which is your justification for why lynching Dunnstral and then Performer would be fine... except if Dunn actually flipped scum, you wouldn't see me on the Performer wagon again.
though i nees to actually look at the circumstances, as that's a very broad generalization based on the existence of the dueling wagons, that could be explained in another way based on who specifically is involved.
which may be fun to do tomorrow if neither is hammered, which would be preferable.
pedit: i need to see the posts. hold on.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
well, to clarify here - i don't think performer is scum and ergo i don't think they're both scum, but i think just the fact that they're two competing wagons doesn't mean that they're not both scum.
In post 871, Almost50 wrote:OK.. and if I'm a Cop I'd be on MariaR or Chara. But -of course- that's IF I was the Cop, which I'm not.
VOTE: Dunn
Just do it EJ... put him @ L1
I'm not NotMaf, my dude. I dont lynch for lynching sake. I look out for everyone. It's why I hung Carmen even as scum. It's not for me, its for the majority.
Perf going let's town!Dunn be useful and Scum!Dunn show his hand and basically psudeo-confirm townies.
Pedit: Performer is to busy trying to hang Ruby now for some reason.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
In post 880, Ruby Red wrote:does literally anyone buy the argument of "if we let scum live then they'll show us their partners"
I do. I sometimes do let Scum live longer to observe their communication and voting patterns. I don't say it in the open though, but EJ always says stuff in the open that it looks ridiculous and people will dismiss it. (Who the hell crumbs Scum when they roll Scum and still go on to win the game?).
catching scum and letting them live until endgame, because scum lynches are anti-town.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
In post 881, Chara wrote:a take: day 1 scum lynches are anti-town. ;>
The only time you said that before -in my presence- was in Civilization.
i said it when i was scum in vonflare's laser tag game, too!
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
because from your previous stated positions i feel like you should not be alright with the status quo right now and cracking jokes but if your mind has changed then you haven't said so
actually my favourite part about 887 is the implication that i wasn't actually scum in Civilization. that's simply how town i was.
pedit: i haven't yet Ruby, i got distracted because this is more fun. but i will.
"Sibling," Farkran asked, starting slowly.
"The CORE is full of lasers, and Chemist1422's entire existence depends on her eye. If she looks into a laser, she will almost certainly die. Did you think about that?"
"Oh yes, my brother. I love thinking about that."
In post 880, Ruby Red wrote:does literally anyone buy the argument of "if we let scum live then they'll show us their partners"
I do. I sometimes do let Scum live longer to observe their communication and voting patterns. I don't say it in the open though, but EJ always says stuff in the open that it looks ridiculous and people will dismiss it. (
Who the hell crumbs Scum when they roll Scum and still go on to win the game?
In post 880, Ruby Red wrote:does literally anyone buy the argument of "if we let scum live then they'll show us their partners"
I do. I sometimes do let Scum live longer to observe their communication and voting patterns. I don't say it in the open though, but EJ always says stuff in the open that it looks ridiculous and people will dismiss it. (
Who the hell crumbs Scum when they roll Scum and still go on to win the game?
).
Some weird mofo, that's who.
Actually its pretty genius; im rarely believed when i crumb anyway so maybe if i crumb mefia.. then they wont believe my crumbs and will be obligated to think im town ??
In post 893, Chara wrote:actually my favourite part about 887 is the implication that i wasn't actually scum in Civilization. that's simply how town i was.
pedit: i haven't yet Ruby, i got distracted because this is more fun. but i will.