Town should never quickhammer

[Gamma Emerald]

@Flubber - How'd that work?

Dunno

Let's throw some ideas around

My immediate one is an in thread VOTE: override that gets counted for some period of time (24-48 hours) after a lynch. Day continues as if the lynch never happened up to the already established deadline

There should probably also be a penalty for having your hammer overridden

This gives hammering much less weight
I’d suggest to add the person must be brought down to L-2 and following the override that player is Hated for the rest of the Day.

[Gamma Emerald]

I have just remembered an accidental hammer I did in my third game. It was very poor play, and what happened was I was temporarily blacklisted until I showed improvement. I agree with Zach though. I don't think it should be banned, it's poor play and other players should punish it, or try to at least. Funnily enough, I hammered the final scum. Ha.

The fuck
Why were you punished if it won you the game

[Gamma Emerald]

Also what’s up with the terrible arguments that “If I let him defend himself, he may escape the lynch”?

Like that is hugely egoistic play that only comes from a player who is deathtunnelled on someone and I seriously cannot accept that as a valid argument.

Isn’t the reason that you let players defend themselves because you might be wrong on them? And if you are not convinced by their defence, just lynch them anyway?

I agree with this btw
What’s interesting is I’ve never seen RC pull this no matter how he feels
Probably because he votes before it can get there but w/e

[Gamma Emerald]

And I think banning people for taking the probablistically advantageous approach is in a very roundabout way advocating the breaking of setups

[Gamma Emerald]

I don’t agree with your stance but you’re amazing

[Gamma Emerald]

Hi Taly!