No u.In post 424, Ruby Red wrote:just stop bambi
See reason already.
Shut up and let someone who doesn’t shitpost their way through a game lead the two of youIn post 423, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah, the scum team Michael/Lolwagon/McQueen are lynching the other 2 vts. So smart. Such scum. Much wow.In post 420, LolWagons wrote:You don’t even to have to solve the damn pairs I’ve solved the VTs alreadyIn post 417, Ruby Red wrote:i have no idea who's deepwolfing me right now and i'm not voting either one of them until i figure it out
Ruby dont fall for this shit.
It was Auro that said that, not me. My biggest concern with our slot being mislynched on day one is that BOTH VT's have to correctly solve between the ensuing {Bambi, Ruby} vs {Clemency, Muh} battle on day two following our mislynch. If one VT has bad reads that will cost us the game.In post 421, Bambi Jay wrote:Well that buffer is useless anyway since me and Clem are voting you tommorow, and clearly 1 of us is town in your eyes.In post 415, Michael Scott wrote:What are you talking about? The two lovers in a pair don't have to vote the same way, and their votes aren't tied to each other. So if the day two town:scum ratio is 5:3 and the five townies are {town lover A, town lover B}, {town lover C, town lover D}, {VT E}, and A votes with scum but B,C, D, and E all correctly vote for scum FIRST, then town still wins in spite of the fact that A voted for a fellow townie. This scenario is possible with a 5:3 ratio but not with a 4:3 ratio.In post 388, Bambi Jay wrote:The lovers votes come in pairs bro. If we lynch a vt it's still basically the same thing as 3:4.
What happened to you being the "necessary sacrifice"? Fricken weird that that disappeared.
Clearly you don't want to lynch the pairs so I get to be scummy af now without repercussions: if we don't go through this plan and kill YOU, then I will only vote you tommorow. If Clem also agrees, well look where you are.
So yes, the 5:3 ratio does make a difference, and it clearly favors the town. You want to take away that advantage by sending us into day two with a 4:3 ratio, which doesn't give the town that buffer of still being able to win if one townie has bad reads and votes with scum.
- Volxen (Date Mike)
Do the necessary sacrifice for town like you said you would, because you don't get to be scummy and get away with it.
i'd rather just win tbh you knowIn post 436, Bambi Jay wrote:It'll be a very fun challenge to do.
in theoryIn post 437, Michael Scott wrote:@Mcqueen, @Ruby, @Overkill, @Muh: Are any of you willing to join LolWagons and I in voting for Dong?
Bless.
I’ve laid out why Dong > Overkill. Do you want the reasons specifically from them?In post 439, Ruby Red wrote:i'd rather just win tbh you knowIn post 436, Bambi Jay wrote:It'll be a very fun challenge to do.
in theoryIn post 437, Michael Scott wrote:@Mcqueen, @Ruby, @Overkill, @Muh: Are any of you willing to join LolWagons and I in voting for Dong?
why dong over overkill? why is wagons town?
Mainly thisIn post 377, LolWagons wrote:How the fuck am I weak? You’re the only one throwing shade. Hypocrite.In post 373, Donempire wrote:All gameyou jerked yourself off saying im the optimal lynch but you only shaded me. If you're not scum, you're weak. Kill me already i wont even put up a fight.
You literally just did it to OK and now, me.
This is simple. Dong doesn’t want to take any town stances on either Vt because he knows he has to set up another lynch tomorrow. He’s trying to just skate by until we ML Michael. OK is VERY UNLIKELY scum because he does not have this fear. This is the ultimate tell in this setup because it is all-or-nothing.
VOTE. THIS.
VOTE: dongempireIn post 440, LolWagons wrote:Bless.
Now we need two of Ruby/Mcqueen/Bambi and this nightmare will end.
In post 446, Clemency wrote:VOTE: dongempireIn post 440, LolWagons wrote:Bless.
Now we need two of Ruby/Mcqueen/Bambi and this nightmare will end.