedly ask others to vote her. On your reasoning, Here's what you said about Nauci's post (291) - is this your "discussed in detail“?In post 1142, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
What do you define as an 'opportunistic vote'? Is every 4th vote on a wagon opportunistic? Because the only disagreement with my reasoning you have stated is that it seems 'fake as hell' which is hard to quantify and hard to dismiss. Like, how does it seem fake?In post 1139, DrDolittle wrote:BBT: his votes all of yesterday were very opportunistic on Nauci and on Kop. His reason on Nauci was that a post read fluff and 'safe', ignoring the fact that Nauci has been one of the leading posters and putting in effort at 163 (other than the weird 81 post praising irrel). The reason seems fake as hell, and more like an excuse to push to a lynch (Nauci was at L-3 and BBT was the 4th piling vote) Then, BBT switches to Kop as sees that wagon gaining momentum - and doesn't fully commit to Kop " If we could, I would lynch TChill or DDL over Kop." as if he knows kop will flip town, meanwhile setting up a lynch on me and tchill and potentially irre.
You also say 'putting in effort' and 'leading poster' as if that is somehow alignment indicative and negates my reasoning for voting Nauci. Effort is not indicative of alignment and neither is posting a lot. Why is the vote on Nauci seen as opportunistic and not advancement of the game state and pushing of a scum read? Early game wagons are always beneficial - even more so if the leading wagon is a scum read. So when you actually look at your disagreement of my Nauci push it actually comes down to you looking for an angle to attack me from.
Additionally, to dilute my post/read on Nauci to 'fluff and safe' is underselling what I wrote. I responded to a particular post and discussed in detail what I didn't like about it (which was quite a lot for an early game read, 291).
As for Kop, my first mention of a dislike for Kop's play came in 291 when Kop only had one vote. In 323 I again mention my dislike for Kop's play to this point of the game. And again in 326. At this point, Kop still only has one vote. I continue to address my disliking of Kop's play in 390 and then I finally vote him in 417 when he can become the leading wagon and a real lynch candidate. At what point am I allowed to vote a scum read? How is this vote opportunistic?
Will get to the rest in a moment.
The detailed read is literally that Nauci separarated her read list into a people who are null that have lots of information and little information. There's no way its alignment indicative, and maybe imo even a little town. Also you need to put this post into context where he is trying to get a stronger wagon on Nauci. However, I do agree that the 4th vote on Nauci is weak. That was by pg 3, and might have been just by chance, and I agree with 132 that nauci's post on irre seems a little set up and awkward, but my deal is that BBT despite having strong 'reads' on nauci and wanting other people to vote her, changed votes to kop.This looks like a scum post, trying to look like they're engaging with the game. So many words and yet so little said. Like, two separate null categories is just bad, but it's there to fluff the 'reads-list' out a little. Not to mention the reads are very safe.
On your read progression of Kop: guys please click on the link
291 - A response to a Kop saying "I mean, it could also be argued that scum reading TChill for pushing lurkers is an equally 'easy' read to give/push."
323 - "Not only is Kop a low poster but what he has posted has been bad."
326- "If you're gonna vote a low poster, it needs to be Kop. "
390 - Reponse to Tchill "Effort isn't alignment indicative, And what reads has he [Kop] given?"
Does this look like scum read PROGRESSION which leads to a scum read in 417? Or does that look like shade throwing and eventually placing a vote till the wagon on Kop gathers votes?
Yeah sure not every 4th vote is opportunistic, but its a reasonable approximation. The fact that you were 4th on BOTH kop and nauci wagon,one after the other, and especially jumping to kop after nauci fizzes (and then a setup onto tchill/me after kop wagon stalls a bit) is really suspicious.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
I'm going to try to hit up my readlist again so that I can get some updates
Playerlist:
1) Creature TWAIN lean scum. I don't see Creature as transparent. His post is rubbing me in a wrong way. I see reads. But I don't see reasons behind the reads, and Im getting suspiciuous that all these posts are scum based content desgined to clutter thread.
@creatureyou note that scum!bbt doesn't make that kill. Can you respond to my theory of scum!bbt trying to set up today's lynch today on me with that kill?
2) BlueBloodedToffee scum. see my post history.
3) HeWhoSwims Mumble null. I'm null on mumble and i'm null on hws. actually if someone can tell me why they read mumble town that would be nice.
4) Alchemist21 town Alch's actions have been solid, transparent. They look town driven.
5) Nauci lean town. Nauci has been transparant. I liked her post from 81 onwards. In general she's maintaining her own reads, and questioning reads she doesn't understand or agree with.
6) ejjinami lean scum. My reads on him has not changed from 795. Ejj has been a little flakey today.
7) Toranaga northsidegal lean scum See read on NSG. I don't see enough from Toranaga to change my read, but I'm also less concerned that he did notput out a vote after 33 posts, since most of these posts are kinda fluff. Am watching this slot carefully.
8) Scioness Sajj Lalendra town I like Scion's + he didn't feel pressured by alch's threatening. The read progressions that scion advances today is good.
9) Krazy Tchill13 town. I thought Tchill is town. Krazy's post has not convinced me otherwise. I like that he's putting pressure onto new people, and he's giving reads pretty freely.
12) panthaleon Rei: town. I did't see the business with Rei scum day 1, and I think panthaleon's coming in has been town (he reads!)- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
In post 1354, Scioness Sajj wrote:
have you read all the posts from today?In post 1345, DrDolittle wrote:no following the cop is exactly how you play a mafia game
yeah i have im following the cop.In post 1356, ejjinami wrote:
write readsIn post 1338, DrDolittle wrote:im pretty ready to do nothing except sheep ejj today
Who do you want to lynch- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
In post 1502, Alchemist21 wrote:
Not avoiding this. I'll get to itIn post 1482, Nauci wrote:
Can you go into a bit of detail on why you chose them?In post 1475, DrDolittle wrote:Oh we are all claiming? I'm JOAT, cop, doc, track kills only. I copped alch day 1 and got town. I tracked creafure day 2 and got no result.
I want the answer to this as well.- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
sorry I quoted badly. I meant to say I'll get back to you on why I chose alch and creature. I'm on a family trip with a little limited access
but the tldr is alch is a strong player, and was being pretty neutral/polarizingly read. I was nervous that he was scum and could potentially taking over the game to strongarm lynches, so i wanted to make sure that day 2 comes i can trust his reads from town perspective.
on night 2, I just thought creature was potentially scum (see post 1226), but also that if he were scum, I think it is likely they would send him to do the kill as other people generally town-read him (compared to ejj and nsg my other two scum reads)- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6679
- Joined: January 27, 2011
- DrDolittle
-
DrDolittle Jack of All Trades
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle
- DrDolittle