Fallout Mafia - Commonwealth Edition (Day 8)
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I mean I brought up the flavour thing and even pointed to which part of the PM it is contained within. As scum I wouldn't know that information if everyone wants me to claim first then that's fine by me.
I was also working off the assumption that there would only be 1 miller tbh and was aiming to catch dave out already but going by what's been said 2 millers is something the mod would definitely do so i'm now beginning to believe both me and dave are millers here.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 71, Ouroboros wrote:Wilky had an odd reaction to being CCed and I think he might be scum miller given miller as a fakeclaim.
I wasn't cc'ed- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Why because I pointed out your mistake? I wasn't cc'ed dave hardclaimed miller first, I claimed it second.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 88, Ouroboros wrote:No I actually explicitly don't think that safe claims were given since giffles didn't last game: I think that your role is actually miller but you're scum and that the role PM is something memey about you being a miller despite being scum.
That's also such, such, such a scummy reaction.
WE'RE LYNCHING BUGS BUNNY BOYS EASY GAME.
Actually the PM isn't memey at all just the miller part has its own flavour (and is not explicitly called miller in the ability parts) to fit in with the flavour of the game.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I can pretty much guarantee that we would have got the same flavour due to the way its worded in the role pm.In post 97, ManWithNoName wrote: We don't even know that you both got the same flavor.
VOTE: Wilky
Yeah, I'm feeling this one over dave if we are lynching in millers.
I wasn't with holding information at all, my idea was to get dave to flavour claim then I would know if he was miller or not. Rest of town have a different view and i'm now happy to flavour claim first.In post 125, MariaR wrote:In post 70, wilky wrote:I mean I brought up the flavour thing and even pointed to which part of the PM it is contained within. As scum I wouldn't know that information if everyone wants me to claim first then that's fine by me.
I was also working off the assumption that there would only be 1 miller tbh and was aiming to catch dave out already but going by what's been said 2 millers is something the mod would definitely do so i'm now beginning to believe both me and dave are millers here.
These pinged me as scummy stuff with tmi trying to withhold info. And even without the miller claims I don't really like his tone about the whole miller situation in the first place. Why are you voting Ank? For pressure or because you sr them? I don't think just voting will hurry them up with whatever they're doing.In post 87, wilky wrote:So we're just assuming that safe claims are given now?
What even would a scum miller be? Is that a thing?In post 132, Ouroboros wrote:Also let's be totally clear on what my viewpoint is
My viewpoint is that Wilky IS IN FACT A MILLER BY ROLE. HIS ROLE PM SAYS MILLER.
But he is scum nonetheless.
That is why he claimed miller, having the role, and that is why he immediately gave Davesaz an out to make the situation not a counterclaim.
I get zero vibes from his response that he actually thinks Davesaz is lock scum and the vote felt more of an obligation and that Wilky just wanted to get the situation dealt with.
This is also a completely GIF thing to do, he has put two town millers in multiple previous games and I think it's about time that he screws with that meta by making one scum.
Also, if the mod has done two town vigs in multiple games before the idea of him just randomly changing it up in this game sounds pretty far fetched to me.
In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
Yeah I see no advantages at all for a scum!Tchill to claim in the manner he did that would be taking advantage of the miller claims.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
This seems like such an easy way to hop on to my wagon but brush your hands off any backlash once I flip town.In post 186, Ramcius wrote:
VOTE: WilkyIn post 183, Ouroboros wrote:? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?
Why would he just not claim it if that was an issue on his radar? Why would he ever be getting protection from investigative roles when he explicitly claimed something that doesn't require investigative roles?
You're just scum pushing a mislynch to distract from Wilky here well over 90% of the time.
fine, have your way
VOTE: Ramcius- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
The role is Commenwealth Miller with something else too. I didn't really want to full claim but there is more to my role.In post 208, davesaz wrote:
Is yourIn post 193, wilky wrote:Flavour Claim:
One of my abilities is that I am a prototype synth, my win condition is to eliminate the institute but upon investigation I will show as sided with the institute.rolemiller? Or just the investigation results?
Fair's fair. My role is Commonwealth Miller, and for flavor in the "abilities" section I'm a former institute scientist who will investigate as Institute.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 233, Impossibear wrote:Hey, someone with time and nothing better to do:
Find games GiF's run with multiple millers.
Crossreference playerlists with wilky/dave.
Find any other games with wilky/dave and multiple millers.
Link all of those for me to go through.
TYIA
~Jingle
I can make this slightly easier for whoever does this if anyone. This is my first game with any sort of miller i'm sure so there won't be any with me and multiple millers.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 256, MariaR wrote:
I haven't commented on Ram on purpose. I rather not speak on Ram atm if a wagon keeps going I'll comment but for now I rather shut up about him due to my own reasons.In post 255, Alchemist21 wrote:@MariaRWhat's your read/opinion on Ramcius right now? You seem to have played with them before but you popped in with the Nero vote and haven't commented on Ram's actions and wagon.
This might be far fetched, and generally i'm not a fan of partner hunting pre flip, but these quotes just really don't sit right with me. I feel the withholding on ram is too obvious to show a partnership of scum!ram and scum!maria but I don't have experience with Maria to know how well her scum game is anyone else played with her before?In post 257, MariaR wrote:How do people feel about Alch? I don't think I'm bias tring that slot. (seems rather obv town) but some people have said he's scummy so I want to know where that came from
The second quote is the one that really irks me though, coming in and asking about a specific player. I'd put my neck on the line now and say IF there was a Maria scumflip then Alch would most likely be scum too.
I want to counter this with the vote on me was scummy as i've already explained. How wagons build can be a good way to form reads through wagon analysis to. Granted wagon analysis isn't my strongest point though.In post 304, Ramcius wrote:
Why you comparing mine and Wilky wagons traction? He claimed miller in scummy manner, while what i did? Wanted someone else lynched? Voted myself to indicate how ridiculous i find this push "Ram is scummy"? I hear that in pretty much every game and should i make list of games, where i got ML'ed D1?In post 292, Ouroboros wrote: Sure, that's true, but given all that like we got Willy to l2 almost effortlessly and this Ramcius push has gotten far less traction.
Actually I don't see the implication of Scum!me in those posts at all. In the first post there was still very much a wagon on me and saying he preferred Tchill to me looks more to me like he prefers Tchill to the current wagon rather than Tchill to his second scum read (if that makes any sense i'm not sure i'm explaining it well).In post 319, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
It was these 2 posts that gave me the impression, but I do see where I missed the implied Wilky scumread in that first one.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
UNVOTE:
The second post refers to both me and dave as "millers", not claimed millers, or claimed pr's or even claimed roles just simply "millers" which would imply he doesn't doubt either the claims.
You really can't see that if a mod has history of two town millers before in multiple games that it's far more likely he'd do that again rather than throw in one town miller and one scum miller?In post 373, verylazy wrote:
why?In post 192, wilky wrote: Also, if the mod has done two town vigs in multiple games before the idea of him just randomly changing it up in this game sounds pretty far fetched to me.
QFTIn post 376, hebichan wrote:Wait, keade, WHY, you literally cracked under no pressure.
Okay, from now on no more claims....- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 380, Ramcius wrote:
Oh boy, i don't think anyone believes there 2 scums in you, Dave and Tchill, so question is which one of you is scum? Dave is townread by majority, so i leave him out, as i did before, therefore it's you and Tchill. At this point i hope it's obvious, why you and Dave are millers, if Tchill is scum trying to use fuss caused by millersIn post 379, wilky wrote:
Actually I don't see the implication of Scum!me in those posts at all. In the first post there was still very much a wagon on me and saying he preferred Tchill to me looks more to me like he prefers Tchill to the current wagon rather than Tchill to his second scum read (if that makes any sense i'm not sure i'm explaining it well).In post 319, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
It was these 2 posts that gave me the impression, but I do see where I missed the implied Wilky scumread in that first one.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
UNVOTE:
The second post refers to both me and dave as "millers", not claimed millers, or claimed pr's or even claimed roles just simply "millers" which would imply he doesn't doubt either the claims.
So Dave being the townread one makes him the obvious town one? Let's put it another way then what if the ones who came out to defend Daves claim were his scumbuddies? (I'm not pushing Scum!dave here by the way just trying to piece together your decision making).- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Long-ish post. I make no apologies for that.
The whole beef between the hydra's is tedious, unnecessary and quite frankly a silly argument. Can that stop now before this game reaches a pretty toxic state and becomes unfun for everyone.
Ugh, I can't fully remember why I quoted this post now but I agree with what Wraith is saying here.In post 431, Wraith wrote:
Almost forgot, might as well elaborate on why I find this post very suspicious, because why notIn post 427, Wraith wrote:Yeah I could get on board with a Vent wagon too
Very suspicious postIn post 235, Ventriloquist wrote:Is it not possible Tchill has a jester role of some sort? Not suggesting an insta win but I don't see how his claim could be helpful to town otherwise.
It wouldn't surprise me if Wilky has done research and is relying on the miller claim because he realises the host has done this before, especially since he chose to highlight that it wasn't far fetched for there to be 2 millers again. As Alchemist said though, this is relying on some pretty niche assumptions so I'm not buying it just yet.
He uses some ratherabsurdleaps in logic in two separate cases to paint a narrative picture about these two players, deliberately ignoring Occam's Razor in favor of stirring up WIFOM.
What is more likely? That TChill is running a Jester gambit? Or that TChill is fakeclaiming? TChill's was by far the least believable claim so far, and the most awkward (considering Kaede is mod-confirmed). By bringing up some a longshot possiblity, Vent is indirectly mounting a soft defense of TChill.
Simultaneously, he attempts to cast suspicion on Wilky with a similarly absurd leap. What's more likely? That Wilky is claiming Miller truthfully in a game run by a mod who apparently has a habit of these kinds of setup quirks? Or that Wilky is deliberately playing off mod meta to mount a roundabout fakeclaim gambit, with a claim that is by its nature instantly considered suspect by default?
I don't like that whatsoever. And after we get the VC I might consider switching my vote right now.
Agree with the first part why wouldn't scum give the impression of scumhunting early on?In post 433, Dunnstral wrote:
Scum players don't play up scumhunting on day 1? I disagree., I don't think the explanation for your read is a good one.In post 430, hebichan wrote:I'm not scum reading manwithnoname that hard right now, he seems to be scumhunting, which I don't think many scum players try to play up this early day one.
In post 431, Wraith wrote:He uses some rather absurd leaps in logic in two separate cases to paint a narrative picture about these two players, deliberately ignoring Occam's Razor in favor of stirring up WIFOM.
What is more likely? That TChill is running a Jester gambit? Or that TChill is fakeclaiming? TChill's was by far the least believable claim so far, and the most awkward (considering Kaede is mod-confirmed). By bringing up some a longshot possiblity, Vent is indirectly mounting a soft defense of TChill.
Absurd leaps in logic aren't more likely to come from scum than town. If anything it's the opposite. While you may be correct, I don't think you make a good point here. Town is allowed to soft defend people too, by the way.
Can you elaborate on the next part? Why is absurd leaps in logic more likely to come from town?
This is interesting.In post 439, Ouroboros wrote:
If you think that MWNN is scum it should at the very least intrigue you that MWNN followed me on several votes but then got cold feet and waffled when I tried to vote Ventriloquist.In post 424, Ankamius wrote:RC
All I really want to know in light of that is how much weight you put behind the points on him you've already stated.
I might be willing to go back to sheeping, but I want to be sure that it's worth not gunning for a slot that I think is highly likely to flip scum.
This is a bad reply.In post 441, ManWithNoName wrote:I got tired of following a town read rather than pursuing my own reads, especially when the Ventriloquist read came down to "He's inactive".
Just because you're obvtown, doesn't mean you are always right, RC. You should have learned that by now.
Again this is interesting, so mwnn sheeped you up until ventriloquist, then backed off saying he wasn't a blip on his radar whilst voting someone else he said the same thing about? I'm too lazy to check if this happened that way but I will check it over the weekend.In post 446, Ouroboros wrote:Like: if you agree with me that Ventriloquist is doing nothing and needs to start doing something, shouldn't you at the very least be enthusiastic about wagoning him to force him to do something?
You're also voting another person on your another blip on the radar list, so idk.
Ankamius is several percentage points above rand and I totally agree with the read that Hebi has so idk what your issue is Dunn.
Ahh good ole deflection "yes my scumbuddy isn't playing stellar but look at this other player here..."In post 448, ManWithNoName wrote:I agree Ventriloquist needs to start posting, that being said, I think Realmen's posting has been to the point where he is just avoiding posting anything that can be AI. The last time I voted off of someone that was doing that, I got burned, that's why I am pushing Realmen.
Ventriloquist has enough votes without me to pressure him into voting, anyway.
Like, fuck, this is a large anyway, if I were scum with Ventriloquist, why wouldn't I vote him for the town cred anyway?
I hate posts like this, the whole I can understand why you feel i'm scum but promise me i'm just not playing great just feels so scummy and is also a subtle AtE.In post 450, ManWithNoName wrote:I can understand the reaction to my posting, by the way. I'm just going to have to be better going forward.
I still think Realmen is the best vote at this point in time. Ventriloquist can be on notice, but Realmen has actually been scummy (I will admit again, amusing) but scummy, overall.
Who are the two players you are referring to in the bolded part?In post 467, Ramcius wrote:
if i considered sk, i said 14 v 3 v 1, but i doubt sk - 2 millers and hider in closed game with 2 KPN (as you see, i don't consider either of them gambiting scum in this case - i doubt scum would risk such gambit, if there was only 3 of them)
As to why i doubt 5 maf, there's general rule for numbers in game - town = 3xscum + 1, closest number is 13 v 4, adding 5th scum in closed game requires them to be very weak and town godlike.
As to games with similar numbers - Beneath the Mask was 16 v 5, Divergent was 15 v 4 v 1 and we barely won, Kingdom Hearts was 13 v 4
So when someone gives unrealistic number, i wonder if they have no idea about setups or are scum trying fake townslip
The whole fake townslip over numbers is a bullshit argument if I have ever seen one. I mean who said there isn't a 5 man scum team? Just because it's slightly out from the norm doesn't mean it might not be the case. I also get a feeling your posting from a perspective that 100% knows the size of the scum team which doesn't go in your favour for my reads.
And your scum reads aren't subject to change?In post 468, Ramcius wrote:As for TRs, i never give those, unless someone do or say something that makes them locktown in my eyes, otherwise all my TRs are subject to change
Same as above there's not a possibility your scum reads will change later?In post 474, Ramcius wrote:
Then what point of posting townreads, if you going change them later on? If anyone want my TRs, they can just assume people i'm not scumreading are my townreads atmIn post 469, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Why hide that information? I think anyone's TRs are always subject to change unless they are mod confirmed, yet you dont see them hiding them.
Does it really fucking matter? This might be the worst case of shit flinging I have ever seen in a mafia game.In post 494, Ramcius wrote:So, oldtimers, who can confirm that in past it was norm 5 scum in 18p closed games?
Wait? Wut? Where did this come from? Weren't you against the vent wagon before now?In post 546, ManWithNoName wrote:Fine, whatever.
VOTE: Ventriloquist
I don't like being a leader anyway
QFT. I agree with everything in that quote.In post 702, Ouroboros wrote:
Ick.In post 648, verylazy wrote:he was awkward and scummy tonally
I hate tone reads. They're basically like gut reads and a lynch-bait thing to have as the foundation of your scum read on someone.
So...? Let me summarize this so that I can understand it....In post 648, verylazy wrote:I don't have a huge amount of scumreads so far this game. One of wilky and tchill is probably scum, MWNN is scummy too and probably more so than wilky at this point. Unsure what to make of the impossibear and jungle thing.
Wilky is probs scum cause of awkward and "scummy" tone, but TChill might be scum too! But MWNN is scummier than Wilky (and probably TChill?), but I'm still vote sitting on TChill all theway fromPAGE ONE RVS!
And then, there's this...
GhostIn post 648, verylazy wrote:for what it's worth this probably means tchill and mwnn aren't both scum.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
OK, great. Considering there is as much a chance as anything that there is a 3 man scum team with a 3rd party and if there's a 3 man scum team then Ram thinks that none of the claims are scum then why is such a huge chunk of his iso focusing on 1 of the claims being scum? Below is quotes from Ram's iso that insinuate scum in one of the claims. I still get the feeling from Ram's post that he's more in the know than most of the rest of us.
In post 150, Ramcius wrote:well, this hider claim might come from scum - this way they are safe from checks and can't be used as weak cop - won't die, if visit scumIn post 164, Ramcius wrote:
if i have to choose, i'd lynch Tchill - he can hide from vig, if he's tells truth about his role, while miller can be dealt by vig. But if we don't have vig, we can come back to Wilky D2/D3. That's assuming we will decide he's scum and must be dealt withIn post 159, Ouroboros wrote:
Wilky remains scum and everyone who comes in and doesn't comment on him at all while pushing the wagon elsewhere is dying over the next few days.In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claimsIn post 186, Ramcius wrote:
VOTE: WilkyIn post 183, Ouroboros wrote:? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?
Why would he just not claim it if that was an issue on his radar? Why would he ever be getting protection from investigative roles when he explicitly claimed something that doesn't require investigative roles?
You're just scum pushing a mislynch to distract from Wilky here well over 90% of the time.
fine, have your wayIn post 303, Ramcius wrote:
Well, i could keep my RVS vote, but we were past RVS stage, so it's kinda obvious why i voted someone, as to why i voted Wilky - I never said i townread them, just that my scumread on Tchill was stronger, hence i said Wilky can be shot.In post 238, Ventriloquist wrote:I don't understand why a townie (moreover, anyone) would vote for themselves - seems like you saw a wagon forming and then panicked to try and loosen the noose around your neck. Also, why change your vote to Wilky seemingly just because Ouroboros called you out for it? Please explain your logic.
VOTE: RamciusIn post 304, Ramcius wrote:
Why you comparing mine and Wilky wagons traction? He claimed miller in scummy manner, while what i did? Wanted someone else lynched? Voted myself to indicate how ridiculous i find this push "Ram is scummy"? I hear that in pretty much every game and should i make list of games, where i got ML'ed D1?In post 292, Ouroboros wrote: Sure, that's true, but given all that like we got Willy to l2 almost effortlessly and this Ramcius push has gotten far less traction.In post 315, Ramcius wrote:
I just realised i can't change RC mind and going against him would ended in my own lynch, so i decided settle for my 2nd scumread and give RC his way. There are people i feel like arguing and there are people i try reason a bit and just give their way, if they seems unmovable.In post 313, Alchemist21 wrote:
This sort of thing is what I'm worried about since the last game I played had a D1 VI lynch and I don't want to repeat that. That's why I asked Maria about him, to see if he's known to be a VI. But I still can't get over how his jump onto Wilky looked like he just wanted RC to stop pushing him. Do you think that's something Town Ramcius would do?In post 285, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
I spectated that Bastard game GIF modded, it seems to me that Ramcius is the type of player that plays in a way that rubs ppl the wrong way and ends up getting himself lynched, ill give him the benefit of the doubt for now.In post 283, Ouroboros wrote:No I'm pretty sure everyone agreed it was the way they claimed not the claim itself. Can I persuade you to help me run up Ramcius?
As for VI, i disagree with that, it's just that people find my methods scummy or rather not up to this site meta and i get ML'ed way too often D1 to my liking.
Also, we played in Beneath the Mask, so you have some first hand experience with me and my methodsIn post 318, Ramcius wrote:
"Let's lynch Tchill, we can vig Wilky, if needed" sounds to you like Wilky is town to me?In post 316, Alchemist21 wrote:I really don't remember much from Beneath the Mask aside from the Mulch-based drama, though your avi was familiar to me.
Also I was asking Kaede about you partially to try getting a read on her. I keep looking at the early interactiin between Kaede and Maria but can't get any reads based off of it.
How come you didn't say you thought Wilky was scummy before you voted there? The way you were talking made it sound like you trusted both Miller claims as Town with scum Tchill taking advantage of the situation.In post 344, Ramcius wrote:
It's not how pressure works - you don't tell people you vote just for pressureIn post 343, Alchemist21 wrote:On second thought I think I will go back on Ram for now. Half the reason I didn't want to unvote him earlier is because I don't have a better place for my vote right now and I still don't so I'll put it back just to keep up some pressure.
VOTE: Ramcius
also, why you townreading both millers and hider claimants?In post 380, Ramcius wrote:
Oh boy, i don't think anyone believes there 2 scums in you, Dave and Tchill, so question is which one of you is scum? Dave is townread by majority, so i leave him out, as i did before, therefore it's you and Tchill. At this point i hope it's obvious, why you and Dave are millers, if Tchill is scum trying to use fuss caused by millersIn post 379, wilky wrote:
Actually I don't see the implication of Scum!me in those posts at all. In the first post there was still very much a wagon on me and saying he preferred Tchill to me looks more to me like he prefers Tchill to the current wagon rather than Tchill to his second scum read (if that makes any sense i'm not sure i'm explaining it well).In post 319, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
It was these 2 posts that gave me the impression, but I do see where I missed the implied Wilky scumread in that first one.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
UNVOTE:
The second post refers to both me and dave as "millers", not claimed millers, or claimed pr's or even claimed roles just simply "millers" which would imply he doesn't doubt either the claims.In post 462, Ramcius wrote:I don't like Ventrilo's attempt push me, i dlike Wraith's "5 scum, no faceclaim", we still have Tchill/Wilky situation, Realmen asking to be burned with the fire, hebi's sheeping is unsettling, Nero is awkwardly silent
Hm, i guess i try
VOTE: Nero
others at least are talking- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 793, ManWithNoName wrote:I'm going to just come clean on why I was fighting Ouroboros before. I played a game with RC on my main and just don't like interacting with him because his play style clashes so much with mine.
It was personal, petty and stupid. And I am nothing if not petty and stupid.
Nice AtE.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I've read the thread don't really have time to do a big post though will do that tomorrow.
For now both hydras and RMOJ are town from todays posts. Impossibear's complete u-turn on me is weird though, will compare others on their earlier reads lists until now tomorrow when I have the time.
Not sure what to think of Ank, on one hand were they trying to dispel the wagon or at least delay it d1 to buy time for a scum partner? On the other hand I really don't think scum pulls a gambit like that at all.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Why would scum!ank pull a gambit like that? The more I think of it the less it looks like scum to me. Also you have been insistent on lynching lurkers for a while why push someone for it?In post 1049, Ramcius wrote:VOTE: Ank
i dislike Ank's answrs at end of the day, i disliked that hammer and now i have no idea why she wants lynch lurker
qftIn post 1064, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:impossibear's cooperation to get themselves cleared makes them obvious town now anyway
I agree with thisIn post 1071, Dunnstral wrote:
That's not something scum says about their partnersIn post 1069, Wraith wrote:Ank's insistence that town should not lynch Vent because "D1 scumlynches are bad" is insanely suspicious.
Ugh, I still think your scum but this post is towny af.In post 1087, Ramcius wrote:
ran out of "how to scum 101" tricks?In post 1086, Ankamius wrote:Nah, I'll reveal it when I care enough to. Not before then.
>"it was just a reaction test and you failed it"
>"you can never lynch me"
>"i know your team"
Being a lurker is the only reason someone wouldn't have a read on you by now?In post 1127, Ramcius wrote:
i can see why other 4 on the list, they kinda lurkers, but why you put me there? Also, i'm always available to talk, well, as long as you don't try tricks on me, then i might get little unpleasantIn post 1126, Impossibear wrote:Also how familiar are you with the game? We are thinking RMOJ is definitely town - we received the message from the mod re: the quest, and I can't think of a single mental leap that makes that character aligned with the institute.
ETL
p-edit: Ok, how are you feeling about these people? They are weaker reads for us. I've basically scrapped our entire readslist from yesterday.
Maria
tchill
ramcius
verylazy
dunnstral
We think the gamemightbe solveable if the claims are all real.
In post 1149, Impossibear wrote:
Tonally... I still think his counterclaim was towny-sounding. Today's posts? I dunno. I have a specific reason for believing he is worth a lynch that doesn't have to do with tone though.In post 1146, Ouroboros wrote:Do you still think Wilky is super locktown tonally like you said earlier in the game?
ETL
p-edit: What are you even talking about....
Just going to put it out there that I'll avoid voting myself unless I really have to as its then 1 less vote scum need on me.In post 1179, Impossibear wrote:I specifically want wilky on his own L-1 wagon so that he can't selfhammer.
Also the RC hydra has a few times now changed there vote whilst impossibear was vote 3 on a wagon. Not sure what to think of that just now, but I think they're still town just something worth considering.
VOTE: Ram- wilky
-
wilky
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I'm available for 10 minutes or so, if that's not enough i'll be available for longer tomorrow.In post 1216, Impossibear wrote:Will you indulge me in revealing some information- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
You just removed your vote off of me before the vote count.
Not sure how the votes look but that takes away that part of your quest right?- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Ahh shit yeah, I forgot about the bit that specified an L-1 wagon too.In post 1222, Impossibear wrote:
In order for it to count, it would need to be reflected on a VC as the third vote on a wagon that is at L-1.In post 1221, wilky wrote:You just removed your vote off of me before the vote count.
Not sure how the votes look but that takes away that part of your quest right?
That's the way I understood it.
I guess that makes more sense for me selfvoting as I was strictly taking it as me not self hammering.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I guess through the flips i'd argue it being ank. I jumped on ank's scum flips don't always benefit town in d1 but as I said the more I think about it the less I think it comes from scum!ank trying to defend his partner.In post 1224, Impossibear wrote:
Me too. I'm gonna leave it up to Jingle to coordinate the votes. Haven't seen him around all day so I'm hoping we'll connect tomorrow. I know RC wanted his individual reads list as well.In post 1223, wilky wrote:Ahh shit yeah, I forgot about the bit that specified an L-1 wagon too.
I guess that makes more sense for me selfvoting as I was strictly taking it as me not self hammering.
Besides the hydrae and RMOJ, who's your strongest townread?
ETL << sorry forgot to be signing these today
Anyway I gotta bounce will be back tomorrow.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Again don't have much time to post but I just want to add the flavour thing wasn't about confirming my alignment to everyone else it was about confirming Dave's to meIn post 1275, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:There's no scum motivation for either of them to claim miller, but that's not a town tell either, simply put if you're miller everyone knows you should claim it in your first post. wilky's entrance was kinda towny, but then he started pushing the flavor claim as if it would confirm his alignment and that's how i started getting suspicious of it, I mentioned this back in day 1 too.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I don't think it goes without saying at all unless confirmed.In post 1291, Ramcius wrote:it's goes without a saying that scum have fakeclaims, it would be too easy to break game trough mass flavour claims, when flavour matters
that being said, people seems forgot Wraith being confident is scum not having fakeclaims D1
@mod- are you willing to confirm wether scum have fake claims?- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
RC I know you like using meta dives so you can go ahead and meta dive me if you like. I don't even use meta to read players (except maybe NM) so why would I meta dive a mod?In post 1319, Ouroboros wrote:Now: I feel pretty damn certain at that point that scum have fakeclaims because the last flip's claim is a literal scumclaim. I think it is precisely within the bounds of what GIF would do to give scum a miller role as a fakeclaim to mess with people, even if the character itself is not an actual miller. All these arguments that Wilky would not have claimed there are bullshit: scum sees the conflicting miller claims, first thing they do is mod meta. Ventriloquist even said:
aka, that they would potentially be willing to jump into the miller counterclaim situation after mod metaing, and that's exactly what happened I believe.It wouldn't surprise me if Wilky has done research and is relying on the miller claim because he realises the host has done this before, especially since he chose to highlight that it wasn't far fetched for there to be 2 millers again. As Alchemist said though, this is relying on some pretty niche assumptions so I'm not buying it just yet.
Tchill is a lame wagon that like don't get me wrong isn't never scum but Wilky is never getting lynched with me gone with several people's attitudes so.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Thats because there is no case to address I mean half of it is the claim and the other half is how vent acted on my slot.In post 1349, Ouroboros wrote:No like I'm actually not literally 100% certain Wilky is scum. I've repeatedly asked for you to engage with me on it where I didn't for Vent because I can be persuaded here.
I made my points, asked for thoughts on it, you just got mad at me for leading the playerlist when today I've been doing so solely through strength of reasoning rather than character.
I think Wilky scum makes a shitton of sense in the gamestate particularly given Ventriloquist's approach to the slot, but like I'm open to persuading
You've made no effort to actually push Wilky scum besides to say that they're locktown because of flavor, which is... bad reasoning
And wilky, your defense keeps coming down to whether or not scum have fakeclaims and arguments that don't address the case at all so, meh.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
My switch to vent had nothing to do with it becoming guaranteed to happen and I was totally convinced with the time stamps on the posts.In post 1368, Ouroboros wrote:
There's also the fact that you used MWNN/Ventriloquist associatives to push on MWNN while saying that Vent could be scum if MWNN was scum but refusing to go the other direction until it became basically guaranteed to happen and never actually comment on Ventriloquist much at all.In post 1366, wilky wrote:
Thats because there is no case to address I mean half of it is the claim and the other half is how vent acted on my slot.In post 1349, Ouroboros wrote:No like I'm actually not literally 100% certain Wilky is scum. I've repeatedly asked for you to engage with me on it where I didn't for Vent because I can be persuaded here.
I made my points, asked for thoughts on it, you just got mad at me for leading the playerlist when today I've been doing so solely through strength of reasoning rather than character.
I think Wilky scum makes a shitton of sense in the gamestate particularly given Ventriloquist's approach to the slot, but like I'm open to persuading
You've made no effort to actually push Wilky scum besides to say that they're locktown because of flavor, which is... bad reasoning
And wilky, your defense keeps coming down to whether or not scum have fakeclaims and arguments that don't address the case at all so, meh.
This is fence sitty af.In post 1405, Dunnstral wrote:I didn't think he was scum but he's kind of scummy in his responses to you/not really making a case for himself here
FOS- Dunnstral- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
But you're not the one making it toxic no?In post 1480, Ouroboros wrote:Fight me then. You've repeatedly dragged this out of the game and I've had enough with your shit and ETL's shit.
This.In post 1513, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
And flipping the vig is your idea of progressing the game state?In post 1512, Ouroboros wrote:Sure. I don't know the details, I need more flips.
Nothing confirmed.In post 1528, Kokichi Oma wrote:Is there a 3rd party this game or is it confirmed scum vs town
You are actually fucking toxic as fuck when you don't get your own way. RC is officially on my blacklist now, grow the fuck up.In post 1550, Ouroboros wrote:I will quickhammer ramcius if they are brought to L-1. 0 purpose doing that.
If you want this check then wagon Wilky for it.
Oh right, no way RC would bus is there?In post 1562, Ouroboros wrote:I'm playing terribly but I was the one who fought my ass off to get scum lynched on D1.
Pretty much.In post 1612, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Oh so now we're going to the "Anything can be scum motivated so long as it fits with my reads"
There isn't oneIn post 1622, projectmatt wrote:does someone want to summarize the case on wilky for me?
I mean RC can't even decide if i'm a scum miller, i'm fake claiming miller off my own back or i'm using a mod provided fake claim.In post 1650, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
Like the scum miller wilky?In post 1646, Ouroboros wrote:
because they did what they wanted, they gave their strongest scum player a godfather and told people to cop them.In post 1641, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Actually yeah, why did Vent die with the body swap if keeping it would let them keep swapping stuff.
they don't need to keep switching stuff around and giving anything else to town means losing actual usable powers.
I mean i'll be serious the other ability I have isn't the best PR available but it is a PR. I mean, if it comes down to me being lynched its probably expendable.In post 1679, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:also i seriously hope your reasoning for thinking it's a fake claim is because he's millerwith additional abilities.
Nah, no way you're giving me a black mark for not being here at 4.41 am when this post was made UK time. You can fuck right off with that suggestion.In post 1689, Ouroboros wrote:Is it just me... Or are the people we're all arguing about convientlly NOT here e.g. Wilky and TChill mainly. But where's everyone else? It feels like 10+ pages since I haven't seen some of the other players.
Ghost
But, but, but RC isn't the one making it toxic...In post 1790, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:So am I supposed to endure you creating a toxic game state? i rather rep out than that.
You're not.In post 1836, Ouroboros wrote:What if I'm right on Wilky though, Kaede?
For the whole hydra 1v1 thing the way I see it is that RC keeps having digs at them and when Jingle/ETL reply he's hitting out with the whole 'see they're attacking me not the other way around' bullshit. There is no way that i'll ever play another game with RC again.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Thinking about it I may aswell just full claim now.
Claiming Miller Slow Cop
As I said the role probably is expendably and if I don't get lynched there are better night kill targets. If i'm going to be lynched at least run Ram to L-1 then let Impossibear hammer me. Tomorrow keep a close eye on Ouroborus because RC's reasoning on his read on me is bullshit.
Also keep an eye on Maria/Tchill they seem the most sus on my wagon.
RMOJ, ETL and Dave are all town.
I still think Ram could be scum too.
EBWOP I seem to have lost the first half of my post there.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Ram and RCIn post 1909, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Problem is, we keep spending deadline doing these switches just for this quest.
But well i can always blame it on Ram right?
It's not a mislynch though is it, its getting the first part of the quest done which you are hellbent on not helping with.In post 1910, Ramcius wrote:
Or we could have L-1'd you then had some unvotes after the vc and by now be past that stage of the quest but you and RC had to be awkward about it all.In post 1906, Impossibear wrote:It unfortunate that this causes another day of unnaturally formed wagons VCA is one of my strong points.
What would be helpful from the unnatural wagons?In post 1918, davesaz wrote:
Eh, I can do VCA on the unnatural ones too. If anything, they'll help overall.In post 1906, Impossibear wrote:It unfortunate that this causes another day of unnaturally formed wagons VCA is one of my strong points.
We would have been done earlier if it weren't for two awkward players...In post 1921, projectmatt wrote:i think focusing this day on fulfilling the quest is a bad idea that stifles natural conversation/scumhunting/vca
i hope we're done soon
I mean I've never even played with RC but know enough to know that hard bussing is well within his range so what would a flip on someone who was null to you provide on RC exactly?In post 1967, MariaR wrote:The flip would help me figure out RC's alignment and the other lynches I wanted at the time weren't happening.
If someone acts super confident in a read and I know them to have decent reads I don't mind sheeping it it's not like we were at lylo. Vents flip of info was gonna help me regardless I didn't really care if they flipped town or scum the fact they flipped scum is a bonus
I think Tchill slot is still awaiting replacement isn't it?In post 2008, Impossibear wrote:These people continue to need to vote Tchill's replacement so we can get a VC and be done with this ridiculous L-1 thing. No one else should vote Tchill, but I can't be arsed to actually do an FOS vote count rn.
Non bolded names are already on the wagon, but should stay on the wagon. We will unvote at our earliest opportunity after GiF votecounts. Remember, we get the hammer and to hammer today is a scumclaim.
OTM, there's a list of claims that was accurate not long ago in my ISO. If you skim backwards you should be able to find it pretty quickly.
~Jingle
This sounds awkward and fake.In post 2051, OnTheMark wrote:
RC because when he busses he doesn’t talk about anyone else.In post 2049, projectmatt wrote:
can you explain where literally any of these reads came fromIn post 2047, OnTheMark wrote:
Okay I am legit scared.In post 1117, Ouroboros wrote:Ouroboros still town obviously
Ankamius town
Wraith town
Kaede town
Alchemist21 town
that's my 100% list, I'll branch out from there
I agree with RC.
Help. Me. I must be going insane.
Ank is a because I know her read.
Wraith is because his reasons are good for attacking my predecessor’s slot. Wrong conclusion but I see where he is coming from.
Kaede is the IC.
Alchemist21 is more a gut read.
In post 2072, Ouroboros wrote:I said I wouldn't strong arm shit today so I'll leave you to your mislynch of Tchill. Wraith and Dunn die the next two days though.
I'm not liking OTM since he has joined, his push on kokichi makes no sense at all, the lack of understanding about a scum no kill seems like someone with information feigning ignorance and the reads he posted seem fake.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I'm not fully convinced on the scum!dave thing here but I do feel its a lynch that would provide info moving forwards.
I want to iso wraith to get a better read on the slot i'll pencil this in for tomorrow night. I'm going to be honest I skipped alot in my catchup because I am 100% sick of RC being toxic af and blaming everyone else now.
Before changing my vote i'll wait to see a vote count though.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Why would ETL co-operate so well with the quest if it was him?In post 2767, OnTheMark wrote:Someone convince me this isn’t RC Dave ETL Wraith.
Please my gut says that is right brain says that can’t be right it’s too many.
Well this is a fucking lie. Maria has been wanting my lynch from early d1, I didn't claim cop until a bit into d2 so Maria lets have your reasons for my read without the lies thank you .In post 2972, MariaR wrote:Stop role fishing <3 Why do you think I've wanted Wilky lyched
You have reacted like this to every vote on you. Do you genuinely think you have played a good town game here?In post 3055, Ramcius wrote:RC, at this point i just can't take your scumread on me serious it's like 3rd time you want me lynched
Oh look, caving to RC again. Lets lynch this.In post 3070, Ramcius wrote:
VOTE: ProjectMattIn post 3067, Ouroboros wrote:You should vote ProjectMatt then!
sure
Lol.In post 3080, Ramcius wrote:
Peer pressureIn post 3078, projectmatt wrote:i mean, not really. the only reason i switched from you to dunnstral is because you reacted semi-decently to the pressure on you, and it seemed like dunnscum was slipping under the radar.
what made you decide to vote me, ramcius?
Scum!OTM would have needed alot of planning and part of the planning would have meant Hebi deliberately breaking rules to pull it off. If that was the case you would have been guaranteed a modkill. That alongside impossibear's reasoning makes OTM pretty damn near conf!town to me.In post 3121, Wraith wrote:If you're wondering why it's because my gut is increasingly telling me that OTM is running a scum gambit to mislynch a claimed Miller.
There's been so many PR claims so far that I'm starting to rethink just believing all of them blindly.
Where did I make excuses on not dying?In post 3205, Ouroboros wrote:It's pretty fucking strange that Wilky claimed the equivalent of non-consecutive cop, made excuses for his failure to die in the future in the process of doing so, and said he was an okay lynch because of his role ...?
Right so lets get this straight. Your read on me is that you remember very little on me and that I haven't really given you any town or scum vibes? Right, fair enough but you follow that up with a description of Tchill that includes the words "very scummy". So why would you want me who is basically null to you lynched before Tchill who is "very scummy"?In post 3243, Ankamius wrote:Okay, here's my reads and efforting.
Wilky + davesaz + Tchill13/punreader-- I remember very little of Wilky; a lot of his posts haven't given me vibes either way outside of his early posts looking really scummy. davesaz is always hard to read for me but I haven't seen a whole lot of reason to townread him? Overall pretty much null. Tchill13 was very scummy... but I want to see what punreader does to see if they can reverse my read.PoE Scumreads
In conclusion
Ramcius is my pick for scum.
Wilky is probably second pick pending other slots being resorted.
davesaz/Tchill13slot can go either way, but it's more likely the third scum is here than anywhere else.
.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Bullshit voting for a pretty null slot over a flaked "very scummy" slot shouldn't even be difficult to come to conclusions on. If you had described my play as scummy but just not quite as scummy as tchill i'd maybe be able to accept that but what you essentially said was you found my entrance scummy but have found me pretty null since.In post 3330, Ankamius wrote:
Because I'd like a more recent read on a slot that effectively flaked on day one?In post 3327, wilky wrote:Why should that change anything? You're voting the slot and not the player.
*yawn*In post 3332, Ramcius wrote:
if you have convincing case against me, feel free to share with the class, cause i still haven't seen any and just vague "Ram is scum" just makes me laugh, especially, when they are retracted later onIn post 3325, wilky wrote:
You have reacted like this to every vote on you. Do you genuinely think you have played a good town game here?In post 3055, Ramcius wrote:RC, at this point i just can't take your scumread on me serious it's like 3rd time you want me lynched
Oh look, caving to RC again. Lets lynch this.In post 3070, Ramcius wrote:
VOTE: ProjectMattIn post 3067, Ouroboros wrote:You should vote ProjectMatt then!
sure
I'm not caving to RC, i'm trying consolidate on someone else than Dave and who is my scumread/nullread (preferably scumread)
and to answer your question, i don't give a shit about playing good town game, my wincon is lynch scum, so i do my best to find and lynch them. If people find my methods scummy, that's on them, i'm not going hinder myself just to look more towny
also, you can die - your wish to kill me is very telling, cause that indicates you didn't copped me last night, while i'm your strongest scumread
I've given several reasons for my scum read on you over the course of the game but if you insist on a case i'll try pencil that in later when i'm doing my wraith iso.
Also, where in any sense would it make sense for me to waste two days to get a result on you when I already think you are scum and I think you are definitely lynchable and expendable. I'd be wasting two nights on that result in all honestly.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
co operating would be suicide aswell though. If I were in a scum!impossibear situation i'd definitely be looking for a way to derail the quest. I certainly wouldn't be making the order votes are made and incorporating a FOS system in to the game that I would also try to keep count of.
- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 3346, Ankamius wrote:Wilky
I'm pretty sure Ramcius is scum
The other three right above him is my scumlist via PoE since I'm townreading everybody else
So... why does the relative strength matter there.
I mean if I was looking at the playerlist and thinking that through process of elimination I was left with 2 players I find null and 1 I find very scummy i'd want to flip the very scummy one before the two null ones.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Alright then, so what you want is a guilty before anyone can lynch you? Fine, show me a guilty for all your scum reads.In post 3350, Ramcius wrote:
i don't ask reasons, i ask for a real case, something that will show that i am scum 100%In post 3344, wilky wrote:*yawn*
I've given several reasons for my scum read on you over the course of the game but if you insist on a case i'll try pencil that in later when i'm doing my wraith iso.
Also, where in any sense would it make sense for me to waste two days to get a result on you when I already think you are scum and I think you are definitely lynchable and expendable. I'd be wasting two nights on that result in all honestly.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
Because i'm trying to figure out wether there's a relationship between your slot and the tchill slot.
No I could make a strong case on you and as I said if you went through my iso you'd find reads that would be the basis of that case but what you asked for is 100% proof that you are scum. The only way to do that would be an investigation result...In post 3357, Ramcius wrote:
Did i asked too much? Can't make believable case that would prove your scumread on me?In post 3352, wilky wrote:
Alright then, so what you want is a guilty before anyone can lynch you? Fine, show me a guilty for all your scum reads.In post 3350, Ramcius wrote:
i don't ask reasons, i ask for a real case, something that will show that i am scum 100%In post 3344, wilky wrote:*yawn*
I've given several reasons for my scum read on you over the course of the game but if you insist on a case i'll try pencil that in later when i'm doing my wraith iso.
Also, where in any sense would it make sense for me to waste two days to get a result on you when I already think you are scum and I think you are definitely lynchable and expendable. I'd be wasting two nights on that result in all honestly.
And your counter makes me laugh, i didn't asked guilty, i asked strong arguments, which apparently you can't provide, and i never complained about my scumreads not taking me serious, i don't care, if my scumreads aren't intimidated by me or whatever, all i care is other people to agree with me and lynch them- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
I'm caught up on reading but at work so just a quick post invade wraith gets another few votes before I get back on
A vig kill on me denies us a cop result tomorrow so people suggesting that are wrong.
@OTM if you role block me tonight then I won't meet the requirements of copping someone two nights in a row and would need to start from scratch so I wouldn't be able to gain a result until n4 which the way things are going I won't even be here by.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
And what if scum!wilky was to guess right on wether I was roleblocked or not? You would "clear" me as town but would then be wrong. Quite frankly, roleblocking me leaves too much to chance and we would be in the exact same position tomorrow as we are now which is that we'd be arguing over whether something is concrete or not. On top of that we would not have a cop result from me.In post 3594, OnTheMark wrote:
If I block you and you tell the truth it’s like a check on you.In post 3592, wilky wrote:I'm caught up on reading but at work so just a quick post invade wraith gets another few votes before I get back on
A vig kill on me denies us a cop result tomorrow so people suggesting that are wrong.
@OTM if you role block me tonight then I won't meet the requirements of copping someone two nights in a row and would need to start from scratch so I wouldn't be able to gain a result until n4 which the way things are going I won't even be here by.
If I don’t block you and you tell the truth and you’re town it’s like two checks.
If I block you and you lie you’re caught scum.
If I don’t block you and you lie you’re caught scum.
I see zero down sides. Sure if I block you you don’t get a check but I check you.
Then again this is pure wifom so I may not.
If you roleblock me i'm going to consider it a scum claim and concede that I was wrong on the OTM/hebi slip and that you are a scum roleblocker as it just denies too much information.- wilky
-
wilky Mafia Scum
- wilky
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1612
- Joined: September 29, 2017
In post 3624, OnTheMark wrote:If I don’t block you and you say a result AND you’re town. << That is the predecessor.
Consider it how you like but it’s pretty much clear I am not scum and this threat is empty. I may roleblock I may not.
I already explained the stance and it is airtight.
If you’re scum and guess right the section is not met for “and you’re town”
And roleblocking you and you accurately saying you were blocked proves you have an action that you can tell I can block which Ergo confirms me as a blocker and confirms therefore I can block Davex
Consider that bolded part and think about it another way then. I am town you roleblock me and I confirm in thread that I have no result as I was roleblocked. That won't result with you conceding that I am town as I could have just guessed right which ergo proves my fucking point. You roleblocking me is pointless as it proves nothing on my alignment and denies us a cop result. - wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky
- wilky