Open 738: Purgatory | LA FIN
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
In post 29, Keyser Söze wrote:For some reason I thought it was a 7:2 setup... learnt from the OP that there are in fact three mafia!No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
This feels LAMIST honestly; I think the worst wagon was very hard to miss and he wasn't at risk of being hammered, like, anytime soon.In post 127, LabRat01 wrote:friendly reminder that Majority is 5 and duck has 3 votes on him rn
just don't hammer when not even a day has passed since SoDNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
It really hasn't been very long since the game began. I don't get why you seem so convinced Creature's scum already. Also I don't think he really does the lurking thing as scum anymore.
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I mean on the other handIn post 169, Creature wrote:was I replaced from this game?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Like what is actually the point of this post? I feel like it's supposed to be game-related content but it contains nothing except Creature saying "I'm going to try and identify who's scum and town" which literally everyone tries to do. If it was as easy as just "finding scum" town would win every game.In post 226, Creature wrote:I'm gonna aim for the long game.
Find one scum per hell phase
One town per heaven phaseNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Actually I think the lynch is likely Creature anyways so not gonna post more about him for now.
In post 254, the worst wrote:
#wolfpostingIn post 112, LabRat01 wrote:honestly
I have never started an honest sentence with the worst "honestly"
Did you roll scum on me worstIn post 287, the worst wrote:honestly i called him "very town" because he pinged town to me consistently while he is posting, i'm cognisant of the fact that him sounding like that early is town indicative...and also i was biased by korina's posting later
i think that slot's reasonably obviously town, i'll be reevaluating it but i don't feel like i should be paranoid...? or doubting that people who sound like town in rvs might be tEh ScUmZ?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Can you elaborate on your read on my predecessor? because you were pushing them earlier, they kinda just flaked after that, and I don't understand how they suddenly pop up as your top townread? You sort of backtrack on that a few minutes later but they're still like a townread for you.In post 268, the worst wrote:so basically as of like page 4 i'm pretty sure there's at least one wolf int he {DrJ, Labby, KeySo} interactions. they felt like.. steery but not actually conductive to anything really happening if that makes sense. like there's something there which is just interactions for the sake of interactions and somebody is either peddling some bullshit or coasting through that conversation. i had some intense Keyser paranoia ln but in retrospect I'm pretty sure Labby is always a wolf before Keyser here
i was on around
{tw}
{lefty, Jek/Hy}
{Carmen, Creature, Volxen, Relly}
{LabRat, ?KeySo?}No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
honestly I kind of feel crazy for even entertaining the idea that tw has been bussing creature this whole time? but at the same time it kinda seems like something worst might do? idk
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I don't understand this. It definitely seems like Lefty was shitting on derpclears and I don't get how they were saying it was a gross conversation?In post 297, the worst wrote:In post 19, Lefty wrote:oh so we're pretending derp clears have actual merit or
?
I don’t think anyone should read any of pg 1 as anything but tongue in cheek shitpostingoriginally shitting on derpclears as an institution kinda rubbed me the wrong way but in this case i actually pretty strongly agree that the derpclear conversation/interaction between Labby and Carmen felt grossNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
AWOO
No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Creature's entire dayplay recently has been orientated towards saving himself.
His vote and push on me has been completely devoid of substance and wasn't real. It was an easy compromise lynch because nobody townread my empty slot, Creature pushed that like an actual read. Now labrat says "I'll stop pushing you if you vote Keyser" and he goes and does exactly that immediately by saying "oh Keyser's recent posts wouldn't come from town lol."
Hanging anyone except him today is just a huge mistake.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Like yeah Keyser's vote there wasn't the best but from what he said afterwards it seems likely that he was townreading Creature there hence why he doesn't want that lynch - with less than a day left a compromise lynch does make some sense. And like 991 was a joke and I really don't think it's scum indicative at all.
wrt/ 954 I haven't exactly read the entire game but just because town emotion seems obvious to you doesn't mean every townie is going to interpret it in the same way - I do think TW is capable of faking emotions as scum and a fluid train of thought, and looking at 429 honestly I don't even see why scum can't fake that.
I think it is very rare to be "salty that (somebody) SRd you right" and I also don't get the impression Keyser is that kind of person. And again you interpreting those posts as town tells really does not mean that everybody has to.
wrt/ 1047; you don't need to be an extensive expert to know about Creature's meta; you can simply look at recent games in which he blurred the line. And a lot of people are just strongly against meta in general without any background knowledge of the player being discussed.
the lovers game thing was incorrect, yes, but that doesn't mean his intentions behind bringing it up were malicious; it's perfectly reasonable that he just saw the game, saw Irre buddying his buddies, and reporting his findings without thinking to check too much, since it was an off-the-cuff theory as he puts it. FTR there was a problem in that game with a town player not realizing the setup was Lovers so it's definitely possible the same happened to Keyser.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
oh but I thought Keyser's recent posts were just too scummy to ignore?In post 1053, Creature wrote:
Copypaste this post but replace my name with Ausuka when lynching her hell2In post 1051, Ausuka wrote:Creature's entire dayplay recently has been orientated towards saving himself.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I'm already voting Creature.In post 1058, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka you should place a vote
btw I don't see how keyser's posting is inconsistent with someone who is just demotivated.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
asdfghjjkl;In post 1062, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:there's a character limit of 3 million, which I broke, by a lot.whatNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure that post was a joke since we're all vanilla.In post 1067, Eragon wrote:I mean “I was VT” in the past-tense when you aren’t even the top wagon?
That’s honestly bullshit.
But it’s just sad ;_;No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
(I know that the basic answer to that is going to be "meta" like you've said in your ISO and I probably should've said that in the post above, sorry. I just don't understand why his ISO is so towny and I don't understand why his scumgame can't have just, improved - I don't think it's that rare.)
I'm concerned about him, mainly due to his general push of {Creature, Keyser, Eragon} i.e the most suspected players in the game as a category.
pedit: I think I'm alright at interacting with you? So I probably could just play for a few days and if I don't have a definite read back then go for the quotewalls etc.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Yeah idk I don't get that. Does he really have such a distinctive scum meta to the point where you can easily predict exactly how it would improve? I mean, I've had scum games before where people have just believed that I'm town because I played a terrible scumgame with them recently and they believe an extremely mediocre scumgame was beyond my capacity; I think that sometimes just playing scum, even if you don't do so well, can help you get used to it and perform better next time. And IMHO volxen's play in Watchmen really wasn't that bad and could've got him pretty far had things gone differently / the game had a different playerlist?In post 1128, the worst wrote:
It's within the scope of his town meta pretty comfortably and it'd be like quite a stretch for his scum metaIn post 1124, Ausuka wrote:(I know that the basic answer to that is going to be "meta" like you've said in your ISO and I probably should've said that in the post above, sorry. I just don't understand why his ISO is so towny and I don't understand why his scumgame can't have just, improved - I don't think it's that rare.)
I'm concerned about him, mainly due to his general push of {Creature, Keyser, Eragon} i.e the most suspected players in the game as a category.
pedit: I think I'm alright at interacting with you? So I probably could just play for a few days and if I don't have a definite read back then go for the quotewalls etc.
I don't think his scum meta is currently gearing towards improving so dramatically in such specific ways so to speak - I hope this makes sense but if not hmu and I'll iso diveNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
good tone and his ate at the end of d2 felt genuine, seems interested in scumhunting similarly to other games i played with him.In post 1163, Eragon wrote:who do you think keyser is town?
i could see having some reasons for a town lean, but willing to put in heaven im suprised tbh.
w/ volxen and tw, tw's read had a lot more nuance and progression? and i feel like he had a large role in like setting those players as scumread, whereas volxen is just like "yeah a few of these points why eragon is townreading creature are kind of wrong" at a time when i think creature and eragon are considered the scummiest players here, and says "Any why doesn't he consider the possibility that Keyser could be pushing him as scum as well? Why is Keyser the only person on his wagon that gets a free pass?" while quoting creature openly entertaining the possibility keyser is scum. tw's reads feel a lot more developed than volxen's in this regard and also his entire reason for pushing eragon and keyser as scum is essentially "they make sense as buddies with creature" but he's also like "I'm like 99.99% certain that there is at least one scum among {Keyser, Creature, Eragon}. I don't see a world where they are all town." which doesn't actually account for how his push was revolved around creature and preflip associations. his push today is basically just "people on the Creature wagon are scum" which seems like a really surface level view and doesn't at all account for the possibility that scum might have just stayed off the wagon which happens regularly in games generally.
i'm tired right now so sorry if none of this makes sense.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
but like people can change? like when you metaread me in mafia month it didn't work because i had changed my scumgame to subvert your expectations knowing that i was scum and you were town and the best way to not be caught by you, considering how well you knew me, was just to try and play outside the boundaries of what you knew of my play? do you think volxen, if rolling scum against you, could try the same thing as that? i kinda hard doubt he would just sort of roll over and play to what you KNEW was his meta as scum?In post 1170, the worst wrote:
I think his town and scumganes have been pretty markedly different (we play together lots and maybe I've probably inadvertently read all of his games on site I guess). plus we're like buds and have talked a bit about how we approach both alignments + he's sought some feedback from myself and others about his playIn post 1156, Ausuka wrote:
Yeah idk I don't get that. Does he really have such a distinctive scum meta to the point where you can easily predict exactly how it would improve? I mean, I've had scum games before where people have just believed that I'm town because I played a terrible scumgame with them recently and they believe an extremely mediocre scumgame was beyond my capacity; I think that sometimes just playing scum, even if you don't do so well, can help you get used to it and perform better next time. And IMHO volxen's play in Watchmen really wasn't that bad and could've got him pretty far had things gone differently / the game had a different playerlist?In post 1128, the worst wrote:
It's within the scope of his town meta pretty comfortably and it'd be like quite a stretch for his scum metaIn post 1124, Ausuka wrote:(I know that the basic answer to that is going to be "meta" like you've said in your ISO and I probably should've said that in the post above, sorry. I just don't understand why his ISO is so towny and I don't understand why his scumgame can't have just, improved - I don't think it's that rare.)
I'm concerned about him, mainly due to his general push of {Creature, Keyser, Eragon} i.e the most suspected players in the game as a category.
pedit: I think I'm alright at interacting with you? So I probably could just play for a few days and if I don't have a definite read back then go for the quotewalls etc.
I don't think his scum meta is currently gearing towards improving so dramatically in such specific ways so to speak - I hope this makes sense but if not hmu and I'll iso dive
so within reason, I think I can anticipate a trajectory of his scumplay/townplay development yeah. Sorry it might sound bizarre from the outside looking in but I feel really comfortable. Relly's defence makes me feel pretty comfortable too (I think he does this as either alignment but it doesn't present as s/s)No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
you're right that i have more experience over him but i also feel like you don't need experience to do this if that makes sense? like maybe i'm biased or something but I feel like you don't need experience to feel that, if you roll scum against someone who knows you and someone you've talked to about your scumgame, you would just avoid stuff you do in your scumgame and avoid stuff that you told that person you do as scum so you don't get caught. like, i think fooling people by subverting expectations is something that occurs outside mafia and is an idea i think most people would be familiar with even if they are completely new to the game of mafia itself.In post 1187, the worst wrote:
in fairness, you have over a year's experience over volxen and are kinda cognisant of how to avoid being meta scumread. like to some extents. for example rn you look exactly like town you but I'm holding off on the read to better analyse intent/trajectory alongside of meta pings.In post 1182, Ausuka wrote:but like people can change? like when you metaread me in mafia month it didn't work because i had changed my scumgame to subvert your expectations knowing that i was scum and you were town and the best way to not be caught by you, considering how well you knew me, was just to try and play outside the boundaries of what you knew of my play? do you think volxen, if rolling scum against you, could try the same thing as that? i kinda hard doubt he would just sort of roll over and play to what you KNEW was his meta as scum?
Sure there's a world where volxen could be scum but also I kinda think his contributions have been really towny as well. I know they're easier to fake than say, mine, but they're still showing a pretty clean train of thought imo.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I'm not Irrele but sure, let's do it.
VOTE: Keyser SözeNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I'm not saying that no scum are on the Creature wagon; I'm saying that there may be 1 or 2 scum off it. The only reason the Creature wagon couldn't be all-town is that LabRat and Keyser were both outside it; I've played plenty of games with no scum on the d1 mislynch wagon. Town aren't actually all that good and townies suspect other townies all the time. It's perfectly reasonable to suppose that over a majority of townies would elect to lynch somebody, especially somebody acting suspicious. It's possible for Irrelephant to be the only scum on the wagon for example and I don't think it's possible to rule it out, even if there's a limited number of possible scumteams containing him.In post 1195, volxen wrote:
@Ausuka, do you really think my conclusion about their being scum on Creature's wagon is unreasonable? Even in games with the usual town:scum ratio (e.g., 7:2, 10:3, etc.), I still believe that in the vast majority of cases, townies don't get lynched without scum involvement, especially on day one where the most votes are required to achieve a lynch. I have done this kind of VCA analysis, as town, in multiple newbie games that I have played.In post 1177, Ausuka wrote:
good tone and his ate at the end of d2 felt genuine, seems interested in scumhunting similarly to other games i played with him.In post 1163, Eragon wrote:who do you think keyser is town?
i could see having some reasons for a town lean, but willing to put in heaven im suprised tbh.
w/ volxen and tw, tw's read had a lot more nuance and progression? and i feel like he had a large role in like setting those players as scumread, whereas volxen is just like "yeah a few of these points why eragon is townreading creature are kind of wrong" at a time when i think creature and eragon are considered the scummiest players here, and says "Any why doesn't he consider the possibility that Keyser could be pushing him as scum as well? Why is Keyser the only person on his wagon that gets a free pass?" while quoting creature openly entertaining the possibility keyser is scum. tw's reads feel a lot more developed than volxen's in this regard and also his entire reason for pushing eragon and keyser as scum is essentially "they make sense as buddies with creature" but he's also like "I'm like 99.99% certain that there is at least one scum among {Keyser, Creature, Eragon}. I don't see a world where they are all town." which doesn't actually account for how his push was revolved around creature and preflip associations.his push today is basically just "people on the Creature wagon are scum" which seems like a really surface level view and doesn't at all account for the possibility that scum might have just stayed off the wagon which happens regularly in games generally.
i'm tired right now so sorry if none of this makes sense.
In this game, I believe this applies even more-so than usual because the town:scum ratio is 6:3 rather than 7:2, and a third of the original playerlist is scum. To put it in perspective, there are only 6 townies, so if Creature's mislynch wagon was all-town, it would mean that 100% of his fellow town players all voted to lynch him, and that the scumteam is {Keyser, Eragon, Labrat}. I'm 99.99% confident that isn't the case.
I furthermore concluded that Irrelephant isn't the sole scum on Creature's wagon, because his vote didn't really make a significant difference in the outcome of day one (i.e., Creature would have been mislynched even if Irrelephant did not place the hammer vote). So what is wrong with my conclusion that there is scum among {TW, Dr. J, Ausuka} based on VCA? Do you really think I should be entertaining the notion of a {Keyser, Eragon, Labrat} scumteam at this point?
Even ignoring accuracy, saying "in this game with 3 scum out of 9 players, there's probably 1 at least scum in {Ausuka, Jekyll, worst, volxen}" isn't really a helpful point and is also the only alignment-hunting you've done today.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
hi, sorry for disappearing for a bit. i've not really been feeling that well.
VOTE: Jekyll
i thought volxen's posts recently were towny and i don't scumread him anymore but he doesn't want heaven and neither does keyser so...
keyser, are you totally sure about this? i don't see anything exactly wrong with following that scumteam for now since the players you scumread are pretty likely to be scum but it's very difficult to nail the exact scumteam right now and I think you should be somewhat open to the possibility that you've gone wrong somewhere in the future; it might not be a good idea to base your decisions on your current theory throughout this entire game.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
there, necessarily, has to be 3 scum in {eragon, jekyll, volxen, labrat, worst, keyser, irre}In post 1529, LabRat01 wrote:
elaborate on your reads please, why do you think the team is me/irre/TW?In post 1515, Ausuka wrote:hi, sorry for disappearing for a bit. i've not really been feeling that well.
VOTE: Jekyll
i thought volxen's posts recently were towny and i don't scumread him anymore but he doesn't want heaven and neither does keyser so...
keyser, are you totally sure about this? i don't see anything exactly wrong with following that scumteam for now since the players you scumread are pretty likely to be scum but it's very difficult to nail the exact scumteam right now and I think you should be somewhat open to the possibility that you've gone wrong somewhere in the future; it might not be a good idea to base your decisions on your current theory throughout this entire game.
i've always felt that jekyll and keyser are town; both feel genuine to me. i don't see keyser really behaving like this as scum and again he feels genuine in his convictions. i don't really see korina writing 300k words as scum either; even if the whole thing was mostly quotes i feel like it shows that they were going back and reading through the game in a very detailed way that probably doesn't come from scum.
volxen was less so but I kind of like the insistence that he shouldn't go to heaven despite lots of people thinking that he should and 1432 is towny also.
that leaves {worst, lab, irre, era} as the main pool i'm looking at and honestly that's enough for me to support a scumteam of 3 of them. irre feels shallower than i'd expect from him normally, worst has done some suspect stuff like saying he'd never begin a honest sentence with honestly and later doing that + the volxen thing may have been TMI, and labrat's push on keyser doesn't really feel genuine, like they're trying to throw as many things out there as possible just so the theory is really hard to totally disprove.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
You also townread Jekyll who hasn't made any such objections, is there any reason you don't want to send them to heaven?In post 1567, Irrelephant11 wrote:we should send volxen to heaven, in spite of himselfNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Jekyll would've been in heaven by now if there's a "lack of rejection" from the entire thread. Just because people aren't screaming about how bad of a vote it is.In post 1599, the worst wrote:The lack of rejection from the rest of the thread makes me wanna not send Dr. J to heaven. I don't think he's a wolf but I think scum want him heaven'd
Eragon is null to me. Like I get he probably shouldn't be but like I seriously don't know what to read him on, lol. Most of his posts just look null to me. Maybe I should catch up on d1 after all.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
this does kind of strike me as non-SvS? I don't see the point for Jekyll doing this as scum.In post 320, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I'm honestly a little confused at tw town-reading me so heavily based of meta fromJanuarythis year (the "I wear my heart on my sleeve" part? As far as I know its still in my chest ) and possibly reading another game where I was scum. I'd probably call it an attempt to buddy me, given I know him from back then, and am possibly likely to respond by TRing him.
UNVOTE:
I need to look a little closer at tw's ISONo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
They focus on tw early in a way that suggests they're really being critical of his posts in a way I wouldn't expect from scumpartners and I think it would be unnecessary to push the spotlight onto him at that point.In post 1777, Irrelephant11 wrote:What about that post can't be SvS?
I said that my read on him was null, didn't I? If I get a read on him when I'm reading the thread, I'll tell you.In post 1778, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka did you ever settle on a read for eragon?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:
I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:
Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:
You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
The flip itself doesn't change much for me other than generally losing confidence in my current reads as a whole. I never had any associations for anyone with Jekyll.In post 1781, Irrelephant11 wrote:In post 1779, Ausuka wrote:
I said that my read on him was null, didn't I? If I get a read on him when I'm reading the thread, I'll tell you.In post 1778, Irrelephant11 wrote:Ausuka did you ever settle on a read for eragon?
Okay, fine, how has the flip changed your reads?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Hmm actually maybe that comment was stupid.In post 388, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Tw is probably town based on the lack of any wagon - while I don't doubt scum could be WIFOMING there, I think thats much less unlikely than them leaving a wagon sit there.
Also, post 297 - it looks very town. I see plenty of town motivation there, it shows plenty of effort which I don't think scum is going to do if they can get by without it. Sort of similar to how someone in another game (town) literally made a chart with colour showing every vote
Furthermore, he kind of feels like he is enthusiastic. Maybe that sounds stupid and probably is, but just based on tone, I think he looks a lot more like town than scum.
I still am a little concerned at him seemingly trying to buddy me, but hmph, I'm probably reading too much into itNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
tbh I think it's partner indicative at least to the point of canceling out my earlier idea. The "this post has a bit of effort so it literally can't be scum" looks like it's explicitly trying to townread you rather than just TMI.In post 1784, the worst wrote:Do you think 388 is partner indicative or TMI cuz?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Obviously he doesn't need to but I think a lot of players like to substantiate all their reads, especially as scum so that they can point to all their logical effort game-solving etc.In post 1786, the worst wrote:I was pretty consensus townread at that point. Do you think he'd feel the need to soft towncase his partner and wouldn't feel anxious about doing so?
I mean that's possible too yeah.In post 1787, the worst wrote:The other alternative was he was slipping into the pack without wanting to look like he was slipping into the pack which is frankly NAI or slightly antialigned imoNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Reading Jekyll's ISO I feel like they were SRing labrat and then just kind of flipped to townreading them for no reason? Am I missing something about this?
Didn't they say before that point that they'd read into your ISO, though, in 320? I wouldn't say it was exactly random; they gave a light SR on you and then did a 180 pivot out of it.In post 1789, the worst wrote:I tend to read random lengthy reads like that as anti partner indicative. If it was cheekily massaged into a larger read list I'd kinda get it but he sort of just broke into this random town!tw soliloquy which would be a very weird way of drawing associatives to yourself and your partner. Especially if you're looking at a {Dr. J, tw} scum dynamic which has a high chance of at least one of us going to heaven d2 and spewing the other.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Right I get that but I just want more detail on the "chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy" bit. What motivation exactly does Labrat have for doing that at the time, what's the point?In post 1807, volxen wrote:
At the time I wrote that post, Labrat was the player I was the most suspicious of, and I found it suspect that within a few minutes she attacked both TW and Lefty (your predecessor) for asking questions to each other about Keyser. I thought she might have been chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy.In post 1780, Ausuka wrote:
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:
I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:
Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:
You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.
Of course a lot has changed since then, as I think Keyser is town now.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Why did you think this?In post 641, Irrelephant11 wrote: Carmen and lefty both need to show up, willing to bet there's a scum in at least one of those twoNo matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I mean, fmpov I thought those things were all scum motivated - I thought the scum perspective made more sense. I was definitely wrong but being wrong doesn't make me scum; everyone is wrong sometimes.In post 1833, Keyser Söze wrote:[It's a pretty sharp focused push on Creature. Ausuka wasn't letting Creature survive D1. I don't think Creature ever got called up on this either...? Shouldn't have Ausuka been more aware of Creature's playstyle? My concern with this: Ausuka was definitely painting every action of Creature's as scum motivated: 1) Creature's lack of early scum hunting content 2) Creature's vote for me 3) Creature's vote for Ausuka.... there isn't much of an attempt to look from Creature's town/scum perspective]
I'm not going to get fustrated or have passionate reads just because you want me to? I'm just going to do what comes to me naturally.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
Why would Lefty want to chainsaw defend someone because it's something that scum frequently do? I mean, you probably were trying to say that scum chainsaw defend often independent of my question, but I wanted an answer The second one especially very much does not come across that way; she's saying that Lefty shouldn't townread Keyser because what he did could easily be faked, rather than shutting down Lefty's suspicion of Keyser.In post 1840, volxen wrote:
Because it's something scum frequently do (chainsaw defense), although TW makes a fair point that scum may be more likely to chainsaw defend a townie rather than a scumbuddy. Regardless, it just struck me as very odd that she attacked two different people who were asking each other questions about Keyser within a 7 minute period, and it came across to me like she was trying to shut down both questions (e.g., telling Lefty he should be doing something else).In post 1819, Ausuka wrote:
Right I get that but I just want more detail on the "chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy" bit. What motivation exactly does Labrat have for doing that at the time, what's the point?In post 1807, volxen wrote:
At the time I wrote that post, Labrat was the player I was the most suspicious of, and I found it suspect that within a few minutes she attacked both TW and Lefty (your predecessor) for asking questions to each other about Keyser. I thought she might have been chainsaw defending Keyser because he was her scumbuddy.In post 1780, Ausuka wrote:
can you walk me through your thoughts when you were writing this volxen? what's the purpose of chainsaw defending somebody that early when suspicions are not set in stone?In post 351, volxen wrote:
I don't think it's too far-fetched that scum!Rat would chainsaw defend one of her scumbuddies against two players. And her two posts where she attacked both TW and Lefty for asking a question about your slot were on pages three and four, not on page one:In post 350, Keyser Söze wrote:You think scum-labrat is chainsaw defending scum-me on PAGE ONE against TWO PLAYERS?
This was at the bottom of page three.In post 74, LabRat01 wrote:
Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
And this was as the top of page four.In post 76, LabRat01 wrote:
You know, sth like that could prob be faked by a 5-year old.In post 55, Lefty wrote:What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Possibly younger
It kinda feels like you didn't want to appear useless so decided to writeanythingthat might appear helpful without actually considering if it makes sense to ask about that.
Do not do it like that. If you want to do sth, you can comment on the stuff:
-I wrote about duck,
-keyser wrote about me&DrJ,
-DrJ wrote about me/keiser
-or w/e.
Just pick a wagon and go with it, there’s no need to be wary here
And both posts were written within seven minutes of each other, which makes it even more odd.
Of course a lot has changed since then, as I think Keyser is town now.
I can't really imagine any scenario in which Labrat's altness is alignment relevant.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
tbh I'm chill with that but that might just be because I'm kinda low-motivation rn.In post 1867, the worst wrote:If I was being more politicalful I probably should have nullread Ausuka here without commenting and seen if she punched me for it (I think town!suka does but scum!suka probably chills with being third from the bottom)No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
What I'm doing is enough, and I've committed plenty of time to this game. If you don't like it that much then just vote me or something; I'm not going to drastically increase my investment in this game because you tell me to or make snide remarks about me.In post 1964, Keyser Söze wrote:I mean.. to look at the players who have sat on their ass all day.
We stand before the precipice of defeat and I would have expected more urgency (talking to Volxen, ausuka.. and potentially Eragon here).
RE: Volxen - do you think you went too deep of a town read too early on D1?
RE: Eragon - I did like some of the meta points he raised (can you personally see a difference in your energy/WIM/game solving pointedness between this game our previous games together?)
Labrat is a firm townread for me by now. I don't see scum doing what they've been doing recently tbh.
Worst is volxen still your top tr? I feel like people townread him far too easily d1 and although he had a fairly towny d2 people have really exaggerated just how towny he actually is?
I'm going to try and see if Irre/volxen/Drj work together as a scumteam.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I mean yeah, I'm probably outside my scumrange? I don't examine my own meta and haven't reread Mafia Month in detail ever. Not entirely sure what you want me to talk about specifically.In post 1970, the worst wrote:What did you think of my towncase on you Ausuka?No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
I don't think there's any possibility that we lynch anyone but Rel today anyway so that's basically a foregone conclusion. I'm mainly thinking about tomorrow and the hell phase after that. If I find something that strongly indicates Rel town I guess I'd push against it but doubt I'd have much luck.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
165 is heating Irre a little hard for earlygame tbh?
This is kind of what I'd expect from a Drj/Volx/Irre team although Era and TW would also fit and so would I so probably not that conclusive. Does make Lab and Soeze look better though.In post 1073, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Also, quick readslist:
{DrJ}
{Volxen, Eragon}
{Irrel, Ausuka, TW}
{} - Null
{Lab(?), Soze(?)}
{Creature}
{}
This wifom is grinding my head in.In post 1656, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Here are my last words, lynch keyser or tw tomorrow, preferably the latter of the two, if scum send the other to heaven and lymch irrel and you'll have a good chance of winning. Good luck!
Dr J obviously didn't want volxen in heaven; he wanted Keyser. This is confusing, but maybe also important? Jekyll obviously didn't really want to have town in heaven; if they did they would've resisted their lynch far more than they actually did. So either Dr J or Keyser must have been scum's target for heaven. However, Irrelephant wanted volxen to be elected.
So, listing the possibilities that I can see:
1) Scum wanted Dr. J in heaven, badly. I see Irre's Dr J vote as simply a protest vote - therefore I don't think this is exactly consistent with Irre's agenda for d2, unless he only began to care at the day-end and scum didn't care until then? Does that make sense?
2) Scum just didn't care. But in this case, why would they all be on the Jekyll wagon?
3) Scum preferred Jekyll but didn't care that much. But then like why would Irre keep suggesting alternatives?
4) Scum preferred Volxen. Jekyll wouldn't vote Volxen though.
So the only possibilities that exist wrt/ d2 on this team as far as I can see is that scum didn't care until the end, when they decided they wanted the Jekyll wagon (but why?) or they all just happened to decide Jekyll was best - which is possible, yeah, but I don't think likely exactly. Or Irre wanted Jekyll in heaven the whole time but decided to distance himself until he had to vote. Idk.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
In post 1988, Irrelephant11 wrote: I've kinda been fine with my lynch
I wouldn't bite on a labby wagon personally.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you.- Ausuka
-
Ausuka she/herTeam Mafia Winner
- Ausuka
she/her- Team Mafia Winner
- Team Mafia Winner
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: July 21, 2017
- Pronoun: she/her
- Location: Coventry, UK
:thinkign:In post 107, Irrelephant11 wrote:tw and I agree the scum chat is very sad without you
Is Irrelephant the kind of person who would vote his two scumbuddies successively at the beginning of the game?
if this wins Irrele the game I think him supporting it makes a lot of sense?In post 652, Irrelephant11 wrote:In post 649, the worst wrote:
wild, I don't mind those reads
how do you feel about
Hell: Creature
Heaven: DrJ
Hell: Keyser
Heaven: Volxen
Confession I'm not 100% sure when the win is triggered but I think this just gets us there
also I feel mmmm pretty good about this?
Super meh.In post 765, Irrelephant11 wrote:Okay
To start, volxen and I just finished a newbie game together tvt.
One of the biggest differences I saw in his play in the newbie vs in Watchmen Wanted was in how he formed reads. In WW his reads were something like "This player is pushing someone I think is town, therefore scum" and "lurking is scummy". That's about as deep as he ever got (read: so shallow they're not even in the water, even as he wrote walls to say it all)
In the newbie, his reads were "This player's suggestions help a pro-scum agenda, therefore scum" and "This player's play would be extremely risky and likely to fail if scum, therefore town". The first of the two reads I'm describing here (scumread on varsoon) was wrong, but he
a) clearly believed it
2) was considering other players' motivations in both cases, which showed much deeper thinking about "why" someone's play is scummy, rather than leaning on caricatures of scummy play to make other players more mislynchable.
From his 307 - "I would think town!Rat would understand that this game isn't just about everyone forming their own reads in isolation and then presenting their readslist to the rest of the group, but it's largely a game that involves interacting with everyone else to understand their motivations, which includes asking players questions such as, "what did you think about X from player Y?" The fact that Rat's initial reaction to both questions about Keyser was to immediately label them as attempts to be LAMIST rather than as genuine questions that were asked to gather information to help gamesolve, seems much more likely to come from scum than town."
This paragraph alone is halfway to townclearing for volxen imo. It reminds me of his push on Varsoon - probably wrong (if I'm right about labrat), but he believes it and is taking into account more than surface-level scum traits. He's really trying to find another player's motivations.
I won't say volxen HAS to be town here, because I will take into account his tryhard-ness and comments he's made about wanting to improve his scumgame, but I think his similarities to his play in the newbie and the difference between this and WW is notable and obvious - not to mention he is game solving mostly un-prompted so far, whereas a lot of the development of his reads in WW came after he was wagoned
the fact that tw also meta-townreads volxen helps confirm, as I think regardless of tw's alignment he'd probably agree that this is very different from the weak scumgame we've seen from volxen, and is very similar to town!volxen as seen elsewhere
How do you read him?
So I haven't finished reading yet but from what I've gathered so far I plan to vote keyser today.No matter what happens, I'll be right there with you. - Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka
- Ausuka