[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 10604301 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 837: Joint Operation Mafia (End game) - Mafiascum.net
Hey all, very occasional scummer here. I remember playing with wisdom before (though I don't remember which game), but the rest of you are new to me—good to meet you! I haven't touched the site in over 2 years, so I'm a bit rusty, but I should get into it pretty quickly!
pretending to be greyscale with that screen name, clearly red or blue
I like leaving my options open B-)
I actually used to have a red/blue-ish lightbulb as my avatar; some lightbulb picture with that was recolorized, but I ended up changing it in exasperation after I kept being lynched on day 1. So I picked the least suspicious thing there is, which I suppose, in itself, is suspicious. I guess that makes the vote valid.
I just feel like Cheeky has been scumhunting scumtells and not scum, with no regard for their implications. She doesn't seem to be considering this game's dynamics or even care about them.
@Mod Are mafia required to submit their kill in their pt that they both share, or can they message you during the night?
This feels fake. Why would we care if scum submitted kills via PT or PM? Feels like a derped town tell.
This is a good spot, which i agree with (also the reasoning behind my first scum accusation of dunn), though I don't agree that the question is the issue. Cheeky's question throws me off. She's posing the question openly without making any effort to dig deeper and actually understand what the dynamic Dunnstral is pointing to actually is—and it's not hard to spot if you actually care.
In post 32, profii wrote:why are you playing with fire there DLA
This. He's clearly reaction testing - DLA omguses him after admitting he sees Profii's gambit. I also like his wagon analysis but don't know why he would choose PP over DLA.
This throws me off a lot. He is literally analyzing a RVS, and explaining my response to voting him after he did his unvote trick as an OMGUS? I'd think it would be pretty that it's not an OMGUS vote. It's like he's just doing analysis for the sake of generating content.
In post 113, Wisdom wrote:10 is rvs
26 was a fake unvote
32 is meaningless
I don't get it
Ugh do I really have to force feed you? 10 shows his only vote before his fake unvote on me, 32 shows him following up his 32
[sic]
reaction test asking DLA why he'd play with fire by being on my wagon.
Actually thinking more about it Profii could have been trying to lure more votes/a quickhammer onto me so it's not the towniest reaction test out there...interesting.
I don't understand why anyone would think a fake unvote would be used as a reaction test. And why he would possibly consider 32 to be a legitimate question.
Another of these scumhunting for the lulz moments. As correctly pointed out by profii there would be no reason for scum to WK each other (sooner the opposite), and it makes it look like Cheeky is interested in pointing out tells and sharing blame more than finding scum.
In post 124, CheekyTeeky wrote:Also if you guys get to lylo without a scum lynch then I'd assume one scum would be pushing the other around that phase.
Brilliant reasoning. Except that a little thinking reveals they should be interested in lynching scum from start to avoid a draw, and LYLO isn't actually meaningful in this game.
I'm referring to the whole "own" debacle. I think any rational person would assume the scum share a PT if they're given one. I actually noticed while reading the role PMs before that the links to the PTs are different. Even with this I assumed it was just a mistake and that one was used actively.
I think most people would assume "your own" refers to the two scum teams, as illustrated by Wisdom in 171. Defaulting to the opposite is suspicious as hell.
In post 161, profii wrote:So Dunnstall doesn’t have a huge ISO but he goes from not knowing there are no night kills to being clear that the 2 scums know who each other are - obviously in a “normal” game that is in fact normal so I think it displays he understands the competing factions element which means I think he is derping on purpose because it said nightless way back at sign up phase
I think the sealing point, more so than "own PT", is "own PT to talk in"
It literally says "You are aware that XXX is the Blue mafia goon and you have your own pt to talk in here"
Why you would assume that's a private pt to talk in is beyond me.
Thea dont address the QT. It does explain why clemency would be confused into correctness though. I don’t see any evidence that profii was in the same boat.
cool you WK Dunn then.
