How people perceive each other's gameplay is subjective. Someone's nom could make so much sense to another, but not feel worthy for another person.
There's not a lot of room for
"more objective analysis"
when there's a minimal pool to work with, and a select few people that nominate the pool.
With that said, I actually like
Alisae's
thought here. If people have issues with the scummies, or find ways that it could be improved; then doing something different as in putting more effort into nominating people would be a step in a better direction.
I'm actually taking much more notice of other people's gameplay than I did in 2015. I haven't found someone I'd nominate yet, but this is the type of mentality that works to improve a system. A higher quantity of people putting in greater effort for a higher quality product.
That mentality breeds improvement among a group.
Also, if anyone wants to say something about
Alisae's
noms... then maybe, well... they could work to nominate someone themselves first, and then have a conversation with her. Plus, I don't think she's nominating people
JUST
to nominate them, it's her opinion and she's putting it forth for a better outcome than what she's known previously.