In post 80, Sesq wrote:In post 25, Keyser Söze wrote:
This was a page one question intended to be answered before we enter serious/non-RVS gameplay.
You shouldn’t see it as an attempt to look ‘townie’: it’s as non-alignment indicative as say a player asking if there is scum day chat - why are you being lazy/shortsighted?
you're right. if you were scum you would have at least tried to phrase it differently. and you're not new. also; town tries hard to look like town too. so theres that
after reading further its clear (i hope i dont come off as too rude) that keyser is entirely detached from the state of the game ... but not in a scum way. nothing you have said has really made any sense and ive changed my mind. vote stays
In post 91, 2 718281828459 wrote:Hmmm.
Keyser is interesting. Although he seems scum, I am unable to support that logically. Why is Keyser wanting to limit the forbidden topic to page 1? (And why not wait until day 2, when the forbidden topic actually becomes a thing that can be done?)
Reundo's 46 is a little annoying but I like how he looked at everyone.
I kind of am concerned about Keyser, so VOTE: Keyser.
I am not in that good of a mood, so do not expect any more reads from me at this time.
In post 104, volxen wrote:In post 22, GameNBurger wrote:Also nobody dare TR me for that I did a bunch of shitty math only to come to the conclusion that its business as usual as far as claiming goes
in my last game a bunch of people town read me simply for effort and It blew my fucking minds as to why
I put up with it because I was town and people were having a hard time reading me but I'd like to get it out there that effort is not a one to one correlation with scuminess
a lack of effort is a good indicator of scum but a presence of effort does not indicate town
Anyways let that be a lesson to never do gametheory math late at night because youre bound to make idioitic mistakes, theres still a not great part of the stupidly simple model i used that doesn't account for the fact that T contains M in it, I should have broken it into P=t+M for more generalized use to make the death equation a bit easier to see the relationships
Why did you feel the need to "remind" us not to townread you for posting a mathematical proof? I find it a bit odd to automatically assume that people would give you free towncred just for that one early game contribution. I get your point about people making the mistake of townreading based on effort alone, but I really don't think it was necessary to explicitly say that you don't deserve towncred for sharing a mathematical proof.
In post 203, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.07
2 718281828459 (2) - Irrelephant11 184, Kop 194
Reundo (2) - Ausuka 142, Keyser Söze 143
Dunnstral (1) - northsidegal 170
Sesq (1) - Dunnstral 117
Keyser Söze (1) - Reundo 50
[GameNBurger] (1) - volxen 14
Not voting: [GameNBurger], Toranaga 110, Sesq 135, 2 718281828459 151
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 293, northsidegal wrote:anyways, i feel as if this game i'm just going to try to get a towncore and go off of poe mainly
town:
northsidegal
2.718281828459 (unfortunate you didn't replace into this slot ducky, i think it's town)
Ausuka
Keyser Söze (presuming i can trust kop on keyser's alignment and just for now - keyser is someone who i plan to do more meta on when i get the energy or when someone bothers me about it enough)
Irrelephant11
that leaves:
{volxen, the worst, Dunnstral, Reundo, Toranaga, Kop}
which feels vaguely alright in terms of a poe
In post 298, northsidegal wrote:In post 286, Reundo wrote:but for now I'll say that I think volxen's case against active lurkers is hypocritical considering he's been active lurking as well for the most part.
next up on nsg's guide tolazylow-effortvery accurate reads!!!™ - we'll be taking a note out of mathdino's book and we'll be townreading hypocrisy!
after all, i would personally imagine that newbie scum (assuming volxen is a newbie) would feel self-conscious about trying to push someone for something that he himself knows he's doing. of course, that's assuming that volxen recognizes his own inactivity, but i think we can take that to be true given this:In post 216, volxen wrote:I've been busy with work, I will respond more tomorrow.
In post 399, the worst wrote:hot take: we need to hammer Sesq who will do nothing to defend themselves or flashwagon volxen who is one rung townier and will become extremely obvious later if scum
In post 538, Keyser Söze wrote:Toranaga, bad news.. during my re-read I had you down as the scum partner who bussed Volxen![]()
Do you want me to talk through the scum narrative I have in my head?
In post 230, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.08
volxen (4) - Reundo 220, Irrelephant11 221, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224
2 718281828459 (1) - Kop 194
Dunnstral (1) - northsidegal 170
Reundo (1) - Ausuka 142
Sesq (1) - Dunnstral 117
[GameNBurger] (1) - volxen 14
Not voting: [GameNBurger], Toranaga 110, 2 718281828459 151
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 251, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.09
volxen (5) - Reundo 220, Irrelephant11 221, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224, Ausuka 239
2 718281828459 (2) - Kop 194, volxen 237
Dunnstral (1) - northsidegal 170
Sesq (1) - Dunnstral 117
Not voting: [GameNBurger], Toranaga 110, 2 718281828459 151
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 344, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.11
Sesq (4) - Dunnstral 117, northsidegal 307, the worst 308, volxen 330
volxen (4) - Reundo 220, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224, Ausuka 239
Toranaga (1) - Irrelephant 255
[2 718281828459] (1) - Kop 194
Not voting: Toranaga 110, [2 718281828459] 151
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 395, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.13
Sesq (5) - Dunnstral 117, northsidegal 307, the worst 308, volxen 330, Ausuka 345
volxen (3) - Reundo 220, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224
Keyser Söze (1) - Huntress 393
Toranaga (1) - Irrelephant 255
Huntress (1) - Eragon 194
Not voting: Toranaga 110
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 411, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.14
volxen (6) - Reundo 220, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224, Toranaga 402, the worst 406, Ausuka 408
Sesq (3) - Dunnstral 117, northsidegal 307, volxen 330
Keyser Söze (1) - Huntress 393
Toranaga (1) - Irrelephant 255
Huntress (1) - Eragon 194
Not voting: N/A
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 603, Dunnstral wrote:My case on Ausuka is that he voted Volxen then switched over to Sesq when that became a thing then switched back to volxen when that was happening, and I remember their votes being pretty bad at the time
In post 647, Keyser Söze wrote:Came into D2 thinking Toro-Dunn (but they’re both united over scum-Ausuka, who in turn doesn’t town read them! how perfect) so this is going to be an interesting day. So I’m now sat here with my popcorn, waiting to see the uncensored interactions between those players (so far they’ve talked about eachother, but not engaged one another).
In post 657, Irrelephant11 wrote:My last thought (about Toranaga) got me thinking about how the wagon on volxen happened and I went back and found thisIn post 399, the worst wrote:hot take: we need to hammer Sesq who will do nothing to defend themselves or flashwagon volxen who is one rung townier and will become extremely obvious later if scum
Which, given scum don't have day chat, is VERY INTERESTING.
If volxen "will become extremely obvious later if scum", why be concerned about lynching him now? (wagon movement was still more toward sesq, who tw says here is scummier)
Unless he's trying to hint to his scum buddy that it's time to bus
Toranaga immediately followed it up with the move to vote volxen, which tw followed. Tor has tried to claim towncred for them both this game day, and has since lampshaded "inb4 partners" which, admittedly, would be bold, but would also make anyone who called them partners look a little silly
Any thoughts on this? tw has come across as feeling v towny in tone but I can't get over the combo of
-GNB's weirdness
-volxen's long, drawn out nullread of the slot
-tw's TMI of the lynch
And then Toranaga
-Has directed attention off-wagon without reasoning
-Has lots of interactions with tw that are really very friendly and (significantly) once tw joined the game Tor was much more interested in playing
Tor was also pretty scummy last game day imo (see: Keyser's case, which was mostly ignored?)
Thoughts anyone? They happen to both be independently possible scum but ISO the two of them + GNB and see if you see what I see
For now I'll start with VOTE: Toranaga
pedit: hi sorry
In post 652, Keyser Söze wrote:I will get your name correct one day, sorry Toranaga.
[You a Kurosawa fan?]
Has everyone written off Eragon as town? A slot we haven’t spoken about much. Kop felt like town kop, and Eragon hasn’t made any scummy moves since replacing in.
In post 672, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 666, Toranaga wrote:instead of trying to lynch the people who dunked on scum yesterday, just look at other slots. just today. it's day 2. look at ausuka's vote movement, it's scummy. I have no reason to townread anything she said today either. NSG is probably scum as well.
In follow up of Irrelephant’s points against you:
You say we shouldn’t look at people who “dunked on scum” / pushed and voted Volxen D1, but you are looking at Volxen’s wagon yourself (Ausuka). I just wish you’d been on Volxen’s wagon earlier: instead you name-dropped Volxen early saying you would lynch them but did not vote for a long part of D1. Then when the wagon looked inevitable then you decided to vote / post your belated case. That is what is grating in the back of my head. I asked you before, give me a grade for “believability” for the scum narrative I am presenting. You are not acknowledging but deflecting. You keep laughing off cases on you with humour, gifs, talking about the worst, or throwing out a town read on the person analysing your behaviour. I feel the Volxen wagon was too damn enticing for at least one scum not to bus.
Nauci says NSG is the townie who towned in townville - are you going to challenge Nauci in regard this read?
In post 351, Flicker wrote:Votecount 1.12
Sesq (5) - Dunnstral 117, northsidegal 307, the worst 308, volxen 330, Ausuka 345
volxen (3) - Reundo 220, Sesq 222, Keyser Söze 224
Toranaga (1) - Irrelephant 255
Huntress (1) - Kop 194
Not voting: Toranaga 110, Huntress 151
The deadline for Day 1 is 1:52 pm CT on Tuesday, September 4, in (expired on 2018-09-04 14:51:53).
In post 682, Keyser Söze wrote:Yeah... but the Sesq case was bad... and was being trampled on at the time.
The Volxen slot was in very bad shape too.
In post 685, Keyser Söze wrote:VOTE: Ausuka
Reason: “for being sloppy scum and shamefully jumping off her partner’s wagon to push a viable counter wagon, to then jump off that wagon, and return to her partner’s wagon in a desperate attempt at towncred/bussing.”
This vote feels dirty.
In post 717, Ausuka wrote:In post 541, Toranaga wrote:also maybe don't lynch inside volxen's wagon if you can avoid it today thx
game is easy bros. just don't do hero reads like me and TW this gameday and lynch inside an actual smart POE for today. not volxen's voters unless you wanna lynch sesq.
also him doing this and then jumping on me (who was on the volxen wagon) is really :thinking:
this is the benefit of a bus in and of itself btw, consider the following;
this is actually a 12p game, we have two mislynches and that's it. from bussing you get a huge pile of towncred, which you then use on things like ^ this, which burns through town mislynches very fast. I can also imagine Tor would absolutely love the idea of getting mass towncred and sweeping with the worst as his buddy. as far as I'm aware this is the only example of someone trying to use the fact they were voting scum to their advantage wrt/ towncred.
In post 714, Ausuka wrote:In post 699, Toranaga wrote:I'll let someone else do it cause it's a lot of long complicated posting that'd require too much from me lol
I just dropped by to say ausuka has literally dropped the 3 names pushing her the hardest as her top scumreads
it's OMGUSing so hard that it's probably the first time I use the term seriously
This is also horrible, and ignores the fact that a) I was scumreading Dunnstral from before he voted me and b) town are naturally inclined to suspect people pushing them. Like in this case scum are legitimately on my wagon because the push on me is awful but even if they're not any townie is often inclined to say people pushing them is town. Honestly I think Toranga is far too experienced to not know this.
In post 22, GameNBurger wrote:Also nobody dare TR me for that I did a bunch of shitty math only to come to the conclusion that its business as usual as far as claiming goes
in my last game a bunch of people town read me simply for effort and It blew my fucking minds as to why
I put up with it because I was town and people were having a hard time reading me but I'd like to get it out there that effort is not a one to one correlation with scuminess
a lack of effort is a good indicator of scum but a presence of effort does not indicate town
Anyways let that be a lesson to never do gametheory math late at night because youre bound to make idioitic mistakes, theres still a not great part of the stupidly simple model i used that doesn't account for the fact that T contains M in it, I should have broken it into P=t+M for more generalized use to make the death equation a bit easier to see the relationships
In post 25, Keyser Söze wrote:
This was a page one question intended to be answered before we enter serious/non-RVS gameplay.
You shouldn’t see it as an attempt to look ‘townie’: it’s as non-alignment indicative as say a player asking if there is scum day chat - why are you being lazy/shortsighted?
In post 31, Keyser Söze wrote:Are you saying GNB is suspiciously being overly-conscious about being t/read for a townie?
In post 36, northsidegal wrote:what? i thought i was pretty clear, although looking now i guess i was less verbose than i had thought. yes, his thought process doesn't make sense to me as a real one, which would naturally imply that it's something made up - hence my saying it "rings kind of fake".
In post 748, northsidegal wrote:In post 747, Toranaga wrote:but in a post that's overrall towny and from a perspective that NSG has no reason to believe it comes from scum.
-shrug-
it sounds like we just disagree on whether or not that's actually towny. that's to say nothing of my current read on tw or even what my read on GNB was - just whether or not GNB's original posts were town indicative or not.
In post 22, GameNBurger wrote:Also nobody dare TR me for that I did a bunch of shitty math only to come to the conclusion that its business as usual as far as claiming goes
in my last game a bunch of people town read me simply for effort and It blew my fucking minds as to why
I put up with it because I was town and people were having a hard time reading me but I'd like to get it out there that effort is not a one to one correlation with scuminess
a lack of effort is a good indicator of scum but a presence of effort does not indicate town
Anyways let that be a lesson to never do gametheory math late at night because youre bound to make idioitic mistakes, theres still a not great part of the stupidly simple model i used that doesn't account for the fact that T contains M in it, I should have broken it into P=t+M for more generalized use to make the death equation a bit easier to see the relationships
In post 756, northsidegal wrote:In post 754, Toranaga wrote:also... I was in that game. I know why he was bothered. basically, no one liked much of what GNB said but it was so many words it was hard to think it ever came from scum. I think that annoyed him cause people started to clear him without interacting with his posts in any meaningful way.
getting townread and people ignoring your posts are two entirely different issues
if your posts getting ignored is what upsets you then it makes sense to make comments regarding that. getting townread for reasons you believe are invalid is entirely unrelated to that subject matter.
In post 79, Irrelephant11 wrote:No my vote was RVS but I can't decide how to feel about his one post being a response to Burger's game theory stuff. He didn't participate in RVS, or correct Burger on the definition of hypoclaiming, or suggest anything was AI
It's the lack of content from a player that has shown up that I find interesting
In post 111, Ausuka wrote:Spoiler: northsidegalSpoiler: SesqSpoiler: 2 718281828459 (replaced Saudade)Spoiler: Keyser SözeSpoiler: volxenSpoiler: GameNBurgerSpoiler: Irrelephant11Spoiler: Reundo
@gamenburger: you mentioned keyser was being a bit stiff about sesq. can you like elaborate on if that actually makes you scumread him?
@volxen: why do you think scum!GNB argues that people will tr him for mechanics when he doesn't actually believe that?
In post 781, the worst wrote:In post 770, Ausuka wrote:duckling why do you townread toranga so much?
his reaction to my entrance pinged town, he's quite organically reached a few of the same thoughts I have and I think his fluctuations in energy levels are pretty genuine from him.
legit starting to t/tread u two as well
In post 381, Eragon wrote:Aye this playerlist is lit AF.
That’s literally the reason I joined even though schools starting.
Driving home from the airport, so will maybe do stuff later
(Or just meme with teh wurst and tora)
In post 419, Eragon wrote:Irrelephant11 wrote:we've got a couple hours might as well use 'em
Anyone else around?
@Huntress, what would you say if I told you scummy word choices were a reason to townread Keyser?
pedit: whatever you're thinkingSpoiler:
i mean, there 4 posts dont really have much to read off, tbh id read them more off the flips.
If volxen is town then i might look at them/sesq a bit more, but if Volxen is mafia i think huntress is going to be quite towny.
i know bussing is a possibility, but how easy is it to just come in, state intent to hammer, and vote sesq?
Instead, they came into the thread, gave a few starting reads, then said they dont want a sesq lynch and voted Keyzer.
then said they're fine with volxen, but preferably not sesq, so more defending sesq, who was at (L-1 was it?) and a few more reads.
so if i had to make a read right now i think id give them a town lean for their posts
In post 170, northsidegal wrote:dunnstral seems kind of scummy right now, so that's a good a place as any for a vote.
i remember someone asking or pondering upon why i wasn't voting GNB if i was apparently scumreading him, and while i didn't and still don't really understand the mindset of what he was saying, it didn't really ping me as all that scum indicative on an instintcutal level.
anyways,
VOTE: dunnstral
In post 171, northsidegal wrote:In post 155, Kop wrote:I think Keyser is town from the quick glancing I made. I have played with Keyser quite a bit under a different alias on another website, and kinda know what his town game is, and what his scum game is. Unless his game play is different over here compared to over on the other website I play with him, but at the moment, I am getting his town game play from what I've seen so far.
how accurate would you say you are when it comes to reading keyser? i just want to know your degree of confidence here.
on a different note, kop's staccato sentences with all of the commas are standing out to me. from memory i don't really remember him talking like that, although i could certainly be wrong here. i'm going to check for myself soon (if not right after this then this should serve as a reminder), but does anyone else who's played with kop remember that?
In post 174, northsidegal wrote:In post 173, Dunnstral wrote:For real though I've got no clue what Kop's normal posting style is like - why do you think the commas are AI?
saying that my opinion is "commas are scummy" is an utter misrepresentation of what i'm trying to say
he's typing in an awkward manner and it's an awkward manner that i'm not sure i remember him doing in the games i've seen him as town
not sure how you could frame that as my opinion being "commas are scummy"
In post 232, northsidegal wrote:In post 176, Dunnstral wrote:I mean, that looks like exactly what you're saying here, except replace that with "Kop's commas are scummy"
i began a response to this a day or so ago but never finished it
the statement "kop's commas are scummy" implies that in a vacuum i think that the use of commas is scum-indicative (patently absurd). the punctuation itself is secondary to my main point - i noticed a stylistic difference between the way someone was typing here and the way that i remember that same person typing in a previous game as scum. i don't think anyone would possibility dispute that that has a very good chance of being in some way meaningful.
-shrug-
you're being far less reasonable than i typically expect you to be, and i'm not sure if i should take it as scum-indicative or not
In post 234, northsidegal wrote:In post 187, Keyser Söze wrote:Not sure I buy into NSG’s “staccato sentence/comma” theory - unless you can clearly show Kop only posting this style as scum, I think it’s too reachy for my taste.
wasn't much of a "theory" in the first place, nor something to "buy into" before more research was done. despite how dunnstral may want you to look at it, it was really only ever something that stuck out to me as being potentially a thing / relevant, hence my asking anyone else for information. honestly, i still haven't done the meta on kop that i wanted to.In post 206, Irrelephant11 wrote:Because NSG is hard townreading you and one of the following is true:
-She's town and probably correct
-She's scum and correct
-You're both scum <--- in this situation, I have no useful reads on any players, so I'm assuming it's not this
ah, the mathdino-style reads. i love it!
In post 236, northsidegal wrote:it angers me the way dunnstral has framed my argument, genuinely.
In post 291, northsidegal wrote:
mainly i felt like -nothing- he was saying early was actually town indicative, which on its own might not make that much sense (not noticing towny things = scum?) but i feel like it's relevant. if someone is town thwn i would expect that they would show it in some way. here's what i mean (aka my shitty mathdino-style "lolcase" that will, going off of previous experience, get me either scumread or into a very stupid argument that lasts longer than it should):Spoiler:
In post 293, northsidegal wrote:anyways, i feel as if this game i'm just going to try to get a towncore and go off of poe mainly
town:
northsidegal
2.718281828459 (unfortunate you didn't replace into this slot ducky, i think it's town)
Ausuka
Keyser Söze (presuming i can trust kop on keyser's alignment and just for now - keyser is someone who i plan to do more meta on when i get the energy or when someone bothers me about it enough)
Irrelephant11
that leaves:
{volxen, the worst, Dunnstral, Reundo, Toranaga, Kop}
which feels vaguely alright in terms of a poe
In post 318, northsidegal wrote:-shrug-
i'm not particularly concerned about him yet, so i think it's probably fine. i might just tunnel sesq for today and leave it at that.the worst wrote:shame there's no trackers in this setup
In post 1051, Irrelephant11 wrote:Yeah that's the strongest thing I'm pulling from it too actually
I guess nsg could be the lynch - like volxen's ISO doesn't rule it out and the way nsg made up BS to push onto sesq instead of volxen is scummy
I wonder if nsg and dunnstral would both be scum in that scenario? Where Dunnstral says the volzen wagon is bad and votes sesq and nsg follows with "reasoning"
In post 245, Dunnstral wrote:Who was town reading Volxen?
In post 353, Dunnstral wrote:Still think sesq is question dodging
Ausuka votes are kind of weird, though
In post 519, Eragon wrote:
I think this is actually TMI, because he was already like “red flip Day 1 feels good”
I mean, town never KNOWS that the person is scum unless a TI has a guilty, but TW acted like he KNEW volxen was scum, not HOPING that volxen was scum and not actually watcher.
In post 1063, Ausuka wrote:{Nauci, Irrelephant, Keyser}
{nsg, (will just trust nauci on this particular read since I'm low on towns anyway) dunnstral}
{Eragon, the worst, Toranga}
{reundo}
about here, i'm probably missing something
In post 1078, Ausuka wrote:VOTE: Dunnstral
from here on out just voting whoever I'm supposed to vote.
if anyone sees me signing up for a Mafia game ever again please spam my inbox reminding me not to
In post 1108, Nauci wrote:ErrantParabola was scum in my last game with Keyser/irrelephant/tw and sounded generally towny without making any particularly committed or controversial reads and coasted by while other players post a lot more for a long time
In post 1153, Dunnstral wrote:Can somebody remind me why we need me specifically to post more in this game? I don't think I caught that
In post 1192, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 1185, Eragon wrote:ahh, the self-deprecation, always the distancing from yourself being scum, because scum isnt likely to point out where they did bad
FTR: "self-deprecation" doesn't just come from scum.
It is very common for honest townies on mafiascum to be critical of their own game
In post 1241, Ausuka wrote:In post 1098, Eragon wrote:In post 1063, Ausuka wrote:{Nauci, Irrelephant, Keyser}
{nsg, (will just trust nauci on this particular read since I'm low on towns anyway) dunnstral}
{Eragon, the worst, Toranga}
{reundo}
about here, i'm probably missing something
can you explain how you think reundo is your biggest scum?
can you explain how you think TW, Tora, and I are scummy?
can you explain your Keyser and NSG TR's?
Reundo is my SR due to my view on the gamestate (Mafia are comfortable now and this sort of town isn't the kind to ace a game based on today, bussing is therefore likely), Keyser things, and the fact he has a wide lynchpool of popular suspects that he's stating willingness to chainlynch. I am open to other ideas but dunn/Keyser isn't really one of those ideas, sorry. Although it doesn't matter what I think really.
Tor is an old read that just decayed over time, tw gives me bad vibes, you're kind of not readable for the most part and some things you do ping me vaguely. Like why am I suddenly 4th scummiest when you've been tunneling me this whole day?
NSG read explanation is in my readslist. Keyser feels genuine and I don't really get how he's meant to be scummy.