VOTE: implosion
-
Ghost
cuz i think i've read you correctly like ... twice out of like 6? timesIn post 46, northsidegal wrote:i always have to wonder how i ended up as someone that people seem to always say they can't read. if anything, i would imagine it would be the exact opposite.
this pings me the wrong way. i think because it kinda indicates that ur looking at the game rn on some level as gauging how lynchable people areIn post 51, Skygazer wrote:I don't have any completed games with vizzy to link to but I know of them and have read games of theirs and get what skitter is getting at
I personally think it's townie to pick up on what skitter picked up and point it outwhen vizzy could maybe possibly be considered lynchbait
why belated rvs?In post 55, LazyLump wrote:After years of personally knowing wgeurts you can never assume he's trustworthy when it comes to anything mindgamey and as such I mustVOTE: Wgeurts
Because I cant tell if ur serious or if ur memingIn post 60, RadiantCowbells wrote:guys how have we not lynched nsg yet when she's confirmed scum?
who is this directed at?In post 83, LazyLump wrote:How so I clearly stated I am and you have no reason not to believe me. Or do I come over as untrustworthy?
do tellIn post 87, RadiantCowbells wrote:Skitter is being really strange and it might be because she's scum
i can't tell if this is a serious read or notIn post 95, implosion wrote:Just pick any one of his posts and read it. It should be self-evident.
VOTE: wgeurts
this wagon is kinda mehIn post 106, AnonymousGhost wrote:wgurts: Alchemist21, LazyLump, BlueBloodedToffee, popopopopopopo, implosion (L-2)
like i say i think vizzy is possibly town and her response is basically - it's townie she's townreading someone who could be lynchbait - which pings me because that makes me think she's viewing vizzy as potential lynchbaitIn post 135, implosion wrote:i actually somehow managed to miss this. I think 51 is town; the logic for townreading skitter looks somewhat genuine/unlikely to be faked. I really don't buy the logic about skygazer was thinking about what people are relatively lynchable -> skygazer is scum.
Actually yeah.
Unvote
VOTE: skitter
this coupled with how she's been defending vizzy throughout is making me rethink the read thoIn post 137, Skygazer wrote:I think 58 jumps to a conclusion that I'm gauging vizzy's lynchability for scummy reasons. It's true that I'm examining vizzy's lynchability but it's because I think he'd be an easy target for scum to jump on D1. The fact that 1) we had similar thought processes that resulted in townreads on vizzy and 2) you had a well reasoned townread on a player that would be easy for scum to jump on was enough for me to give you town points.
yes i agree i don't have super much experience with youIn post 137, Skygazer wrote:this. not sure how well your meta argument works here when we haven't completed a game together. I think my engagement has been on par with what I usually do
ok were you trying to get anything out of the wagon? did the wagon tell you anything useful about the game and/or players?In post 141, popopopopopopo wrote:i do enjoy an early day 1 wagonIn post 134, skitter30 wrote:also i want to hear more about popo's vote since he announced l-1 (without unvoting or anything) whicih indicates to me he was kinda worried about the wagon getting too high but his vote was literally for the sake of the wagon happening so announcing l1 felt kinda off to me
if you're referring to vizzy's vote i think it's probably one of the most interesting parts of the game thus far (that and the wgeurts' wagon) and i think it (and player's reactions to it) are worth looking into so i'm not sure why you're 'zzzzz'ing itIn post 148, popopopopopopo wrote:yes, it got us this horrordude/invisibility interaction.In post 147, skitter30 wrote:ok were you trying to get anything out of the wagon? did the wagon tell you anything useful about the game and/or players?
why wasn't vizzy's 'vote' bad play?
it was a joke. im done talking about this zzz
so i don't particularly agree with this understanding of the situation - you seem to think that after people weren't hopping onto the 'bad l1 / fake-vote' reasoning they went back to look for something else to scumread for, namely that you haven't had any real content.In post 152, Invisibility wrote:it looks like no one else wanted to go with his reason for scumreading me but he was still trying to shade my slot
i mean implosion asked me to elaborateIn post 179, Skygazer wrote:Have a few townleans in vizzy/implo/skitter/alchemist/maybe wgurts based on the lack of a cw but it's bugging me that skitter's last post at me was basically just the same points reiterated
@rc: is this scum-indicative for nsg?In post 183, AnonymousGhost wrote:northsidegalhas been prodded. She has 24 hours to be post game advancing content or be replaced. ((expired on 2018-08-11 03:44:17))
this is actually a pretty icky post - you pose a very general question but fail to give an answer or explain how to go about answeringIn post 184, Randomnamechange wrote:ok so imo there are 3 major slots in the game so far. horrordude, invisibility, skitter. the question is, are scum in those 3 trying to take over the game or are they taking a backseat in the hope that these players cannibalize and lynch each other?
the main observatin is that me/horror/vizzy are the most active playersIn post 188, Randomnamechange wrote:do you dispute the observations in the post?
vizzy, i'm pretty sure that putting out content is a towntell for you but i disagree with most of the positions you've taken thus far (and don't really understand them either), which is worrying meIn post 193, Invisibility wrote:ok so i can get how people might've considered that post from rando as busy but like 190 actually makes me feel better about it
out of anything i feel like it reaffirms my vote on horrordude
192 looks like an attempt to belittle rando's logic
btw i was thinking that popopopopopoiopopopopop[popopopopopopopopopopopopo disliking rando's post suggests that if he flips scum one of his partners is in horrordude, me, and skitter
you literally said in 193 that horror's reaction to random reaffirmed your vote on him so i don't know how you suddenly forgot you were scumreading him? i don't understand your timelineIn post 200, Invisibility wrote:i forgot and i was scumreading horror at the time so it kinda made sense in that mindset and 196 seemed pretty legit
also i should have probably stopped scumreading horror earlier its a pretty bad read
w/e we did get a lot of content out of horror because of it
also its a townlean not a full a town btw btw tbw tbwtbwtbw
because you know that i'm going to compare whatever you do here to what you did there (just like you were able to play on me comparing how you treated gemini to how you treated me in that micro last year to get me to mislynch her)In post 215, RadiantCowbells wrote:You claim that scum me scumreads you given the newbieIn post 131, skitter30 wrote:i mean ok?
i can't really talk to u about it if you wont' explain why tho
overall i don't care that much rn cuz i know that town!you can read me properly so i'm sure you'll figure it out eventually. and the more i think about it i think scum!you scurmeads me here given the newbie
In said newbie I locked you town so why is that the case?
no, just explaining why i don't really care how you read me tbh. if you're town you'll figure it out and if you're scum you'll probably keep this up, idk. i'm very confident that i can deal with you incorrectly scumreading me so like ... i don't really give a fuck tbhIn post 216, RadiantCowbells wrote:Of course, if you were scum and concerned that I had caught you and wanted to plan ahead and make an excuse for why me with a perfect record reading you would be calling you scum, saying that it's something that I'd do as scum makes a lot of sense.
because i think you think i'll be looking for similarities so if you're scum i think you'll approach me differently hereIn post 217, RadiantCowbells wrote:Like in the early game I called you null and conceded to mathdino under pressure that me not having a read on you made you +equity scum, I never hard scumread or pushed you so I'm having some difficulties understanding that town thought process whereas that's exactly the kind of scum reaction I'd expect.
do you independantly scumread nm's slot or are you voting him because he's notmafia (ie on policy)?
what happens when i dont'?In post 272, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're welcome to after reading my post just naked vote the person that I voted because they're always flipping scum.
i know i'm town tho, so i know that your associative-based case is asinine-trumped up-bullshit. i think that you're making mountains out of molehills and i think that you're trying to get exacerbate the associatives you've drawn out earlier right now by trying to coerce me into voting him, so i'm calling it outIn post 328, RadiantCowbells wrote:i mean you're in a situation where I've called you scum together and pointed out how your associatives are god awful and even without me tomorrowthere's almost no chance of you individually reaching endgame
if you see bussing as a dead end since you're going to end up dying to my d1 case anyway, you're better off trying to discredit me, get a lynch elsewhere, and hope that you can get a nightkill on me and have people forget I exist.
for you to pretend it's implausible of me to take the line of thinking that I have is completely disingenuous.
so like you can be very confident that you're right but unless you have a proven history of being accurate on something like this i don't really see a reason to trust your read over my ownIn post 340, RadiantCowbells wrote:anything further I want to say to everything that you just said which I horrendously disagree with can wiat until I know whether or not you're just sayign that because scum.
yes can we pressure her more please?In post 353, Alonzo wrote:Wanna destroy something beautiful? Vote sky gazer
yes, i agree that's it's pretty obviously tongue-in-cheek and i think it's disingenuous of him to push otherwiseIn post 363, implosion wrote:If you're reading 92 as not tongue-in-cheek then idk. Because I think it's pretty damn clearly tongue-in-cheek.
ftr i disagree with this assessment; i tend to behave in very ai ways when i'm wagoned ime; i tend to be very obvtown when i get wagoned as town and i tend to panic-lurk as scumIn post 363, implosion wrote:I wasn't interested in getting momentum; I was interested in seeing how skitter would react to the vote. She doesn't seem like a player where momentum on her will be especially effective, and I didn't feel good enough about the read to actually push it.
last november/december actuallyIn post 363, implosion wrote:The answer does require outside understanding, actually. It requires knowledge of my past experience with her; I played one game with her where I was scum and she was town, and she was very widely viewed as obvtown and I remember giving a genuine strong townread on her there. Her play here hasn't seemed transparently town in the same way I remember it being in that game ~a couple years ago, but only that one thing has stuck out as scummy. Hence a focus on sorting her, because I feel like she's supposed to be easy to sort. I remember her saying she's easy to sort then too. I can explain why her explanation made sense to me. It was weird, but it made a lot of sense.
i would appreciate if it could be frozen until we at least get the latest replacement (for lazylump maybe? i don't remember)In post 373, RadiantCowbells wrote:mod can you freeze the deadline until >Half of this game gets replaced with people who want to play the game?
yeah i was wondering if this was bothering you since the list of people you listed as not townreading overlaps quite a bit with the people you're voting withIn post 377, implosion wrote:I'm not really strictly a fan of the wagon itself for a couple reasons(people on it,the composition of my own wagon).
yeah that's what i'm trying to figure outIn post 382, RadiantCowbells wrote:he's scum and voting the place that's most likely to result in a non-him lynch before deadline.In post 381, skitter30 wrote:yeah i was wondering if this was bothering you since the list of people you listed as not townreading overlaps quite a bit with the people you're voting withIn post 377, implosion wrote:I'm not really strictly a fan of the wagon itself for a couple reasons(people on it,the composition of my own wagon).
ok what don't you like about sky?
yeah it sometimes takes me a couple of tries to figure out how to articualte what i'm seeing, sorryIn post 377, implosion wrote:It's the third paragraph here. It's obviously convoluted but it seems more plausible as a genuine scumhunting thought process to me than the description you'd given before (which you basically rephrase exactly in the first paragraph here) and I can see it being phrased that way at first before getting clarified.
In post 616, skitter30 wrote:In post 614, RadiantCowbells wrote:whoever rolled scum this game had a field day with mathdino and myself aroundI'm really paranoid that you're telling me what I want to hear tbh
you did it when I was going on about the 2.7/math associatves too
In post 391, RadiantCowbells wrote:implo is being very reasonable but that doesn't make him town.
i'm very very aware that you have a tendency to reinforce my own opinions in order to get what you wantIn post 367, skitter30 wrote:like you can make sense while not being town and it took me like three dayphases to figure that out.
like you make a lot of sense here but i don't know if you've actually posted anything much ai
In post 396, RadiantCowbells wrote:I have a scumreadIn post 394, skitter30 wrote:In post 391, RadiantCowbells wrote:implo is being very reasonable but that doesn't make him town.i'm very very aware that you have a tendency to reinforce my own opinions in order to get what you wantIn post 367, skitter30 wrote:like you can make sense while not being town and it took me like three dayphases to figure that out.
like you make a lot of sense here but i don't know if you've actually posted anything much ai
you're pointing out that they're being scummy
i'm like yeah you're right they're being scummy
and i'm going to resist because i'm literally that stubborn and i don't like being corraled and the more you try the more i'm not going to do it just for the point of it *especially* since you're using tactics right now that i've seen you use on me when you were scumIn post 399, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm going to corral your vote because it's how the game is played.
also i'm getting distracted but this post is pinging meIn post 390, implosion wrote:I haven't really been actually paying attention to the game until today and didn't realize the wagon had so many people in my PoE.skitter wrote:yeah that's what i'm trying to figure out
i don't like it when people vote with their scumreads
i don't know if the lazylump/bbt/alonzo votes are meaningful though gien that the first two are rvs-votes by lurkers/flakers and alonzo's vote i think is policy
I really feel like I shouldn't have to explain this vote.3/5 of the people in my PoE right now aren't even pretending to contribute to the game. And it's not like it's strong PoE yet. If there's support for a popo wagon I'd happily do that.
wait i initially glossed over that and thought this was a quote from earlier this gameIn post 401, RadiantCowbells wrote:eh I wasn't even referring to that.
I don't trust people to just follow the order and I'm scared you'll start thinking for yourselves at some point and just not lynch implosion or not lynch brian because they're writing semi-reasonable words.
also when did this happen?In post 404, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't think you're scum anymore though
I was a little reluctant to point that out in case it made it harder to lynch implosion.
yeah the instantaneous thing with a quote means that maybe it's a thought you arrived at independently; not sureIn post 412, RadiantCowbells wrote:i mean
i had it open in another tab because I was reading that game trying to get ideas about how to lock this lynch in
you will notice the response was instantaneous because of that and that was in fact what I was thinking of when I responded
That said: so what if I was quoting you? So what if I was trying to convince you that someone I think is scum is scum? What does this magical town me that you're differentiating me from do differently?
oh i missed this postIn post 407, RadiantCowbells wrote:if you want to sort me, looking into the 'what' of my gameplay is worthless. instead look into the 'why' of my gameplay. My process of persuading people to vote people is pretty indistinguishable, but my motivations aren't.
Either there's two conclusions to draw here
1) My push on Mathdino is utterly indistinguishable from my push on Implosion here in which case I'm literally impossible to read and the best play is to treat me like I'm town (the by the numbers play)
or
2) My push on Mathdino is somehow distinguishable from my push on Implosion and by seeing that difference you can read me here and in future games.