Yes.In post 749, Chateau Lobby wrote: So you agree I'm PR.
No.This is a scumslip.
BTW, I received a piece of fruit last night.
Yes.In post 749, Chateau Lobby wrote: So you agree I'm PR.
No.This is a scumslip.
YupIn post 752, Xtoxm wrote:So it looks like despite overkill
Changing his claim since yesterday when about to die
Has me visiting 2 people neither of which were the apparent kill target
Others prs having claimed making his existence unlikely from a setup perspective
Mislynching me is still you going to be required to catch him
Because not having a role is unbelievable in comparison to what he's done
So that's cool
Gamma showed a totally non natural read progression today, from spending all yesterday voting overkill to instantly believing him today. Good chance this is one of overkill buddies
I'm a good lynch if CL makes an explicit claim which he can't weasel out of tomorrow.In post 751, Not_Mafia wrote:Can we lynch overkill pls, there's no justice in the world if he lives to day 3, Persivul is always a good lynch though
And why, after a full night to discuss it with his buddies, would scum!overkill do that?In post 752, Xtoxm wrote:Has me visiting 2 people neither of which were the apparent kill target
Do you think I am town PR?In post 754, Persivul wrote:I'm a good lynch if CL makes an explicit claim which he can't weasel out of tomorrow.In post 751, Not_Mafia wrote:Can we lynch overkill pls, there's no justice in the world if he lives to day 3, Persivul is always a good lynch though
You said you had a night action and I don't see any scum motivation for a faked result on me. So, yes, you're probably a (bad) town PR. You could also be scum or lying town, but those seem less likely.In post 756, Chateau Lobby wrote: Do you think I am town PR?
Why are you just now claiming to get fruit? Getting desperate?In post 750, Persivul wrote:Yes.In post 749, Chateau Lobby wrote: So you agree I'm PR.No.This is a scumslip.
BTW, I received a piece of fruit last night.
That hurts my feelings.In post 757, Persivul wrote:You said you had a night action and I don't see any scum motivation for a faked result on me. So, yes, you're probably a (bad) town PR. You could also be scum or lying town, but those seem less likely.In post 756, Chateau Lobby wrote: Do you think I am town PR?
I just now remembered it. It has absolutely no relevance to my alignment.In post 758, Chateau Lobby wrote: Why are you just now claiming to get fruit?
Nope. Seems like you are though.Getting desperate?
Are there other options?In post 759, Chateau Lobby wrote:That hurts my feelings.You said you had a night action and I don't see any scum motivation for a faked result on me. So, yes, you're probably a (bad) town PR. You could also be scum or lying town, but those seem less likely.
How do you know that?In post 760, Persivul wrote:I just now remembered it. It has absolutely no relevance to my alignment.In post 758, Chateau Lobby wrote: Why are you just now claiming to get fruit?
There’s scum roles that are well served to visit their alliesIn post 624, 0verki11 wrote:because Xtoxm visited them.In post 621, Almost50 wrote:Explain??
Because I've read the wiki on fruit vendor.In post 762, Chateau Lobby wrote:How do you know that?In post 760, Persivul wrote:I just now remembered it. It has absolutely no relevance to my alignment.In post 758, Chateau Lobby wrote: Why are you just now claiming to get fruit?
The airIn post 763, UnaBombaH wrote:Guys, let's sit down for a moment and let CL and Pers clear the air.
*grabs popcorn*
.... Loyal...In post 765, Persivul wrote:Because I've read the wiki on fruit vendor.In post 762, Chateau Lobby wrote:How do you know that?In post 760, Persivul wrote:I just now remembered it. It has absolutely no relevance to my alignment.In post 758, Chateau Lobby wrote: Why are you just now claiming to get fruit?
https://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Fruit_Vendor
But if you have an argument to the contrary, feel free to present it.
If I but he's shown already yesterday by messing up his claim that he's not exactly a sophisticated scumIn post 755, Persivul wrote:And why, after a full night to discuss it with his buddies, would scum!overkill do that?In post 752, Xtoxm wrote:Has me visiting 2 people neither of which were the apparent kill target
Just make a claim that you can't weasel out of tomorrow after I flip green, and I'll put a vote on myself.
Everyone should be requiring an explicit claim from CL. THEN, yes, they should pile votes on me.In post 768, stan1ey wrote:Why isnt everyone piling votes onto Persivul yet
I get that, but as noted, after two days to discuss with other scum buddies, wouldn't you think he'd have a more plausible claim?In post 769, Xtoxm wrote:If I but he's shown already yesterday by messing up his claim that he's not exactly a sophisticated scumIn post 755, Persivul wrote:And why, after a full night to discuss it with his buddies, would scum!overkill do that?In post 752, Xtoxm wrote:Has me visiting 2 people neither of which were the apparent kill target
P-Pardon?In post 674, UnaBombaH wrote:No, wait.
Overkill could be speaking the truth, and Xtoxmox could be multitasking scum, BUT Stanley and GiF aren't automatically paired in alignment. (think scum!Doc healing scum!Stanley but trying to kill GiF or whatever)
So we lynch Overkill, but all he has said today is actually WIFOM and doesn't help us at all.