Fallout Mafia - Commonwealth Edition (Day 8)
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
this is common sense, not trustIn post 40, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:For example I chose to believe davezas is a Town Miller until play says otherwise, because Scum Millers are pretty rare to begin with, and let's not even get into fake claiming Miller territory.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
VOTE: MariaRIn post 44, MariaR wrote:
Eh I just want to get out of RVS I'm hyped about this game and the talk of miller play that comes down to throwing opinions around isn't really my style. We'll get a serious vote and time I guess I just won't be the one to do it...maybeIn post 41, Alchemist21 wrote:
Nah the trick is to withhold your vote until that person makes even a mildly substantial post, then throw it down and say Serious Vote. It's a known trick but still works. The catch is that you're more likely to get reactions from other people who want to know why rather than the actual target.In post 38, MariaR wrote:I was just looking to see if you'd act sketchy/squeamish about it...although perhaps I should've said srs vote after a few more posts cause maybe it was obv I was trying to get a reaction. Reeeee
Pedit: I trust everyone until you give me a reason not too
i like RVS, so you just became my enemy- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Yes, i remember, you got free ML for scum team, while you were townIn post 47, MariaR wrote:
Last time you came at me we know how that ended you sure ya wanna try againIn post 45, Ramcius wrote:
VOTE: MariaRIn post 44, MariaR wrote:
Eh I just want to get out of RVS I'm hyped about this game and the talk of miller play that comes down to throwing opinions around isn't really my style. We'll get a serious vote and time I guess I just won't be the one to do it...maybeIn post 41, Alchemist21 wrote:
Nah the trick is to withhold your vote until that person makes even a mildly substantial post, then throw it down and say Serious Vote. It's a known trick but still works. The catch is that you're more likely to get reactions from other people who want to know why rather than the actual target.In post 38, MariaR wrote:I was just looking to see if you'd act sketchy/squeamish about it...although perhaps I should've said srs vote after a few more posts cause maybe it was obv I was trying to get a reaction. Reeeee
Pedit: I trust everyone until you give me a reason not too
i like RVS, so you just became my enemyPUNK?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
what i can tell, i'm scared of guns, so when someone points one at me, i panicIn post 49, MariaR wrote:...listen that was YOUR FAULT- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
if i have to choose, i'd lynch Tchill - he can hide from vig, if he's tells truth about his role, while miller can be dealt by vig. But if we don't have vig, we can come back to Wilky D2/D3. That's assuming we will decide he's scum and must be dealt withIn post 159, Ouroboros wrote:
Wilky remains scum and everyone who comes in and doesn't comment on him at all while pushing the wagon elsewhere is dying over the next few days.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
VOTE: WilkyIn post 183, Ouroboros wrote:? ? ? ? ? ?? ? ? ?? ? ?
Why would he just not claim it if that was an issue on his radar? Why would he ever be getting protection from investigative roles when he explicitly claimed something that doesn't require investigative roles?
You're just scum pushing a mislynch to distract from Wilky here well over 90% of the time.
fine, have your way- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Maybe, or maybe i just got ML'ed D1 way too many times for going against strong vocal playersIn post 192, wilky wrote:
This seems like such an easy way to hop on to my wagon but brush your hands off any backlash once I flip town.
VOTE: Ramcius
P-edit: RC, i don't have gladiator role this time, so i can't change your opinion on me- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Huh? You were strongarming wagon on me, after gladiate you said i'm town and didn't voted, it was funny, whew Kiana in next page asked where's your vote on meIn post 198, Ouroboros wrote:
But I wasn't trying to lynch you until you gladiated someone that I was townreading?In post 197, Ramcius wrote:
Maybe, or maybe i just got ML'ed D1 way too many times for going against strong vocal playersIn post 192, wilky wrote:
This seems like such an easy way to hop on to my wagon but brush your hands off any backlash once I flip town.
VOTE: Ramcius
P-edit: RC, i don't have gladiator role this time, so i can't change your opinion on me- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Well, i could keep my RVS vote, but we were past RVS stage, so it's kinda obvious why i voted someone, as to why i voted Wilky - I never said i townread them, just that my scumread on Tchill was stronger, hence i said Wilky can be shot.In post 238, Ventriloquist wrote:I don't understand why a townie (moreover, anyone) would vote for themselves - seems like you saw a wagon forming and then panicked to try and loosen the noose around your neck. Also, why change your vote to Wilky seemingly just because Ouroboros called you out for it? Please explain your logic.
VOTE: Ramcius- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Why you comparing mine and Wilky wagons traction? He claimed miller in scummy manner, while what i did? Wanted someone else lynched? Voted myself to indicate how ridiculous i find this push "Ram is scummy"? I hear that in pretty much every game and should i make list of games, where i got ML'ed D1?In post 292, Ouroboros wrote: Sure, that's true, but given all that like we got Willy to l2 almost effortlessly and this Ramcius push has gotten far less traction.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
I just realised i can't change RC mind and going against him would ended in my own lynch, so i decided settle for my 2nd scumread and give RC his way. There are people i feel like arguing and there are people i try reason a bit and just give their way, if they seems unmovable.In post 313, Alchemist21 wrote:
This sort of thing is what I'm worried about since the last game I played had a D1 VI lynch and I don't want to repeat that. That's why I asked Maria about him, to see if he's known to be a VI. But I still can't get over how his jump onto Wilky looked like he just wanted RC to stop pushing him. Do you think that's something Town Ramcius would do?In post 285, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
I spectated that Bastard game GIF modded, it seems to me that Ramcius is the type of player that plays in a way that rubs ppl the wrong way and ends up getting himself lynched, ill give him the benefit of the doubt for now.In post 283, Ouroboros wrote:No I'm pretty sure everyone agreed it was the way they claimed not the claim itself. Can I persuade you to help me run up Ramcius?
As for VI, i disagree with that, it's just that people find my methods scummy or rather not up to this site meta and i get ML'ed way too often D1 to my liking.
Also, we played in Beneath the Mask, so you have some first hand experience with me and my methods- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
"Let's lynch Tchill, we can vig Wilky, if needed" sounds to you like Wilky is town to me?In post 316, Alchemist21 wrote:I really don't remember much from Beneath the Mask aside from the Mulch-based drama, though your avi was familiar to me.
Also I was asking Kaede about you partially to try getting a read on her. I keep looking at the early interactiin between Kaede and Maria but can't get any reads based off of it.
How come you didn't say you thought Wilky was scummy before you voted there? The way you were talking made it sound like you trusted both Miller claims as Town with scum Tchill taking advantage of the situation.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
It's not how pressure works - you don't tell people you vote just for pressureIn post 343, Alchemist21 wrote:On second thought I think I will go back on Ram for now. Half the reason I didn't want to unvote him earlier is because I don't have a better place for my vote right now and I still don't so I'll put it back just to keep up some pressure.
VOTE: Ramcius
also, why you townreading both millers and hider claimants?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
14 v 4 i'd say, maybe 13 v 4 v 1, if GiF decided put some neutral for good measureIn post 368, ManWithNoName wrote:Also, to mostly RC because I feel like he would know best, but I guess anyone can chime in. In this sized game, what's the general ratio of town to scum, assuming no multiball?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Oh boy, i don't think anyone believes there 2 scums in you, Dave and Tchill, so question is which one of you is scum? Dave is townread by majority, so i leave him out, as i did before, therefore it's you and Tchill. At this point i hope it's obvious, why you and Dave are millers, if Tchill is scum trying to use fuss caused by millersIn post 379, wilky wrote:
Actually I don't see the implication of Scum!me in those posts at all. In the first post there was still very much a wagon on me and saying he preferred Tchill to me looks more to me like he prefers Tchill to the current wagon rather than Tchill to his second scum read (if that makes any sense i'm not sure i'm explaining it well).In post 319, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
It was these 2 posts that gave me the impression, but I do see where I missed the implied Wilky scumread in that first one.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
UNVOTE:
The second post refers to both me and dave as "millers", not claimed millers, or claimed pr's or even claimed roles just simply "millers" which would imply he doesn't doubt either the claims.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Why would scumbuddies out themselves so early to defend scumbuddy, who took risky gambit?In post 381, wilky wrote:In post 380, Ramcius wrote:
Oh boy, i don't think anyone believes there 2 scums in you, Dave and Tchill, so question is which one of you is scum? Dave is townread by majority, so i leave him out, as i did before, therefore it's you and Tchill. At this point i hope it's obvious, why you and Dave are millers, if Tchill is scum trying to use fuss caused by millersIn post 379, wilky wrote:
Actually I don't see the implication of Scum!me in those posts at all. In the first post there was still very much a wagon on me and saying he preferred Tchill to me looks more to me like he prefers Tchill to the current wagon rather than Tchill to his second scum read (if that makes any sense i'm not sure i'm explaining it well).In post 319, Alchemist21 wrote:In post 174, Ramcius wrote:well, in my past large themes there wasn't, but i trust you on this
still, i'd prefer Tchill over Wilky, he came after both miller claims, so i feel it might be scum trying take advantage of miller claims
It was these 2 posts that gave me the impression, but I do see where I missed the implied Wilky scumread in that first one.In post 182, Ramcius wrote:
Are you believe some weird hider claim that isn't weak? Or it's more likely scum trying smuggle in some fishy claim during confusion caused by millers and attracting less attention than it would get normally, and simultaneously getting protection form investigative roles?In post 175, Ouroboros wrote:final answer
I would lean it a few percentage points towards it being his town meta although this result isn't especially conclusive
definitely enough to not want to lynch him today, yall can clusterfuck him later in the game when me and anony are gone if you want
@Ramcius???????????????????????????????????????????????????/
How the fuck is he scum trying to take advantage of miller claims in what way does claiming that as scum take advantage of miller claims?
UNVOTE:
The second post refers to both me and dave as "millers", not claimed millers, or claimed pr's or even claimed roles just simply "millers" which would imply he doesn't doubt either the claims.
So Dave being the townread one makes him the obvious town one? Let's put it another way then what if the ones who came out to defend Daves claim were his scumbuddies? (I'm not pushing Scum!dave here by the way just trying to piece together your decision making).- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
why assume no fakeclaims and 5 scums?In post 412, Wraith wrote:
Keep in mind that if we assume there have been no fakeclaims and that there are 5 scum in this game, then there is only a pool of 10 players that have strong positive PRs.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Huh? What vote changing you talk about? Open my ISO and tell me what vote changing i've done? I voted Maria in RvS, i voted Wilky, then selfvoted as a joke, that's about it. I just feel like you try get easy lynch and don't like my wagon dissolvingIn post 434, Ventriloquist wrote:My only other scum reads so far were on Ramacius & MWNN, as both were very fickle and kept changing their votes without offering any good reason for doing so. This to me suggests an uneasyness when under pressure in the former case and a desire to please the supposedly protown mascot, Ouroboros in the latter.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
if i considered sk, i said 14 v 3 v 1, but i doubt sk - 2 millers and hider in closed game with 2 KPN (as you see, i don't consider either of them gambiting scum in this case - i doubt scum would risk such gambit, if there was only 3 of them)In post 464, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:
After looking through Wraith's ISO and your question about this which is still unanswered, i dont understand what about it makes you dislike it.In post 462, Ramcius wrote:i dlike Wraith's "5 scum, no faceclaim"
First you brought up:
The later 13 v 4 v 1 if we assume the 1 cant win with town (serial killer for example) that also classifies as scum, not groupscum, while I believe this might be just wording issue, you're the one who brought this up at first, so I dont understand your issue with it.In post 375, Ramcius wrote:maybe 13 v 4 v 1, if GiF decided put some neutral for good measure
As to why i doubt 5 maf, there's general rule for numbers in game - town = 3xscum + 1, closest number is 13 v 4, adding 5th scum in closed game requires them to be very weak and town godlike.
As to games with similar numbers - Beneath the Mask was 16 v 5, Divergent was 15 v 4 v 1 and we barely won, Kingdom Hearts was 13 v 4
So when someone gives unrealistic number, i wonder if they have no idea about setups or are scum trying fake townslip- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Then what point of posting townreads, if you going change them later on? If anyone want my TRs, they can just assume people i'm not scumreading are my townreads atmIn post 469, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Why hide that information? I think anyone's TRs are always subject to change unless they are mod confirmed, yet you dont see them hiding them.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Voting lurkers is never bad idea, that's brings fact that you aren't very active eitherIn post 473, MariaR wrote:
I'm slowly turning ok with a ram wagon considering he was aIn post 470, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Also can anyone confirm that's something Ram does on every game?lotmore cocky and less team playerish/excuses like he's trying now I was biting my tongue cause I was just waiting for him to do something but hey.
I'm coming around to Ram and that vote on Nero was bad so I might take back my nero sr
Also, i won't self meta, but why you think i could win power struggle against RC and not get lynched for standing in his way?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Because i have strict anti-lurking policy, also, i have played quite a few games with him and saw him as both alignments, so i want get it out of the way and move on other people, while i have no or just very little past experience with most of other people (Maria and RC would be exception, but i haven't played with sum them tho), also, seems verylazy played with me too, but i have no clue who's alt it is, so i can't use past experienceIn post 476, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Huh?
You're just voting Nero for lurking?
Well tbf i've known Nero for being more active usually, but why arent you voting the people that can actually respond to pressure? Nero's last post on-site was his last post here.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
I'm not saying he's scum, cause lurking, i'm saying i need him to speak to determine which alignment he is. My vote wasn't "hey, Nero is scum", but "Nero, where are you?"In post 480, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:So you say you've seen him as both alignments, have you found him lurking as scum?
Are you even sure he's lurking and not busy IRL?- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
awkward, yes, but it was my way to show how ridiculous my wagon was - a guy with biggest wagon (according to RC he was l-2) looking someone else to take his place under lime light and RC's vote which was more like reaction test than real voteIn post 498, Ventriloquist wrote:
You changed your vote to wilky because Ouroboros called you out for it, you then changed your vote to yourself. It's convenient that it's suddenly a joke that you self voted now, even though others picked up on how awkward it was.In post 459, Ramcius wrote:
Huh? What vote changing you talk about? Open my ISO and tell me what vote changing i've done? I voted Maria in RvS, i voted Wilky, then selfvoted as a joke, that's about it. I just feel like you try get easy lynch and don't like my wagon dissolvingIn post 434, Ventriloquist wrote:My only other scum reads so far were on Ramacius & MWNN, as both were very fickle and kept changing their votes without offering any good reason for doing so. This to me suggests an uneasyness when under pressure in the former case and a desire to please the supposedly protown mascot, Ouroboros in the latter.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
eh, some people have too much free time, you simply could see that RC isn't bringing hell on me as he played with me and was metadiving, alternatively, why would i make such lie instead of just throwing few names as townreads? That was a bold claim and RC/MariaR/Nero would just crucify me, if it was a lieIn post 602, Impossibear wrote:
They asked me a fucking question. I answered it.In post 600, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:So... will this Ego battle end someday?
Since no one else wanted to actually look, I did. I only found the following as far as calling someone town, in a large theme where he replaced in, this was the only post containing a townread, and it was over 60 posts in.In post 470, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Also can anyone confirm that's something Ram does on every game?
Subject: Surreptitious II: Secrets and Misdirection
Subject: Real Folk Blues Rematch [GAME OVER]Ramcius wrote:Gut says Desp town, probably go for Von tbh
Majiffy, i almost have more posts than you and i replaced in, so if that's your only "scumtell" on me, i pitty you, really
Again, over 70 posts in, the first and only townread mentioned.Ramcius wrote:
a) Titus not conf town, but very close to itIn post 4714, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Has Ramcius still been a stick in the mud regarding your conftown status?In post 4669, Titus wrote:
The resistance to conftown for me. Socrates as scum (well the only place I have seen him), he was actually more active than this. I didn't like his outward hostility to me early.In post 4668, Almost50 wrote:@smith/Titus: Let me ask you two.. what makes Ram scummier than ZZZX or Socrates? What have they done (or haven't done) that he didn't (or did)?
b) i don't pushing or trying to interact with Titus at all, it's pointless to do so with her current status, only she wanting my head for some reason
I don't feel like looking more as this seems to be just the way he posts. So... NAI.
ETL- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
i thought we were friends...In post 611, MariaR wrote:Wilky>Ram>??? (this one is hidden)>Nero- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Do i really have to bring cocky Ram out to prove you that i'm town?In post 613, MariaR wrote:
I'm trying this new thing where I have everyone as town until they give me reason otherwise (tbh it's harder then normal) and wellIn post 612, Ramcius wrote:
i thought we were friends...In post 611, MariaR wrote:Wilky>Ram>??? (this one is hidden)>Nero
I thought otherwise
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
i would, but there's hardly anything to engage in your ISOIn post 711, Nero Cain wrote:y aren't you trying to engage me or talk about my content or anything?
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
UNVOTE:In post 722, Nero Cain wrote:
Well its hard to post content with all that lurking that I'm doing.In post 717, Ramcius wrote:
i would, but there's hardly anything to engage in your ISOIn post 711, Nero Cain wrote:y aren't you trying to engage me or talk about my content or anything?
but real talk: That's not true and you know it.
I doubt i can get anything more from you, if no one else is joining me, but i'll keep eye on you- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
i'm saying, both millers and hider must be town, if we have 3 maf + sk, but that makes weak town in a game with 2 KPNIn post 772, wilky wrote:
Who are the two players you are referring to in the bolded part?In post 467, Ramcius wrote:
if i considered sk, i said 14 v 3 v 1, but i doubt sk - 2 millers and hider in closed game with 2 KPN (as you see, i don't consider either of them gambiting scum in this case - i doubt scum would risk such gambit, if there was only 3 of them)
As to why i doubt 5 maf, there's general rule for numbers in game - town = 3xscum + 1, closest number is 13 v 4, adding 5th scum in closed game requires them to be very weak and town godlike.
As to games with similar numbers - Beneath the Mask was 16 v 5, Divergent was 15 v 4 v 1 and we barely won, Kingdom Hearts was 13 v 4
So when someone gives unrealistic number, i wonder if they have no idea about setups or are scum trying fake townslip
The whole fake townslip over numbers is a bullshit argument if I have ever seen one. I mean who said there isn't a 5 man scum team? Just because it's slightly out from the norm doesn't mean it might not be the case. I also get a feeling your posting from a perspective that 100% knows the size of the scum team which doesn't go in your favour for my reads.
And your scum reads aren't subject to change?In post 468, Ramcius wrote:As for TRs, i never give those, unless someone do or say something that makes them locktown in my eyes, otherwise all my TRs are subject to change
Same as above there's not a possibility your scum reads will change later?In post 474, Ramcius wrote:
Then what point of posting townreads, if you going change them later on? If anyone want my TRs, they can just assume people i'm not scumreading are my townreads atmIn post 469, Kaede Akamatsu wrote:Why hide that information? I think anyone's TRs are always subject to change unless they are mod confirmed, yet you dont see them hiding them.
Does it really fucking matter? This might be the worst case of shit flinging I have ever seen in a mafia game.In post 494, Ramcius wrote:So, oldtimers, who can confirm that in past it was norm 5 scum in 18p closed games?
scumreads always can change, but people don't question scumread changes so harsh as they do with townreads
When someone speculates unreasonable numbers, yes, it matters to me, it indicates that person just throwing numbers around without giving a thought to it
VOTE: Wilky
your earlier questions about my opinion on Dave and why he can't be scum in sounded like you asking opinion from town, yet you again pushing my lynch, when people realised i'm town and left my wagon- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
I don't believe there's 3 man scumteam with sk, 3 man scum team with non sk 3p is out of question, i believe it's 4 man mafia and maybe some non sk 3p, or town just got weaker/less PRsIn post 794, wilky wrote:OK, great. Considering there is as much a chance as anything that there is a 3 man scum team with a 3rd party and if there's a 3 man scum team then Ram thinks that none of the claims are scum then why is such a huge chunk of his iso focusing on 1 of the claims being scum? Below is quotes from Ram's iso that insinuate scum in one of the claims. I still get the feeling from Ram's post that he's more in the know than most of the rest of us.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
because losing a member from group of 3 hurts much more than losing a member from group of 4In post 801, wilky wrote:So why is there no chance of scum in the claims in a 3 man scum team but half your iso is about scum in at least 1 claim in a 4 man scum team? Why such a difference with 1 player difference- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
Who you addressing with this? Who is scum speculating setup before town?In post 826, hebichan wrote:
Why are we doing set up spec with no flips?In post 800, Ramcius wrote:
I don't believe there's 3 man scumteam with sk, 3 man scum team with non sk 3p is out of question, i believe it's 4 man mafia and maybe some non sk 3p, or town just got weaker/less PRsIn post 794, wilky wrote:OK, great. Considering there is as much a chance as anything that there is a 3 man scum team with a 3rd party and if there's a 3 man scum team then Ram thinks that none of the claims are scum then why is such a huge chunk of his iso focusing on 1 of the claims being scum? Below is quotes from Ram's iso that insinuate scum in one of the claims. I still get the feeling from Ram's post that he's more in the know than most of the rest of us.
This seems weird, and its something scum try to do before town.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
I don't like this post, it feels like Ank is trying save Vent and preparing for worst case scenario by doing some damage control after Vent will flip redIn post 916, Ankamius wrote:I think a few of Vent's posts after this whole tunnel started were icky, but that's... pretty much it.
I'm against the tunnel because I think it's going to be a net negative for the rest of the game. Scumflips by themselves are useless and could even benefit scum in the worst scenarios.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
So, you think this town is easy to abuse for scum?In post 921, Ankamius wrote:Do I need to show you examples of when I abused an early scumflip to my advantage as scum?
Trust me, that's not even close to a weird statement for me to make.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
What you suggesting then? Flip someone else? Who have enough associations and is scummy enough for it?In post 923, Ankamius wrote:I think day 1 scumlynches are a net negative for town unless they're way ahead of where they're supposed to be relative to the amount of information they have.
This is not that type of situation at all because this Vent-push has drowned out 80% of the game. Even if Vent does flip scum, where does that get us, exactly? Limited information based on associations towards that slot and very little else directly, and less indirect information because this push was brute forced through.
I see you complaining how bad Vent scumflip would be, but i don't see you doing something substantial to change it, do you really need RC permission to push someone else?
Also, little known fact, but you there are other methods to find scums than just rely on postflip associations- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
EBWOPIn post 927, Ramcius wrote:
What you suggesting then? Flip someone else? Who have enough associations and is scummy enough for it?In post 923, Ankamius wrote:I think day 1 scumlynches are a net negative for town unless they're way ahead of where they're supposed to be relative to the amount of information they have.
This is not that type of situation at all because this Vent-push has drowned out 80% of the game. Even if Vent does flip scum, where does that get us, exactly? Limited information based on associations towards that slot and very little else directly, and less indirect information because this push was brute forced through.
I see you complaining how bad Vent scumflip would be, but i don't see you doing something substantial to change it, do you really need RC permission to push someone else?
Also, little known fact, but there are other methods to find scums than just rely on postflip associations- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
let me guess "I don't like main wagon, but i don't know what we should wagon instead and i don't want to push anyone, cause my reads aren't strong" sounds about right then?In post 931, Ankamius wrote:I don't think you actually understand what I'm trying to get at here.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
thing is, you can use any strategy, if you can convince town it's right strategy by giving examples from other gamesIn post 1071, Dunnstral wrote:
That's not something scum says about their partnersIn post 1069, Wraith wrote:Ank's insistence that town should not lynch Vent because "D1 scumlynches are bad" is insanely suspicious.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
is it the world, where all 3 of you are scum and bussed poor Vent, because he's not from your crew?In post 1079, REALMEN ONLY JUNGLE wrote:is this really a world where RC, ETL, and REAL MEN are town?? is it really???
inb4 RC is not town, scumbussing his partner as he usually does and is here to cut our innocent heads off like the evil scum maniac he is- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
nah, i'm good, but i'd like to give you this fine rope, it would look nice on your neckIn post 1082, Ankamius wrote:Oh before I forget
Thanks for falling for the bait, Ramcius. You can hang day three.- Ramcius
-
Ramcius Mafia Scum
- Ramcius
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4126
- Joined: November 22, 2016
I'm listening, i always like good stories, especially from caught scumIn post 1084, Ankamius wrote:Sorry, I'm never getting lynched this game.
Maybe you'll have to shoot me after I find out who the rest of your team is, though. I already have a decent idea who the fourth is. - Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius
- Ramcius