NY 215: HMS Erebus - Game Over!

Lapsa · Post Post #775 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:54 am

oh snap...

I like both:

#772 and #773

who's gonna chicken out?

popopopopopopo · Post Post #776 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:55 am

In post 766, Saudade wrote:VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy

wow

r u a sextuple voter

Io · Post Post #777 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:56 am

In post 774, davesaz wrote:I think CT is changing stances under pressure. Thoughts on that?

Huh? Where? I didn't see that.

I guess it is a change. I would honestly much prefer Mala over anybody else, and that is by a fairly large margin.
Most of my other scum reads are just people I'm fine with lynching if no one else wants Mala dead.
Actually, thinking about it probably not. I'm actually fine with him being lynched.

Io · Post Post #778 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:56 am

In post 775, Lapsa wrote:oh snap...

I like both:

#772 and #773

who's gonna chicken out?

What does that actually mean?

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #779 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:56 am

Io, why did you explain Saudade's reasons for voting me instead of letting him do it?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #780 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:00 am

In post 767, Io wrote:I think Saudade.exe crashed.

Lmao

Io · Post Post #781 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:02 am

In post 779, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Io, why did you explain Saudade's reasons for voting me instead of letting him do it?

He already did explain hisread.
I just went further and pointed out to you some specific examples where you exhibited what he accused you of because I didn't feel like Saudade would go through with linking to the examples based on how their posts have been short and to the point thus far. Plus I don't entirely disagree with the accusations, just the first one isn't very strong in my opinion and the second point was outdated.

Lapsa · Post Post #782 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:04 am

hah...

Io didn't even bother addressing daev

I bet she's on mobile phone. singular tab problems

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #783 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:04 am

In post 774, davesaz wrote:I think CT is changing stances under pressure. Thoughts on that?

Elabore if you could.

Io · Post Post #784 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:06 am

In post 782, Lapsa wrote:hah...

Io didn't even bother addressing daev

I bet she's on mobile phone. singular tab problems

What?
I both addressed him, linked posts, and it was fairly large of a post.
I'm pretty obviously not on mobile if I did all that.

Io · Post Post #785 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:09 am

I just realized I said both and posted 3 things. RIP.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #786 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:13 am

No I see where the both comes in. But that does mean the post is oddly written. I’d think that type of error would look scummy but the self callout gives me pause

Lapsa · Post Post #787 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:15 am

In post 777, Io wrote:I'm actually fine with him being lynched.

yet CT asks her opinions. guy's a genius

Completly Trustworthy · Post Post #788 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:30 am

GE, why do you think that Io's error is something that looks scummy?

Lapsa · Post Post #789 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:31 am

I know! let's change addressee!

Lapsa · Post Post #790 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:33 am

can you stomach these snake tactics, liar?

UNVOTE:

davesaz · Post Post #791 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:40 am

In post 783, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 774, davesaz wrote:I think CT is changing stances under pressure. Thoughts on that?
Elabore if you could.

I can and will probably do so after work, but it's actually pretty obvious. Just look through CT's posting -- when you see a difference in opinion on a point between two of his posts look at the stuff in between and you'll see someone criticizing the first opinion. I've noticed it 2-3 times at least. And his new opinion tends to match the person who was critical.

davesaz · Post Post #792 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:41 am

One of the instances happened right before I made a comment where I saw a scumtell btw.

Lapsa · Post Post #793 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:45 am

In post 792, davesaz wrote:One of the instances happened right before I made a comment where I saw a scumtell btw.

beautifully worded. I like you daev. why can't we be friends?

davesaz · Post Post #794 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:55 am

245 and the reference is inside a spoiler. I'll leave that pointer for folks to ponder -- really must go to this meeting given I'm the leader.

@Lapsa I think we're getting along now?

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #795 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:57 am

In post 788, Completly Trustworthy wrote:GE, why do you think that Io's error is something that looks scummy?

Because it looks like she revised her post but didn’t fix the comma situation. Scum are more self-conscious so they’d be more likely to revise a post. As such revision-generated errors can occur

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #796 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:58 am

In post 790, Lapsa wrote:can you stomach these snake tactics, liar?

UNVOTE:

Uh what?

Saudade · Post Post #797 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:01 am

In post 776, popopopopopopo wrote:
In post 766, Saudade wrote:VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
VOTE: Completely Trusthworthy
wow

r u a sextuple voter

Keep being utterly useless and I'll exchange roping CT for you

and god will it feel so goooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood

Saudade · Post Post #798 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:04 am

In post 772, Io wrote:I wouldn't really call that changing the argument, just adding another piece of evidence. Again you don't need to restate all the reasons you suspect someone every time you change anything.
Changing it would be saying something like "you know what i think I was wrong about him alienating himself and not taking stances"

Honestly, the alienation claim makes sense. Early on you were distancing yourself from the others by in the middle of RVSing saying that you were new and wanted to know what a good way of scum hunting and looking for town is.
It's not strong of an argument, but the reason is valid to point out I think. Scum, after all, know they are not town and thus may accidentally alienate themselves subconsciously not treating themselves as confirmed town which all town will do as they know they are town.
You also tend to ask more questions than give reads yourself which is both alienation and not taking stances. Not taking stances is a less valid argument in my opinion though as you do actually post reads, but your reads are noticeably limited (except in 398, but he made that argument a while ago before that post) and actually quite a bit delayed in my opinion. 243 for example was quite a delayed vote in comparison to the posts you were quoting for your vote. It looks like you waited for others input on Lapsa before pushing him yourself. It's a reactionary tactic that scum tend to do.

I don't really remember Sudade before, this is my first game since I last played back in my first year of college. (about a year ago, I think I left Jan-March this year) So, no I don't know if this is his style of play, but I do just give people the benifit of the doubt that they are posting their normal way as I don't really like meta arguments. Mostly since, I myself purposely manipulate my meta so that I don't change how I play from town and scum (aside from obviously who I am trying to lynch).

and here I thought nobody was reading what I post and I'm just wasting my time here for nothing
thanks buddy

Saudade · Post Post #799 (ISO) » Wed Sep 12, 2018 10:04 am

You are still voting my kitty though and you need to flip