this does kind of strike me as non-SvS? I don't see the point for Jekyll doing this as scum.In post 320, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I'm honestly a little confused at tw town-reading me so heavily based of meta fromJanuarythis year (the "I wear my heart on my sleeve" part? As far as I know its still in my chest) and possibly reading another game where I was scum. I'd probably call it an attempt to buddy me, given I know him from back then, and am possibly likely to respond by TRing him.
UNVOTE:
I need to look a little closer at tw's ISO
They focus on tw early in a way that suggests they're really being critical of his posts in a way I wouldn't expect from scumpartners and I think it would be unnecessary to push the spotlight onto him at that point.In post 1777, Irrelephant11 wrote:What about that post can't be SvS?
I said that my read on him was null, didn't I? If I get a read on him when I'm reading the thread, I'll tell you.In post 1778, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka did you ever settle on a read for eragon?
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.
In post 1779, Ausuka wrote:I said that my read on him was null, didn't I? If I get a read on him when I'm reading the thread, I'll tell you.In post 1778, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka did you ever settle on a read for eragon?
The flip itself doesn't change much for me other than generally losing confidence in my current reads as a whole. I never had any associations for anyone with Jekyll.In post 1781, Irrelephant11 wrote:In post 1779, Ausuka wrote:I said that my read on him was null, didn't I? If I get a read on him when I'm reading the thread, I'll tell you.In post 1778, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka did you ever settle on a read for eragon?
Okay, fine, how has the flip changed your reads?
Hmm actually maybe that comment was stupid.In post 388, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Tw is probably town based on the lack of any wagon - while I don't doubt scum could be WIFOMING there, I think thats much less unlikely than them leaving a wagon sit there.
Also, post 297 - it looks very town. I see plenty of town motivation there, it shows plenty of effort which I don't think scum is going to do if they can get by without it. Sort of similar to how someone in another game (town) literally made a chart with colour showing every vote
Furthermore, he kind of feels like he is enthusiastic. Maybe that sounds stupid and probably is, but just based on tone, I think he looks a lot more like town than scum.
I still am a little concerned at him seemingly trying to buddy me, but hmph, I'm probably reading too much into it
tbh I think it's partner indicative at least to the point of canceling out my earlier idea. The "this post has a bit of effort so it literally can't be scum" looks like it's explicitly trying to townread you rather than just TMI.In post 1784, the worst wrote:Do you think 388 is partner indicative or TMI cuz?
Obviously he doesn't need to but I think a lot of players like to substantiate all their reads, especially as scum so that they can point to all their logical effort game-solving etc.In post 1786, the worst wrote:I was pretty consensus townread at that point. Do you think he'd feel the need to soft towncase his partner and wouldn't feel anxious about doing so?
I mean that's possible too yeah.In post 1787, the worst wrote:The other alternative was he was slipping into the pack without wanting to look like he was slipping into the pack which is frankly NAI or slightly antialigned imo
Didn't they say before that point that they'd read into your ISO, though, in 320? I wouldn't say it was exactly random; they gave a light SR on you and then did a 180 pivot out of it.In post 1789, the worst wrote:I tend to read random lengthy reads like that as anti partner indicative. If it was cheekily massaged into a larger read list I'd kinda get it but he sort of just broke into this random town!tw soliloquy which would be a very weird way of drawing associatives to yourself and your partner. Especially if you're looking at a {Dr. J, tw} scum dynamic which has a high chance of at least one of us going to heaven d2 and spewing the other.
