In post 539, nonny wrote:Can’t see scum!CT not just faking a Target but don’t see why a VT would fake claim except to save their own ass. It wasn’t to draw the night kill like he says when there were already claimed tracker/investigative role. A doc wouldnt be a huge threat.
Flavor you confuse me in nearly every post. You said just last page Tchill is lockdown barring RB but now he might be scum because he SR you for not being legendary scum hunter this game?
CT: so you essentially find all my posts scummy but not enough for a vote and only on the conditional of FA being scum?
In post 596, nonny wrote:CT you accuse me of misrepping while linking a post that doesn’t say what you are implying it says, you say I’m the one that pointed out the weirdness of you and FA being alive. That was posted by someone else after me, at work currently and can’t pull quote. I pointed out your narrisstic gambit and how it’s antitown. There is still time to solve and I want a reread prior to voting, but if I had to vote now it would be on you, not omgus but know it’ll look that way.
Tchill said it well, why would 3 scum narrow in on you? Why did you explain your gambit with now real pressure? You’re timing is odd and stands out:
Bad timing but I will be modified v/la this weekend, mobile only going out of town to ride roller coasters.
In post 607, nonny wrote: In post 605, Completly Trustworthy wrote:Also, I didn't like the fact that Nonny said their vote wouldn't look like OMGUS. If she had voted right then, would anyone have thought of that as an OMGUS vote? That and their insistence in
499 that they weren't using ATE seem to me like her being overly self-conscious about what others think of her.
I said it would look like omgus but wasn’t coming from that place. I am self conscious as a person and it leaks into all of my games, look at any of the newbie game I’ve played since July, not purposeful but just real life character flaw the leaches into my game play.
Dave’s post re:CT gambit claim I can see and better explains CT’s possible intention but still not sure I like the whole scenario.
FL can you say more on your Dave read?
In post 679, nonny wrote: In post 675, Tchill13 wrote:Nonny has 23 damn post.
I don't see scum selling out other scum at this point in the game.
Didn't realize it was that low
Curious, how many of dave's 40 posts are "sorry I'm too busy", slightly throwing shade but also curious.
What do you mean by the last sentence?
Working on my promised re-read now will post within next hour.
In post 684, nonny wrote: In post 637, UnaBombaH wrote:
It's only dave and
nonny
not listed in this post...and I think you might townread nonny, or..? So, uh...not much fuzzy to clear then, eh?
Was mobile and couldn't go look at playerlist and honestly keep forgetting how many players are still around. Gave memory reads off the people I could remember. Also, think it's stupid to include yourself in any reads list.
In post 637, UnaBombaH wrote:
This is rather surprising to me, as I'd guess there's likely no need to list at least both scumbuddies into scumreads at this point?
Meaning at least reundo wouldn't perhaps ever be scum with nonny then?
(unless CT somehow read their role-PM wrong?
)
Also want to point out, that I got the feeling of "need" to put a separate "SR on CT" after the two scum"leans".
Scumlean and scumread are different standings in my book. I don't do reads on a black and white scale (town/scum scale), I do reads on a spectrum with deviations away from null. *shrug*
Dave and CT are most likely scum, can't pinpoint the 3rd but at this stage we just need one red flip.
tchill is closer to null than town than prior.
FA is still town, his posts tend to align with what I see and I can only trust myself right now.
FL and Una are hard for me to sort and cross back and forth over the null line a lot.
Reundo moved up to TR.
VOTE: Daveaz
In post 727, nonny wrote:Shit, that was a very good page. Don’t wholly disagree with anything when laid out that way. I’m still more confidant in Dave though so will keep vote there for now.
In post 757, nonny wrote:UNVOTE:
mod can we have vote count
Want to iso FA to review my read in conjunction with what you all are saying. If I had to vote now I still see CT as more scummy then FA
In post 776, nonny wrote:VOTE: FA I hope my read is wrong which is very possible. Def want CT addressed tomorrow. Don’t see another wagon happening before deadline. And if FA had a claim it would have happened in his last post.
please read this post
First of all other than catch up posts most of nonny's iso is responses and fluff. No general game solving Like CT's iso.
i'm seeing consistent pushes towards CT and Dave from nonny. The MAJOR red flag is that nonny speaks of being self aware of the fact nonny is self aware. Said it bleeds into his games. Well, nonny uses a statement i made to push CT "Tchill says it well why would 3 scum...". Then i comment on nonny's post count and nonny immediately deflects towards dave's post count using my own argument (of low post count). Nonny then states Dave and CT are most likely scum (before this day phase) magically, both are still alive this day phase. Which is important because scum needs to pretend like they have a team figured out to achieve a ML at this point. Then nonny asks ME to make a case for CT's partner. This is very important because Nonny is self aware. Which means nonny knows It'd be easy to avoid blame by saying "this is Tchill's reasoning and Tchill was wrong, not me".
Nonny goes out of their way to show confusion on Boon's statement as to why Boon thinks im town, its a quoted post. Then after Boon's MaGnIfIcAnT page... nonny says good point but Nonny still doesn't like dave...
After all that go back and look at the way nonny votes FA. Is that convincing to anyone? With the game no scum lynches yet and from someone who's been pushing 2 players pretty steadily they switch over to FA like that?
