idk if your "1" is really that big tbhIn post 33, Espeonage wrote:I give it a big fat 1.
SUPP 2017 MAFIA: COMPLETE
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
my role is wang swinger
i can check one person each day
at night I can target someone and swing my wang at them - whoever's is smaller diesI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
anyway help me sort the bolded players who I haven't played with in a while/ever
1. TehBrawlGuy
2. Taly
3. Punreader
4. MariaR
5. DeasVail
6. Espeonage
7. Dunnstral
8. ActionDan
9. the worst
10. TwoInAMillion
11. Shoshin
12. Fire Assassin
13. ReubenWasFine
14. Chara
15. Srceenplay
16. Vaxkiller
17. PenguinPower
18. NicoRobinI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
it means don't get too cockyIn post 41, Vaxkiller wrote:
and you have no idea waht that means?In post 36, TehBrawlGuy wrote:at night I can target someone and swing my wang at them - whoever's is smaller diesI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
yeah don't you remem-In post 55, Punreader wrote:
You've played with me? This is news to me.In post 37, TehBrawlGuy wrote:anyway help me sort the bolded players who I haven't played with in a while/ever
3. Punreader
fuckIn post 55, Punreader wrote:
I should clarify I am not in factIn post 51, Chara wrote:regarding Cheet's roleclaimthe scummerCheetory.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
i'm pretty sure that's not what nico's doing, but there is something to be said for attempting to pseudolynch today instead of going into d2 mostly blind, especially since the mafia are likely to give themselves decent numbersI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
disagree that pun's claim should be viewed as towny - BP is a very easy falseclaim to make, especially conditional where nobody can shoot safely to check it. I still read him as Town on tone, but I think giving him townpoints for the claim is bad logic.In post 80, Taly wrote:2)TehBrawlGuy, where's your head at? D: You posted but I don't know what to conclude from it.
espeonage town tone
fire scums
maria town for 126/127
@dunn and espeonage: do you just need him to be higher/lower than an average, or a certain mark? because we as a town could give him all 0s or all 10s to guarantee one of you gets the powerI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 199, Taly wrote: Also:
Tonereads without meta or defined reasoning does not look like strong logic to me, either.TehBrawlGuy wrote:disagree that pun's claim should be viewed as towny - BP is a very easy falseclaim to make, especially conditional where nobody can shoot safely to check it. I still read him as Town on tone, but I think giving him townpoints for the claim is bad logic.
And if the claim shouldn't be viewed as towny - which is not the sole reason of my townread there at this point - then what's your take on it?
I get the point you're trying to make here, but it's an awful strawman to say that a tone read, which is explicitly a non-logical gut based reaction "isn't strong logic". It's not strong /or/ weak logic because it's inherently on a different axis. It's like going to a restaurant and complaining they don't serve good Chinese food there. Solid complaint at a Chinese place, but pretty misleading if you went to an Italian one.
My take on it, as is my take on most early claims, is that I don't really care. I could give you 5 reasons town!pun makes that claim and 5 reasons scum!pun makes it, but it's all baseless speculation.
From my experience, people like to read roles and claims a lot more than players (see also: some of the chatter on espe/dunn), and it's a mistake early in the game. Shelve the claims, develop reads on actual play.
That's just a mislynch though? I don't get why you're opposed to this. Yes, if we hit the wrong target, someone Town dies, because that's how lynches work - and we're not usually shy about lynching. I've been thinking about it more, and I'm strongly in favor of having two pseudo-lynches today. If we don't do that, I'd bet dollars to donuts Scum rank people weirdly to fuck with the numbers behind the scenes. The reasons for doing it to save another scummate are clear, but they also benefit from keeping someone Town alive who should've died to the ranking, because they'll enter D2 as mislynch bait.In post 199, Taly wrote: Ehhh... I have reservations of literally pointing out someone and all of us collectively give them 0s. If they're town, that's basically a free sacrifice for scum.
In other news, Vax's recent prodge post bothers me. It's jokingly LAMIST, so you can't call it out as being LAMIST, but writing it that way obscures natural tone completely which is beneficial mainly if he's Scum. Also, generally, I feel like I see Scum make longer prodge posts rather than just posting "prodge" or w/e because they're afraid of being called out.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I'll probably make a longer post later but here are my brief thoughts:
lmao @ vax wanting to kill me for the wang claim - I'm not even mad, it's too funny. Vax is probably Town because I think that's a crazy push for Scum to make.
I definitely see resisting the pseudolynch as a ProScum play - PP and Taly both get shade for this.
Chara's townread on me doesn't seem genuine - they've given themselves an "out" to it every time they've posted and I find it weird that I've consistently sat at lukewarm town without moving.
previewedit: PP's last post makes me feel that PP v Taly is not TvT. Dunno which one is the Scum yet, though. I'll catch that on re-read.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Fire: pings me, but I can't tell if that's because badtown or scum. I'm leaning badtown.In post 235, Taly wrote:
Meh... Do you have a read on their play, then?In post 211, TehBrawlGuy wrote:My take on it, as is my take on most early claims, is that I don't really care. I could give you 5 reasons town!pun makes that claim and 5 reasons scum!pun makes it, but it's all baseless speculation.
From my experience, people like to read roles and claims a lot more than players (see also: some of the chatter on espe/dunn), and it's a mistake early in the game. Shelve the claims, develop reads on actual play.
I just don't get tonereads, as in, I'm not someone who uses tone to gamesolve, usually.
I'm very case-style, and that doesn't merge too well with current site-meta.
I'm having second thoughts onFire. I didn't like that they minimized me trying to interact with them. I can't tell if he was playstyle clashing with me or overtly trying to dismiss me. He could've easily responded to my points, and instead he found reasons to state that I wasn't oriented to gamesolving. 84 - 87 and 88
I also don't know what to think aboutEspeandDunn'sclaims at the moment. I don't have a strong read on either of them, and coincidentally, I'm leaning to the suspicion side forVaxandFire.
Vaxbecause he's just drifting in the game and fluffposting; like an active lurker.
Firebecause I'm afraid I'm townreading scum, and he would be the first person I'd rethink.
If I had to number based off reads, I'd put them all near mid-range, but I don't think that's optimal.
How do you feel about these 4?
I'd rather not mislynch at all. If I were going to put someone at a 0 as a scumread, I'd be weary on whether everyone's doing it or not.In post 211, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
That's just a mislynch though? I don't get why you're opposed to this. Yes, if we hit the wrong target, someone Town dies, because that's how lynches work - and we're not usually shy about lynching. I've been thinking about it more, and I'm strongly in favor of having two pseudo-lynches today. If we don't do that, I'd bet dollars to donuts Scum rank people weirdly to fuck with the numbers behind the scenes. The reasons for doing it to save another scummate are clear, but they also benefit from keeping someone Town alive who should've died to the ranking, because they'll enter D2 as mislynch bait.In post 199, Taly wrote: Ehhh... I have reservations of literally pointing out someone and all of us collectively give them 0s. If they're town, that's basically a free sacrifice for scum.
Is there anyone that has warranted a 0 from you, yet?
Espe: Has been pretty content to talk a lot about his role and the mechanics, but hasn't chimed in on much else. I consider focusing on that kind of role-centric discussion and avoiding giving any stances a pretty universal scumtell.
Dunn: Not a lot to go on, but seems genuine in the content he has. town lean
Vax: Town, as stated in my last post.
I get that you'd rather not mislynch, but surely you see that putting the two upcoming deaths in Town's hands completely is better than leaving it influenced by Scum? We should all just agree to 0 the top two vote getters for today. I'm willing to go on record agreeing to it now. I'll 0 the two top vote getters today.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Re-read PP and I don't see anything that jumps out to me as particularly scummy, and I'm not going to re-read all of Taly's posts. I still think it's not TvT though.
I suppose if I'm going to endorse pseudolynches I should vote. VOTE: espe.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I'm pretty confused how you think " I still read him as Town on tone, but I think giving him townpoints for the claim is bad logic." is vague and non-committal. It literally contains the phrase "I still read him as Town".
Scum can fuck with the numbers by giving one generally-seen-as-scummy person high numbers, for one. Say that by the end of the day, I'm generally suspected. If I'm Scum, then obviously my mates will rank me highly to prevent me from dying. If I'm Town, then they can still do that so people ask "How did Brawl live?" at the start of D2. People keep talking about "catching scum" via the rankings, but the voting is all private, so there's not any way to actually do that. Unless they're careless and make a shitty fake ranking instead of a buyable one, there's not really any way for us to catch them doing anything.
This is a pretty big misrep, especially the part in bold. If I strongly believe that pseudolynching is in the Town's favor, then naturally, I think Scum would want to push against it, because it's to their advantage if we don't pseudolynch.In post 307, DeasVail wrote: Not only this, but in 285, he implies that those who disagree with the pseudolynch idea are scum because pseudolynching is pro-townbecause he said so and isn't listening to what other people might have to say about it.
I've given you the mechanical reasons why pseudolynching is good. It's not like I just came off my mountain to preach it for no reason. Implying that I'm not listening to what anyone else says about it is disingenuous, especially when the primary arguments in rebuttal have been fairly weak, such as "we'll (somehow) catch scum in rankings!" and "i don't want to mislynch townies".I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
someone who isn't me, give me your thoughts on 307
I feel like it's pretty blatantly misreppy with the things I addressed in my last post, and that pings me pretty hard, but there's an amount of internal frustration/omgus there that makes biased. I'm trying to sort if this is town!dv getting overeager and viewing all my posts under his own tinted lens, or if it's scum!dv just trying to bury me
I'm leaning towards the first, but I'd like an outside opinionI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Or you could stop being condescending in giant text? Seriously, it's obnoxious, and I'm already sick of you doing it.
I don't get what the issue is with using terminology if it helps convey meaning. It's not like this is a newbie game. You all know what it meansI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
is this a towntell for taly or something?In post 315, the worst wrote:yeah okay fine Taly is probably town whatever
give me your thoughts on 307 and 308I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I sincerely don't understand what you're trying to get at with this. Clarify?In post 318, Taly wrote:
Is this your way of trying to downplay my intentions, again?In post 314, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Or you could stop being condescending in giant text? Seriously, it's obnoxious, and I'm already sick of you doing it.
I don't get what the issue is with using terminology if it helps convey meaning. It's not like this is a newbie game. You all know what it meansI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
sorry, 307 & 309In post 321, the worst wrote:
1) going by the last few pages he's more likely to be town than he usually is yeahIn post 319, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
is this a towntell for taly or something?In post 315, the worst wrote:yeah okay fine Taly is probably town whatever
give me your thoughts on 307 and 308
2) what about 307/308?
specifically w/r/t how much I feel like DV misreps me in 307 for his points that I talk about in 309. I don't really have a problem with his other points - the first half of his post is fine.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
(i'm going to do this as a string of posts instead of a wall because walls suck)
Asking me whether or not I "know for a fact" in Mafia is pretty unreasonable. Almost nothing is ever known for a fact in this game.In post 324, Taly wrote:In post 285, TehBrawlGuy wrote:lmao @ vax wanting to kill me for the wang claim - I'm not even mad, it's too funny. Vax is probably Town because I think that's a crazy push for Scum to make.1)You sayVaxis town, but instead of telling him why his push on you is wrong, you laugh at his reasons. Disingenuous and clearly not oriented into gamesolving.
2)Your reason for his push being bad is that it's crazy for scum to push it? What? It just sounds like you're injecting your own bias to strengthen your means of discrediting him.
Do you know for a fact scum would be crazy to push you? Because you're pretty blatantly anti-town with the reason posts.
IDK if it's a reading comprehension failure here or a strawman, but I never said Scum would be crazy to push me. I think Scum would be crazy to push meon the basis of the wang claimand I think I said that pretty clearly.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Here?In post 324, Taly wrote:
At what point have I EVER gone with the idea that a psuedolynch option is bad? What the hell? I've been voting and ranking and giving suggestions of how town should work together, and this comment heavily implies you're not even listening to it.
In the next post you do say that you're "down for voting and ranking", but the above quote seems to imply that you're not down to actually pseudolynch based on the results, does it not?In post 199, Taly wrote:
Ehhh... I have reservations of literally pointing out someone and all of us collectively give them 0s. If they're town, that's basically a free sacrifice for scum.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 324, Taly wrote: If you think using poorly-defined buzzwords ... accurately display your thought process ...then you need to rethink your approach here, critically.
Oh, I see, using terminology is bad, but using WIFOM (incorrectly, I might add) in theIn post 324, Taly wrote: Must be great to cast as much WIFOM as possible for you, right? Helps that scum-wincon.same postis cool?
OK, good, I'm gla-In post 324, Taly wrote: Being condescending is the last thing I'm intending right nowoh
I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I feel like you don't get the point I'm making.In post 325, Taly wrote: How do I know scum doesn't want to give someone an all 0?
And why are you voting based on who gets votes by others? What if it was one of your poorly articulated townreads? Your posting is noncomittal and easy to flow with.
Say at the end of the day, the players that are generally suspected are A, B, and C, and each gets very low ranking points. If they're close enough, Scum can decide which of the three they want to save, and give that player higher ranking points, thereby choosing which set of {A, B} {B, C} {A, C} dies and flips. Hell, if the field's close enough, they could boost all three, and we might see a {D, E} flip, which is obviously awful. I would much rather we just all agree, to, say, give {A, C} 0s and ensure they flip. Now do you see why a mass 0-ing limits the power of what Scum can do by coordinating their own rankings? Scum absolutely are going to coordinate amongst themselves - it's naive to think otherwise. That's why we need to coordinate amongst the Town to limit their influence.
I'm ranking based on votes because I feel the loss of personal agency is worth giving votes a tangible value. Votes were worthless before I did that, and now they have a tangible value in controlling my rankings. If more players did that, votes would become more important, and we could use that to scumhunt/gamesolve/whatever. Enough players do it, and we have a psuedolynch.
Also, there's no reason to call my townreads "poorly articulated" there unless you're trying to be condescending or grandstand, and neither is helpful or necessary.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 339, Dunnstral wrote:
So Why espeonage?In post 306, TehBrawlGuy wrote:Re-read PP and I don't see anything that jumps out to me as particularly scummy, and I'm not going to re-read all of Taly's posts. I still think it's not TvT though.
I suppose if I'm going to endorse pseudolynches I should vote. VOTE: espe.
Did you miss this or did you want more clarification?In post 305, TehBrawlGuy wrote: Espe: Has been pretty content to talk a lot about his role and the mechanics, but hasn't chimed in on much else. I consider focusing on that kind of role-centric discussion and avoiding giving any stances a pretty universal scumtell.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
actually, Dunn, you can add this on to thatIn post 349, Espeonage wrote: DV's case feels like the only decent thing in the thread, but my support of that will get taken with a grain of salt because the slot just 'voted' for me.
town!espe acknowledges that I'm voting him, but votes me/pushes me/does anything other than vaguely support DV, because I'm apparently his top scumread
scum!espe is more concerned with not rocking the boat and seeming OMGUS-y, and doesn't want to disrupt or interject into DV's case on me in the hopes it'll gain traction more organicallyI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
who is then? Reuban?In post 353, Espeonage wrote:You are not my top scumread. ?_?I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 360, Chara wrote:
this. Brawl's posts make me want to townread him on gut but his stance of Penguin/Taly just doesn't make sense to me.In post 325, Taly wrote:You reread, and then weakly, weakly say that PP isn't scummy. But his post is what made you think this wasn't TvT?
what can you point to that tells you it's not TvT if not someone acting in a way that makes them seem not town?
worst: i know you said you wanted to talk about Taly, but if you like my reasoning, i'm not sure if there's anything more to talk about. :>
he's not locktown, but while i don't agree with everything he says, the points being picked at for Taly-scum don't really resonate with me either.
This is kind of a vague, shitty answer, because my initial read on it was just that the interaction between them felt off in a way that TvT isn't usually.
Going back and looking, this pings me the hardest:
but all the interactions between them seem aggressive, but only just barely, in a way that genuine interactions aren't. I'm having a hard time parsing what the reason for that is, specifically, though. It could be one of them is Scum, and that's why it feels off, it could be both and they're bussing, but I feel reasonably sure that they're not both Town.In post 284, PenguinPower wrote:In post 282, Taly wrote:
Then why are you even bringing up votes? If you think there's no point, you're not adding to the discussion by sayingIn post 280, PenguinPower wrote:
And have no impact, so are worthless.In post 277, Taly wrote:This reads like an excuse.
Nobody's stopping you from voting right now, faux votes are legal."I want this, but we can't have this"
And if you think votes are worthless, I'm voting you, and is it not catching your attention?
I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
oops I fucked up the quote, here it is unfucked
In post 284, PenguinPower wrote:
I said I wanted a system to vote, not the standard voting system. I don't really care that you have voted me since it means naught.In post 282, Taly wrote:
Then why are you even bringing up votes? If you think there's no point, you're not adding to the discussion by sayingIn post 280, PenguinPower wrote:
And have no impact, so are worthless.In post 277, Taly wrote:This reads like an excuse.
Nobody's stopping you from voting right now, faux votes are legal."I want this, but we can't have this"
And if you think votes are worthless, I'm voting you, and is it not catching your attention?
I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
y thoIn post 374, MariaR wrote:
giving this guy a 0 as his death gives me info I want andIn post 373, TehBrawlGuy wrote:In post 360, Chara wrote:
this. Brawl's posts make me want to townread him on gut but his stance of Penguin/Taly just doesn't make sense to me.In post 325, Taly wrote:You reread, and then weakly, weakly say that PP isn't scummy. But his post is what made you think this wasn't TvT?
what can you point to that tells you it's not TvT if not someone acting in a way that makes them seem not town?
worst: i know you said you wanted to talk about Taly, but if you like my reasoning, i'm not sure if there's anything more to talk about. :>
he's not locktown, but while i don't agree with everything he says, the points being picked at for Taly-scum don't really resonate with me either.
This is kind of a vague, shitty answer, because my initial read on it was just that the interaction between them felt off in a way that TvT isn't usually.
Going back and looking, this pings me the hardest:
but all the interactions between them seem aggressive, but only just barely, in a way that genuine interactions aren't. I'm having a hard time parsing what the reason for that is, specifically, though. It could be one of them is Scum, and that's why it feels off, it could be both and they're bussing, but I feel reasonably sure that they're not both Town.In post 284, PenguinPower wrote:In post 282, Taly wrote:
Then why are you even bringing up votes? If you think there's no point, you're not adding to the discussion by sayingIn post 280, PenguinPower wrote:
And have no impact, so are worthless.In post 277, Taly wrote:This reads like an excuse.
Nobody's stopping you from voting right now, faux votes are legal."I want this, but we can't have this"
And if you think votes are worthless, I'm voting you, and is it not catching your attention?
I dislike this postI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
other than the fact that that's not what chainsaw means I guess that's an alright pointIn post 377, MariaR wrote:Trying to chainsaw a lynch. You think the post is SvT but don't make a solid stance on what one is what gives you options I dislike that. You basically spent the whole post explaining why itcouldbe TvS but never took a stance on what one you think it is giving town the option to jump in and do the work for you
i do kind of resent that there are players absolutely coasting by without much stated towards anyone, but "at least one one of taly/pp is scum, not sure which one" is leaving me too many options
like if I wanted to leave myself options I would've never said anything about either of them but *shrug*I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
part of the reason I don't think town!pp makes that claim is that he's one of the candidates for lynch and there are pretty much no good outcomes
we rank him highly to give him the BP - now we have an uncheckable, unvigable scumspect
we buy the claim and rank him low - he survives with a useless role and makes the pool for town PRs to hide in smaller, we potentially mislynch better roles today
scum!pp just cares about surviving, and if we happen to rank him highly all the betterI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I think this is only a good idea if we agree to two lynches. If we don't fully commit to a pseudolynch, it hurts more than it helps.In post 412, Srceenplay wrote:You guys blown the thread up during my drive today.
Probably to tired to read and absorb anything.
Do we all want to post how we are voting before end of day?
It might help us figure out who is getting offed at night before it happens.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
i'm aware, but when someone I already had reservations about claims a perfect scum role, that definitely does not ease my suspicionsIn post 423, MariaR wrote:Claim doesn't =ali
look fhr the way they claimed that's what's important not the claim itself.
Also I hope I'm not the only one openly lying about rankings here
(ftr, though I think the circumstances around the claim make it even worse, as I laid out in my other post)I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
How does it force any accountability? There's nothing preventing the scumteam from just lying about their actual rankings.In post 431, Srceenplay wrote:
I don’t see how.In post 426, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
I think this is only a good idea if we agree to two lynches. If we don't fully commit to a pseudolynch, it hurts more than it helps.In post 412, Srceenplay wrote:You guys blown the thread up during my drive today.
Probably to tired to read and absorb anything.
Do we all want to post how we are voting before end of day?
It might help us figure out who is getting offed at night before it happens.
If anything it shows us what direction we are heading going into night.
That’s a lot better than going blind and it forces some accountability.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
it helps the scumteam strategically rank to try and kill off the players they want, rather than who the town wantsIn post 432, Chara wrote:
because it exists? but if you think he's town, you answered my question already.In post 430, MariaR wrote:Eh PP is prob town
my rankings aren't gonna be 100% honest because I refuse to believe scum doesn't have a power to influence votes
Pedit: Why would I care about his role
pedit: what does knowing who'll die at night help us do?
it absolutely does not help the town at all unless we vote in a strong enough bloc to prevent scum from altering the resultsI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
i know, but I care less about your read on Screen than I do very forcefully making sure Town does not fuck this up by giving too much info to Scum (sorry!)In post 443, Chara wrote:i like Brawl for town again. :>
pedit: i like Brawl for town x2 for the way he answered that, but also i wanted Srceen to have to answer before you did for him.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
want to interject here - i think the discrepancy came up here because you used the absolute of "what looks like it can't be fake" vs "what looks like it's not fake"In post 446, Fire Assassin wrote:
Just that you told me you saw genuine posts by him and than I ask you for them and you tell me that "anything can be faked" was mildly annoying to tell you the truth.In post 440, Chara wrote:Fire, your problem with Taly is he's asking surface-level questions he should know the answer to. my answer is i've seen Taly ask more questions than necessary as town so it isn't going into my read of him. what's the problem?
pedit: obvious, but i agree with Brawl. was scumreading Penguin before the claim. even if i entirely disregard it, i still scumread him.
those sound similar but have very different answersI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
talk to me about why you want to post our rankings before EoD and what your thoughts on pseudolynch areIn post 453, Fire Assassin wrote:Thank you brawlguy.
I feel like I should have things I want to talk to you about, but I really don't right now.
I guess I can tell you I am not sure I agree with your analysis of Penguin but I don't have any strong reasons why just feelings of uncertainty about it.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
lol, you don't have to apologize, but you do have to tell me why the 180
I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
It depends on how many Scum we have and how unified we are in giving 1s. If we have 3 Scum, each one can get 20 points from the other scummates, which is enough to beat a slew of 1s. We could theoretically defeat that by agreeing to rank everyone besides the 0s by the playerlist (i.e. 10s to the people below you, 9 to the person below them), but that makes our rankings entirely known and opens us up to role-based shenanigans.In post 478, Srceenplay wrote:
I’m not sure of the math but someone can figure it out, right?In post 348, TehBrawlGuy wrote:
I feel like you don't get the point I'm making.In post 325, Taly wrote: How do I know scum doesn't want to give someone an all 0?
And why are you voting based on who gets votes by others? What if it was one of your poorly articulated townreads? Your posting is noncomittal and easy to flow with.
Say at the end of the day, the players that are generally suspected are A, B, and C, and each gets very low ranking points. If they're close enough, Scum can decide which of the three they want to save, and give that player higher ranking points, thereby choosing which set of {A, B} {B, C} {A, C} dies and flips. Hell, if the field's close enough, they could boost all three, and we might see a {D, E} flip, which is obviously awful. I would much rather we just all agree, to, say, give {A, C} 0s and ensure they flip. Now do you see why a mass 0-ing limits the power of what Scum can do by coordinating their own rankings? Scum absolutely are going to coordinate amongst themselves - it's naive to think otherwise. That's why we need to coordinate amongst the Town to limit their influence.
I'm ranking based on votes because I feel the loss of personal agency is worth giving votes a tangible value. Votes were worthless before I did that, and now they have a tangible value in controlling my rankings. If more players did that, votes would become more important, and we could use that to scumhunt/gamesolve/whatever. Enough players do it, and we have a psuedolynch.
Also, there's no reason to call my townreads "poorly articulated" there unless you're trying to be condescending or grandstand, and neither is helpful or necessary.
Even if we all agree on who to give zeros to. Say we pick scum. If scum gave themselves 10 instead of zeros will that put them over the 1’s and 2’s?
Personally, I would endorse giving out all 0s to two players and making your other votes more or less random. It's very unlikely Scum can save anyone from that. The avg. points from other players each player would have if we did a full randomization is about 90, which is way more than Scum can swing. The odds anyone drops below 20 are pretty low.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
where did you say any of this?In post 514, MariaR wrote:
Whoa It's like I said this yet only now people understandIn post 513, Espeonage wrote:That actually gives us a situation where dissonance is actually good for us.
Because if everyone has a solid mix other than some universal reads given 0s. We end up with it very likely those two die. I am however still worried about a vote swapper or set one players average to five.
:/ need to think.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Screen was talking about how many points they could swing to a fellow scummate if we agreed to give them all 0s. They can swing +30.In post 518, Chara wrote:and you may as well include 1s as an additional 0 to use, if you're doing something like this at all.
and there are 4 scum, they have 40 points max with which to elevate a player of their choice, not 30.
They'd get up to 40 points total, since everyone has to 10 themselves, but it's easiest to think about if you look at the total number of points given by other players since that lets you work at a base of 0.
Randoming or lying both accomplish obscuring our non 0s, so I endorse both plans.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Here's are two pretty simple scenario where that's a bad idea. Say we have a mafia member in our 0s. Scum save him, and someone else who was 1s/2s die. We react appropriately, and PL the mafia member D2.In post 521, Chara wrote:basically, i think we're better served going in order of our reads whilst deciding on some players that definitely need to go. if someone dies outside of that, it means scum decided to kill them with rankings, and it also means that the player would probably have been mislynched anyway.
if we go random after deciding on a few universal zeroes, it means scum could theoretically kill anyone they liked.
like me, for example. :> or any other more helpful player who's actually good at mafia.
This is just straight worse than offing the mafia member D1.
In the other scenario, assume Scum save a town 0 instead. If we PL him D2, then we get to D3 with 3 Town deaths on our hands.
We definitely don't want to stack 1s and 2s on the same people.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 531, Nahdia wrote: TBG really needs to stop talking shop and get back to scumhunting.
Cool, can we start with you?
Straight up throttling discussion on mechanics is absolutely not pro-town in nature, especially when the players involved have already established scum reads. If and when we see flips we don't want to see after today, I'll be looking at you.In post 532, Nahdia wrote:I hereby declare anyone after this point who makes a post purely mechanical in nature will provoke my eternal ire and I will campaign for their death forevermore.
I could maybe buy that you're just super interested in scumhunting over mechanics discussion if it wasn't for the end day vote and lack of any engagement with me w/r/t my reads. As it stands it just looks to me like you're attempting to powerwolf your way into silencing discussion that helps the Town.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
In post 547, Errantparabola wrote:Votecount 1.3
Espeonage(2): the worst, TehBrawlGuy
Fire Assassin(1): NicoRobin
PenguinPower(1): Taly
Shoshin(1): Srceenplay
Taly(1): PenguinPower
the worst(1): Shoshin
Not Voting(11): Punreader, MariaR, DeasVail, Espeonage, Dunnstral, ActionDan, TwoInAMillion, Fire Assassin, ReubenWasFine, Chara, Vaxkiller
--
End The Day(1): Nahdia
(10 needed for majority)
Deadline in (expired on 2018-06-17 08:11:00)
Prodding ReubenWasFine and Vaxkiller.@mod, i voted PP a while back
In post 411, TehBrawlGuy wrote:VOTE: pp
I buy the claim, I just think he's lying about the alignment of it. That's a straight-on perfect Scum role.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
Given that you're likening looking at the ranking system to taking a math test, I find it ironic that you're calling anything fucking stupid. I also think it's absolutely bullshit that mechanics discussion doesn't ruffle feathers. Look at how many people have wanted my head today partially because of that.In post 550, Nahdia wrote:
Color me exquisitely doubtful that this discussion helps town. Straight up creating a mechanics smokescreen to let scum contribute to the tthread without ruffling feathers is not only not pro-town, it's actually very much anti-town. So stop doing it. I've scanned over what you're discussing; it's fucking stupid. No lying about reads. No randoming your slot ratings. Follow your reads, publish your list day 2, lynch people who shouldn't have survived. We're playing mafia, not taking a math test.In post 542, TehBrawlGuy wrote:In post 531, Nahdia wrote: TBG really needs to stop talking shop and get back to scumhunting.
Cool, can we start with you?
Straight up throttling discussion on mechanics is absolutely not pro-town in nature, especially when the players involved have already established scum reads. If and when we see flips we don't want to see after today, I'll be looking at you.In post 532, Nahdia wrote:I hereby declare anyone after this point who makes a post purely mechanical in nature will provoke my eternal ire and I will campaign for their death forevermore.
I could maybe buy that you're just super interested in scumhunting over mechanics discussion if it wasn't for the end day vote and lack of any engagement with me w/r/t my reads. As it stands it just looks to me like you're attempting to powerwolf your way into silencing discussion that helps the Town.
We can agree to disagree on how valuable the mechanics discussion is, but if I feel like I want to talk about it, I'm going to do it, and I encourage other players to do it. It absolutely helps me scumhunt. Hell, even here, your stubbornness actually reads pretty genuine, so I can buy your opener being Town and not just powerwolfing.
@thread:thoughts on PP and Espe if you haven't given them recently?I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
read has actually given a way to force real accountability. We will force players to post a ranking list, but there's no accountability for posting a fake list. If Scum post a sensible rankings list D2, but actually submitted something else, we have no way to tell.In post 594, Taly wrote: Given your recent posts, I can actually see town-motivation behind you not giving a lot of information about your reads, and you being uncertain about Me/PP - even though I'm town, and a dichotomy D1 is really unhelpful here. While I think it's towny, I don't think we should lie or make our numbers randomized in any part of our list.
Town needs to congeal on lower numbers, but it is easy for scum to blend behind this plan. I do agree scum can overpower with numbers, but with accountability D2, don't you think it's far-fetched that scum would be so similar, if not the same as each other in ranking?
1)Why do you thinkPPis most likely scum with his role?
2)Nahdiahas disagreed with you BOTH on your plans for the day, andPP'salignment, but what makes you think they're town?
3)Who would you recommend having as a 0 for the day?
4)Stop with the WIFOM onme/PP. What about his posts ping you, and why are you uncertain of your read over me?
5)How do you feel about the sudden surge of town-ish reads coming to you?[/spoiler]
1) I feel like I already laid this one out. I disliked the interaction between you two, so I was on the lookout for Scum in the pairing. As far as the claim itself, I already made a post on that you can grab in my iso if you want
.
2) I talked about this already, too, but it's the stubbornness and tone in the reply to me I read as Town. Shoshin put it pretty well. The way Nahdia's coming at this is the way a genuinely convicted Townie does. I still think her points are wrong and AntiTown, so she could just be powerwolfing well, but Occam's Razor says Town is more likely, so weak Town read.
3) The people I've voted for - PP/Espe. Pine's not a bad policy 0 since almost all his content is fluff. Given that only two players are dying, though, I'm probably gonna toss my third 0 to someone unlikely to die to ramp up the chances PP/Espe die.
4) That's still not what WIFOM means, and no. I'm not going to suddenly abandon my opinion just because you say so. Again, I've already laid out what I feel on PP. If you have any specific questions, I'm happy to answer those, but I'm going to refer you to my iso if you ask big generalities I've already answered.
As for you, I don't see the genuine line of thought in your posts that others are seeing. I see mostly a scattering of easily answerable, obvious questions. The lack of comprehension behind your inquiries and extreme focus on quantity over quality both suggest a lack of genuine motivation to find Scum as Town, but make sense if you're Scum that a) just wants to be seen as useful and b) benefits from clogging up the thread and wasting our time. But, on the other hand, from the little I know of your meta, this is pretty standard, and most of the thread who know you better townread you, so I might be completely off base there. Either way, I have scummier people to hunt who I'm going to have an easier time persuading the Town on, so going after you is a poor use of my effort. Time will either lead me to think you're more town, or everyone else to think you're more scum, so I'm happy waiting until you sort better.
5) Nothing much, really. Relieved a bit. Basically, what should happen did happen, so there's not a lot to say on it. The points at my earlier posts were solid, the rest was bullshit, and I've been pretty helpful to Town since. I feel like all three of those are being generally acknowledged, so we're good.
What were you expecting me to say about this? I don't know what you're trying to get at.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
PR / PP respectively or?In post 668, Taly wrote:So I just found who I'll give one of my 10s, and who I'll give one of my 0s
My confidence is this game has been somewhat rescuedI don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
omae wa mou shindeiruIn post 675, Dunnstral wrote:
Because she's kind of scummy but not a 0 to me.In post 574, Shoshin wrote:
Why is Maria a 4?In post 571, Dunnstral wrote:
Nico can have a 1 for being useless, Vax can get a 0 for being my quest and being scummy anyway, other than that I don't know, and don't know if revealing a lot of #'s is even a good ideaIn post 566, Shoshin wrote:Dunn, I'd like an answer to this:
In post 470, Shoshin wrote:
Why 4? Who's lower?In post 462, Dunnstral wrote:you can have a 4 though mariar
Want more? 4 is actually associated with death in japanese, because they sound similar. In this way, by giving MariaR a 4, I could have been implying that death is coming for her
anyway I'm pretty iffy on Pun's claim, but I see no reason to off him right now. He's leashed now that he's claimed, and in the event he's Town he'll either draw a RB every night or see some use, and both are beneficial. I might reconsider after his 11th hour claim. The sudden addition of a no N1 modifier is kind of weird, but actually makes a lot of sense given that we have an extra death today because of rankings.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
No, that's not how the rankings work. I have absolutely no idea why you think that's the case.In post 708, Punreader wrote:
No, the reason I can't kill N1 is altogether different and should be stupidly obvious.In post 681, TehBrawlGuy wrote:He's leashed now that he's claimed, and in the event he's Town he'll either draw a RB every night or see some use, and both are beneficial. The sudden addition of a no N1 modifier is kind of weird, but actually makes a lot of sense given that we have an extra death today because of rankings.
Rankings are doneduringN1.
Rankings are assigned at theendof N1.
How can I kill someone ranked lower than me before we actually have rankings?
Obviously, the answer is I can't. My role PM doesn'ttellme I can't; it is an obvious inference from the given game mechanic. (That won't stop me from trying, but I expect Errant to tell me it's not possible.)
Also, and I'm going to get a little bitchy here, so bear with me, how in the fuck did nobody else address this in the page since Pun made this post? I get that apparently the thread has something against mechanics, but holy shit you guys, there's one major difference between this and a standard game. How hard is it to keep track of thatIn post 1, Errantparabola wrote:MECHANIC INFORMATION:
- Day 1 is lynchless and will end in 14 days unless a majority of players vote to end the day early.
- Between Day 1 and Night 1, a Ranking Phase will take place, wherein players send their rankings of players in the game in a PM to me. The ranking values are as follows:
{10, 10, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 6, 5, 5, 4, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, 0, 0}
In short, 3 tens, 3 zeros, 2 fours, 2 fives, and 2 sixes. You can do this by sending me assigned point values or a ranking from top to bottom (10 to 0). Keep in mind that in accordance with SUPP guidelines, one of the tens is for yourself.
- All scores will be privately averaged and ranked. Ties will be resolved by # of 10s, # of 9s, and so on.
- The lowest two ranked players will immediately die at the end of the Ranking Phase.one thing? Some of you can criticize me for paying a lot of attention to mechanics, but at least I'm paying attention to them. Shit like this is the reason I do.
Anyway, onto the actual usefulness of this. I'm 99% this is Pun townslipping, or at least TP-slipping. Scum have daytalk, and I have to imagine they've been talking about rankings, so I'd wager they wouldn't make this mistake. I don't think vigilante-that-can't-shoot-N1-because-of-mechanics-except-actually-it-can makes it out of a Scum PT as an unprompted fakeclaim, but this line of events makes a lot of sense for town!pun.
Pun, I know you scumread me, but I s2g if you shoot me tonight after I reminded you you can shoot... It would be hilarious, true, but also I would hate you.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
For the record, I'm against full reads lists as a general concept, because I think they're counterproductive. (until the game is small - <9p ish) They often quagmire into side topics about players not on the lynch block, and I'd rather keep my posting to things I actually want other players to focus on. When they're the norm, pestering people for reads lists is also a great way to seem Town without doing much. If you have specific questions that you want answered for whatever reason, fire away. Asking specific questions also helps me get a lens into where your mind is at.In post 695, the worst wrote:Nothing really changed rereading TBG's recent posts.
I'm starting to kinda like TBG honestly. his reactions have felt more genuine as the day has progressed and I think he's on the right track pretty much for the most part?
He's focused on mechanics sure but we have a heavily mechanically weighted d1 so I'm actually kinda feeling like that's fairly pro town.
Part of me wants to ask him for a reads list but also I hate reads lists but also were gonna be forced to do a compulsory one shortly so...... TBG can you sum up your current reads for me?I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
I still think Dunn is town, both because I don't think he and Espe are scum together and I'm pretty sure Espe is Scum, and also because Dunn's early posting seemed to address both his role and scumhunting in good proportion. I wish he was doing more shit but meh.In post 687, Shoshin wrote:TBG, update on your reads? Thoughts on Dunn/Maria?
Maria's openly advocating for lying and being mildly abrasive, which is pretty fearless if she's Scum but makes sense if she's Town, so probably Town.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
actually on the note of lynch-block players, I really don't get Pine being pretty low on rankings. I weakly townread him. Most of his content is NAI and what there is seems to me like a townie who's just chilling waiting for the game to progress.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee.- TehBrawlGuy
-
TehBrawlGuy Mafia Scum
- TehBrawlGuy
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1098
- Joined: August 30, 2011
we're obligated to do rankings, but those don't clog up the thread and my rankings won't really be close to my reads tbh.
if you want a snippet of where my mind is at, it's not hard to get, both because I'm posting shit as I think it becomes relevant (my above posts contain 4 reads, for example) and because i'm here. Like, if you want to know where I'm at, you gotta ask me specific shit so I can talk to you about why you care and where you're at. If you're just asking me for reads, I can't calibrate my read on you from that, either.I don't have anything to put here because my normal signature is images. Weeeeee. - TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy
- TehBrawlGuy