and you'll pick up cause you're not a quitter
you've got addictions too, it's true
you've got addictions too
lucy dacus - addictions
- xwing is vla on weekends
probably not S/SIn post 231, LolWagons wrote:Hey Nikk and Profii: go look at post #47 and tell me what you see in regards to Robert/TGP
lol i said not S/S because they were pushing the similar thing - i would expected more distancing :OIn post 242, LolWagons wrote:Sure, I think you two (Ie you and Robert) are scum together and this a transparently contrived attempt to distance.
I wanted more explanation on you FOS on Nikk. It looks odd and out of place.In post 246, Lapsa wrote:I have answered all your questionsIn post 245, Robert2424 wrote:From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions
I'll look up exactly what I'm talking about here and qoute it. You've been defending your "naked voting" along with everyone elses this entire time. Hence I've called your defensive, and consider your vote part of your defensiveness. dose it mean it makes you scum, no but I find it a bit scummy.In post 247, Doughboy wrote:Easy on that shade. It’s not my color. I never called you defensive. You essentially called me defensive but I have no idea why you think that. Mind explain how I’ve been defensive?In post 245, Robert2424 wrote:Doughboy, an interesting charicter to say the least. He claims me to be defensive when he voted me defending what he calls Naked voting
Side note being defensive isn’t alignment indicative but since he brought it up, he should at least be able to explain/show how I’ve been.
That may be wrong, adjusting my notes.In post 248, Lapsa wrote:@robert how is post 17 late?
If it was a "lolwagon", it didn't turn into one after all those people jumped in on him.In post 249, Doughboy wrote:I find it hard to believe Robert from 2012 has never seen a lolwagon. Hell we have a player named after them. lol wagons happen in rvs and that’s what took place. I appreciate his attempt to look at the wagon for scum, however I feel if he were town he’d try to converse more with the naked voters. I don’t even think he said anything about the fact that he called out naked voters and then I intentionally naked vote. I don’t see any sort of curiosity coming from him, which probably means he’s more informed than I.
gave you my explanation pretty much instantly on #233. repeatedly on #237In post 255, Robert2424 wrote:I wanted more explanation on you FOS on Nikk. It looks odd and out of place.In post 246, Lapsa wrote:I have answered all your questionsIn post 245, Robert2424 wrote:From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions
THis is pinging me HARD.In post 257, Doughboy wrote: I appreciate the attempt though. I like to see scum fight back.
ah it wasn't dough. still don't see how I've been defensive on it.In post 223, profii wrote:dunno if id call him a liar BUT I do find him scummy...In post 216, Doughboy wrote:@profli. Thoughts on Robert and him lying?
firstly it's hilarious that TGP called him potentially "cunning scum" and Robert says hey thanks for calling me cunning as if to slip "yes I'm scum I'm glad you rate my scum play so highly" sort of thing.
Also further to that, I think his push on the naked voters is low hanging fruit because as scum he cant find a fake push to latch on to so "that will do" - as you said, when i read you 2 in ISO, my first reaction was "just ask the reasons if you dont like the naked vote" but Robert gets needlessly defensive about it
VOTE: Robert
I don't really have a problem other then your attitude and some of the stuff you've said so far. I don't hate you or anything, just don't like your posts from what I've seen so far from me. Its day 1, so in the event that neither of us are lynched, day 1 will likely amount to just reads and feels, unless there is a lynch.In post 258, Lapsa wrote:gave you my explanation pretty much instantly on #233. repeatedly on #237In post 255, Robert2424 wrote:I wanted more explanation on you FOS on Nikk. It looks odd and out of place.In post 246, Lapsa wrote:I have answered all your questionsIn post 245, Robert2424 wrote:From odd explanations to sometimes out right ignoring some of my questions
and was catching up with the thread
@robert what is your problem with me?
And why is that?In post 259, TheGoldenParadox wrote:THis is pinging me HARD.In post 257, Doughboy wrote: I appreciate the attempt though. I like to see scum fight back.
Actually shorter deadlines benefit town more than scum. I’m not saying lynch tomorrow but definitely before ChristmasIn post 262, Robert2424 wrote:with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.
Interesting, I've never heard this before. Can you provide a source?In post 264, Doughboy wrote:Actually shorter deadlines benefit town more than scum. I’m not saying lynch tomorrow but definitely before ChristmasIn post 262, Robert2424 wrote:with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.
I never think of the possible dumb moves. I'm too cartesian I guess.In post 229, LolWagons wrote:I’m kind of fucking with ya. But the idea is if the rules say no cops but someone doesn’t know there’s always a small chance they would fake claim cop for an easy lynch.
I guess it means town has less pages to read through to try to find the scum bits, meaning it is more effective. My 2 cents.In post 266, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Interesting, I've never heard this before. Can you provide a source?
What?In post 270, Lapsa wrote:that's a full dollar
Experience. I think a game I just finished had quicker lynches and we did well.In post 266, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Interesting, I've never heard this before. Can you provide a source?In post 264, Doughboy wrote:Actually shorter deadlines benefit town more than scum. I’m not saying lynch tomorrow but definitely before ChristmasIn post 262, Robert2424 wrote:with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.
Exactly. That’s my experience but I played 24 hour days.In post 269, Robert2424 wrote:I've always found it better. I used to play on these one boards with 72 hours days and 24 hour nights and town had an 80% win rate. If not better while this other site I play on now with days like here it's around 48% town win rate.