In post 90, skitter30 wrote:And that's AI because ...?
I mean if you want me to turn on 'sounding like an SAT prep class' mode I can but I find that tends to make people less likely to read what I say, and people tend to gloss over my posts as is so I try to make my posts as readable as possible
The 'u' thing is a product of occasionally phone posting
This is a relatively minor point but I have so, so many times seen scum use this excuse when they're playing differently than their norm.
In my recent experience with Skitter up to / including the newbie game she has played exactly like I've always seen her and I've always been super quick to read her as town.
Using the 'I am changing my playstyle' card is super common from scum playing different and it belies a self awareness about the whole playstyle that isn't usually there as town
people play the way they do as town because it's how they play, most people don't consciously change that and I don't really buy skitter feeling the need to change her playstyle here.
Particularly when she would be trusting me to take her input seriously and read her correctly, if I were town.
Shortly following that on the same page, we have the following few posts by Implosion.
In post 91, implosion wrote:Invisibility/skygazer town.
Rando has practically claimed scum though.
In post 95, implosion wrote:Just pick any one of his posts and read it. It should be self-evident.
VOTE: wgeurts
So Implosion does two things here that are of relevance.
1) He establishes an accordance with my prior read that Skitter is being scummy, which is something that scum would want to do.*
2) He doesn't follow up on it at all, and instead votes Wgeurts without actually giving a reason for doing so.
--
@implosion: why has rando practically scumclaimed?
First off, this is a rather forced interaction.
Second off, look at the sheer number of interactions that Implo has with Skitter. It's super excessive and it's super excessive because they're trying to look not SvS after Skitter was jumped on early.
It's more interactions than anyone including me and given I was actively pushing her and am presumably her go to person to bounce reads off of it's rather strange outside of the SvS explanation.
In post 120, implosion wrote:Why is cheekiness more likely to be town motivated?
It's not necessarily, and I'm not claiming it is. But it certainly can be.
Do you think scum would be particularly likely to take the kind of risk to make that kind of vote, explicitly say to the moderator that they didn't want it to count as a vote, and then wait for someone to quickhammer? I find it hard to put stock into that.
Gonna tackle the original cheekiness and this together
I don't think that this is how Implosion deals with this read as town. Besides the 'find it hard to put stock into that' being an incredibly weasel worded and scummy way of phrasing it just feels really bad.
I would call this a TMI read except he doesn't even TMI it because he weasel words it the entire time and says hard to put stock into that and particularly likely instead of standing by the reads that he has.
But again: this isn't how town!Implo deals with this readon. This is how scum!Implo tries to seem like a reasonable townie.
i think that fake-hammer comes from town more often than not; i dont' really see scum faking a vote like that. like there's no town motivation, sure - but i don't think there's any scum motivation either
it's too ... brazen almost to come from scum and i don't think that scum!vizzy plays like that tbh
Again, another thing that doesn't really make sense coming from town.
And again it's not the argument itself that's wrong, I fundamentally do agree with both positions, it's how they both talk about it that to me suggests that they're scum.
Even just the ellipses and the whole structure of how the point is made, but I also want to add in all the weasel wording wrt 'i dont think', 'dont really see', 'brazen almost', 'dont think', 'tbh'.
I don't think that this is how either of them justify this read if they had them as town.
overall i don't care that much rn cuz i know that town!you can read me properly so i'm sure you'll figure it out eventually. and the more i think about it i think scum!you scurmeads me here given the newbie
Again I already pointed this out as the thing I wanted a response to because the position doesn't make sense coming from town.
It does as I said make sense coming from scum who is afraid that I'm gonna full on deathtunnel her (hint: I am) and needs to in advance justify it as a scummy move to try to get me lynched instead.
In post 134, skitter30 wrote:comprised of rvs votes + naked vote from a guy who's only post is that naked vote + someone who wagoned him for the sake of being wagoned + your vote which is just kinda there and i don't know why you voted him
also on a guy who hasn't posted since rvs who i dont' really think is scummy rn
also no cw or resistance
basically the votes aren't that good and i don't scumread the person it's on and the gamestate is loosely pointing to town!wgeurts
also i want to hear more about popo's vote since he announced l-1 (without unvoting or anything) whicih indicates to me he was kinda worried about the wagon getting too high but his vote was literally for the sake of the wagon happening so announcing l1 felt kinda off to me
p-edit:
cuz i don't think you're particularly scummy right now
she tends to feel more engaged in my (admittedly limited) experience - everythign she's posted is just kinda ... banal (like asking why she was townread). those sorts of posts make me feel like she's looking for somethign to post about
and i dislike that she ignored
58
In post 135, implosion wrote:
i actually somehow managed to miss this. I think
51 is town; the logic for townreading skitter looks somewhat genuine/unlikely to be faked. I really don't buy the logic about skygazer was thinking about what people are relatively lynchable -> skygazer is scum.
Actually yeah.
Unvote
VOTE: skitter
So there's a laundry list of terrible things in this list. I'm going to start from the bottom up because interestingly (and I believe this is the first time I make it clear) it is Implo I am far more convinced is scum.
1) The entire formatting of Implo's final post is scummy as hell. The 'actually yeah' is so telegraphed and such a scum indicator in this context for reasons you'll just have to trust me on.
2) Look at the actual reason that Implo votes Skitter it boils down to 'I DONT AGREE WITH SKITTERS SKYGAZER READ ERGO SHE IS A FUCKING SCUM BITCH'
Now WRT Skitter who is also terrible
3) (And this is SUPER indicative) 'cuz I dont think you are particularly scummy right now' WHY IS THAT EVEN IN QUESTION. WHY IS SKITTER IMPLICITLY ASSUMING THAT SHE HAS TO JUSTIFY NOT VOTING IMPLO.
NEVER HAS SHE INDICATED ANY SORT OF SCUMREAD OR ANYTHING. But as scum who knows that they're scum, yes it might seem to you like you have to justify not voting your scumpartner.
The most that she had said was that she 'didnt know why he was voting him' (which is again a very SvS way for that interaction to go down because you allow your partner to explain themselves then change your mind.)
4) Wgeurts read is really just blah and I expect better from Skitter.
Also importantly note that Implo never really pushes her he just... asks questions and interacts with her in that way to try to look like he's sorting.
I say this but he voted, right, so that must change something?
Wrong!
In post 136, implosion wrote:I also do want to hear more from popo about the vote. Both popo->horror and horror->invisibility sort of look like lazy scum votes. They're both really easy things to vote for, though I don't think horror's is especially likely to be indicative of scum.
IMMEDIATELY after voting, he starts talking about other people who could potentially be scum. No effort to help me get momentum on Skitter, just immediately talking about other people.
like i say i think vizzy is possibly town and her response is basically - it's townie she's townreading someone who could be lynchbait - which pings me because that makes me think she's viewing vizzy as potential lynchbait
like she's giving me townpoints for calling lynchbait gut-town on page2 - her response to what i did feels stronger than it ought to be almost; i don't think that's something to really townread me for because if i were scum and wanted to pivot onto vizzy it would be the easiest thing in the world to drop my page2 gut townread given his playstyle
like i kinda got the vibe that she was giving townpoints because she as scum would not want to townread him because his playstyle makes him imminently lynchable
idk i'm having trouble articulating what pinged me there
And this response to Implo is, frankly, garbage.
On top of the fact that generally overly questioning townreads on you is usually the realm of scum.
Skygazer's read is fundamentally reasonable and she even acknowledges that it generally makes sense, she just jumps because it seems stronger but like why is that what skitter does
It's just bad. But even worse?
In post 167, implosion wrote:Eh I'm not especially interested in horror. I don't think his vote is particularly likely to come from scum the more I think about it. The tone of
105 sort of screams "I want to be the center of attention in the game" which scum are relatively loathe to do early on.
skitter's explanation in
147 also makes sense.
VOTE: wgeurts
In post 169, implosion wrote:Sorry, missed that.
I (still) don't really like wgeurts's early posting and don't really buy the wagon on you. Mostly
42 feels like a bit of a throwaway question on page two.
And after an objectively weak post, which Skygazer agreed with me was weak, Implo is off to give a throwaway line about the Skitter unvote, TMI read horrordude with more weasel words and say some generally stupid things, and start pushing the wagon elsewhere (and Horrordude is never a good push her because he's kinda obviously leaning towards town at the very least and he would know that the good people would shut that down.)
So let's break this down
1) Skitter does scummy things
2) Implo agrees skitter is doing scummy things
3) Skitter justifies scummy Things
4) Implo votes them
5) Implo talks about other people being potential scum without really pushing them
6) SKitter gives a really bad explanation why her read is what it is
7) Implo unvotes and goes elsewhere.
So yeah, they're scum.
VOTE: Implosion
100% sure this flips scum, I'm above 90% on Skitter but to me this is the more important flip because I think Implo is far more capable of weaseling his way out than Skitter at this point.
*The elephant in the room, possibly, is going to be... why does Implosion feel the need to treat my scumread on Skitter the way he does? Why not just straight defend or ignore her?
The answer requires an understanding of both Implosion's general playstyle and my relationship with Skitter.
I
guarantee
you that Skitter before I said anything mentioned that I am highly likely to catch her and that she will need to be careful.
There's an understanding that everyone on the scumteam should have that I am a massive threat to Skitter because of my high consistency catching her and my ability to project that read onto others.
Implosion would not just let me strongarm Skitter without getting a piece of the pie. This is exactly what he does as scum here.
He as often as possible early on agrees that Skitter is being scummy while doing his best to avoid making her a wagon. That is precisely what he has done in this game. Until my attention gets distracted.
It's a transparent SvS as well interaction for gut reasons just based on how he's talking which I can't necessarily explain in the best words, but I expect someone to make the argument
"Why would he care, why would he bus, why wouldn't he just ignore your read on Skitter" well that's the reason that he would play this game in this manner.
He doesn't want to hardbus her because Implo isn't that kind of player, he doesn't want to hard defend her because he can easily get clusterfucked, he doesn't want to ignore her because bad associatives...
so the play that Implo would make is to appear like he's sincerely scumreading her while never actually pushing on her, and again, that's what he does here.
Until he notices that she's not getting momentum and finds an excuse to get his vote elsewhere.