VOTE: Completly TrustworthyIn post 13, Completly Trustworthy wrote:I recognize Dave and Popo, but I haven't played with anyone else here.
VOTE: Profili
Lies in the first post. I have played with you before.
VOTE: Completly TrustworthyIn post 13, Completly Trustworthy wrote:I recognize Dave and Popo, but I haven't played with anyone else here.
VOTE: Profili
because....In post 38, TiphaineDeath wrote:Yeaaaah, my vote is totally serious, I am ok with this guy dying today.
This assumes that you understand why Tip placed the vote there to begin with. Why assume rather than ask?In post 47, Reundo wrote:If the only thing you found meaningful enough to comment on was the lack of inactivity, how would you expect others to have something to add to the conversation?In post 35, Tchill13 wrote:So there's been like... Zero activity. Come on people. Let's get this pond jumping. No waddlers left behind.
Literally took the words right out of my mouth. Good vote.In post 39, profii wrote:1 week deadline hereIn post 37, nonny wrote:What's the hurry?In post 24, Carcalilly wrote:hey guys enough RVS let's Lynch someone
Is it really duck's birthday? Happy birthday!
We must agree a lynch soon
I think we vote you
VOTE: nonny
I'm not sure if Tiphaine understands the difference between playstyle-indicative and allignment-indicative. A lot of players develop a spammy, "I'm super town" playstyle similar to Carcalilly's, and while I'm unfamiliar with her meta I'm gonna bet she probably starts off this way as either alignment. That being said, his vote reads more like a genuine bad take to me. Otoh, I'm less convinced by nonny's push on / question to Carcalilly, since it came after Tiphaine's vote + the question asked was pointless + it also came after Tchill's call for more activity, so it read a lot like a grab for towncred. Not really a fan of Tchill either, but nonny irks me more out of the two.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: nonny
Also, happy belated birthday the worst! Hope it was a good one.
so in a game that is lacking content, you come in here and decide to avoid posting content even though you have caught a scum tell.....In post 52, TiphaineDeath wrote:Actually though, let's play spot the scum-tell UNVOTE: . Who can tell me why Reundo deserves rope right now?
Fair enough. His lack of response tells me that you were correct in your assumption anyway.In post 55, Reundo wrote:I already had a rough idea as to why he was voting Carcalilly through his posts -- he wasn't impressed by her "I'm not scum so unvote me" stance and he seemed to agreed with nonny that he didn't like her saying "hey guys enough RVS let's Lynch someone", for instance -- and those things seem more like concerns with play-style since it felt like she was only half-serious when she made those statements. I guess it wouldn't have hurt to ask, but I had a feeling I know how he'd respond and if I was wrong then he'd naturally be inclined to correct me.In post 49, FA_Q2 wrote: This assumes that you understand why Tip placed the vote there to begin with. Why assume rather than ask?
This post really bothers me.In post 152, Tchill13 wrote:I voted CT just so we'd have two main wagons. I don't think either grew though...
I am but never thought you would gambit like this.In post 297, Flavor Leaf wrote:The three that would have known I’d have been gambiting from the get go, and I was trying to see if I could find any correlation in regards to communication towards the scum team had any of you been scum.In post 293, UnaBombaH wrote:Like..he says that Carca IS scum, I can see that in conjuction with his gambit, but then Chill/Gamma/Me?
That is the part that bothers me the most.
I was kinda trying to force communication within the scum team to potentially make one of the other players Freudian slip through insider knowledge only one of the three of you would know well.
To be fair, players like Dave/FA are also aware of how I play, but not to the extent you guys are.
That is essentially what gamma did. What do you think of him pulling his vote back so fast?In post 302, Completly Trustworthy wrote:VOTE: UnaBombaH
Una has given no real reads or made any pushes, the only posts with much content are 292 and 293, which seem like fence sitting to me. It seems odd that despite talking about how Boon's behavior bothers him, he says that nobody should think he believes that Boon is probably scum instead of null. It almost seems as if he doesn't want to come off as accusing him.
Tchill, I was going to unvote Profii. I was in the process of deciding who I was going to vote for next(I didn't like the Tiphiane wagon) when Leaf quickhammered.
I did not shade anyone at all. I openly scumread them. You are right, I can go any way here - lynch any of those three.In post 337, Flavor Leaf wrote:Also, FA’s 303 shades Carca, Gamma, and myself setting him up to go any way there, but yeah he baited is all in with a nice thing, then turned it.
Your gambit WAS terrible. Just because it netted something this time without utterly outing all of town's PR does not make it a shit gambit.Called my gambit terrible, but then said Carca reacted badly.
It was. His initial reaction would have been meh, then he suddenly switched gears as though he did not want to engage with you on your gambit. That is scummy.Called Gamma reaction valid, but turned it when he switched fast
Then what would town FA have done? Ignored reactions? Not called anyone out?This is a nicely hidden seemingly pushing a scum agenda.
VOTE: FA
That’s the ScumFA I like to watch.
Why?In post 432, Tchill13 wrote:I don't think it should be her choice.
My read on you has not changed a whole lot. You are null. You are not an option today considering your claim and no real reason to doubt it.
And you know this how?In post 507, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Alright, I have a theory on what the scumteam is. I'll make my case tomorrow when it isn't so late.
Also, the mafia team probably has a ninja and an investigative role because Gamma didn't see anyone visiting Profii on N1 and can't see why he would be killed over other options. Flavor, can you fully claim?
This post does not sit well with me.In post 498, UnaBombaH wrote:OK, agree with the notion for Carca's shootpool then.
VOTE: Carcalilly - in case it wasn't a hammer yet.
Why were you liking Dave at this point. For the life of me I cant think of anything that Dave has even done this game at all.In post 488, Flavor Leaf wrote:Variant, but yeah, i get ya. I think Ive only seen it like that in themes, so yeah.In post 487, Gamma Emerald wrote:Idk I’d the wagon-only thing is normal-allowed with the strict rules about roles having one way to function
I don’t really have much else to say in this game.
I’m liking dave right now, though.
I scum read una so any 'idea' coming from him is rather tainted. I think CT is scum as well though so that works for me. I think una is simply distancing here.In post 621, Tchill13 wrote:Somebody say something I want to see takes on unas idea lol.
Chill is my only real TR at this point.
Like?In post 612, davesaz wrote:FA doesn't seem to be following through on anything.
There was a lot more than just you staying alive that was at issue. Your claim, retracting it and most of your 'reasons' you gave around all this are scummy.In post 642, Completly Trustworthy wrote:I don't really understand how FA is forming their reads. For instance, they initially said I was null in 462. Then they said that it was suspicious that I was still alive in 577. However, explanations were eventually offered for that.
[/quote]Now I don't get why they are so confident that I am scum and not null. Also, their read of Una is confusing. They claimed they didn't like 498, but I don't really see anything scummy in that and Una addressed it. Also, they said it was scummy that I wasn't being pushed on surviving the night(even thought I think I was), then claimed one of the people pushing me was a teammate. Basically, they claimed that the scum were simultaneously distancing themselves from me and trying to keep the attention off me, it just doesn't make much sense.
In post 612, davesaz wrote:FA doesn't seem to be following through on anything.
Dave.....In post 631, FA_Q2 wrote:Like?In post 612, davesaz wrote:FA doesn't seem to be following through on anything.