Player | Vote |
---|---|
xReckonerx | Ja |
Not_Mafia | Ja |
BuJaber | Nein |
inspiratieloos | Nein |
Something_Smart | Nein |
mallowgeno | Ja |
Klick | Ja |
2 718281828459 | Ja |
Mitillos | Ja |
NicoRobin | Ja |
The government has been voted in!
So the odds of you being town (already objective low in my opinion) just were made 5 times lower. In a game of probabilities like this, that ought to round to zero.In post 607, Mitillos wrote:@S_S: Presumably you're saying I should have zero credibility because it is unreasonable for 6F3L to yield 3F. Even though the probability of this is about 23.08%. That's some really valid reasoning there.
I'm not asking for you to have discussions and reasons. I'm asking for you to have literally zero say in who you shoot. Are you saying that if Reck and Not_Mafia and Klick decided they wanted you to shoot me, you'd trust your own opinion (even knowing that I am fascist) over theirs?Anyway, I already said ages ago that I wouldn't be deciding the execution myself if I happened to get one (I believe this was when 2.718 joined the game and was discussing executions), and that I'd want to see discussion and reasons as to whom I should shoot.
I mean my opinion of how an observer with no information should see the game. So while it is subjective, in some sense it is objective as well. (My subjective opinion, of course, is that there is a 0% chance you are town.)In post 611, Mitillos wrote:Your opinion is automatically subjective, given that it is an opinion.
That was my first plan when I thought reck can't pick NM if we skip 3 times. And I wanted someone else to do it even before the 3rd fascist policy was pased.In post 607, Mitillos wrote:@BuJ: I believe that your plan involved Reck picking someone between the four people involved in investigations. This doesn't mean we skip three times, and get a random policy first. That would have been a waste of an execution, something desirable only to fascists (*cough* inspi *unconvincing cough*), since it reduces the likelihood of a liberal wincon. The plan can still happen, now that it doesn't take 3 neins in a row to carry out.
And this is why discussion is good. You are correct: I was completely ignoring the potential effect on votes, and I should reconsider this.In post 618, BuJaber wrote:Secondly Mitilos you are severely underestimating how much each vote matters. Yes we can shoot NR or 2.7 and if we hit hitler we win, but if we shoot a liberal we lose a vote which is huge right now.