[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10517288 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 831: Great Idea Mafia (Game Over) - Mafiascum.net
In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.
Wait, do you really think he accidentally showed his true face for a moment?
It's possible that he's scum pretending to be town messing around, but I'm not feeling that either.
idk maybe. I know my first thought would have been "I hope he's reaction testing" not "I hope he just got himself killed cause he deserves it". I think its more worthy of a wagon than anything else I've seen so far.
In post 46, Micc wrote:I wouldn't call compulsive child killer verifiable at all. And post 8 pretty antitown in mindset. I say we wagon shortaru.
predit: you might want to read it again. that's not how compulsive child killer is meant to work afaik
What happens if an IC is revealed later on and they immediately get dayvigged by shortaru? Would that not be verification?
That's the one way to verify the child killer that I can think of without killing them. I don't think it's a particularly good solution for obvious reasons. I also don't know what a mafia day vig has to do with anything.
the purpose of bob's post 54 went completely over my head specifically because I know how childkiller works and the idea of a mafia day vig using it as a fake claim after they actively shoot an IC claim never crossed my mind. I didn't even realize the dayvig shots were by request and not of his own making.
I can't understand anything tazaro is writing and it's already annoying. maruchan reading and commenting on only half the thread to then come back 20 minutes later and answer a brand new question is ehh. gamma purposefully talking in riddles is also rather annoying.
In post 87, Bicephalous Bob wrote:Gamma has a writing style. I don't remember gamma having a writing style. This feels genuinely paranoid, though:
In post 70, Gamma Emerald wrote:I guess that logic works. Don’t think I’m gonna let that go forever, though, see? I’ll keep it in mind.
but idk
I'm leaning town on maru for discussing contentious stuff without having had the opportunity to read everything.
Taz and Simeon are the easy lynches
kitten seems alright for now
VOTE: jay
Is 'jay' "biceph bob speak" for gamma (emerald)?
This concerns me because later he's talking about how he's read the thread enough but he doesn't know there's a player in the game named Jay. The interaction you and simeon talked about is equally weird. and like I said, 118 to 123, I don't even understand what he's trying to say so I'd appreciate some clarification there.
predit: well I sat down to read the thread 10 minutes ago so how about you just let me go through my process. also add 129 to the list of posts I dont' understand.
In post 133, Tazaro wrote:Who give a s*** about his push on Simeon when he clearly says it's for developing reads, not necessarily a consequence of scum radar.
I care. I don't have a good feel for what direction to scum hunt atm moment. he seems like he does and I was getting town pings from his post so I want to give him a chance to say what he's thinking. If you don't care then don't listen. If I'm asking a specific question to him you don't have to answer and in a lot of cases id prefer you just don't answer.
In post 148, Maruchan wrote:im surprised there havent been more responses from some of you (cough MICC) to my post.
It's almost as though a number of you skimmed/didn't read it
I don't have much more to say than what I said in 125. I'm sorry you think my page 1 RVS vote was opportunistic or that my comment was any more serious then general ribbing about the unfortunate circumstances of potentially having multiple negative utility roles. I'm sorry that you didn't like the shitty case I pushed to help move the game out of RSV. I'm sorry that I got confused as fuck the discussion of day vigs because I was posting at work while barely reading the predits. I'm sorry that you decided to go to bed before reading my explanation or chose to ignore it. I'm sorry that you think my name being green makes me any different than anyone else.
yeah pop corn mass claim is probably correct. I thinking kittenlicks or maruchan going first but idk to be honest. I haven't spent any time thinking about this game in like 4 days.
or I guess if anyone thinks they have a guilty we start there instead of mass claim. any 1v1 is better if the rest of the players are unclaimed as opposed to claimed imo.
davesaz wrote:I'd like to see some reads developed and stated before massclaim. With such a broad range of roles to choose from, almost any claim could be fake. It's too easy to let scum get by with a believable claim. And too easy to WIFOM a trueclaimed role away. In fact while writing this I'm starting to lean toward massclaim being a bad idea, because it only adds noise and gives scum targets given the situation.
yeah this is fair. I was thinking the discussion of who popcorns first was a good way to accomplish this while leading into the mass claim...and then a third of the playerlist claimed unprompted so idk where to head from here.
In post 230, KittenLicks wrote:I'm a Town FBI Agent, and I checked Gamma, with the logic that getting a result of "Serial Killer" confirms Gamma as not an Alien, Werewolf or Mafia, which is way more useful than just knowing someone isn't an SK. I was feeling ever so clever with myself, until some jerk went and killed him, ruining everything.
This is actually a pretty neat interaction. town points for you.
In post 237, davesaz wrote:
Giving the post numbers and not linking or quoting them isn't helping.
Not sure what more Maruchan wants after this.
Yeah that’s a bad habit of mine. Sorry.
I don’t know what he wants either. He was proud enough of his case to throw shade at me for ignoring it, but in my mind the case was so obviously contrived from nothing that a response from me wasn’t really warranted - hence the passive aggressive answers when I finally did respond. I guess I could reword my post to be less dickish, but my answers aren’t going to change. But if this line of conversation is his one contribution to the game so far and he doesn’t even want to continue it, I can’t help wonder how he thinks he’s going to find scum.
In post 240, davesaz wrote:I'm leaning toward KittenLicks reaction to the lynch being a possible partner.
I have to get up early in the morning and can't do much except run the workshop all day, so hoping to see some discussion on this by the time I'm back.
I had this thought briefly but KittenLicks being unsure of supersaint mechanics lead me away from it. If your partner is a supersaint you probably look that up before he’s claiming in the game thread and it would be an impressively wierd thing to fake. Similarly investigating the universal Miller is not an interaction that I think a scum player thinks of. I’m leaning pretty strongly towards town on KittenLicks right now.
The combination of no guarantee of balance along with so many factions does make speculating on scum(teams) difficult. I’m of the opinion that any case based primarily on those types of interactions is a bad case in this setup.
You should try looking at Maruchan’s ISO for some direction. He’s my pick for scum at this point mostly by POE, but there really isn’t anything there that gives me Town vibes.
In post 249, KittenLicks wrote:Speaking of which, we haven't discussed this (possibly because people are taking strategy as something everyone knows) but
should
we actually lynch today? If we knew we were at 2 scum vs 4 townies it'd be obvious not to lynch, right? Or are we scared of the possibility of two kills?
Not lynch would be a high risk plan with very little payoff. I’m strongly against it unless a clear breaking strategy were to emerge from the mass claim.
He seemed as likely to be a serial killer as anyone one else with the added benefit of probably not being nightkilled. and then he got nightkilled...I feel your frustration.
In post 261, Maruchan wrote:because day 1 was a bucket full of null, and I needed a name, and the only person I felt had done anything of note was Micc pushing a policy on a role, so i investigated him
No part of me pushing shortaru was policy on his role. Stop acting like it was. I went from RVS voting him to making an admittedly shitty page 1 push that helped bring us out of RVS to correctly town reading him.
Not realy? If the game is mod confirmed to have a single scum team a case can be made for lylo having better odds than mylo. My expierence is that the player who everyone agrees is Town dies and nothing really changes.
Now if you consider that this game could have multiple scum teams the no lynch looks real risky. Consider that a two person scum team wins tonight with two deaths that aren’t them. Wouldn’t you feel silly not taking your shot to lynch them today?
In post 279, Bicephalous Bob wrote:If he doesn't want to claim, I'm cool with that. He's last in order anyway, so fakeclaiming would be pretty simple.
Agreeing with this.
I'm hesitant to vote because potential mylo, but consider me voting Maruchan. Not moving it until he gives some kind of indication of who he's scum reading or where his head is at.
In post 285, Maruchan wrote:ya'll a big basket full of null and the only person I'm towny reading is simeon for his push of me because i did something uber stupid last night.
oh hey that's progress. What are your thoughts on the reasoning I laid out for Kittenlicks being town in post 242?
Any tell based on anything is fakeable tho right? I feel like at some point you have to admit you won't know for sure until there's a flip and just go with what you believe. I happen to believe kittenlicks didn't fake those things so that explains my read.
I don't really have a problem with you thinking that particular point is null, but at some point you've got to actively do something to sort your pile of null reads and I'm annoyed that you refuse to.
I see where you guys are coming from with respect to Maruchan being possible lynchbait. But I’ve made a pretty reasonable attempt to engage him over this entire day 2 and he clearly doesn’t anything to do with it. We lynched Tazaro for similar things and he also looked like lynchbait, but that worked ok. /shrug.
KittenLicks, care to expand on your Bob/Simeon town reads?
Sure those things are possible. Anything’s possible. I’m just here trying to make reads based off what I think is most likely to be true. Youre not actually playing a game of mafia if you read everything as null right?
How about you offer your read on KittenLicks and back it up with evidence?
In post 296, KittenLicks wrote:I was originally against a Simeon lynch due to being provably a fruit vendor, but I double checked the cards and, at least, mathematically, being a fruit vendor makes you more likely to be non-town, not less. So oops, my bad there. I will say that Simeon was a large part of the Taz lynch, so that speaks to his scumhunting abilities, if not his alignment.
It's 50/50 right? Town or Mafia.
I agree Simeon's involvement in Taz lynch is a good indication he's not a werewolf because it didn't look like busing. But we already know that he's either Town or Mafia because those are the only fruit vendors. I don't think him leading the wagon is a good thing to be basing a read off here.
My push is basically a policy lynch. It feels off to me too.
I’m open to hearing other cases, and have been asking for them this whole day phase. I just see things I can call town from everyone but Maruchan. That’s a case that’s worked for me in the past so I’m begrudgingly going with it here.
Sorry guys. I’m traveling this weekend and have spent most of my free time this week getting ready. Sitting down to look things over now. My instincts say that the tree stump claim indicates bob is Town and that this is between Simeon and davesaz.
So first things first I think we refrain from having Bob treestump today, and we do lynch. If there's disagreement with that I'm willing to argue my opinion but otherwise its trivial.
The 30 minute reread has me leaning towards davesaz being scum. His involvement on both the tazaro and maruchan wagons was basically "I think this person is scum and the wagon has support so I'll vote there". Simeon's involvement has been stronger as much of his interactions are him actively engaging people in order to form reads. davesaz actually just straight up ignored my attempt to engage him regarding kittenlicks in post 294 in favor of hammering maruchan to end the day. I didn't realize it until reading back.
I targeted simeon last night so baring unusual circumstances he's not a serial killer. I'm not exactly sure I'm ready to write off Bob as being town with his claim being the biggest reason cause that should really be NAI, but it's where I'm at.
Just as a heads up: While he didn't explicitly announce it in-thread, I'm treating Micc as V/LA until Monday because he mentioned he was traveling this weekend.
Thanks for this. I didn’t really plan to go mia for the weekend but my phone was dead all day Saturday and today was pretty busy.
In post 351, davesaz wrote:I could climb up on a pedestal and say I'm actually trying to solve and so I should be obv, but y'all should see that anyway.Micc is a little sketch for trying to use my votes as evidence. VCA is pretty useless in a setup that's more likely to be MB than not.
Are you really trying to solve tho?
You've made votes and you've said you think I'm scum here but you haven't put any reasoning down for any of it. You called me sketch for giving my opinion and presenting things that happened as evidence. You misrepresent my evidence as being VCA when that's not what it is. You ignored my attempts to engage regarding kittenlicks during day 2 and you again decided not to engage me about why my blundered night action makes me scum.
I feel like I'm the one trying to engage and solve here not any of you. Kind of crazy to think considering I've been regretfully mia for big stretches of this game.
In post 240, davesaz wrote:I'm leaning toward KittenLicks reaction to the lynch being a possible partner.
I have to get up early in the morning and can't do much except run the workshop all day, so hoping to see some discussion on this by the time I'm back.
I had this thought briefly but KittenLicks being unsure of supersaint mechanics lead me away from it. If your partner is a supersaint you probably look that up before he’s claiming in the game thread and it would be an impressively wierd thing to fake. Similarly investigating the universal Miller is not an interaction that I think a scum player thinks of. I’m leaning pretty strongly towards town on KittenLicks right now.
Might a scum player fake that as a way to appear not scum? Or be worried about a watcher so claim a plausible visit?
In post 294, Micc wrote:Sure those things are possible. Anything’s possible. I’m just here trying to make reads based off what I think is most likely to be true. Youre not actually playing a game of mafia if you read everything as null right?
How about you offer your read on KittenLicks and back it up with evidence?
Here's the extent of the conversation. It starts with you asking for discussion on the point you presented. I respond with my opinion which you immediately challenge by calling wifom. I rebuttal while trying to move the conversation back towards productivity, and then you don't respond. I don't see any indication you had a real interest in having a open minded discussion about the topic.
I clearly didn't think my night action through regardless of my alignment tho right? I didn't just decide as scum that claiming a bonehead action was the right play to make. If you're saying town me is more likely to take the action seriously then I guess my counter is that scum me has a lot more to lose because its clearly an easy way to get caught. I can honestly say as town that it doesn't feel like my night action in this game matters at all so I didn't put much thinking into what the best play was. I know that's pretty ugly and I'm not happy to admit it, but it's what happened.
In post 333, Micc wrote:I'm not exactly sure I'm ready to write off Bob as being town with his claim being the biggest reason cause that should really be NAI, but it's where I'm at.
I haven't moved much from this opinion. davesaz, if you're actually interesting in interacting lets make this the topic. Do you think my opinion is reasonable or not?
In post 361, davesaz wrote:I posed this as a question: Is town better off in a 2v1 with a stumped advisor, or a 3v1 where we don't have anyone confirmed? In the 3v1, all 3 town need to agree on who is scum, or we no-lynch and scum get to choose whom to remove for the LYLO. In a 2(+1) v1 we get a classic LYLO with an added voice. Numbers wise stumping "seems" better.
Yeah I get this. But if the consensus is that Bob's town, and Bob knows he's town, then stumping him has no upside and only downside.
There doesn't seem to be consensus that Bob's slot is town. I could see forcing them to stump in that case. I guess I'll put a little more effort into to reading him in the earlier days tonight. I still want to say that no solo scum player decides to claim treestump as the last person in mass claim, but I don't know if I'm willing to gamble the game away on that.
Looking forward to hearing from the replace in's. Hopefully in a timely manor. I'll be pretty busy all week with holiday stuff after tomorrow night.
Sortaru and I had expressed scumreads and Simeon was already voting Tazaro so I'd say there was support for the wagon before davesaz replaced in. At least as much support as any other wagon had at that point in the game.
I realize I didn't get back to the thread to explain my tazaro vote and that it looks pretty bad. I almost replaced out over that weekend but thankfully the night phase was enough of a break to get me through. Despite this I don't think davesaz's vote was any stronger than mine and yet no one is willing to consider that.
We're headed in the direction of losing this game by mislynching me out of default and I don't know what I can do about that.
Simeon, davesaz and Bob have all posted that I'm their scum read in some form or another without being willing to expand or engage me on it.
Now it's mylo and two of them got replaced and the third is on his way. not to mention bulbazoor's been in this game for over 48 hours without making a meaningful contribution. I know I've been somewhat apathetic about this game at times, but I'm here now and it will be really disappointing if we lose this game because "ehh whatever. let's just lynch Micc".
In post 378, Micc wrote:Sortaru and I had expressed scumreads and Simeon was already voting Tazaro so I'd say there was support for the wagon before davesaz replaced in. At least as much support as any other wagon had at that point in the game.
Expressing a scum read but not voting, only to vote once the wagon gains traction, is scummy AF.
That’s not even true. Mural agreement on a scum read that leads to a wagon and eventual scum flip is just good townblocking. Like, we’re taking about the heart of day 1 here. It’s the single most reasonable point in the game to be openly interacting and exchanging opinions. Once I realized my opinion was lining up with some people I loosely Town read I voted.
In post 383, Persivul wrote:1. davesaz gave a partial reads list upon placing in. I give that a lot of credit.
2. So, same situation - if you think it's scummy, why aren't you pushing him? Making weak suggestions in hope that someone else picks up the case and pushes it is a scum move.
That reads list wasn’t rooted in anything. He could have pulled it from anywhere. Are you going to tell me you like bulbazoor too simply because he gave a partial read list?
I’ve said I’m leaning that direction the whole day and was pretty vocally not satisfied with his responses to me trying to wngage him. I’m not sure why you’d think I’m doing anything but pushing him. He’s scum with the game already wrapped up. I doubt we’ll see anything but a vote from him for the rest of the phase.
In post 400, davesaz wrote:We're back to the same place deadline wise. Someone wanna talk?
It’s time for you to put a vote down tbh. I don’t know if that was supposed to be a case for why you intend to vote bulbazoor or if you’re still waffling between me and him. I’ll go through and offer my thoughts on the things you pulled out in a sec but the tldr is that I’m not convinced.
I don’t intend to move my vote here which I guess means we’re no lynching?
In post 393, davesaz wrote:Micc, saying that I'm not engaging you is a lie. You may not like the answers I'm giving, but we are having conversations. I'm the type of person who stops talking when I don't see anything new to add, maybe that bothers you? If you're "not satisfied" you could be a little more open about what you're not satisfied with.
This is not the point in the game where an OMGUS is acceptable. Pushing you on bad night actions is a sign of town, not scum.
I guess my problem is that you don't have anything new to add then. We can have all the conversations in the world but if you're not willing to put you're foot down and state what you believe to be true it doesn't mean any thing to me. All the while you think the conversations are over and was meaningful.
I don't know if you're pushing me for scum or if all these posts pushing simeon mean you're pushing him. You didn't make a vote but also didn't specifically ask anyone to comment the push. We got a two day extension and are once again up against the deadline. It's time for you to vote.
In post 393, davesaz wrote:But I don't want to put words in your mouth. Can you honestly say that you look at my posts and you don't think I'm solving? If you go beyond being wrong on a few things (and several/most of us have been wrong on something), point to something that's illogical or manipulative. Please do. And if you can't, please admit you can't.
I don't think you're solving. Sure you've looked at the game, you've pulled stuff out, you've said stuff, but you haven't translated that into a solution. You weren't even willing to commit to Bob's slot being town. You're not looking for a solution, you were biding time until you could hammer my wagon for the win and now that bulba's afk you're testing the waters to see if that's a viable path to victory.
Spoiler:
In post 394, davesaz wrote:One-liner percentage might be off a bit. I'll do this in batches of posts which have "content".