- Emperor flippyNips
• Alonzo
Mcqueen
Xtoxm
If there is a bullet point,
that means they have voted
to end day.
(I'll go find Ramcius's vote then)
Do you know the alignment of the Day Reps? Do you have any clue of the vote count?In post 901, Elsa Jay wrote:Because it's not important to reveal that yet. I'll keep the benefit that the mod gave us all to use, thank you very much.
I don't think this is a hard vote on Elsa, IMHO. Just a threat at best.In post 851, Ramcius wrote:Lynching random person and having short D1 is bad
Lynching you will give info, you have quite a bit of interactions and it will reduce pool for scum to hide
In post 900, The Last Knight wrote:Since we have Alonzo already voting to end the day and flippyNips threatening to do the same, it seems we are pretty close to ending this early. So unless you want the scum to be able to coordinate a vote, I think it would behoove us to collaborate and find a decent person to lynch, and soon.
(I'll go find Ramcius's vote then)
Something I forgot to mention in this explanation was this: if the alignment of either of the two remaining day reps ends up being scum, then they have a much bigger benefit than any town right now by ending the day while everyone still has one vote apiece. If we town can get someone to agree on, then we can at least outnumber the scum.In post 901, Elsa Jay wrote:Because it's not important to reveal that yet. I'll keep the benefit that the mod gave us all to use, thank you very much.
I was just c+p a template. Not trying to make claims about that. Fair point though. Feel free to edit and post in the future. I'll be more aware of it from now on.In post 904, Xtoxm wrote:Elsa is my first townread
Page 37. Not bad
@knight, pls change not voting category to unknown. You are putting fake claims in everyone's mouth. Thanx.
Why would that be AI?In post 908, Elsa Jay wrote:If everyone ends up with 1/2 votes, then whoever got those votes first is the one who dies, as the moderator explains. Is it wrong to see who jumped tje gun and voted immediately in that case?
How is it a slip only scum would know if it was based on towns wincon?In post 884, The Last Knight wrote:In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Hmm, I have reason to believe drewva pulled scum.This is RCE scum reading DrewVa based on a quote from a different game. RCE based this off of a rule slip only scum would know.In post 89, RCEnigma wrote:Maybe not scum, but she isn't town.
And then claimed not to have read the rules to begin with. Could be playing coy, but it seems like a tonal slip to me.In post 95, RCEnigma wrote:I would have had to read the rules to know that.In post 92, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 89, RCEnigma wrote:Maybe not scum, but she isn't town.*They say in a game confirmed to not have Multiball and hinted on page 1 to possibly have 5 scum.*
Now, unless this is based on a discussion about the ruleslip in question, RCEnigma abandons the DrewVa non-town read with little clarification. Please expand on this if you like, but in your ISO I was unable to find good reason for this change in allegiance.In post 371, RCEnigma wrote:I'm not scumreading drewva. I'm semi-content with what I got out of it. I like Bef pushing there even if it was based on miscommunication. They are both just town here Imo.
This is RCEnigma accusing me of what I identified above as a very similar series of actions. Either he is a hypocrite or is scum himself.In post 380, RCEnigma wrote:No it's a combination of the omgus read, presenting scumreads on myself and bef as serious reads then backing off when Bef gained support (or at least townreads), and then reverting back to "none of that is serious I'm still RVSing".
It all wreaks of cautious scum and I'm calling back on it.
I have already explained why I changed views on BEF (me not liking the semantic approach but also finding it too specific to be fake). Would you mind going into detail as to why you read me as scum other than your own "omgus" argument against me?
And then this statement basically agrees with all of my own points about who I have decided to vote for so far.In post 667, RCEnigma wrote:I agree with this actually. I know I'm going to get scumread for saying we should use day 1 as a test day. I think in regards to how we want to handle votes/votecounts it should be a test day.In post 664, Nero Cain wrote:I had wanted to talk about something that I felt was semi-important but I forgot earlier so here we go.
I don't think Alonzo is necessarily scummy for wanting to end the day @ p30. Like, he seems genuine that he's just behind but the stopping the thread a little prematurely is nearsighted.
I think artificially extending the day beyond useful discussion is p anti-town but as long as it's fruitful it's not much of a big deal. I think the strength of this mechanic is that we can vote the scum without them knowing we are voting them...unless we say so. The only minor drawback is we can't really coordinate a lynch. I could do unofficial vote counts if we wanted to do them or we could just vote whomever in our threads and just see how that works.
Now, don't go saying that me defending myself is inherently scummy here...
So...either/or. Which is NAI...In post 911, Elsa Jay wrote:Because if you voted day 2 or 3 IRL and it pops up to show that with the timestamp, clearly something was up. Obviously an exaggeration, but seeing who voted first reveals an agenda a bit. Or it shows you are very stubborn.
No worries bro.In post 907, The Last Knight wrote:I was just c+p a template. Not trying to make claims about that. Fair point though. Feel free to edit and post in the future. I'll be more aware of it from now on.In post 904, Xtoxm wrote:Elsa is my first townread
Page 37. Not bad
@knight, pls change not voting category to unknown. You are putting fake claims in everyone's mouth. Thanx.
I don't agree. It's hard to make any good AI interpretation from votes without more info. A straight flip of votes leads to nothing but speculation since it can't be explained in the immediate.In post 911, Elsa Jay wrote:Because if you voted day 2 or 3 IRL and it pops up to show that with the timestamp, clearly something was up. Obviously an exaggeration, but seeing who voted first reveals an agenda a bit. Or it shows you are very stubborn.
I have a post on this idea but it's a wall that's been passed over, but yeah I agree and this page bumped Elsa towards town for me.In post 916, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah, I said RCE was more likely to be scum earlier because I liked TLK more at that time, but considering he ignored Ramcius point blank saying he was trying to lynch me, and he is trying to guide the lynch, he may possibly be partners with Ramcius.
Clearly you all don't like the idea of someone only having 2/3 votes dying, so lets bring up TLK and RCE again.
TLK literally scrounging for the votes is a way for scum to reestablish controll and take out the factor of the game that scare them.