mini 2048: more songs (game ougre)

[Doughboy]

Sorry going to be v/la for a day or two. Today is a rough day for me and mafia isn’t my priority right now.

[Doughboy]

VOTE: trivium

[Doughboy]

Who is the person we've heard the least from?

Flubber. I have the 2nd least. I should get back into this game this weekend. My mind is still elsewhere atm. Sorry about this. Just bad timing

[Doughboy]

I dont feel as great about xwing though, dunno why

you would be surprised how often overabundance of lame questions indicates scum

It’s probably not as high as you think it is. Asking questions is a good way to understand people better. Why do you think police ask lots of useless questions?

[Doughboy]

No I don’t think he’s s cop. Was just making an analogy

[Doughboy]

VOTE: Robert

[Doughboy]

That seems like a misrep flubber.

[Doughboy]

His post doesn’t seem to be saying that at all. Can you explain how you picked that up?

[Doughboy]

idk. I’m sure he has a reason to ask them.

[Doughboy]

Not if you’re being open minded it isn’t.

[Doughboy]

I mean I can sort of get why people think it’s scummy but it’s also early.

[Doughboy]

I personally think Robert is way scummier. The way he discredited people for naked voting isn’t townie. Naked voting is perfectly acceptable. His other posts leave much to be desired.

[Doughboy]

I see where you're coming from, but right now Robert is more "overeager town" than "cunning scum" in my eyes. This could change. In the meantime, I'd like you to evaluate how you feel about the various other wagons.

How can you tell the difference? Also it doesn’t take cunning scum to do what he did. It’s easy for scum to push on things they would push if they were town. That doesn’t take cunning. It takes common sense.

[Doughboy]

Sure, we can call it "Naked voting". I would call it more, unwilling to provide reasoning

Somebody not giving a reason doesn’t mean they are unwilling to.

Did you bother to ask them why they voted?

[Doughboy]

Duuuuuude GPs post is awful. The OP he’s quoting is profii saying that it’s probably not a reliable read because he’s reading off someone else’s meta. Instead of sheeping more updated and more rationally sound logic of generating questions with no content. Reasons matter and I am not buying that.

Trivium is town. This time, I think I’m actually sure.

get on xwing!

Robert is better

Fixed.

[Doughboy]

I am going to assume you don't have a series 7 then, with this type of market analysis.

Probably works at JT Marlin.

[Doughboy]

Couldn’t he say the same to you?

Couldn’t I say the same?

That’s a bad argument but you know what I think of you already so it’s par for the course I guess.

[Doughboy]

I really shouldn't have to ask people, hence my response before

You do if you want to know why they voted. You can’t say people refused to provide reasons just because they didn’t give one. Sometimes it’s good to not give a reason. Sometimes people just don’t have the time. Sometimes people do it to get a reaction.

Ask before you say people refused or don’t say they refused.

[Doughboy]

Well, I've never been called cunning so I guess thanks? lol.

I wasn’t calling you cunning.

[Doughboy]

If they don't have time, don't post

No. You’re taking advantage of easy targets because you are trying to say not giving reasons are scummy when they aren’t. You say they refused to provide reasons which isn’t true either.

[Doughboy]

I’ve been a cop in a Schadd game where it said no cops.

I’ll let you all think about that. I even got a guilty that got a scum lynched

I could actually see that. No cop but any other variation of a cop isn’t really a cop. There are also other roles that kind of work like a cop.

[Doughboy]

@profli. Thoughts on Robert and him lying?

[Doughboy]

UNVOTE:

ohkay... back from some x-mas traveling

Did I oversleep and miss a week or you traveled for Christmas early?

[Doughboy]

Doughboy, an interesting charicter to say the least. He claims me to be defensive when he voted me defending what he calls Naked voting

Easy on that shade. It’s not my color. I never called you defensive. You essentially called me defensive but I have no idea why you think that. Mind explain how I’ve been defensive?

Side note being defensive isn’t alignment indicative but since he brought it up, he should at least be able to explain/show how I’ve been.

[Doughboy]

I find it hard to believe Robert from 2012 has never seen a lolwagon. Hell we have a player named after them. lol wagons happen in rvs and that’s what took place. I appreciate his attempt to look at the wagon for scum, however I feel if he were town he’d try to converse more with the naked voters. I don’t even think he said anything about the fact that he called out naked voters and then I intentionally naked vote. I don’t see any sort of curiosity coming from him, which probably means he’s more informed than I.

[Doughboy]

And town reading somebody for having an lolwagon form on them is also bad. Lolwagons can happen on scum. There is no rhyme or reason for how they form or whom they form on.

[Doughboy]

Correcting your bad push and lies isn’t being defensive.

And him getting to l-2 in rvs makes it an Lolwagon.

I appreciate the attempt though. I like to see scum fight back.

[Doughboy]

I appreciate the attempt though. I like to see scum fight back.

THis is pinging me HARD.

And why is that?

[Doughboy]

with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.

Actually shorter deadlines benefit town more than scum. I’m not saying lynch tomorrow but definitely before Christmas

[Doughboy]

with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.

Actually shorter deadlines benefit town more than scum. I’m not saying lynch tomorrow but definitely before Christmas

Interesting, I've never heard this before. Can you provide a source?

Experience. I think a game I just finished had quicker lynches and we did well.

[Doughboy]

Why did you ignore my question ?

[Doughboy]

I've always found it better. I used to play on these one boards with 72 hours days and 24 hour nights and town had an 80% win rate. If not better while this other site I play on now with days like here it's around 48% town win rate.

Exactly. That’s my experience but I played 24 hour days.

[Doughboy]

What board is that? Always looking for new places. Not sure I like this site.

[Doughboy]

I appreciate the attempt though. I like to see scum fight back.

THis is pinging me HARD.

And why is that?

Because you're being so high and mighty as well as the fact that that post provides no value to anyone.

That’s because I am high and mighty. That’s a dumb reason to ping somebody. Not every post needs to provide value. You of all people should know this since you’ve made posts without any value

[Doughboy]

We should aim to kill before Xmas

You mean lynch. Scum slip?

[Doughboy]

But I think TGP is still a good lynch, although Robert might be looking better.

If I can’t get a Robert lynch I may join the tgp wagon. His posts make less sense as the game goes on.

[Doughboy]

But I think TGP is still a good lynch, although Robert might be looking better.

If I can’t get a Robert lynch I may join the tgp wagon. His posts make less sense as the game goes on.

Can you please elaborate?

You saying me post provided no value when you’ve made posts that provided no value seems hypocritical. That makes no sense to me. I don’t really agree with your push on xwing. You also seem to be chainsaw defending Robert.

[Doughboy]

I do believe doughboy is a townlean, but less so because of that post - it seems fake.

What makes it seem fake?

[Doughboy]

Defending your scum buddy?

[Doughboy]

I only read him right on day 2 I believe. He made a really bad argument that didn’t seem townie.

I’ll be honest I’ve been too focused on Robert and paradox atm. So he’s probably null. I’ll try and read back at work tomorrow.


I’m pushing Robert because he came in and made a really bad argument and then he followed up with a lie. So i fee like maybe lightning has struck twice for me and I’ve found scum and maybe his partner.

[Doughboy]

Defending your scum buddy?

lol, cause if I were to do so, would be a great idea. Since somehow people have already "linked me" with Golden somehow, thinking I somehow care if he got lynched. It won't hurt my feelings, I just think there a more scummy person, unless you have reasons not to vote for Lapsa?

I do have reasons not to vote Lapsa.

[Doughboy]

what lie do you speak of LB?

That people refused to give reasons for their votes is one. I think there was a 2nd. Would have to check my iso

[Doughboy]

It’s db or dough. Not lb but I think it was a lie since nobody refused to give one.

[Doughboy]

One of these days I’m going to steal your pagetop

all pagetops are mine regardless of whose username is next to the post

[Doughboy]

It’s not unusual to be inactive on weekends. Flubber I think was the one who made a big deal about it. I’d lynch him also because that was scummy as fuck.

[Doughboy]

I do have reasons not to vote Lapsa.

Something you can share right now or later, or won't at all??

I scum read others more

[Doughboy]

One of these days I’m going to steal your pagetop

I love the mod so far, lots of vote counts on top of pages. Clean and effiicient.

Agree but why can’t it be automatic? Auto page top vote counts should be easy to implement

[Doughboy]

I actually do have a case on Lapsa. Lapsa has yet to show any town in the slightest.

Course I'm waiting for someone to try to convince me to vote for golden.

You haven’t shown any town either.

[Doughboy]

I would disagree. But at least you agree Lapsa hasn't done anything townish.

I wasn’t agreeing with you