I agree with Elsa on just about everything.
RCE, feel free to say as much as you like about anyone you suspect as town or otherwise.
In post 397, Boonskiies wrote:Technically, SK doesn’t count as being Multiball anywhere on site. However, I advertised the game implying it was Single Ball, and generally if I’m going to straight up confirm it’s not Multiball, I’m not going to put a SK in the game.
In post 404, Gamma Emerald wrote:@DVa I’m probably that guy that is totally a jerk about distrusting Karmeleon because he’s a suave charmer (translation: I have a gut suspicion he’s scum)
In post 401, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 397, Boonskiies wrote:Technically, SK doesn’t count as being Multiball anywhere on site. However, I advertised the game implying it was Single Ball, and generally if I’m going to straight up confirm it’s not Multiball, I’m not going to put a SK in the game.
SK kindaaaa is multiball but I won’t go into that rn
In post 407, Boonskiies wrote:While I agree, it “technically” isn’t. If you look at the wiki, it specifically says only groupscum count regarding Multiball. But yeah, that’s why I chose to just confirm that. I think I’ll change the Checklist to something that better differentiates.
In post 406, DrewVa wrote:In post 404, Gamma Emerald wrote:@DVa I’m probably that guy that is totally a jerk about distrusting Karmeleon because he’s a suave charmer (translation: I have a gut suspicion he’s scum)
but remember, when I offered to dance with you the first time, I was town LOL
like the quick read and offer to dance the first time after witches ball could be townie right?
or is he me in coalition? -D
In post 259, davesaz wrote:Someone who is a human and thinks something is true but isn't 100% certain may say/write if/then logic as a natural linguistic effect of that uncertainty. This goes for whether the uncertainty is in the 1st or 2nd part of the statement.
Once you're in the pattern of if x/then y, modifying that pattern to another conditional to show certainty in x but conditional in y is possible, but to the writer unnecessary given they know what they are uncertain about.
I have never seen a legit slip of this type, and the people who call such so-called slips to attention have been scum at least half the time I've seen someone bring it up, possibly more.
In post 314, Nev and Max wrote:In post 311, Nero Cain wrote:If there's not a good reason to scumread me then I'm town.
I feel like thats not how that works. Scum would be sure to avoid looking like scum at this point and would be acting as stereotypically town as possible. If there isn't a reason to scum read you it just means you are null and have yet to do anything real.
In post 409, DrewVa wrote:I haven’t seen town!Nero yet in this game.
In post 412, Thanos wrote:I thought Lamees would've been posting more by now; Apologies for the inactivity, I'll take some more time before I get into the game.In post 259, davesaz wrote:Someone who is a human and thinks something is true but isn't 100% certain may say/write if/then logic as a natural linguistic effect of that uncertainty. This goes for whether the uncertainty is in the 1st or 2nd part of the statement.
Once you're in the pattern of if x/then y, modifying that pattern to another conditional to show certainty in x but conditional in y is possible, but to the writer unnecessary given they know what they are uncertain about.
I have never seen a legit slip of this type, and the people who call such so-called slips to attention have been scum at least half the time I've seen someone bring it up, possibly more.
It seems unlikely that scum!BEF knowingly pushed a slip he'd know no one else would agree on, and call attention to himself that way. BEF seems to have genuinely believed in that slip, which makes me think he's town.
~Auro
In post 30, DrewVa wrote:VOTE: Emperors New Groove
Gamma Emerald wrote:I just watched Infinity War. You’re on my shit list.
In post 207, Nev and Max wrote:Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but our votes do have consequences. Just like the words and actions we make online have real world implications as well.
Votes in this thread will eventually lynch someone, trick is we never know when the day will end unless it goes to deadline or the 4 tell us when they are ending the day
In post 250, Ultimate Liars wrote:So it seems I misunderstood. So the 4 people vote privately when to end the day. I thought it was their public votes. What do you guys think of this idea. We always have a majority on the scummier of the 4. That way we guarantee one doesn't vote in private. Until we are ready to vote our actual lynch target?
-kokichi
In post 413, Nero Cain wrote:In post 314, Nev and Max wrote:In post 311, Nero Cain wrote:If there's not a good reason to scumread me then I'm town.
I feel like thats not how that works. Scum would be sure to avoid looking like scum at this point and would be acting as stereotypically town as possible. If there isn't a reason to scum read you it just means you are null and have yet to do anything real.
I'm being slightly facetious here though very rarely is there a halfway decent case on me when I'm town.
how is that scummy at all?
???In post 409, DrewVa wrote:I haven’t seen town!Nero yet in this game.
I'll be conftown when we flip RCE.
In post 421, Nero Cain wrote:So ok, I fake daykilled him b/c I was annoyed at him and Else trolling and bloating this thread. That alone is antitown/scummy but then I felt like RCE's threat/promise to ignore me was scummy. Like I can't go into details b/c both our games are ongoing but I have an excellent track record of reading him and I could see scum RCE intentionally not wanting to be in an argument with me.