But what if I smoke weed on a podcast with Joe Rogan?In post 4, Wagonomics wrote:VOTE: LolWagons
This is our IPO. Invest in this wagon while the price is low and see its VALUE skyrocket over time!
VOTE: Trivium
Not this time, you likeable mafioso.
But what if I smoke weed on a podcast with Joe Rogan?In post 4, Wagonomics wrote:VOTE: LolWagons
This is our IPO. Invest in this wagon while the price is low and see its VALUE skyrocket over time!
VOTE: Golden ParadoxIn post 27, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hahaha reason?In post 25, Trivium wrote:Sorry mod, will make note. Whoaa lapsa's in this game?
VOTE: TheGoldenParadox
Was your vote serious? Mine was.In post 41, Trivium wrote:Pretty sure I played with lapsa like a few years ago, and I play so few games it's cool to see the same people again.
This post makes my skin crawl.In post 27, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hahaha reason?In post 25, Trivium wrote:Sorry mod, will make note. Whoaa lapsa's in this game?
VOTE: TheGoldenParadox
Why flubbernugget and not Dough?In post 50, Nikk wrote:People are just acting outside of the interest of the town (quick wagon, naked votes) to stir up conversation? To x's credit they did jump right in and ask good questions.In post 49, Trivium wrote:It's just a thing people are doing to get talking to happen.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
Apparently not, your vote isn’t on him.In post 58, Lapsa wrote:Can we lynch Trivium already?
Ohhh I have commentary on this too but I’ll hold off.In post 62, xwing wrote:what do you think of goldenparadox slot? can we use GP? but i dunno, typing "paradox" feels good lolIn post 50, Nikk wrote:People are just acting outside of the interest of the town (quick wagon, naked votes) to stir up conversation? To x's credit they did jump right in and ask good questions.In post 49, Trivium wrote:It's just a thing people are doing to get talking to happen.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
why is a quick wagon/naked vote during RVS outside the interest of town?
how do you propose to hunt scum?
slightly pinged by the wording used, similar wording and reason used by golden..In post 51, Nikk wrote:Voting flub for bandwagon vote with no substance
You should answer x’s question so I can be less interesting and give my read on you.In post 65, profii wrote:InterestingIn post 61, LolWagons wrote:Egix has a tough meta to crack. Not going to give my read on him just yet.
Trivium reacted way better to this wagon than he did to his wagon in our last game as scum but it is an RVS wagon whereas the other one was much later in the game so it’s like half a tick mark on town.
I’ll hold off on my Profii read
What signals were you looking for re:scum wagon?In post 69, profii wrote:I asked because when I skimmed earlier they hadn’t said anything about Triv wagon (think I missed posts from Robert to be fair)In post 67, LolWagons wrote:You should answer x’s question so I can be less interesting and give my read on you.In post 65, profii wrote:InterestingIn post 61, LolWagons wrote:Egix has a tough meta to crack. Not going to give my read on him just yet.
Trivium reacted way better to this wagon than he did to his wagon in our last game as scum but it is an RVS wagon whereas the other one was much later in the game so it’s like half a tick mark on town.
I’ll hold off on my Profii read
So I was trying to work out if like we were going to get the sign of a scum wagon where it’s hard to get enough people to actually form a majority because town are inherently uninformed
I don’t think my test really told me anything
I get what you’re saying. I think Triv is probably town, as probably as can be at page four. X came off pretty Townie in the exchange as well. You’re playing pretty identical to the game we just got out of so I’m feeling good there too.In post 73, profii wrote:like in the last game when we got BEF it was hard to get the wagon over the line, so, let's assume the rush on triv was fully town...there were a few players who had already objected by the time i posted... so if the players i specifically asked (The undeclared) all kinda came out and went 'Eh why not, im not against it'
you could speculate that the rushers were town, the questioned were town and we hit a scum and found the objectors as his buddies.
I'm oversimplifying a complicated game, but i think there was a general mix of for and against anyway. I think we will have 1 scum for and 2 scum against and triv will be town- thats my guess. idk who
I kind of agree but he’s gone after Trivium (the biggest wagon) and now the obvious policy lynch slot. Not really the blind voting to me as much as it is the targets.In post 77, profii wrote:i kinda ignore people like that until they start doing stuff. Like if i had meta experience i might be more like "that dude doesnt usually just naked vote his way through the day" or whatever but i kinda just null that as they aren't really showing their hand
Having a hard time with Nikk. I didn’t like the clarification post after vote, seemed a little too self-conscious for town. Kind of the same way GP seems a bit image-obsessed. The rest of the profile is null, so probably scum tilt.In post 79, profii wrote:LolWagons what do you think of Nikk
NoIn post 93, Robert2424 wrote:Thats a terrible wagon...
It’s not a reward. Some people are just more methodical and want to have more info before putting their chips in. I generally put my balls to the wall by page 5 or so but I respect other play styles.In post 100, Nikk wrote:I'm still very confused by the seeming reward for non activity. Does this usually work?
In post 115, Lapsa wrote:you would be surprised how often overabundance of lame questions indicates scumIn post 78, profii wrote:I dont feel as great about xwing though, dunno why
In post 118, Lapsa wrote:@dough do you think xwing is a cop?
Oh come on. That’s what pushed you to voting? I can see the questions without follow up thing but to use that as your lynchpin seems super contrived.In post 128, Flubbernugget wrote:"Hey look I might have to defend myself ok bye"In post 91, xwing wrote:hmmm i like to like you profii, but maybe i cant give you a town read just yet..but def not on my scumdar..
im gonna take a backseat for now and let the others come in and comment..
@mod: i'm going to be V/LA on the weekends UTC+12, it's Friday lunch time now my time..
Why would I?In post 125, Lapsa wrote:it had a purposeIn post 82, LolWagons wrote:Also to add to Lapsa the fact he wanted to lynch Trivium without him being on the wagon is icky.
for instance - now I know that you haven't done meta dive on me
This is a better reason to join a wagon. Wish you would have just left the V/LA stuff out.In post 134, Flubbernugget wrote:Mostly the way they addressed profii. "You're pushing me and instead of digging into it I'm just going to waffle on the read for now."
Like, why ask all these questions and then have so much trouble generating a conversation?
I want to hear from TGP and X first. I still like where my vote is.In post 142, profii wrote:I've kept your seat warm... jump onIn post 140, LolWagons wrote:This is a better reason to join a wagon.
TGP is betterIn post 162, profii wrote:get on xwing!In post 161, LolWagons wrote:Duuuuuude GPs post is awful. The OP he’s quoting is profii saying that it’s probably not a reliable read because he’s reading off someone else’s meta. Instead of sheeping more updated and more rationally sound logic of generating questions with no content. Reasons matter and I am not buying that.
Trivium is town. This time, I think I’m actually sure.
You’re not going to intimidate me into getting onto a wagon with two of my scum reads lolIn post 167, profii wrote:Your resistance has been notedIn post 164, LolWagons wrote:TGP is betterIn post 162, profii wrote:get on xwing!In post 161, LolWagons wrote:Duuuuuude GPs post is awful. The OP he’s quoting is profii saying that it’s probably not a reliable read because he’s reading off someone else’s meta. Instead of sheeping more updated and more rationally sound logic of generating questions with no content. Reasons matter and I am not buying that.
Trivium is town. This time, I think I’m actually sure.
... dude I think mafia might be avoiding both wagons. Check the ISOs of all the people off the wagons and then look at the ISOs of the people on each wagon. Tell me which group looks the worst.In post 177, profii wrote:feels like 1 is the c/w to the other... about to fall asleep so will look closely tomorrowIn post 172, LolWagons wrote:Sorry should clarify that’s from GP. On mobile.
Dude your last two votes have been on GP’s wagon. Would you like to explain?In post 181, Nikk wrote:The group with you, Trivium, eg and the other bandwagon.In post 179, LolWagons wrote:... dude I think mafia might be avoiding both wagons. Check the ISOs of all the people off the wagons and then look at the ISOs of the people on each wagon. Tell me which group looks the worst.In post 177, profii wrote:feels like 1 is the c/w to the other... about to fall asleep so will look closely tomorrowIn post 172, LolWagons wrote:Sorry should clarify that’s from GP. On mobile.
Yes, I do.In post 185, Nikk wrote:You mean xwings wagon?In post 182, LolWagons wrote:Dude your last two votes have been on GP’s wagon. Would you like to explain?In post 181, Nikk wrote:The group with you, Trivium, eg and the other bandwagon.In post 179, LolWagons wrote:... dude I think mafia might be avoiding both wagons. Check the ISOs of all the people off the wagons and then look at the ISOs of the people on each wagon. Tell me which group looks the worst.In post 177, profii wrote:feels like 1 is the c/w to the other... about to fall asleep so will look closely tomorrowIn post 172, LolWagons wrote:Sorry should clarify that’s from GP. On mobile.
Don’t play this game with me, it doesn’t end well for those who try.In post 187, Nikk wrote:The same xwing I was originally voting for to make sure they couldn't skate by on votes without reasons?
The supposition is that you are broadly chainsawing for GP. Or... did you mean GP?In post 189, Nikk wrote:The supposition being that I am defending x, right? Then why would I target him to vote when there were 2 other naked voters early.In post 188, LolWagons wrote:Don’t play this game with me, it doesn’t end well for those who try.In post 187, Nikk wrote:The same xwing I was originally voting for to make sure they couldn't skate by on votes without reasons?
Explain to me why you think people on the X wagon are more scummy than the people on the GP wagon.
I've laid out my reasons for each vote individually. I cannot provide reason to a fantasy you've crafted.
Explain to me why one person saying you are in a scummier group got you so flustered you rushed to double post with incorrect information.
And I’m not the one trying to dodge questions, so I’m not flustered.In post 189, Nikk wrote:The supposition being that I am defending x, right? Then why would I target him to vote when there were 2 other naked voters early.In post 188, LolWagons wrote:Don’t play this game with me, it doesn’t end well for those who try.In post 187, Nikk wrote:The same xwing I was originally voting for to make sure they couldn't skate by on votes without reasons?
Explain to me why you think people on the X wagon are more scummy than the people on the GP wagon.
I've laid out my reasons for each vote individually. I cannot provide reason to a fantasy you've crafted.
Explain to me why one person saying you are in a scummier group got you so flustered you rushed to double post with incorrect information.
Of course, as you gracefully pointed out, X and GP should be switched, so it reads:Explain to me why you think people on the X wagon are more scummy than the people on the GP wagon.
Explain to me why you think people on the GP wagon are more scummy than the people on the X wagon.
I get pissed when people don't answer my questions. About half the people in this game just finished a game with me where the guy wouldn't answer me directly and yeah, I fucking hate it.In post 194, Nikk wrote:You seem very defensive, friend. It interests me.
You're question has a simple answer. I don't. I wanted to see how you would react. I now have my answer.
As I said early, Paradox feels like a
But you think Lapsa is better?In post 195, Nikk wrote:...decent push, especially since none of the answers given by him have made me feel warm and fuzzy.
That's referring to Lapsa's ISO btw.In post 202, LolWagons wrote:#113-#118 (they aren't all his, but that window) in his ISO...I mean, that's bad.
Yup.In post 204, Nikk wrote:I mean 115 literally describes 117 and 118.In post 202, LolWagons wrote:#113-#118 (they aren't all his, but that window) in his ISO...I mean, that's bad.
What happened to this?In post 145, Sashaddin wrote:Having caught up, I sense the better wagon here is Xwing. I feel the same thing as everyone who voted for him. My vote would put to L-2 if I count well, so I will hold off for a bit.
When I come back home I'll vote him if my mind hasn't changed or if someone hasn't posted something about him.
I’m kind of fucking with ya. But the idea is if the rules say no cops but someone doesn’t know there’s always a small chance they would fake claim cop for an easy lynch.In post 225, Sashaddin wrote:Sorry dude. I did not think of the consequences as deep as you did. How does it help town? (Not a trick question, I just want to be educated)In post 210, LolWagons wrote:Well I was hoping no one would specifically point that piece out because if people want to think there's a cop when there's not, that would typically benefit town, but you went and blew it.
Oh this is getting spicyIn post 236, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Robert you seem to be pointing fingers at literally everyone who posts: can you please condense your reads a bit into a list?
Sure, I think you two (Ie you and Robert) are scum together and this a transparently contrived attempt to distance.In post 240, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Any comments? I see a lot of your posts but have a lot of trouble understanding what your reads are.In post 238, LolWagons wrote:Oh this is getting spicyIn post 236, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Robert you seem to be pointing fingers at literally everyone who posts: can you please condense your reads a bit into a list?
I think they’re trying lolIn post 254, profii wrote:lol i said not S/S because they were pushing the similar thing - i would expected more distancing :OIn post 242, LolWagons wrote:Sure, I think you two (Ie you and Robert) are scum together and this a transparently contrived attempt to distance.
We will see when X gets back. My town read on that slot is just post-RVS so it’s tenuous. But I think TGP is still a good lynch, although Robert might be looking better.In post 256, profii wrote:Yo Lolwagons - i wanted you to vote Xwing because I thought you were scum WITH Xwing - that why I note your resistance but you are starting to town it up a bit more so I'll reveal my read.
I am placing you under the pressure of a relatively high burden of proficiency so if you keep getting stuff wrong I am going to revert back to my initial instinct that you are scum with xwing.
it was an early read and probably wrong but that's why i was going that way.