Question seconded. I atleast want to know the scumbags who killed my ass later on so I can roast the townies in dead chat.
Better phrasing: at the end of the day, do we know who voted who?
Question seconded. I atleast want to know the scumbags who killed my ass later on so I can roast the townies in dead chat.
In post 49, DrewVa wrote:idk if you guys know this but if there's literally no consequence to votes then there is no reason to not use them
it's just a way to indicate thought processes in this case
the one big appeal being that there's no risk of an actual quickhammer from anyone other than the four dayenders
that same post explicitly says we can still use the same vote tags
but that does raise one question actually
@mod will the wagons of the plurality votes be revealed when resolved?
-D
Obviously nobody did but me.In post 55, Nero Cain wrote:Am I the only one that hasn't read the mechanics yet?
DrewVa wrote:I'm not sure "question" is the word I'd use -D
It would be very rude to call royalty "old-fashioned" but may I introduce you to the wonderful world of AES 256-bit encryption?In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.
I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.
I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.