No.
I don’t want to have to crawl through seven pages of flaming shit when I do analysis.
I don’t have any on this account. I replaced into and out of one for a day phase or two but that’s it. It’s two-three years old.In post 35, Michael Scott wrote:Also lolwagons; if possible can you link to a scumgame or two of yours?
Why the reluctance to claim? Mass claim is ideal.In post 39, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah Michael's trying to hard to control this game so imma ignore him for now. Probably scum, but I'll see what else we got.
1 if we are lucky.In post 41, muh316 wrote:So does this game only last two days?
That’s what I’m saying.In post 45, Michael Scott wrote:Good scum definitely won't all claim VTs, they're gonna divide into one lover pair and one VT.In post 42, LolWagons wrote:Why the reluctance to claim? Mass claim is ideal.
Scum can’t choose who they want to be in which group after the fact, they’re forced to commit up front.
So one fake VT, all we need to do is scumhunt there.
Just realized we probably shouldn’t be throwing TRs at people who haven’t claimed. My bad.In post 50, Michael Scott wrote:I'm strongly TRing Lol wagons now, and yeah agree with the weak TR on muh. I'd like to hear his claim though, nonetheless
Is it an alt or something?In post 55, Michael Scott wrote:FoS: Bambi Jay
Lolwagons, what she's doing isn't out of her townrange. I don't wanna vote her if she's part of a Lover Pair, fortunately we can afford one slot not claiming.
I think you’re town but I think you’re wrong. Let’s do VOTE: dongempire first.In post 86, Michael Scott wrote:Lolwagons, you sure you wanna vote Bambi, now that he's a claimed lover? I think we should start with 0verki11.
Then the dong dude. My current solve is {Clem, Muh, 0ver} right now.
Vote dong with me arch nemesisIn post 99, Clemency wrote:this game is big dumb doodoo
We can be frenemiesIn post 103, Clemency wrote:i think we're doing this nemesis thing wrong
ISO him it’s literally all that’s in there are these contrived townslipsIn post 128, Clemency wrote:is that an attempt at a townslipIn post 125, Donempire wrote:What does the third mafia lover do? is there a love triangle in mafia
If they look contrived it really doesn’t matter how many or when they are, they’re contrived. It’s the right vote. OK hasn’t even posted have they?In post 152, Michael Scott wrote:0verki11 is the likelier here I think, supported by the fact that Clem voted him.In post 140, LolWagons wrote:ISO him it’s literally all that’s in there are these contrived townslips
If you think they’re forced get back on the wagon with me
They do look like contrived townslips, but he made one *after* you stated suspicion on him for the same? I think that comes more from non-self-aware town, rather than scum.
Nope. Optimal play is still to lynch the VT. If we sort wrong I want that extra Townie in lylo.In post 211, Michael Scott wrote:Now, to both Bambi and Elsa, the optimal votes for them are to crossvote, so there's no chance of a VT kill.In post 207, LolWagons wrote:Michael you think it’s a coincidence your wagon started after I started pushing dong?
I don’t.
This instantly means you don't care about sorting Dong/0verki11, they both become irrelevant once I'm dead.
The lack of posts from 0verki11 make it hard to association-lock Bambi|Clem. On a whole, VTs are therefore now irrelevant.
Agree? Time's better spent on purely analysing Egix/Bambi and Clem/0verki11.
Dong isn’t going to flip town lolIn post 219, Michael Scott wrote:Bud, you're tied to me and McQueen here.In post 216, LolWagons wrote:I don’t compromise on lynches. Egix knows that well.
We lynch out of VT claims.
Say we lynch Dong today, and he flips green.
Come tomorrow, Clemency is going to allege that you and I and McQueen are scum, and bandwagon onto you/me.
Bambi|Egix also join in because reasons, and I become the mislynch, thus letting scum win.
I explained it pregame.In post 230, Bambi Jay wrote:Because 5/9 people have stated Michael is the proper lynch, 2 lover sets and Michael himself.
Why are you so obsessed with the other VTs?
Ugh.In post 235, Michael Scott wrote:0verki11 always lynches me here.In post 232, LolWagons wrote:I explained it pregame.
If we get it wrong we have a 3:5 ratio tomorrow.
If we do lovers we have a 3:4 ratio if we get it wrong.
I want that extra Townie in lylo just in case.
Dude, if you and Dong achieve consensus on tomorrow's ML (If I flip) right now, it won't matter having an extra townie or not. The extra townie is always tethered to their lover anyway.
I’ve explained twice in this thread now why it’s bettwr. You’re being willfully ignorant.In post 241, Donempire wrote:4:3 is better
Why do you think 5:3 is better, numbers dont matter, it goes off in 2 lynches not 2 dead
Clem posted six minutes ago.In post 248, Bambi Jay wrote:Clem and meh aren't even posting anymore ATM and there's still chaos. No way scum just shuts up here, right?
Is muh usually a sheep or do they drive convo more?In post 281, Michael Scott wrote:BoP, basically. It's in Bambi's townrange to have done what's she has. Town!Clem doesn't push me when I have a breaking strategy here. Also, that slot has just been generating noise, using fancy terms to scumscuse me and drown out any discussion.In post 278, LolWagons wrote:MS I’m leaning the other way.
I think it’s Dong/Egix/Bambi
Why do you think it’s Clemency?
Also, look at Muh's ISO. Does he vote like that?
I need to go to bed soon, we'll take our time and sort this out though
If you suspect me vote me and lynch between VTsIn post 365, Bambi Jay wrote:@humble request to town:pretty please hang Michael now? 70 percent chance the game ends here and now, and 30 percent chance me and Clem get to enter Mortal Kombat with each other and be entertaining AF.
It's a win-win for everyone. Well, except Micheal and McQueen and probably lolwagon.
How the fuck am I weak? You’re the only one throwing shade. Hypocrite.In post 373, Donempire wrote:All gameyou jerked yourself off saying im the optimal lynch but you only shaded me. If you're not scum, you're weak. Kill me already i wont even put up a fight.
^Ignores the substance of my argument and responds to less game-related pointsIn post 387, Donempire wrote:LolWagons wrote:If you strong townread me you need to trust this read. I’m a damn good town player.
I’m willing to listen on why you think it’s OK over Dong but... that’s going to be an uphill battle.YawnIn post 383, LolWagons wrote:Oh my god no. Dong first. And then that’ll be it. Because there won’t be a damn day 2.
Keep trotting your own horn buddy
Source: All the other town games I’ve played, soon to be including this oneIn post 390, Donempire wrote:I dont.
I lose if your ego is hurt though
But hey, you're good. Source: you. So it must be me
That has absolutely nothing to do with what I posted. It does serve to buddy up with MS though.In post 391, Donempire wrote:I was the biggest voice against michael.In post 377, LolWagons wrote:How the fuck am I weak? You’re the only one throwing shade. Hypocrite.In post 373, Donempire wrote:All gameyou jerked yourself off saying im the optimal lynch but you only shaded me. If you're not scum, you're weak. Kill me already i wont even put up a fight.
You literally just did it to OK and now, me.
This is simple. Dong doesn’t want to take any town stances on either Vt because he knows he has to set up another lynch tomorrow. He’s trying to just skate by until we ML Michael. OK is VERY UNLIKELY scum because he does not have this fear. This is the ultimate tell in this setup because it is all-or-nothing.
VOTE. THIS.
There, i responded to it. If you still cant see it you're an idiot.
There’s a simple reason and it’s that OK and I have already found scum, and you two aren’t lynching me. So they literally can’t back down on that stance. They’re locked in. One pair is stupid and one is scum.In post 397, Michael Scott wrote:So @Bambi and @Clemency, do either of you have a trulylegitimateargument for why town shouldn't strive to have that 5:3 town:scum ratio on day two rather than a 4:3 town:scum ratio via lynching a claimed VT today rather than a claimed town lover pair?
Both of you have been shading our slot all game long for extremely bad reasons, and yet neither of you have made anintelligentargument as to why lynching a claimed town lover pair over a claimed VT is the optimal strategy that gives the town the greatest chance of winning the game on day two in the event that the day one lynch is a mislynch.
There is simply no logical reason to fight the strategy of lynching within the claimed VT pool as town.
- Volxen (Date Mike)
NOPEIn post 416, Bambi Jay wrote:Srsly tho I got family to hang out with, lets kill Michael and be on our merry way.
Ruby get back on Michael. Dont fall for their lies.
You don’t even to have to solve the damn pairs I’ve solved the VTs alreadyIn post 417, Ruby Red wrote:i have no idea who's deepwolfing me right now and i'm not voting either one of them until i figure it out
Shut up and let someone who doesn’t shitpost their way through a game lead the two of youIn post 423, Bambi Jay wrote:Yeah, the scum team Michael/Lolwagon/McQueen are lynching the other 2 vts. So smart. Such scum. Much wow.In post 420, LolWagons wrote:You don’t even to have to solve the damn pairs I’ve solved the VTs alreadyIn post 417, Ruby Red wrote:i have no idea who's deepwolfing me right now and i'm not voting either one of them until i figure it out
Ruby dont fall for this shit.