Mouses can squeeze through holes as small as a dime
Open 738: Purgatory | LA FIN
- ManateeDude
-
ManateeDude Mafia Scum
- ManateeDude
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: April 27, 2018
- Location: In bed (EST)
Did you know?
Mouses can squeeze through holes as small as a dime
Votecount 3.01
Time till end of hell phase 2: (expired on 2018-11-27 22:40:00)Last edited by ManateeDude on Wed Nov 21, 2018 2:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
11/10 troll mod (also cool avi)- ManateeDude
-
ManateeDude Mafia Scum
- ManateeDude
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: April 27, 2018
- Location: In bed (EST)
In post 1801, the worst wrote:11/10 troll mod (also cool avi)Funnily enough someone told me there was hammer- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
who was it? fess up- Eragon
-
Eragon Mafia Scum
- Eragon
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3717
- Joined: June 24, 2018
Uh I told them at 4:31 last night
Does that count?Show"follow your heart but take your brain with you"
"Get away... from me...!"
Get to know a Dark Shadow!
viewtopic.php?f=61&t=78520- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
Ye that's probably it I guess- ManateeDude
-
ManateeDude Mafia Scum
- ManateeDude
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: April 27, 2018
- Location: In bed (EST)
oO00oPPss- volxen
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- volxen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
At the time I wrote that post, Labrat was the player I was the most suspicious of, and I found it suspect that within a few minutes she attacked both TW and Lefty (your predecessor) for asking questions to each other about Keyser. I thought she might have been chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy.In post 1780, Ausuka wrote:
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:
I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:
Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:
You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.
Of course a lot has changed since then, as I think Keyser is town now.- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 36602
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
Chainsaw defending someone doesn't make the defended person more likely to be a scumbuddy, just the defender more likely to be scum.. Scum chainsaw defend when they see derpcases against players they know to be town just as quickly as they chainsaw defend bad cases on their buddies.- Keyser Söze
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Keyser Söze
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
@LabRatIn post 26, LabRat01 wrote:
btw, were you planning to say this since before the game started?In post 23, Keyser Söze wrote:Godammit! Still haven't rolled scum withthe worst(there were even improved odds too: 3 from 9!)
I recall someone saying that they want their alignments to be the same as in the watchers game, were you scum there?
Who told you this?
I certainly didn’t talk about it in the sign up thread.- Keyser Söze
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Keyser Söze
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
How were you familiar with my meta too (sheep wearing wolveskin - or Ducky in this scenario) THIS EARLYIn post 71, LabRat01 wrote:
Don’t cross the line though or a tragedy may occurIn post 51, the worst wrote:Keyser my love if you had to dayvig someone based off rvs who would it be and why?
That’s better
ԅ( ˘ω˘ԅ)
so many animal avatars in the game...
Who told you about my relationship with Irrelphant?
You didn’t play WW.- Keyser Söze
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Keyser Söze
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
- Keyser Söze
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Keyser Söze
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
- Keyser Söze
-
Keyser Söze Jack of All Trades
- Keyser Söze
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6064
- Joined: May 11, 2015
This is amazingIn post 1390, Keyser Söze wrote:
Your discrediting, colourful language and fluff has no power over anyone now.In post 1379, the worst wrote:KEYSERISNOTACTUALLYBADATMAFIA
HEJUSTLOOKSWOLFYQUITEOFTEN
THISISNOTTOWN!KEYSERBEINGBAD
ITISSCUM!KEYSEROPENWOLFINGANDYOUAREALLFALLINGFORIT
ANYONEWHOISFINDINGTHEMSELVESAGREEINGWITHKEYSERISBADANDBEINGBADANDIWILLLAUGHATTHEMPOST-GAME
SINCERELY
THEWORST
They are awake.
We speak in tangibles now.
Why aren’t you voting Dr J?
Sorry- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
Sigh, you’re reading it wrong. That part of the read wasn’t very important to me anyways, as it’s nooot a strictly scum indicative action, but I did miss quite a few of your posts, which I apologize for.In post 1559, Keyser Söze wrote:
(In post 1521, LabRat01 wrote: I did miss a lot of the later posts, though, so sorry for that. They kind of got lost among all of the other, stronger pushes. :/
The way I remembered the game, except for me, no one seriously tried switching wagons from Creat to anyone else. I kind of expected you to be active about protecting someone you think might be town, especially since I didn’t even remember you saying anything about creat being townie after you discarded your meta read on them, but I guess you do have a point here. Sorry for that)Again, I don't know why you are hating on me for not defending Creature enough. Believe you me, if my read was strong my actions would have reflected that intensity (like today). I do not understand how you cannot see this. I do not understand your angle about me being his personal bodyguard either. The playerlist is 9 players. He can defend himself. I needed to defend myself too. I have fought a non-stop fight this game.
Me talking about you not defending creat in the beginning of the post was there mostly to explain the situation to ausuka, since she defended you mostly based on “you town-reading creat”, which at that moment I thought was unlikely to be true. It was not an argument I put much weight on.
The thing I was most confident in was the reasoning behind the CFD votes, but tbh I think the explanation does kind of make sense. :/
That’s not sth I’d personally like to rely on tbh.In post 1559, Keyser Söze wrote:
(In post 1521, LabRat01 wrote:I’m not going to use that as an argument, but actually, the fact that you said “he should be getting TRs from TRing creat” already makes it a valid scum motivation.
But that’s more of a fun fact than anything)Thinking further on this today, when I looked at Eragon's D1 ISO - in my opinion, the nature of Eragon's town read of Creature and subsequent actions in D1 demonstrate he was not interested in town cred / winning town points
The read felt ok to me, because it fit how I remembered Eragon get his reads normally, but I don’t think it should be indicative in either way. Even if he’s scum, I don’t think it would be that difficult for him to enter the game with making a honest read on a townie.
If he didn’t read the thread and he was asked to spontaneously read someone, the read would be 9/10 times a honest one regardless of alignment. I wouldn’t expect him to blatantly lie about that read even as scum, because without the knowledge of what happened on the thread, he’d have to base the read on his own “standard” scum-hunting ideas anyways.
That’s not a reason to push him imo, but I’m not gonna TR him for it either.
The SRs he got from that are a bit more interesting imo. I still kind of think that it would be weird for so many people to miss or misread eragon’s explanations at the same time (don’t remember who pushed him rn, but that might be a good way to start off later).In post 1559, Keyser Söze wrote:In post 1521, LabRat01 wrote:What I SR the most was the lack of effort and the passive attitude towards the push while trying to CFD 1-2 hour before EoD. It felt weird to me that you’d bother trying to change the lynch when you didn’t bother to defend creat against his attackers or explain why is your push a better lynch.
If you didn’t have strong enough reads to either defend creature or push your wagon and there were a lot other players who had much better reads than you, trying to change the wagon, was sth that felt so incredibly detrimental and REALLY unlikely for a townie to do.Did you notice I'd fucked off by then? I had no power, no voice, I was the rival wagon... my motivation and self-will was at an all-time low. D1 was either me or Creature: I had no strong scum reads to push. I bet you one thing: If I'd magically appeared right near the end to hard town defend Creature, the Keyser-Creature scum team theories would have only got worse :lol: So I left D1 with an AtE reaction test. "incredibly detrimental and REALLY unlikely for a townie to do." - at worst you can call me anti-town, and I'll accept that opinion - but you pushing it as scum alignment indicative is very reachy/suspicious.
No, I didn’t think of that. You did indeed write stuff about being uncomfortable about the you&Creat SvS reads, but tbh the only thing I was thinking about at that time was if the tone and the weak distancing/disagreeing with the reads is indicative of SvS/TvS or not. I didn’t really focus on reading the emotions there :/
And tbh I don’t get the last point. I can accept the townies being anti-town in a way of “acting scummy on purpose” or “AtE self-voting” or “making weird things for w/e reason”, which would harm only the others’ opinions on the “jesting” player, but being anti-town in a way that wouldn’t bring any benefit to the player and could seriously hinder the other players with getting and checking their reads on someone they want to lynch, is just a step too far.
Sth like that happening while the player was making a fully conscious and logical decision would be nothing less than a scum-claim imo. I’m kind of starting to see the emotional reasons which might have led to it looking like that, but tbh at that time the CFD votes REALLY looked to me that way, which left me really freaked out.- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
Fun fact, I really doubt I would have ever said so much about myself nor admitted to knowing so many players’ playstyles as scum.In post 1565, Irrelephant11 wrote:(I've found you very hard to read all game, especially with the paranoia that you can take advantage of knowing my playstyle without me being able to compare you to anything)
That’s sth, which is difficult to avoid doing as town, while being fully productive, but it would be a total pain to it do as scum as no one would prob appreciate the effort anyways- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
I have to re-read irrelephant.
And btw, I remembered someone asking me about it, but I’ll prob get to it later
Eragon is ok to me rn. Like, just ok. I don’t think the way he entered the thread was bad and the way he didn’t understand my vote on volx despite wanting to follow the exact same logic at the beginning of the game feels like he honestly forgot about that, which is dumb but slightly townie.
Eragon entered the game with previous knowledge of how to play the game and how to lynch during the heaven phase, so the post he made right after joining the game, about heaven-lynching felt like sth he’d say because he honestly believed that it’s the right thing to do.
Him forgetting about that when it actually came to doing it felt as if he got distracted by “actually having to think of who’s town”, which he didn’t have to do in the previous game because he was scum.
Like, it's dumb, but I think he'd be more likely to do it as town than scum.
That's not my most confident read ever, but tbh I'm ok with it being like that rn- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
Hahaha you’re not even trying to understand what I saidIn post 1575, Keyser Söze wrote:
(In post 1568, LabRat01 wrote:You even answered the read and I scum-read you for it later, so don’t tell me you just forgot about that now
[SNIPPED QUOTES OF THE HEAVEN-LYNCH DISCUSSION FORM HELL PHASE 1]
Why didn’t you even mention anything about it being scummy back then if you’re so confident in it being “bulshit” rn?)I've been highlighting your suspicious behaviour for a while now, but the recent stunts from you lot need to be called out for the bullshit they are.
Let me repeat:
Just a while ago, during the Heaven phase, you yelled at me that my logic for heaven-lynching was “obviously scummy” and “bullshit”.
I have been talking about that method of lynching since WAY before the heaven phase and you literally haven’t said anything about it being “stupid” or “scummy” until you started SRing me now.
I quoted the discussion posts and the stuff I said during the game about my reasons for lynching Volx to heaven in my previous post (that stuff you snipped to make the post shorter).
If you don’t want to read them (again), the discussion started by Eragon introducing "the strategy" during the heaven phase, with which I agreed, but said that we should be careful with it. I was planning to lynch like that anyways, so it doesn’t really matter though.
No one (including you) said anything about it being good/bad until I returned with the subject again later, saying that I think Volx might be a good heaven info-lynch (still during the hell phase).
Irrelephant said that my idea is scummy, which created a bit of a discussion and you joke-answered him that “If volxen flips scum, you’re gonna susp Irrelephant” (which I understood as an indirect agreement with my logic. Or at least, you were talking directly about my logic, but didn’t find it scummy back then).
If you think the strategy is so obviously scummy right now, then why wasn’t it scummy back when you weren’t SRing me? How come you were so happy to yell at me hard for it right now, when you didn’t even bother to disagree with it back then?
All the posts made about that are (again) placed in the spoiler.
Spoiler:- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Right I get that but I just want more detail on the "chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy" bit. What motivation exactly does Labrat have for doing that at the time, what's the point?In post 1807, volxen wrote:
At the time I wrote that post, Labrat was the player I was the most suspicious of, and I found it suspect that within a few minutes she attacked both TW and Lefty (your predecessor) for asking questions to each other about Keyser. I thought she might have been chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy.In post 1780, Ausuka wrote:
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:
I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:
Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:
You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.
Of course a lot has changed since then, as I think Keyser is town now.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Why did you think this?In post 641, Irrelephant11 wrote: Carmen and lefty both need to show up, willing to bet there's a scum in at least one of those twoNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
I am willing to send my weaker town-reads to heaven ifIn post 1575, Keyser Söze wrote:
(In post 1568, LabRat01 wrote:YES, I do think that lynching “uncertain town” to heaven is a good idea)That is tactically naïve and backwards. I would never send my weak town/nullish reads to heaven. This is my first time playing this setup but I feel we need to play one day at a time. Send town to heaven and scum to hell - I don't think we have extra days to play around with.
-the lynch gives enough info
and
-if the person would be unlikely to be ever lynched to hell anyways because of all of the hard TRs from the other players.
IF that person is scum (which you think is unlikely), you’re basically given the choice whatever if you think it’s better to lynch them and get the info that the people pushing them have been wrong the whole time (and try to deduce how many scum have been among them, see their reactions and the way they go about changing their reads), or to let them live and have to deal with yourself and your own TR on them and all of the townies who “are TRing them HARD” and getting all of their interaction reads wrong because of it.
And IF that person is town and if you’re TRing them, but are getting paranoid about them from time to time, while the other townies are REALLY confident that thay’re gonna flip town, which is freaking you out, but also making it very unlikely for the person in question to ever get lynched to hell, it be def better to just get rid of them imo.
IF the risk is too high because your TR is too weak, then you’re obviously NOT gonna use the strategy.
My read on Volx was strong enough for that imo. By the end of the hell phase I started getting confident that Volx is a good lynch and is likely to flip town.
And that’s a choice, which I think would help me sort players more than just a lynch among those I’m absolutely confident will flip town.
Does it make sense to you?- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
It’s not. I do believe in the reasoning and as long as you don’t overdo it, it should be more often beneficial to the town than harmful.In post 1575, Keyser Söze wrote:()I do not understand your reasoning. Plus, I feel it is driven more by scum agenda then town-motivation.
But the idea of lynching uncertain town to heaven is actually not fully mine.
I did consider the subject on my own before hearing the idea, but tbh most of the reasoning came from a player I highly respect, who played in the previous purgatory game on the ToS forums.
The town did try to lynch people based on that reasoning in that game and even though it did end in getting 1 scum lynched to heaven (which wasn’t even because of the strategy but because of a really dumb CFD), it did provide more reactions and gave more AI interaction arguments to analyze than what I’ve seen people get from the previous purgatory on MS (or at least in the first days of the game, because later it turned to shit because of the player list issues… which is not related to the way the game was played imo).
And that was despite having a way lower quality of players on the ToS forums than on MS
(Or at least that was the feeling I got from reading both games)
You can ask Eragon about the purgatory game on ToS if you want to, he has prob more direct experience with it than me, because he was a player in there and I was not.
And feel free to look at the last purgatory game here as well. I don’t have the link, but it was a game hosted around half a year ago and the first townie to get lynched to heaven was Ruru (I think), the last should be a hydra of someone and RC (scum) (if you find that, it means that it’s the correct game) - LabRat01
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- LabRat01
- Ausuka
- LabRat01
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- LabRat01
- LabRat01
- LabRat01
- LabRat01
- LabRat01
- Keyser Söze
- Keyser Söze
- Keyser Söze
- Keyser Söze
- Keyser Söze
- the worst
- volxen
- ManateeDude
- the worst
- Eragon
- the worst
- ManateeDude
- the worst
- ManateeDude