So, there's a whole lot of bs in this recent string of posts that I need to clear up.
In post 1173, UnaBombaH wrote:
If I wanted to WIFOM it up, I'd simply say that scum!Una would've done at least two things completely different this game.
1) Not leave Boon alive for any more than a night (at max)
2) I would've bussed dave in a hearbeat yesterday.
I have a vast history of playing with/against Boon on site, and I have a solid trackrecord of bussing.
If I really cared about appearences (=was scum), I would've bussed dave harder than a sloth crossing a motorway.
We would be in this exactly same situation, but none of you would've even seen Chill soft any suspicions towards me.
Instead I went the way harder route and risked the whole game by going against reason in a situation where I had absolutely no reason to..? Nope.
Scum!Una certainly doesn't do either of these things. There's almost no way profii isn't the night kill N1 since he claimed PR, even if he was a novice and it wouldn't activate N1. By D2 Flavor was town-reading Una, so he wouldn't post a big enough threat to kill N2, especially with a roleblocker on hand, and him being alive would naturally cause paranoia to rise all things considered. For the second point, scum!Una knows that a lynch on me would win him the game, and he only needed one of Tchill/CT to swing over for that to happen (which almost did happen before nonny popped in). Him not bussing also wouldn't affect "appearences" considering how heavy busing is emphasized in this meta. Case in point is this game itself: Una hard defended scum yet no one even bothered to give it a second thought. If he pulled off a lynch on me yesterday, then that's great, but if he hard pushed me and flopped then he'd still garner little suspicion since, well, why would scum do something so obviously scummy? It's using WIFOM to cover up the simple fact that lynching me would've won him the game yesterday and lynching davesaz would've taken him one step backwards, and if that doesn't have
In post 1173, UnaBombaH wrote:
I'm uninformed here, and got dragged down by my pride and paranoia yesterday.
If you want to make an educated vote, use some time towards my ISO and you see I have had 0 agenda this game.
You'll see I was calling FA and reundo scum early enough (as well as that Vengeshot-pool..
)
I do not need to "case" scum!reundo here - that has been made multiple times already!
It's obviously not enough to merely "call someone scum". Scum actually call each other scum all the time -- the difference is that they rarely ever vote them. And Una actually liked a few of FA's posts early on and thought they promoted a "towny mindset". And if he was confident enough in scum!FA that he'd put him in his vengeshot-pool then he should've been pushing on him early D3, yet instead he was focused on pushing CT -- he was toying with the possibility of both CT/Tchill and CT/FA, which gave him the perfect excuse to push for a CT lynch (though he was considering CT/Tchill more heavily, which is significant considering they're both town). He only ends up joining the FA lynch when it's clear the lynch isn't going to go any other way, yet he was definitely pushing FA the least when compared to CT/Tchill. Una certainly isn't unique in this -- I was town-reading FA for a while too and didn't push him much during D3 either -- but he is playing up the extent to which he apparently scum-read FA. And to say he has "0 agenda" is laughable. D3 he was mostly pushing CT/Tchill instead of FA, who flipped scum. D4 he hard pushed me and gave petty excuses for not voting dave, who also flipped scum. Town end up defending scum and lynching town a lot, but to say there'd be absolutely no scum motive behind driving the lynch away from scum is just laughable.
In post 1173, UnaBombaH wrote:
It felt like he was finally making the effort to push for a win, and I usually spot his scumagendas better than anyone. There are only a few players I can really accurately "soulread" on this site, and Chill has been one of them. Well, I have to admit now, that my read towards him here was shamefully forced and affected by other players actions and reads. This lead to a dead-end of convoluted readpatterns and circular logic, and to be fair, Chill wasn't very easy to reason with yesterday either..
..but yeah, I failed yesterday. We can discuss that aftergame.
This is kind of out of order, but I found it important to put this last. Una's applying the same logic for why he scum-read Tchill and using it to explain why he apparently had no scum motive this game. It makes absolutely no sense. If we assume that Una is actually town here, that meant he would've thought that my alignment was likely scum, and by pushing davesaz instead of me was equivalent to pushing a lynch on town instead his scum-buddy... This is EXACTLY what Una did from my perspective when he hard pushed on me instead of davesaz. They were both passionate about lynching who they wanted D3 -- the difference was that Tchill almost always focused on probability and likely scenarios, yet Una always pushed on possibility and relied on scenarios that could've possibly explained why davesaz is town without considering their likeliness.