Mini Normal 2040: Day 4

[tictac]

heyo
VOTE: Not_Mafia
been a while.

[tictac]

Urge to Survive: 5/5

uhh. k.

[tictac]

Good point.

Trebor hasn't posted anything, so he must be scum.
Let's fastwagon the chewy bastard!

VOTE: Trebor

[tictac]

Not sure who Trebor is

lool

[tictac]

ice cream

Yay!

But also, we both voted 4 someone who isn't here.
actions>words

[tictac]

VOTE: Auro

seriousface vote.

[tictac]

A warm salute to those I know and a tepid one to those I don't.

VOTE: Dva

Which one is DVa?

[tictac]

k.

@DVa I don't think either of ya individually scummy, but I'm drawing an associative here in blinky neon.
Ya can say ya understand why, so I don't hafta explain?

[tictac]

Well, okay then.
Sash seems to avoid mentioning names in his rvs, and I think yad out yer main to him if ya shared a scumchat.
his rvs appears to have landed on someone he knows, but doesn't know he knows, which is kinda a large coincidence.
figured yad want to avoid connecting the accounts, but since ya asked..

[tictac]

Yea. I don't think it's necessary to name names here.

[tictac]

Any real reason for that Tac?

like, I've yet to see a game without scum chatting pregame. Have ya?

[tictac]

Didn't even say anything about daychat,so this is weird

[tictac]

urge to Smurf around with people,

enemy or ally

Fluff around with me and I'll fluff around with ya.

I didn't like this, don't really know why

Otherwise he's borderline-posting, like avoiding total nullposts, but not giving content either.

[tictac]

so you CLEARLY had something in mind when you said scumchat

well yea. I thought 'scumchat'. it's not a time-specific term.

[tictac]

I think you're reading too much into 2 posts

Like, that is my opinion on those two posts(and the lack of humorous nullpost response to Trebor wagon or Overwatch discussion)
He's my most likely scum atm so I voted 4 him, DVa asked 4 my reasoning and I gave it. Not like I was trying to drive a fastlynch on him

Don't really think there is such a thing as too early to make an accusation.
Having little info simply means reads are weaker, not that 'scummiest person' isn't a thing that exists. (i.e. I agree with 86)
He's a bit better now that he started posting opinions, but I'm still getting RCE-like vibe off him.

What do ya think of bef not doing his usual 'end of RVS unvote' in 66?

[tictac]

His strength is coasting and bussing.

Pretty safe to say he's not bussing atm

[tictac]

What do ya think of bef not doing his usual 'end of RVS unvote' in 66?

IIRC he unvotes at the end of RVS as both town and scum, so idk, I didn't draw any meaning from it. Why do you ask?

Since the difference in how he does it as scum or as town was pointed out last game, I thought he might be intentionally avoiding giving that tell.

[tictac]

but yea, he's more opiniony here, and not all about effort-reading.
haven't seen him as town so dunno what is indic and what is not on meta-level.

[tictac]

VOTE: Not Mafia

Honestly, DVa arguing 4 this is the only reason, I didn't replace out already.
If she does, I'm following.

I'd prefer A50 policy actually, but this has a wagon already.

[tictac]

Pretty much everything that has been said about NotMaf applies to A50, only he is noisier.

I'm not really interested in lynching anyone besides NotMaf or A50 rn.
Don't really see the point in pretending otherwise.

[tictac]

I don't have the energy or desire to put up with this actually. I didn't join this game to policy lynch two back to back people. I like 7/9 of the players in this game but A50 + Not_Mafia apparently = a game not worth playing. If Not_mafia isn't going to try and you're going to white knight him like a tryhard scrub then this game is dead to me

100% agreed.

I was willing to have NotMaf as a possible end-of-day compromise.
Both of these player in a game means day1

has

to be a policy 4 the game to have any meaning.

[tictac]

scum motivation behind A50's arguments.

What part of "policy" don't ya get?

[tictac]

So you're asserting that both Not_Mafia and A50 being together, even if town, mean the game doesn't have any meaning. Reasoning being it's not his defending Not_Mafia, rather their "trolling" playstyle?

Ya.

[tictac]

UNVOTE: tictac

Moving him back to L-2.

N_M is already on the wagon = No quick hammers. You should've left him @L-1 for me to state intent and demand a claim. tictac has just finished a game with me and he knows well this is my playstyle. For better or worse he should've deduced this is NAI at worst.

What part of "policy" don't ya get?
Dunno why ya don't L-1 me yerself, unless what ya actually wanted to to was quickhammer.

[tictac]

I didn't know tictac hates me

I did wanna say that I hate no one, but it's poor form to post anything after deciding to replace.
Just,

too many

people always playing to survivor wincon makes the game uninteresting to me.
I was aware of 3 at the time, but the actual number was 4. Since it was a 10p game, that's a

lot

.

There is no need to avoid me in que, I'll just out if the playerlist looks unmanageable.
I

would

like it if ya and Elsa avoided

replacing

into my ongoing games in the future, tho I do realize ya under no actual obligation to do so.

@Sash ya looked really towny this game. Ya keep improving really fast. Do avoid fastvoting in lylo, it's usually a losing move, even tho it turned out well here.
@Carmen thanks 4 taking the slot, ya were awesome while ya were here.

Optimal play with a random lolposter on either side involves lynching/killing them off before LyLo, change my mind.

Single hard-null can be mechanically guiltied/cleared/vigged, that's what PRs are for.
If there's loads it's good to reduce the number early on/ probably good to not-lynch them in lylo since they probably townies taken there to get lynched/to rando-vote on town.
As scum, I'd probs keep them around 4 some time.

Maybe

kill them before lylo if I expect town/them to play LYLO sensibly, which is kinda rare actually.