Centre for Incurable Annoyingness?! I shoulda known you were in with those guys.In post 2222, Almost50 wrote:Ran that image through FBI filing system, and it seems you're not registered. But why do I still feel you could be scum? Shall I consult the CIA??
O perfectPerformer wrote:OP stated 3 scum, no need to guessIn post 2221, the worst wrote:almost certainly looking at 3 mainscum
this is in regards to the 50% modifier, what about the 1-shot and activated modifiers?In post 2219, Almost50 wrote:Another point (not related to the above) is the Ruby Red's flip. It says 50% Toxic Goo. The Original/Sample role doesn't include such a %age. This leads me to believe either Scum also have a Toxic Goo (thus the probability split) or Town was deemed to be too strong for the Scum to handle with a typical Toxic Goo (one that would poison who targets them 100% of the Town).
a50 my friendIn post 2219, Almost50 wrote:Please also discuss this proposition if you will.
Yes to breaking the fake style, but no to original style. What I need you to do is adopt Flavor Leaf's style and fake a Mason with me, so we can move our votes together.In post 2227, Performer wrote:a50 my friendIn post 2219, Almost50 wrote:Please also discuss this proposition if you will.
do i really need to break my nos/nm/wisdom/fb playstyles and go to my original one ...
Because Carca was a claimed player who I TRed that I thought would've given a more interesting result?In post 2197, Almost50 wrote:Let's be very calm and logical. Whether you TR her is irrelevant. Watcher would want to catch someone in action. You watch someone who is likely to be investigated, protected or NK'd. That way you identify the Cop(s), Jailleeper or Scum.In post 2156, Lady Angel wrote:Because I mentioned more than once yesterday that she was one of my top townreads?In post 2154, Kokichi Oma wrote:If lady thought she was a watcher why would she watch the VT claim. Makes no sense
A VT is unlikely to be visited by a Cop (after all the Neapolitan was lynched already) and unlikely to be protected (why would the JK protect a VT? Maybe they would BLOCK them if they thought they're lying), and Scum certainly don't want to waste their NK on a VT.
So, even if I buy that you thought you're a Watcher it still doesn't make sense that you targeted Carca of all.
Now that I'm fully awake I decided to skim your ISO, and this is what I found:
So, RUBY RED was your top TR (judging by the phrasing) followed by Maria & Carca.In post 1491, Lady Angel wrote:I think Ruby Red is town, and I would also townread MariaR and Carcalilly.
Now tell me again why did you "Watch" Carca and not Ruby?
Frankly I'll never be able to come up with a good argument against lynching the claimed Lawyer. However, I feel like LA has greater equity of flipping scum here, and so does a couple more slots, which means EJ might not flip scum after all.In post 2233, the worst wrote:wynaut just lynch Elsa today and force both pr claims to produce results?
Ok Mason I will try to work with you together. I think this gimmick of imitating other playstyles has started wearing on me and others so I'm dropping it...though I was actually having a lot of fun with it. Which is something I wanted to do more of in FM, just be fun...because my natural/original style tends toward serious and to-the-point.In post 2229, Almost50 wrote:Yes to breaking the fake style, but no to original style. What I need you to do is adopt Flavor Leaf's style and fake a Mason with me, so we can move our votes together.In post 2227, Performer wrote:a50 my friendIn post 2219, Almost50 wrote:Please also discuss this proposition if you will.
do i really need to break my nos/nm/wisdom/fb playstyles and go to my original one ...
Putting words in my mouth? o.0In post 2235, Elsa Jay wrote:Lynching the Ninja Lawyer claim? What a shock.
Seriously though Ducky, why TR Lady for screwing up and saying that's townie? Its just a newbie scum covering their trackers.
Your SR on me is a meme which I out-memedIn post 2239, Performer wrote:-I don't believe it's definite that we have some sort of poison role on scum team despite ruby having 50% poison
-Dead 50% poison tpr, another tpr dead in dunn, another "tpr claim" in a50 claimed ninja lawyer, claimed tracker. I'm willing to forego lynching the latter 2 today because maybe this modular open has a balance thing running - so ninja & tracker make sense to coexist. The tracker should be able to be sorted out better as time goes on. If LA continues being suboptimal, we lynch her on d3 then
-Current scumreads in snow/maria/maybe tw (sr on him has been gradually fading)
VOTE: Elsa JayIn post 2231, Elsa Jay wrote:Lady you don't have to try to convince me anymore. You are 100% scum in my mind until your hung or NKed. I'm ignoring any other argument you got for you being town.
I was actually wondering if it was role madnessy a little earlier but I stopped thinking that : ]In post 2241, Performer wrote:Based on a quick reread of the mod's posts on pg 1, there are NOT 14 ability roles ... leading me to think VTs can exist. I forget - who kept doubting there could be VTs in this setup? Serious question.
Wow, that last sentence was completely uncalled for. I made a mistake and felt bad about it, and now you do this?In post 2246, Elsa Jay wrote:The fact you took so long to vote me is actually shocking. I've been pushing your death for the last 24 hours atleast. But you havent cased me yet or written out why I'm scum. This is still a vote of passion from you, you know.
Get a good essay about why I'm scum so on the 1 % chance you flip town you fuck town one more time with your game plan. You've clearly fucked up already, what's one more?
