In post 31, Keyser Söze wrote:Are you saying GNB is suspiciously being overly-conscious about being t/read for a townie?
In post 40, Keyser Söze wrote:I don’t think we have played a game together.
In post 41, Irrelephant11 wrote:Oh okay 'cause originally I thought Sesq was just asking you to "please please townread me" in a genuine way
I see now what was meant
In post 39, Irrelephant11 wrote:Wow yay a townread (nsg)
In post 46, Reundo wrote:In post 25, Keyser Söze wrote:
This was a page one question intended to be answered before we enter serious/non-RVS gameplay.
You shouldn’t see it as an attempt to look ‘townie’: it’s as non-alignment indicative as say a player asking if there is scum day chat - why are you being lazy/shortsighted?
What? Asking if there's scum day chat would be an entirely useless question since you can just skim through the role PMs and find the answer yourself. That would actually lean more scum imo since it would seem like a pretty shitty attempt at a dumb-tell. I don't think it would be too unreasonable for someone to town-read you for trying to strike up conversation, or to think it's just a facade by that same reasoning.
In post 58, Irrelephant11 wrote:Oh, I get it. Yeah that was just because I was talking more to Keyser than to you - since he was the one who asked about hypoclaiming
@Keyser did you know what hypoclaiming was when you asked?
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Pedit: how can I write anything gamesolvery when I don’t think a majority of the players have even posted????
In post 60, Irrelephant11 wrote:You seem eager to shut down the few things we have to talk about - there's not a lot else AI yet, and it's not like the game is too long or something, so why shut things down so?
Also, my question is potentially AI. So you didn't know what hypoclaiming was when you asked?
In post 64, Irrelephant11 wrote:I also don't want to discuss whether or not we should hypoclaim
I do want to know whether or not you knew what it was when you asked about it
In post 60, Irrelephant11 wrote:You seem eager to shut down the few things we have to talk about - there's not a lot else AI yet, and it's not like the game is too long or something, so why shut things down so?
In post 66, Irrelephant11 wrote:You seem to think you know why I'm asking this, and suggesting my question is therefore bad. You don't know why I'm asking this, though, clearly, so maybe just let me play how I want to
I know trying to shut down conversations you find unfruitful is something you do as town, but it can still just be really frustrating and unhelpful to those trying to read you through their own methods
Did you know what it was before this game? yes/no is all I need and then I'll explain and we can all move on
In post 74, Irrelephant11 wrote:Yeah that's fair
I'm pretty much over it as much as you are
Talk to me about Dunnstral
In post 88, Sesq wrote:@irrelephant i changed my mind it was less clear in post but i dont like making post edits
@keyser its more complicated than that
In post 91, 2 718281828459 wrote:Reundo's 46 is a little annoying but I like how he looked at everyone.
In post 103, Reundo wrote:I don't believe that you can't do any of the above as town
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Keyser if you haven’t played wih sesq before from what I rmember sesq has a laizefair attitude and tone to their posts and keeps to themself or atleast that’s how I rmember his playstyle looking
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Although to be fair I played scum with them I think the last time I played with them
In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:I think keyser is being a bit stiff on all the sesq stuff
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: northsidegal
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: Sesq
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: 2 718281828459 (replaced Saudade)
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: Keyser Söze
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: Irrelephant11
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: Reundo
In post 118, Sesq wrote:its because i changed my mind but i dont like providing reasons why i scumread people because i find the reactions more interesting
your behavior is really bad but i dont know if its scum bad or town bad. leaning the former
In post 117, Dunnstral wrote:In post 53, GameNBurger wrote:In post 23, Dunnstral wrote:We end up at 4 people alive but 1 person is confirmed town (watcher) or there's a cc
So it's not worse
We have a watcher no matter what and a base 1/3 of finding scum is in fact worse than 1/2 bass chance of finding scum
Unless you’re talking about something else I’m not reading because this doesn’t exactly communicate the idea clearly
I mean it's not worse than a regular game at 3 people alive
----
Keyser I don't think I caught you in the game we played, not sure why you think I should be "taking lead" today eitherKeyser Söze wrote:If Dunnstral flips red I would actually wanna put Irrelephant under closer inspection (i.e ill-timed/ill-formed distancing attempt). Or vice versa. I've enjoyed talking to Irrelephant11 so he's on the green side of null so far.
This is bad preflip stuff and you have to jump to a lot of conclusions to get to this point - also it's not warranted at this time
VOTE: Sesq
This is a good place to put a serious vote
In post 124, Sesq wrote:okay it feels like nobody gets that post which is fine because i could have formatted it better. i said "yeah hes probably town" and the last words were "wait no, i think hes scum." and previously i have seen productive things out of scumreading without explanations so its something i try to use, although devotion to the ideal should be contextual
the main problem i have with his play is that it feels like he is walking into the game with a heavy amount of rigid thinking over what can and cannot be discussed and how things should or should not go. i think this is a scum playstyle because in rigidity you can form solid ideas to build off of that dont require the sort of improvisational fervour one needs as a scumplayer without strategy. that said the goals are seemingly cryptic and i dont really understand them, and it could be a weird fusion of learned behaviors influenced by past results in games, but i havent played with him before so i dont know. feel comfortable on it for now.
In post 122, Dunnstral wrote:I'd rather be weird than scummy
In post 131, Irrelephant11 wrote:Keyser do you think it's true or not that Dunnstral was responding to everything said to/about him?
In post 133, Irrelephant11 wrote:Sure - I just mean the list of things he talked about were all responses to things said to/about him
In post 139, Ausuka wrote:I mean, sometimes people disagree on what's AI, I don't think that makes 2.718 scum.
In post 182, 2 718281828459 wrote:I see nothing that is worth my attention.
In post 181, Sesq wrote:by "detached" i meant that his rigidity was detached, its like he wasnt really thinking but just banking on his own logic
In post 204, Irrelephant11 wrote:I was looking to start a wagon, and Reundo seemed lynchbait-y enough that some scum might jump on after it had three votes
That didn't happen, so I'm wondering if that makes him scummy (partners avoided him) or if this game is just this game
In post 87, Irrelephant11 wrote:mm I think I want Dunnstral to know he's being scrutinized
he tricked me in lylo last time we played together so prolly he already knows that anyway
In post 215, 2 718281828459 wrote:Can we get some pressure wagons? This game is getting boring.
In post 16, Sesq wrote:please Please townread me
In post 80, Sesq wrote:you're right. if you were scum you would have at least tried to phrase it differently. and you're not new. also; town tries hard to look like town too. so theres that
after reading further its clear (i hope i dont come off as too rude) that keyser is entirely detached from the state of the game ... but not in a scum way. nothing you have said has really made any sense and ive changed my mind. vote stays
In post 88, Sesq wrote:@irrelephant i changed my mind it was less clear in post but i dont like making post edits
@keyser its more complicated than that
In post 96, Sesq wrote:apparently having a nuanced opinion means you're flip flopping
except for the time i did do that. in a post. whats so wrong?
In post 118, Sesq wrote:its because i changed my mind but i dont like providing reasons why i scumread people because i find the reactions more interesting
your behavior is really bad but i dont know if its scum bad or town bad. leaning the former
In post 124, Sesq wrote:the main problem i have with his play is that it feels like he is walking into the game with a heavy amount of rigid thinking over what can and cannot be discussed and how things should or should not go. i think this is a scum playstyle because in rigidity you can form solid ideas to build off of that dont require the sort of improvisational fervour one needs as a scumplayer without strategy. that said the goals are seemingly cryptic and i dont really understand them, and it could be a weird fusion of learned behaviors influenced by past results in games, but i havent played with him before so i dont know. feel comfortable on it for now.
In post 135, Sesq wrote:@irrelephant it's not JUST the "stop talking about it" thing, it's the general amount of rigidity. but if this behavior is cohesive with what you've previously seen from him, s' enough for me
UNVOTE:
In post 359, Irrelephant11 wrote:I’ll vote Sesq if that’s the lynch
In post 114, Keyser Söze wrote:HI GNB, just trying to put together the two following statements in my head:In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Keyser if you haven’t played wih sesq before from what I rmember sesq has a laizefair attitude and tone to their posts and keeps to themself or atleast that’s how I rmember his playstyle lookingIn post 55, GameNBurger wrote:Although to be fair I played scum with them I think the last time I played with them
Have you played with town-sesq displaying the same "laizefair attitude and tone"/"keeps to themselves" or was that just scum-sesq?
Or are you saying his playstyle is not indicative of alignment...?
Didn't quite understand your 'defence' of him... if you agree he is indeed showing signs of his scum-meta.In post 55, GameNBurger wrote:I think keyser is being a bit stiff on all the sesq stuff
In your previous games with him, or this current game: do you think it would be rational to expect for a townie to be "stiff" in reaction to sesq's posts?
In post 387, Reundo wrote:Sesq isn't a terrible lynch, but the way it built up didn't make much sense either. It seemed mostly based on their play here not lining up with their town meta, which sort of makes sense but unless their play here is similar to their scum game it might just be NAI. A lot of players have talked about their lack of motivation in this game, and it's debatable how much of this is genuine or just an excuse but it's wide-spread enough to where I can see Sesq just not being at their A-game this game. Just looking at this game specifically, I'm struggling to see a definite scum agenda to their play. I'm annoyed by their limited scum-reads and coasting behavior, but at the same time they clearly don't care about the impression they give off and they're not super motivated to start a counter-wagon, even going as far as to town-read volxen. It almost feels like they're playing to get lynched in some aspects, which honestly does make some sense as a scum play-style, but I'm kind of iffy on it.
In post 373, Sesq wrote:i am going to create a very unexpected wagon that nobody will expect
In post 414, Huntress wrote:Why was the fact that Reundo joined in the conversation in his first post such a problem for you? You asked him a couple of questions which seemed reasonable enough, then after realising it had been his first post you voted him - for that? Before he had a chance to answer you.
In post 414, Huntress wrote:Why did him not having "charged feelings", after just two pages, frustrate/intrigue you? Why did his second post seem "lazy" to you?
In post 414, Huntress wrote:And no; if you'd just talked about hypo-claiming and the setup for the first 10 pages you would definitely have attracted attention.
In post 425, Eragon wrote:Does the last sentence feel forced to anyone else, or am i just mis-interpreting it?
"in the end, i realized i was the person to blame for all this mess" feels forced, like "i accept responsibility but in the most silver-tongued way possible"
"he is no longer a threat but a teammate" like, ive actually never seen anyone say this. "he isnt a threat now, hes a teammate"
i could be reading much to deep/wrong/could just be how keyser posts.
In post 397, Dunnstral wrote:In post 392, Reundo wrote:You also alluded to volxen being a town-read earlier -- has your opinion changed since then?
Kind of a townread yeah, I think more importantly for me is that I didn't like the way his wagon built up (after you, there is no discussion and people aren't able to explain what it is they actually agree with)
In post 119, Reundo wrote:volxen - His post-RVS introduction was pretty pointless and actually did nothing to add to the discussion. I get I might be kind of a hypocrite since similar things have been said about my introduction, but it seems even more exaggerated in that the distance between the post he was responding to and his actual post number were literally pages apart and that all he said was basically just paraphrasing what northsidegal said. A lean scum for me.
In post 220, Reundo wrote:I don't really understand the town-reads of volxen. Everything he's posted seems like surface-level scum-hunting based mostly around points that have already been brought up by others, and as a whole it seems like he's much more interested in garnering why player X scum-reads player Y than providing scum-reads of his own. I'm more worried about him than 2.718 at the moment.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: volxen
In post 387, Reundo wrote:I don't really understand why the volxen wagon died down the way it did. The only town points he got was from northsidegal for being contradictory, and while I can sort of see where northsidegal is coming from it doesn't feel like a particularly strong town-read, and the contradictions run much deeper than mere activity. Looking back on it, post #254 is a lot more petty than I realized. I could see why some of the posts volxen mentioned could be viewed as active lurking, but to not put any more thought into players than "oh, they're active lurking, they're probably scum" is incredibly lazy and narrow-minded. It actually feels like he's afraid of contradicting himself, as if scum-reading someone for doing X means he also has to scum-read everyone who does X, and I'm struggling to see how town can be so close-minded. He gives himself a lot of town points for "having reads and trying to game solve" while completely ignoring that 2.718 made an entire reads list, and the least he could've done was acknowledge that fact and explain why 2.718's reads list was lazy/active-lurking/whatever instead of trying to sweep it under the rug and hope no one notices.
His recent trajectory isn't much better either. 2.718 seemed to be his biggest scum-read, but when northsidegal started town-reading him volxen didn't even bat an eye or seem to care at all really, not even an acknowledgement akin to "well, I guess you have a point on 2.178", and he seemed too eager to hop onto a counter wagon as soon as the opportunity opened up. He also said he was going to update his readslist tomorrow on Friday, and he still hasn't followed up on it. On one hand I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt and assume he was busier than he intended, and I ended up posting later than I meant to once as well, but part of me feels he's just not bothering anymore because the pressure's been shifted to Sesq instead.
Sesq isn't a terrible lynch, but the way it built up didn't make much sense either. It seemed mostly based on their play here not lining up with their town meta, which sort of makes sense but unless their play here is similar to their scum game it might just be NAI. A lot of players have talked about their lack of motivation in this game, and it's debatable how much of this is genuine or just an excuse but it's wide-spread enough to where I can see Sesq just not being at their A-game this game. Just looking at this game specifically, I'm struggling to see a definite scum agenda to their play. I'm annoyed by their limited scum-reads and coasting behavior, but at the same time they clearly don't care about the impression they give off and they're not super motivated to start a counter-wagon, even going as far as to town-read volxen. It almost feels like they're playing to get lynched in some aspects, which honestly does make some sense as a scum play-style, but I'm kind of iffy on it.
Volxen is still my preferred lynch today. I'm not too opposed to a sesq lynch but I have a lot more reservations about it compared to volxen. Toranga/Dunn are my weakest nulls right now, so I probably won't cry a river over their lynches either, but volxen makes the most sense to me right now tbh.
In post 166, Toranaga wrote:volxen/sesq/271 all fine lynches
In post 168, Toranaga wrote:do you think it's beneficial or necessary to talk about things that you clearly don't think are alignment indicative?
In post 190, Toranaga wrote:keyser, idk man, I lost interest with this game cause nobody is playing it
half the slots are scummy so idek where to vote
In post 402, Toranaga wrote:VOTE: volxen
volxen made a lot of scumsplaining and description posts that added no leans and didn't help the game move forward. I think he has a bigger chance of being scum than sesq who is probably kind of... incoherent? regardless of what they rand.
In post 542, Toranaga wrote:in before "HE IS TW'S PARTNUR"
In post 541, Toranaga wrote:also maybe don't lynch inside volxen's wagon if you can avoid it today thx
game is easy bros. just don't do hero reads like me and TW this gameday and lynch inside an actual smart POE for today. not volxen's voters unless you wanna lynch sesq.
In post 549, Dunnstral wrote:Don't think it's Tornaga, think we should be taking a second look at Ausuka
In post 554, Reundo wrote:So, I was planning on casing Keyser, but then he started open wolfing even more than usual, so nvm on that.
VOTE: Keyser Söze
In post 555, the worst wrote:In post 547, Keyser Söze wrote:
@The worst
What is your game history with Taranaga?
Would scum-Taranaga prefer if you buddied up with each other.. and kept in your periphery?
literally 2 weeks? ago we worked crazy well together as r/t in a large theme so I did make a mental note to suss his entrance for possible pocketing but also it'd be a fairly crazy ballsy move from scumanaga at this point so I think it was literally just happy town
In post 568, the worst wrote:slot was obvtown
In post 562, the worst wrote:I have pretty high expectations for town!Tora rn so take that how you will
In post 592, Reundo wrote:Spoiler: My Case On Keyser Söze
In post 603, Dunnstral wrote:My case on Ausuka is that he voted Volxen then switched over to Sesq when that became a thing then switched back to volxen when that was happening, and I remember their votes being pretty bad at the time
In post 642, Irrelephant11 wrote:Eh it was fun but I don't think it's both of them
Keyser's interactions with volxen are pretty scummy on re-read. I can't get over how Keyser defended Sesq, though (ultimately resulting in volxen's lynch, though not directly). Unless both of them are scum?
tw looks bad for his "yes please do scumcase Keyser and hold my hand through it" as well as TMI'ing volxen's flip, but by EOD it did seem pretty obvious we'd caught scum - I was gonna hammer, I felt sure enough - so this might be nothing. GNB was pretty scummy, though.
The reason I don't think it's both is mainly how GNB/Keyser/volxen would have had to have a LOT of scum theater when it would be much easier/townier looking to keep each other at a more average distance. Maybe their pre-game plan was to have Keyser ask about hypoclaiming, let GNB explain (incorrectly), and then move forward together with some towncred, but if it was planned it was executed really terribly, so I doubt it was planned
I don't have any strong scumreads but I have enough townreads and enough confidence that we can keep up yesterday's momentum that I'm not worried about it yet
In post 666, Toranaga wrote:instead of trying to lynch the people who dunked on scum yesterday, just look at other slots. just today. it's day 2. look at ausuka's vote movement, it's scummy. I have no reason to townread anything she said today either. NSG is probably scum as well.
In post 239, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: volxen
In post 345, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: sesq
Probably a decent vote tbh my tr on them kind of feels like it was probably an inaccurate shitread.
In post 691, Ausuka wrote:Not gonna invest much time defending myself since I'm not enjoying this game at all. Tor doesn't do this as town, take up his offer and lynch him day 3. Make tw out his tell today, lynch him d4 if it's horrible, otherwise go Dunn I think.
In post 725, Nauci wrote:Not even remotely caught up (I'm at like post 52) but VOTE: Keyser Söze until I'm done because like dayum
In post 715, Ausuka wrote:Keyser just likes sheeping confident people I guess. Still think he's town.
In post 766, Ausuka wrote:In post 729, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 715, Ausuka wrote:Keyser just likes sheeping confident people I guess. Still think he's town.
My bad, I honestly just wanted the ammunition from your flip to gain clarity with my scum read of Toranaga (if that makes sense). I know this sounds anti-town, but it made sense in my head when I voted you.
But if he's scum can't you like
lynch him
instead of lynching somebody else to prove a point who you apparently don't really scumread
In post 735, northsidegal wrote:@keyser soze, what's your game experience with huntress like?
In post 885, Eragon wrote:Bye
In post 882, Toranaga wrote:ausuka looks horrible if sesq is town, that's why I wanted to kill her after d1
I'm not reading too much into ausuka's posting
re: NSG. IDK. I don't like her initial posts. she spends a lot of time talking about irrelevant stuff and feels like busywork to me. otoh I have seen her towngame and I think she does try too hard to look at every minor thing and has a bunch of her own ideas about mafia that I don't necessarily agree with, so there's definitely an element of our styles and the way we view the whole thing being way too different for me to actively enjoy her posting. I don't understand why she'd get so focused on GNB preemptively bothered with being townread for trying too hard. I don't think she really did anything otherwise? didn't push the game in any direction and is just a nonpresence really, since I got here. So IDK. I'd kill eventually, idc.
also I'm on the 3rd linkin park song now
In post 508, volxen wrote:I don't really have any time to elaborate before the deadline, but I do think Reundo may possibly be scum. I really didn't like his entrance to the game and the way he attacked Keyser right off the bat, and I think the way he is playing this game is very opportunistic.
In post 935, Eragon wrote:
also what i mean by this is that this post is super scummy.
first off, it came pretty much directly after Nauci explained their SR, and showed they had a p.strong SR on Keyser, so this is taken as an OMGUS.
on top of the fact that its "I had thought you were town until you SR me, well, now time to take another look"
Id bet a thousand bucks keyser is/was going to end up "Casing" Nauci and Scumreading them.
"I hope you catch up with everyone because im not responding to your case before you have"
Why does it matter where they are in the thread? someone can SR you for things you did D1, and you dont have to be fully caught up to have thoughts/a SR.
In post 940, Eragon wrote:eh i feel less confident on it i just saw posts that pinged me.
before i was willing to pass it off to playstyle(as you could see i had him in my town block) but that was just because ive never played with him and you said its his style.
but then after that wolfy OMGUS thingy i just cant pass that off to playstyle
Im confident in Nauci, but probably my weakest towncore
im like, 85% postive i dont have scum in my town core
BYE
In post 945, Irrelephant11 wrote:He just recently voted Ausuka at my urging
In post 685, Keyser Söze wrote:VOTE: Ausuka
Reason: “for being sloppy scum and shamefully jumping off her partner’s wagon to push a viable counter wagon, to then jump off that wagon, and return to her partner’s wagon in a desperate attempt at towncred/bussing.”
This vote feels dirty.
In post 950, Irrelephant11 wrote:yeah I'm actually pretty interested in a Nauci flip
In post 952, Irrelephant11 wrote:??
I have no answer atm. Why do you ask?
In post 960, Dunnstral wrote:I started rethinking Ausuka on recent postings
I think I'd prefer to get Keyser Soze and I think he's been kind of awkward around the Ausuka vs Me Dynamic
In post 984, Nauci wrote:Quick and dirty reads list before I head into the 600s
Skitter Tier:
Reundo - Bellaphant of the ball
nsg - this is so outside of scumsg range and definitely in burned-out-townsg range
You know what? You's alright:
Toranga
Eragon
Ausuka
Wouldn’t bet on these:
Dunnstral
The worst
Naughty little boys and well actually just boys:
Keyser
Irrelephant
In post 1059, Irrelephant11 wrote:mm swap keyser and the worst, the evidence mounting on keyser from many slots is a lot
Sorry keyser I'm enjoying your presence but I think you have high scum equity
In post 1091, Toranaga wrote:ok, real talk
anyone scumreading dunnstral needs to read him shading the volxen wagon when it was L-2 and actually pushing people who voted there. is this in his scum range? because this is objectively towny. a player's first instinct while watching a wolf team mate go down, is to distance themselves from it. universally. dunn is not only not doing that, but actively pushing people with good reasoning behind it. this does not seem like he knows volxen is scum at all.Spoiler:
In post 1099, Eragon wrote:Spoiler:
In post 2322, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 2170, Nauci wrote:Spoiler: Mathdino Case on The Worst in Open 719
Well since I am having a little trouble deciding how to feel about The Worst refusing to respond to any of my questions (any of anyone's questions?), I went to look up a little wisdom. We all are sad Math isn't here and think he's pretty good at reading The Worst, Not_Mafia, and more, right? So here's Math's posts casing TW from our game. And some quotes from TW on his own scum play from somewhere else.
I'll let y'all decide for yourselves if this stuff applies here because I don't want to confbias, I only want to provide evidence. I have to go find some The Town games but preferably when it's not 6 AM.
This does sound awfully familiar.
@the worst - is Nauci's fear rational?
In your own words, what is scum!TW?
In post 1153, Dunnstral wrote:Can somebody remind me why we need me specifically to post more in this game? I don't think I caught that
In post 1142, northsidegal wrote:Spoiler: rude comment inside, i apologize in advance
In post 1170, Nauci wrote:In post 1166, Keyser Söze wrote:
My tone was semi serious: but tbh Sesq on D1 gives me enough reason to not lynch you today.
D2, your slot has been focused on killing townies. I just think you need to re-evaluate the playerlist.
It's disappointing how little you've engaged with all of the content from the last 5+ pages (while asking others to contribute more).
In post 1170, Nauci wrote:all the content from the last 5+ pages
In post 1188, Eragon wrote:because most of the reasons are more like, post thoughts and tonal reads? along with a bit of playstyle maybe?
In post 1185, Eragon wrote:ahh, the self-deprecation, always the distancing from yourself being scum, because scum isnt likely to point out where they did bad
In post 1194, the worst wrote:any plans for the weekend KeySö?
In post 1195, Toranaga wrote:In post 1192, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 1185, Eragon wrote:ahh, the self-deprecation, always the distancing from yourself being scum, because scum isnt likely to point out where they did bad
FTR: "self-deprecation" doesn't just come from scum.
It is very common for honest townies on mafiascum to be critical of their own game
lol no it's not
if people were critical of their own games town winrate would skyrocket here
In post 830, Irrelephant11 wrote:I re-examined how the sesq wagon came about in response to the first volxen wagon
New reads:
Eragon
Reundo
Keyser Söze
Ausuka
Toranaga
Nauci
the worst
northsidegal
Dunnstral
In post 1153, Dunnstral wrote:Can somebody remind me why we need me specifically to post more in this game? I don't think I caught that
In post 1223, northsidegal wrote:In post 1176, Keyser Söze wrote:Dunnstral:
- defends scum
- opposes wagon on scum
- attacks town
- encourages wagon on town
- not motivated (or happy to be seen to not be motivated) about scum hunting
- no pro-active urgency demonstrated while being the lead wagon today
- weak ISO
- zero town cred won from D1 (Volxen bud was there for the taking)
- zero motivation to gain town cred for D2
- Lame OMGUS read
- minimal WIM
Tora opened up my eyes to town read him via WIFOM.
Scum-Dunstral would never survive to LYLO playing like this.
Proof of the pudding: he’s been in nearly everybody’s POE today, and likely some people will even want to kickstart his wagon before the deadline.
like that same viewpoint is reflected here and in my opinion it's entirely counterintuitive - you're recognizing a lot of reasons for why dunnstral is scum and then coming to the conclusion that "no way would he make it that obvious if he were scum"
and to that i would say
sometimes maybe you should keep it simple and see what happens
In post 1260, Dunnstral wrote:And I was obvious town in team mafia I think, unless I'm misremembering
In post 1231, Eragon wrote:TOWN CORE
-Eragon
-Irrelephant11
-Toranaga
-Nauci
-the worst
Town based on what other people said
-Reundo
PoE Bracket
-Ausuka
-northsidegal
-Keyser Söze
-Dunnstral
Probably the town
-Ausuka
probably the scum(yes i know theres three of them but i could see them all flipping scum, but i know one of them wont, i just dont know which)
-NSG
-keyser soze
-dunnstral
these are all in order of strength from top to bottom.
So Irrelpephant is my strongest TR(other than me)
and TW is my weakest Town circle(still like 90% positive hes town tho)
Reundo is in his own category because i havent seen him do anything at all today and im just going based off what others say
Ausuka is my weakest SR
While Dunn is my strongest, although its very very close between him/keyser/NSG and i am happy to go any way
In post 1252, Toranaga wrote:I'll maintain that both wolves are in ausuka/nsg/dunn and if we kill all of them we win the game most of the time
if you wanna lynch dunn this gameday, I'm not gonna stop you.
In post 1293, Eragon wrote:IMO we Lynch Dunn > Keyser > NSG/Ausuka > NSG/Ausuka and thats a wrap.
In post 1305, Eragon wrote:So lynching Keyser should end the game
In post 1153, Dunnstral wrote:Can somebody remind me why we need me specifically to post more in this game? I don't think I caught that
In post 1325, Ausuka wrote:I agree that volxen was bussed. Kinda want to hear what you think about who tho :/ I guess you don't really have many reads. How would you feel about lynching Eragon?
In post 509, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.19 - FINAL
volxen (6) - Reundo 220, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224, Toranaga 402, the worst 406, Ausuka 408
Sesq (3) - Dunnstral 117, northsidegal 307, volxen 330
Keyser Söze (1) - Huntress 393
Toranaga (1) - Irrelephant 255
Huntress (1) - Eragon 194
Not voting: N/A
A lynch has been achieved!
In post 406, the worst wrote:I'm down. righteous af flashwagon
VOTE: volxen
anyone who doesn't vote volxen in their next post is scum with him tbqh
In post 491, Eragon wrote:Literally the only play is to kill volxen.
If we lynch him and he’s watcher, then someone else takes his place and we get their results N1
If we lynch him and he’s scum, GREAT!
If we don’t lynch him and he’s watcher, and he’s town, he dies tonight and we don’t get results for N1
If we don’t lynch him and he’s scum, we’ll then we lynch him tommorow, which is a day later than we should