(While I appreciate this)In post 1308, Vorkuta wrote:In post 1300, mbaki wrote:First of all, this is a very personal attack (as is this whole post, such as with the constant use of bullying) and I don't appreciate it.Spoiler:
Pot calling the kettle black much? But I'll tone down my rhetoric from now on.
crumbing is important to traitor so scum knows who you areIn post 1568, Vorkuta wrote:Then why would rb breadcrumb scum if it goes against rb's wincon?
You're still assuming rb thinks the same as you do.In post 1627, OkaPoka wrote:crumbing is important to traitor so scum knows who you areIn post 1568, Vorkuta wrote:Then why would rb breadcrumb scum if it goes against rb's wincon?
otherwise might as well be playing with one less player on scum team, and setup probably not balanced around that
I wouldn't townread someone who started doing things just in LyLo, so there's that.In post 1629, OkaPoka wrote:because lurkers step it up in lylo
The self vote is the only other explanation I've seen from you.In post 1628, OkaPoka wrote:even if u ignore rb crumbs, i still think there is enough reason to lynch mbaki
It's not.In post 1633, OkaPoka wrote: @dannflor should be enough
In post 1469, Dannflor wrote:Scum just doesn't self vote, not experienced players. It never plays to their win condition unless it's a hammer. Rarely, town can self vote and it does play to their win condition.
In post 1104, mbaki wrote:prior to that Vorkuta crumb, I legitimately had no idea who was scum, I was wrong about one of my top townreads (it was sliding because rb can be read by engagement because he hates scum but still), and there are legitimately implicating things in rb's iso that people here are too new to not follow. I think the town wincon is followed by me getting lynched here, I'm not helping.
In post 1147, mbaki wrote:I voted myself because I had no confident reads (useless to town), I am not an important role (if I am a pr it is not something like a cop), and rb's posts to me looked the most like crumbing* (meaning I'd be a liability later on if we didn't hit scum) (*before Nero brought up Vorkuta essentially scum claiming). The fact I was not enjoying this game, combined with the fact I thought it actually might be optimal for town to get rid of me; my self-vote was not out of rage, hence the "Good luck town."
NoIn post 1633, OkaPoka wrote:i guess that rb might have been thinking diff but shouldn't it be standard for traitors to crumb?
This isn't true though. Traitors can easily just be antitown and disregard their partners, and/or fake a guilty mid game to secure a mislynch when necessary.In post 1627, OkaPoka wrote:crumbing is important to traitor so scum knows who you areIn post 1568, Vorkuta wrote:Then why would rb breadcrumb scum if it goes against rb's wincon?
otherwise might as well be playing with one less player on scum team, and setup probably not balanced around that
Tunnelling is not a reason.In post 1628, OkaPoka wrote:even if u ignore rb crumbs, i still think there is enough reason to lynch mbaki
I already answered this. Dann also pointed out where my frustration grew from the start of the day.In post 1637, OkaPoka wrote:when does town self voting play to their win condition
scum self votes to AtE
Is the tally 4 people that have told Oka this now?In post 1640, Creature wrote:NoIn post 1633, OkaPoka wrote:i guess that rb might have been thinking diff but shouldn't it be standard for traitors to crumb?
Even considering the case where rb is not crumbing, you also have to rule out that scum is hunting for traitor crumbs which is exactly what vork seems like doing.In post 1640, Creature wrote:NoIn post 1633, OkaPoka wrote:i guess that rb might have been thinking diff but shouldn't it be standard for traitors to crumb?