I don’t understand this question: you have to vote one scum over another if you’re Town. Maybe if the game is multiball this question would make more sense.
Why are you dragging up something from early d1? I was pushing Snuggly as scum and I was getting worried that Maria was also scum for avoiding them and this just kinda easy opportunistic hop onto FFT. She said I should vote her instead of Snuggly.
Why shouldn’t I drag up something from early D1? One of the advantages to having a replacement is the new voice that can bring up things people may have missed. Do you not want me to do that?
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
I'd ask you why but you don't have the balls to face me.
Because your stances suck (eg faq2 is angry he wasnt here) and the way you insist about them reminds me of scum you
I'm going to insist on my stances regardless of alignment.
In post 319, FA_Q2 wrote:wtf is this. I cant leave for one damn day.
What is your interpretation of this then?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 525, Gamma Emerald wrote:Why shouldn’t I drag up something from early D1? One of the advantages to having a replacement is the new voice that can bring up things people may have missed. Do you not want me to do that?
I just don't see the relevancy here is all.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 530, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t like the level of blowback. It feels like you’re trying to discredit my attempts to read you.
Why is questioning what should have been a pretty obvious statement blowback? And I was right b/c there doesn't seem to be any relavancy since you just wanted to see how I responded. You're saying that you didn't like my response while ignoring my actual response.
Let's speed this up and save the thread a back and forth. You are going to say that my asking you about why you are asking about my question to Maria was blowback. Why are you interpreting it as me scum reading you?
and he can't be scum that's angry that his buddy got power lynched why?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I didn’t interpret that as you scumreading me? And yeah there is no relevancy to the question but it was meant to get you to react. The fact you’re continuing to get militant about how irrelevant my question is tells me there’s something up here.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
How do you expect to find the culprit when you're all worried about each other's feelings? If you're planning to expose a liar, then you have to corner them psychologically.
In post 534, Gamma Emerald wrote:The fact you’re continuing to get militant about how irrelevant my question is tells me there’s something up here.
So to recap here you asked me an irrelevant question and I asked you why you asked that and then you said you didn't like the "blowback" of me asking why you asked an irrelevant question now you're angry that I'm "militant" b/c I responded to your accusation of "blowback"?
then why are you claiming that I'm blowing back on you? I wanted to know why you were asking what you are asking. I feel like YOU are the one thats getting defensive, not me.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 495, MariaR wrote:I don't see why scum NK votes Pork there for Pork to self hammer. That vote was never gonna give him credit it was just gonna make him look bad.
yet ppl ARE town reading the whole of the Pork voters, at least I think Nancy and FA_Q2 are.
And like scum Pork going down I really wouldn't be that surprised to see scum trying to claw their way onto that wagon. Thats probs why FA_Q2 is mad he wasn't here to do so.
Nancy is. I sure as heck am not. It is unlikely IMHO that there is not 1 scum on and off the wagon.
You are just self justifying with that last bit of garbage though. I was not mad - I was surprised that the day ended so abruptly with the holy grail of asinine shit to do - self hammer. Did not get much of a chance to actually play the game D1.
In post 533, Wisdom wrote:because thats a random conclusion and the way you push it like ot should be obvious is why i scumread you
also this exchange with gamma is unnecessary and just makes me think youre scumtheatre'ing
I mean, I'm allowed to have my own interpretation of things so basically, you are chainsaw defending FA_Q2.
Agree on the discussion with Gamma being fairly useless. I think my original question of why he was asking me what seemed like a fairly useless question was fair. I'm not sure where he's going with this or even if he has any kind of point.
I guess my question for you is, if you think Gamma is scum then why are you not more skeptical of FA_Q2's attempts to write off NK15/Gamma's vote as a not bus? Why are you town reading him?
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 534, Gamma Emerald wrote:The fact you’re continuing to get militant about how irrelevant my question is tells me there’s something up here.
So to recap here you asked me an irrelevant question and I asked you why you asked that and then you said you didn't like the "blowback" of me asking why you asked an irrelevant question now you're angry that I'm "militant" b/c I responded to your accusation of "blowback"?
then why are you claiming that I'm blowing back on you? I wanted to know why you were asking what you are asking. I feel like YOU are the one thats getting defensive, not me.
Blowback doesn’t have to be because you scumread me? And you’re giving blowback/militant because you responded like it was inconceivable that I would consider asking a question like that
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
In post 539, FA_Q2 wrote:It is unlikely IMHO that there is not 1 scum on and off the wagon.
Just to clarify, you think there was 2 scum votes on the Pork wagon since ya know, Pork was scum. If so, who is it?
In post 541, Gamma Emerald wrote:And you’re giving blowback/militant because you responded like it was inconceivable that I would consider asking a question like that
??? So I can't ask the reason why you do anything b/c its blowback? gotcha
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 538, FA_Q2 wrote:Then help me out here. What am I missing.
i meant that youre likely townreading her for things youre not experienced enough to know she can do as scum
but you think you solved the game and that scum are me and Gamma. If that were the case then Maria is infact town here and FA_Q2 is correctly reading her as town. So it feels like you know that Gamma-Nero isn't the scum team if you are light pushing Maria.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 546, Wisdom wrote:full disclosure; i was recently scum with Maria and nobody was suspecting her, so you can get why id be wary of people handing her townreads
I'd be scumreading you if you weren't like this tbh
I bet Maria is scum this game
~Firebringer
Na Maria isn't towny enough to be scum this game~
Charloux
MariaR goes for the uwu owo tsundere-dere look but you never know if she has a knife behind her back.~
In post 539, FA_Q2 wrote:It is unlikely IMHO that there is not 1 scum on and off the wagon.
Just to clarify, you think there was 2 scum votes on the Pork wagon since ya know, Pork was scum. If so, who is it?
In post 541, Gamma Emerald wrote:And you’re giving blowback/militant because you responded like it was inconceivable that I would consider asking a question like that
??? So I can't ask the reason why you do anything b/c its blowback? gotcha
You can, but when you act like me questioning something that isn’t recent is a crime against humanity, it lifts my eyebrows.
<Embrace The Void>
“A flipped coin doesn't always land heads or tails. Sometimes it may never land at all...”
