You are to me.In post 8, Springtrap wrote:I hope I can be interesting
VOTE: Springtrap
Loooooool! Still funny!
True.In post 63, Clemency wrote:i never leave rvs
Pressuring a town power role into exposing himself tooo early, I guess. I'll go make coffee.In post 110, Gamma Emerald wrote:imagine scenario that fit what you described that might make your vote not good.
Probably. I'm beginning to think I don't understand this game anymore....
Because I have a day job and it's my wife's birthday today. I had to prepare it yesterday.In post 260, Persivul wrote:How about sash and springtrap? I don't see any significant scumhunting from their ISOs, and that's what you're scumreading me for.
Why aren't they in the conversation?
I imagine this post is extremely towny or very very scummy, but I can't figure out which one it is. Any opinions?In post 181, Chateau Lobby wrote:Let's consolidate our 4 wagons.
Those on spring, move to overkill.
Those on Gamma, move to Persivul.
Didn't see 304 sorry.In post 313, Sashaddin wrote:I imagine this post is extremely towny or very very scummy, but I can't figure out which one it is. Any opinions?In post 181, Chateau Lobby wrote:Let's consolidate our 4 wagons.
Those on spring, move to overkill.
Those on Gamma, move to Persivul.
I get scum read often because I post less than average. Your mileage may vary.In post 301, Springtrap wrote:It appears shutting up is a legitimate strategy around here. That doesn't really work with my friends.
In post 312, Sashaddin wrote:I went through the ISO, and can't figure out why 0verki11 got wagoned this hard this early. Can I have a heads-up please?
Help me out with 312 and I'll be able to contribute more. It's my first large game and I'm overwhelmed by everything that's going on.In post 353, Xtoxm wrote:People who have failed to have any impression at all on me so far:
Gif
Ubh
Sash
Clemency
I can prob think about purging/pressuring these soonish if this doesn't change
Some wanted to vote him, some did and never had the same reaction I got.In post 109, Sashaddin wrote:Imho: Almost 50 is a serious account while AP is where he'll roleplay Austin Powers and fill the thread with spam. Maybe he rolled something good and to be more serious to go along with it he switched accounts.
Let's try to see which side he's on now.
VOTE: Almost50
See above.In post 134, GuyInFreezer wrote:Voting your null read is always a good start.
In post 142, GuyInFreezer wrote:I mean it'd still be better place to vote comparing to where you have your vote on right now.In post 136, Almost50 wrote:In sum, I can't find one good reason to vote Overkill over half the players list.
In post 236, Almost50 wrote:The mere shear of willingness to preemptively end the day here is alarming, and with everybody ganging up on Overkill I am confident he is Town. Not gonna touch this wagon.
I'd like to know what to think about 0verki11, the opinions on him are pretty diverse too, it gets confusing. Above is A50 townreading him against the flow.In post 246, Almost50 wrote:My theory is Scum ARE pushing Overkill, but it's far from "to lynch them". It's a role fishing scheme to get a claim if that's the case.
I didn't see your post as I was fiddling with mine. Well this is what I'm trying to see through here.In post 355, Gamma Emerald wrote:It’s 14 players, not that much more compared to a mini. And Overkill isn’t the only wagon. Step it up.
Ok, I thought he really had made a huge mistake that I didn't see or something. Thanks.In post 357, Xtoxm wrote:It's the first wagon of the game, it's not going to have a serious case behind it. You wagon people to get reactions from them/see how others react.
Oh. I'm playing micros then. 9-10 players.In post 360, Gamma Emerald wrote:1.5? It’s ONE person past being a Mini.
1. Many small uncommital wagons.In post 362, Chateau Lobby wrote:Where are we at?
Who should I vote next?
Do my reads count for anything?
Who believes me?
If you look at my meta, I often have no vote when Day 1 ends. I'm just this way, I'm more of an observer early on.In post 384, stan1ey wrote:@Sashaddin you're playing in a way thats hard for me to get a read on you. how comes you arent voting? whos most likely to be mafia in your opinion
I never played a game where it wasn't. I thought "enabled" was the standard. Must be hell to play without.In post 388, GuyInFreezer wrote:Hmm unless it changed Normal games suppose to include the info if daychat is enabled, right?
Because if daychat is not enabled, then few of the things I read become juicy.
After rereading the latest posts: add xtoxm, jorges and Gamma.In post 389, Sashaddin wrote:Town leans: Chateau Lobby, Not_Mafia, Stan1ey, Percivul
Yeah, it's a good post, that's why I got him in my town bunch. I'd vote myself if I didn't know betterIn post 410, Xtoxm wrote:#407 makes me wanna sheep it.
I didn't like Chateau unvoting quickly, but his reads are very towny to me, so I can't scumread him really.In post 356, Sashaddin wrote:The three last votes for the wagon were: Clemency and Unabombah (who faked a L-1) and Stanley. I assume none of those could be scum, those are risky votes to make so close to lynch.
The first two unvotes were: Chateau (switching to Stanley), Percivul (but it took a long time).
This is what I'm focusing on right now.
I trust Not_Mafia because in the games I've played with him, he had a really good eye. His style is unorthodox, but so far I'm sure he's town and can be relied on. Call it 50/50 experience and gut feeling. But I admit he's hard to read.In post 437, stan1ey wrote:UnAh makes a very good point in 407. Sasha says he scumreads Overkill because he trusts those on the wagon but his post suggests the only one he trusts is NM:@Sasha why do you trust him?In post 412, Sashaddin wrote:Not_Mafia: third game with him iirc, I trust him the way he posts again. I don't see why he's not trustable (well I thought that the first game but now I know him).
All he is done all game is push for overkill and post memes, and youre scumreading overkill based on this? i cant see how anyone can have anything other than a null read on NM so this looks like youre covering up for 407
Ofc you dont, but its what you said here:In post 412, Sashaddin wrote:You are right I didn't add Clemncy. Must I absolutely townread everyone on my wagon? You said yourself that there could be scum on it...In post 389, Sashaddin wrote:Right now, I'd go for Overkill or A50. The first one because I trust some on the wagon and his situation seems murky., and at first I didnt think much of Sashas reply to my question but UnaH has made a very good point in 407 and sashas reply didnt do him any favours so id be willing to vote hereIm also pretty sure UnaH is town this game based on my (albeit limited) experience playing a game with him before
...and if we get a townflip I get a free t-shirt with this mislynch.In post 409, UnaBombaH wrote:..and if we get a townflip forget I said anything.
What was different?In post 485, stan1ey wrote:I played a game with UnAh where he was mafia and it was incredibly easy to spot and he is playing a lot differently here.
So far he's done exactly the same as before: piling on good wagons and pointing out the bad ones; the guy got good reads usually. I imagine if he were scum one of these would change and since he plays a lot someone would probably have had some doubts on him too. It's more of a environmental situation than an isolated read on the guy, if you can understand what I'm trying to express (English is my second language).In post 488, stan1ey wrote:He was acting very confident and his posts were patronising and suggested he knew more than others even though his arguments made no sense and were clearly manufactured, very very different to how he has played this game
Now since you asked me and I answered, what makes you think NM is town this game based on your experience?? Because it seems to me he plays the exact same way every game
You're not helping my case, dude!
I'll be snickering in the dead thread when you take that cop hat off.In post 493, UnaBombaH wrote:Sashaddin should be lynched because of a very telling and obvious scumpost.
True, thanks for reminding me this. Being a target can indeed tell a lot. I'll get on it tonight when the kids and wife are asleep; there is much to assimilate in this game.In post 497, UnaBombaH wrote:Assuming you are town however..
You now have the unique position to get to scumhunting based on the content people are now actually providing ABOUT/AROUND YOU, and help town find the real scumsters.
<------------------- he, not she;In post 504, Almost50 wrote:Not like I'm SRing Sasha, but I don't mind voting her either.
That's why I'll need peace and quiet, and some time too. I don't think I'm good at this, but I'll learn...In post 511, Persivul wrote:It can, but you have to be very careful in interpreting the pushes.
A guy goes golfing alone and meets a fine-looking lady. He asks her to play the round together and she accepts. After chatting and golfing for a while, she decides to give him a blowjob. They finish the round and both leave happily.In post 514, Persivul wrote:So why do you hit from the red tees?In post 510, Sashaddin wrote: <------------------- he, not she;
Here is how I see my wagon:In post 511, Persivul wrote:It can, but you have to be very careful in interpreting the pushes.In post 509, Sashaddin wrote:Being a target can indeed tell a lot.
Post #503 by Persivul » Fri Dec 07, 2018 11:58 amIn post 502, Chateau Lobby wrote:Stanley,
You played me.
Your cred is 0
To me.
I am so
Disappoint.
I will
Not listen
To you
Anymore.
VOTE: overkill
Post #504 by Almost50 » Fri Dec 07, 2018 12:12 pm
If I understand the mechanics, you p-edit when you were typing and someone else was being done. Here, Almost50 posts 17 minutes after Chateau's post and 14 after Persivul. I imagine them cooordinating in PT for number 4 and 5 spots on my wagon during those minutes.In post 504, Almost50 wrote:Not like I'm SRing Sasha, but I don't mind voting her either.
P-edit: @Chateau: weren't you already voting there?
@Percy: OK...
VOTE: Sasha
I took this as some opportunistic distancing between you two. My bad if it's not. Some scums like to vote their partners at rvs or be aggro towards another on Day 1 for this. I don't take the naming thing as AI though.You're still a townlean to me btw.In post 521, Xtoxm wrote:Tries to distract from prior solo vote
Whilst mentioning his name
The sneaky scum move
In post 312, Sashaddin wrote:I went through the ISO, and can't figure out why 0verki11 got wagoned this hard this early. Can I have a heads-up please?
I was wondering too...In post 542, Springtrap wrote:Can someone explain the Overkill wagon again?
I meant :I have been wondering (and got no answer at that time).In post 544, 0verki11 wrote:Am I allowed to put this to L1 now?In post 543, Sashaddin wrote:In post 312, Sashaddin wrote:I went through the ISO, and can't figure out why 0verki11 got wagoned this hard this early. Can I have a heads-up please?I was wondering too...In post 542, Springtrap wrote:Can someone explain the Overkill wagon again?