- Emperor flippyNips
Alonzo
Mcqueen
Xtoxm
If there is a bullet point,
that means they have voted
to end day.
In post 259, davesaz wrote:Someone who is a human and thinks something is true but isn't 100% certain may say/write if/then logic as a natural linguistic effect of that uncertainty. This goes for whether the uncertainty is in the 1st or 2nd part of the statement.
Once you're in the pattern of if x/then y, modifying that pattern to another conditional to show certainty in x but conditional in y is possible, but to the writer unnecessary given they know what they are uncertain about.
I have never seen a legit slip of this type, and the people who call such so-called slips to attention have been scum at least half the time I've seen someone bring it up, possibly more.
In post 30, DrewVa wrote:VOTE: Emperors New Groove
Gamma Emerald wrote:I just watched Infinity War. You’re on my shit list.
In post 207, Nev and Max wrote:Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but our votes do have consequences. Just like the words and actions we make online have real world implications as well.
Votes in this thread will eventually lynch someone, trick is we never know when the day will end unless it goes to deadline or the 4 tell us when they are ending the day
In post 250, Ultimate Liars wrote:So it seems I misunderstood. So the 4 people vote privately when to end the day. I thought it was their public votes. What do you guys think of this idea. We always have a majority on the scummier of the 4. That way we guarantee one doesn't vote in private. Until we are ready to vote our actual lynch target?
-kokichi
In post 422, Ramcius wrote:i don't like this. Assumption on scum having pre game chat and votes in main thread do nothing, so why scum wouldn't make them in RVS stage?
In post 426, DrewVa wrote:But it is mentioned in the setup, so the read should be more nuanced, like could they tell, if we made the “townslip” by play or is the townread solely based on just mechanics?
In post 430, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Your assumption that not reading the game post is towny is unfounded.
In post 440, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Yeah I still don't agree. I'm oblivious as either alignment. I would think it was towny reasoning if they didn't have a myriad of posts and therefore other points you could have sorted them as town for.
In post 405, DrewVa wrote:Something_Smart -- does something_smart not like rolling scum?
In post 453, Cheeky Dancer wrote:If I wanted to evaluate your ISO I would have. I'm asking fir a live interaction. You should be flattered I'm willing to dance with you. Cha cha?
In post 631, Elsa Jay wrote:I literally just called you out for trying to kill the town power roles with the way you were going. Would You rather I push you?
In post 641, DrewVa wrote:That is definitely extreme for a hydra to be that divergent on a read. I know I am far more likely to see this kind of weirdness in scum teammates than from hydras.
In post 631, Elsa Jay wrote:Focusing on me just hurts you more. You dont have to townread me yet, and even if you personally check me, you won't believe me. I'm just a natural of being suspicious.
Why are you so focused on me anyway instead of some others?
In post 607, RCEnigma wrote:That bef was town regardless of thanos alignment. In general an in depth read like that seems tmi given the context. Up to that point it was a pissing match between slots giving vague reads and slots angry at people giving vague reads while not doing anything differently.
It's a good opportunity to seem townie, was my first impression.
In post 794, Alonzo wrote:Ugh... Nancy's reads make me want to end more than just the day....
In post 805, Formerfish wrote:In post 774, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 770, RCEnigma wrote:
Elsa's get Bef lynched schtick is already old. I encourage slots to continue scumreading me without engaging me or asking my views, specifically my reasoning for townreading BEF.
To be honest, I do feel excitement every time Elsa mentions me in a post regardless if it's an insult. There's something there. I feel like Elsa wants to hate me but just can't. Elsa has this conceal--don't feel mentality when it comes to me. He can't just turn away and slam the door though. Perhaps, he should test the limits and break through and win this game with me us town.
Jesus Christ, we get it, just let it go man. Let it go.
In post 844, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 806, Nev and Max wrote:In post 805, Formerfish wrote:In post 774, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 770, RCEnigma wrote:
Elsa's get Bef lynched schtick is already old. I encourage slots to continue scumreading me without engaging me or asking my views, specifically my reasoning for townreading BEF.
To be honest, I do feel excitement every time Elsa mentions me in a post regardless if it's an insult. There's something there. I feel like Elsa wants to hate me but just can't. Elsa has this conceal--don't feel mentality when it comes to me. He can't just turn away and slam the door though. Perhaps, he should test the limits and break through and win this game with me us town.
Jesus Christ, we get it, just let it go man. Let it go.
That's what I get for trying to be funny....
It's Nev, Thanos. He posted this after the slip.
In post 1235, DrewVa wrote:You said we’re scumreading “everybody”. I said I’m sr Ram and if they flip red, I’m taking another look at Alonzo.
So, in what world - let alone THIS game - does that add up to “everybody”?
I thought you were supposed to be good at math.
In post 1246, DrewVa wrote:At worst, I’m not wrong. At best, it’s NAI. Because I have seen it happen, more often than not.
In post 1251, DrewVa wrote:Oh, this really is a serious question then?
I legit thought your slot was trolling us for some reason.
I was kidding. rofl
In post 1252, DrewVa wrote:Yes but I would but then have to dig through every game I’ve ever played in, to do that. You either believe me or you don’t. It’s really that simple.
In post 1258, Ramcius wrote:DrewVa vent even further and said scumslip was that I didn't used "typical" as in "it's not my typical towngame"
In post 1391, RCEnigma wrote:Still don't like TLK's VC it's busy work and I'm not a fan.
In post 250, Ultimate Liars wrote:So it seems I misunderstood. So the 4 people vote privately when to end the day. I thought it was their public votes. What do you guys think of this idea. We always have a majority on the scummier of the 4. That way we guarantee one doesn't vote in private. Until we are ready to vote our actual lynch target?Emperor flippyNips
Alonzo
Mcqueen
Xtoxm
If there is a bullet point,
that means they have voted
to end day.
-kokichi
In post 1404, RCEnigma wrote:It doesn't do anything unless slots openly express they are voting X. So at best it's an inaccurate representation of the gamestate...that's at best. I've expressed why I think votecounts today are an antitown move in the long run though it wasn't acknowledged. Bef said the same recently though which quite a few people agreed with.
In post 1412, Cheeky Dancer wrote:I kinda townread this post as I remember thinking the same when I first did ISO skims like forever ago. Also don't think Hebi takes on Drewva as scum knowing they can obv town.
In post 1410, profii wrote:I know this game is tough but I don’t think we need to stop scum hunting and go for a policy lynch just yeti
In post 1421, RCEnigma wrote:Not game specific, this is the case in any mafia game. It's also right around the corner from Xmas and isn't the place I would expect a scumhunt should originate.
In post 1424, profii wrote:I believe by saying “I’m gonna plump for a lurker” means if you try and threaten someone - again you lose the effect
Also by going for lurkers, particularly at Xmas where there is a few scum can “randomly” pick “this one” imo
In post 1431, DrewVa wrote:Aiuro is just naturly scummy.
In post 1446, DrewVa wrote:And you assuming we’re being scummy, rather than just wrong.
Also, you could be seen as being possibly lamist or tryharding?
At any rate, if you don’t get your partner to stop voting to “end the day”, I’m seriously considering policy lynching you, and this is coming from someone who is opposed to them on principle.
Lamees can’t vote for that, so please make her stop. It’s hella annoying.
In post 1513, DrewVa wrote:In post 1495, Thanos wrote:In post 1446, DrewVa wrote:And you assuming we’re being scummy, rather than just wrong.
That's the game thoughAlso, you could be seen as being possibly lamist or tryharding?
![]()
LAMEESist.
At any rate, if you don’t get your partner to stop voting to “end the day”, I’m seriously considering policy lynching you, and this is coming from someone who is opposed to them on principle.
Lamees can’t vote for that, so please make her stop. It’s hella annoying.
Nah, it's cute, and harmless.
I really dislike this post.
You keep making more like these and I may vote you.
In post 1524, DrewVa wrote:I’m voting Thanos, because A) I’m starting to dislike their surfacey reads.
B) their failure to adequately adress my very valid concerns.
C) I think their posting up to now, strikes me as lamisty and tryharding.
D) Lamees in particular, reads super scummy to me.
E) Their response to my suspicion of their bad response to me, was not to attempt to further clarify my concerns but to immediately call us, “obv scum”.
Earlier, Lamees falsely accused me of scumreading “ everybody”, which was bs shade, not to mention, a flat out lie.
When does town ever respond this way?
Town doesn’t dismiss your valid concerns by bs shading and calling you “obv scum”. They press you for explanations and ONLY if they dislike said explanation - for whatever reason - do they even consider scumreading you for it, at that point.
I will reconfirm with DVa, since she has more meta on Auro than I do but I’m also not getting particularly townie vibes from that slot. In contrast, TLK reads kind of genuine to me by comparison.
Busywork in general is NAI - it all depends on sincerity of of the thought processes and reads.
In post 1531, DrewVa wrote:It’s a big red flag to me that you keep hard defending her scummy posting, rather than clarifying it.
You know damn well, if I ever responded the way your hydra partner did to my post, callling you “obv scum”,for a perfectly reasonable post, you’d be calling for my head to. Don’t even try to insult my intelligence by pretending otherwise.
In post 1534, DrewVa wrote:No, and it’s up to your slot to link me. It’s ludicrous for you to expect me to excuse her scummy behaviour and your shade on me is just more hypocritical bs.
Where is YOUR metacheck on me, huh? Don’t you dare continue to keep shading me with this hypocritical bs, until you actually back it up. IOW, when you practice what you preach. I think you’re either scum here or really bad at Mafia and you defending blatant scummy behaviour by deflecting it back on me, reads super scummy to me, especially when your shading me for reasons that equally apply to you.
In post 1535, DrewVa wrote:these are lies because lamees is always scummy
so you saying anything lamees does is not scummy is a clear misrep and is scummy, auro
you know this
In post 1540, DrewVa wrote:I asked you for LINKS. Of course you should metacheck me, since you’re scumreading me for not doing that. And no, I don’t metacheck every plaayer in a game, only usually if I’m entirely null on them and you just continuing to deflect isn’t helping my read on you at all. Had Ram responded this way, I’d never have unvoted him.
So which is it Auro - are you actually scum here or just being intentionally obtuse and hypocritically deflecting because you can’t be bothered to make a sincere effort to sort me? The more you keep turning this back on me, rather then even genuinely trying to adequately address my concerns about your slot, the scummier your slot looks to me and if you’re actually toxn here, that is a serious mistake, because I never want to mislynch but you are doing jack to help me sort you and putting it all on me.
In post 1544, DrewVa wrote:P.edit. Your head isn’t super scummy, your hydra partner’s is and she is calling for our mislynch. If you are actually town here, you would stop defending this scummy behaviour of hers and not continue shade ME for it. FYPOV, you too would also be supersketched out by it, so I have no clue how town!you, ever finds this even remotely acceptable.
In post 1549, DrewVa wrote:Even more concerning is how Auro is misrepping my meta, when he both acknowledges having not done a metacheck on me and is outright refusing to do one.
In post 1550, Thanos wrote:Lol no I wasn't, D is just mad. I can link past games (COMPLETED) D will do anything as scum, nothing out of range tbh.
But ok, let's hear some cases as to how on earth that slot is town.
In post 1563, DrewVa wrote:Sorry, totally unacceptable.
Don’t expect anyone else in the game to assume this. If she weren’t your hydra partner, it would obviously be different.
Auro wrote:In post 177, Flavor Leaf wrote:
Yeah, that’s wasn’t the greatest post by Lamees.
Especially considering the last game we played there was 5 hours left in the day and we switched wagons to near lynch like thrice.
However it did end up with a no lynch, but just barely. No one wanted to hammer there, so we got stuck at L-1 a lot.
Why I'm not voting Lamees is that she makes very anti-town plays even as town (happened in my last game with her, at least) so I want to engage her as much as possible before wanting to lunch her. (No offense)
In post 1567, DrewVa wrote:Auro, sorry if you end up flipping green, but I'm not putting effort into this game to solve if lamees is going to play to scum wincon like always.
Remember that time we mislynched her where we were scum? We won that game because town knew we were playing to town wincon despite the color of lamees' flip.
Here I have the added benefit of actually being town, but frankly Auro you should just self vote so that you can make sure lamees is not alive on d2.
In post 1567, DrewVa wrote:I'm fine with lynching Lamees today.
Auro, sorry if you end up flipping green, but I'm not putting effort into this game to solve if lamees is going to play to scum wincon like always.
Remember that time we mislynched her where we were scum? We won that game because town knew we were playing to town wincon despite the color of lamees' flip.
Here I have the added benefit of actually being town, but frankly Auro you should just self vote so that you can make sure lamees is not alive on d2. -D
In post 1583, Nero Cain wrote:likeIn post 1568, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: end the day
was just a troll vote b/c you know, I don't have any powers.
but we are at 64 pages now I don't really feel like we are getting any new info. Like if we want to wait on stragglers to chime in fine but I just think this thread will get bloated unless everyone really actives STFU.
In post 1585, Thanos wrote:In post 1583, Nero Cain wrote:likeIn post 1568, Nero Cain wrote:VOTE: end the day
was just a troll vote b/c you know, I don't have any powers.
but we are at 64 pages now I don't really feel like we are getting any new info. Like if we want to wait on stragglers to chime in fine but I just think this thread will get bloated unless everyone really actives STFU.
Sorry, I think it's important for be to defend against someone effectively advocating a policy lynch on my slot after my slot called them scum.
~A
In post 1590, DrewVa wrote:You made two posts in thread saying you would talk with her and lamees then continued to push so I'm assuming those posts were pure theater and an attempted pocket while you try to rile me through her.
In post 1594, Thanos wrote:In post 1590, DrewVa wrote:You made two posts in thread saying you would talk with her and lamees then continued to push so I'm assuming those posts were pure theater and an attempted pocket while you try to rile me through her.
Either I pocket or rile you up, since I'm a Hydra.
If our great scumplan was to pocket you, she would've stopped posting.
If our plan was to rile you up, I'd not ask her to back off from the 1v1, I'd just keep pushing you independently myself
~A
In post 1602, DrewVa wrote:Which is exactly what you're doing, Auro. You saw the pocket wasn't working, and then you pushed independently. Tell me how this isn't the bread and butter of your scum play.
In post 1606, DrewVa wrote:. You should have me as locktown
In post 1606, DrewVa wrote:Instead you just keep defending lamees' ate-laden shitpush when you know I will stand for exactly none of her play.
In post 1629, DrewVa wrote:The most suspicious part was when I asked you why you thought my pushes were scummy as opposed to just wrong and your only response was, that’s the game or words to that effect.
In post 1627, Nev and Max wrote:in other news: i'd totally be down for a thanos lynch
i'm in no way caught up and don't give two fucks to say this.
~M
In post 1629, DrewVa wrote:And your continued ridiculous defense of your hydra partner and the susbsequent shading on us for presumably “ignoring” her meta, is stupid af. Why couldn’t scum!you, use this as some kind of gambit, to allow her to contune to open wolf and get townread for it? If you seriously can’t see how this could even be a possibility, something is, really off with your slot.
DrewVa wrote:
How are you not scum here, when you keep misrepping us?
What I said, is IF I couldn’t figure out who I scumread, I would vote a PL over a NL.
In post 1590, DrewVa wrote:So if you want this to not be a 1v1, then you can self-vote and get rid of the problem player. But I am not moving off lamees ever until she is lynched. She is scum and therefore you are scum.
In post 1640, DrewVa wrote:Lamees is either open wolfing or appearing to. You seeming to subtly go along with it by ONLY scumleaning us and not take a stand against her behaviour, is pinging tf out of both of us and we are not okay with her continued over the top scummy pushes on us. If you’re actually town here, you would try to reign her in and stop apologizing for her super scummy push on us.
Pro tip, once we die, guess who’ll be the #1 scumspect? Did you guess you? If you don’t want people to make that kind of association, then call her tf off.
In post 1636, Thanos wrote:DrewVa wrote:
How are you not scum here, when you keep misrepping us?
What I said, is IF I couldn’t figure out who I scumread, I would vote a PL over a NL.In post 1590, DrewVa wrote:So if you want this to not be a 1v1, then you can self-vote and get rid of the problem player. But I am not moving off lamees ever until she is lynched. She is scum and therefore you are scum.
How is this a Misrep?
In post 1652, DrewVa wrote:Your unwillingness to commit here is lazy and scummy even if at this point you were right
Are you too lazy to read your own iso? Just because you were noncommital does not mean you did not state the read. lampshading your own flip does not make it better
In post 1655, DrewVa wrote:You also keep scumcasing me every game if I do not townread you immediately which has also gotten quite dull
Don't want to be scumread for being wrong? Then stop expecting me to always townread you when you are unwilling to commit to good reads
In post 1659, DrewVa wrote:In post 1642, Thanos wrote:In post 1640, DrewVa wrote:Lamees is either open wolfing or appearing to. You seeming to subtly go along with it by ONLY scumleaning us and not take a stand against her behaviour, is pinging tf out of both of us and we are not okay with her continued over the top scummy pushes on us. If you’re actually town here, you would try to reign her in and stop apologizing for her super scummy push on us.
Pro tip, once we die, guess who’ll be the #1 scumspect? Did you guess you? If you don’t want people to make that kind of association, then call her tf off.
I told ya, I moved our vote off you and she listened.
I'm not going to make her "shut up".In post 1653, Thanos wrote:Show me, specifically where I ever began with a townread. I was always scumleaning your slot and even more so now, but the reason I didn't want to VOTE you was because there were other people better at reading your slot, and I reasoned you'd sort yourself over time.
I don't care about my abilities at reading you at the moment. Stop the whole "townread me or you're scum" thing.
~A
In post 1661, DrewVa wrote:DVa and me are really frustrated with their unwillingness to act townie and have given up beating a dead horse and banging our heads, against a brick wall. \_0_/
In post 1666, DrewVa wrote:You basically said, we can continue to take more crap from her, which is why we’re not moving our vote.
In post 1671, Michael Scott wrote:I don't care that I have your vote because I failed to "reign in" Lamees. I already said our vote is elsewhere.
Once we flip, tho, you don't get to say "Oh, they were playing scummy!", What Lam is doing she's done all the time as town. I'd ask the other players to read out interactions post flip and look at the strawmanning that's been going on
~A
In post 165, DrewVa wrote:@BEF, please ignore me in this game, my surviving brainvells can’t take it.
In post 647, DrewVa wrote:In post 643, Thanos wrote:In post 641, DrewVa wrote:That is definitely extreme for a hydra to be that divergent on a read. I know I am far more likely to see this kind of weirdness in scum teammates than from hydras.
I don't think so, Lam disagrees with me about Ultimate Liars.
I'm taking them out of my town pool, I'll let her explain why she thinks they might be scum.
~A
In post 1680, RCEnigma wrote:Attempting to call her out on lying about your own read is just bad. Doubling down when she provides evidence you did in fact townlean her slot is worse. Backing it up when questioned on it initially and then chastising Nancy because it was just an early read is escargot slimey.
In post 1680, RCEnigma wrote:Are your reads arbitrary and we should just not listen to them anyways?
In post 1679, DrewVa wrote:In post 1548, Boonskiies wrote:Yo, don’t talk about ongoing games.Now to move on to the recent accusations which I found weird:
This line, where is now appealing to emotion/playing the victim:
In post 1590, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1582, Thanos wrote:
I don't like this talk about "reigning someone in", if their push on you is bad, call it out with rhetoric.
Lamees wants to piss me off into replacing out, so she can get lynched.
But how can one be so contradicting when this post was made just a few minutes before????
In post 1545, DrewVa wrote:
In post 1543, Thanos wrote:
Inb4 rage quit the game again lol. Jk.
@mod this player is talking about an ongoing game and I insist they be force replaced.
How's that for proportion lamees?
So as we can see here, attempted to get me out of the game but claimed it's vice versa. Hmmmmmmm??????? Also I just made a joke, there was no link or mention of on going game. This is just a hint at my meta read from what little exp I have playing with the slot, and also I have been joking around a lot this day 1, especially with the end day thing (yes I know you cannot end the day only the four players). ~ Auro /Thanos
In post 1692, DrewVa wrote:Okay, corrected. Your hydra partner disregarded the mod’s directive, to not continue to discuss ongoing games. If you don’t want to reign her in even when she’s flagrantly breaking the rules, it’s going to bite you. by association.
And I apologize for saying “Auro vomit spew,” it should say, Lamees vomit spew. The fact is your partner is out of control and is scumreading us for personal reasons, because of some non-game related issues with DVa and that’s not okay.
I’m truly sorry, you’re stuck in the middle of this nonsense but you nevertheless are by virtue of hydraing with her.
In post 1694, DrewVa wrote:Fine, it’s very trying on one’s patience, when your dealing with one hydra head acting unacceptably and you mistakenly diect that frustration on the wrong head. :/
In post 1941, The Last Knight wrote:Something I didn't like about this is that Gamma Emerald and I have actually interacted in reference to one another, not actually any real conversation. So, Gamma finding this strange is even stranger to me. It feels like Gamma is trying to force a relationship between the two of us when there wasn't actually anything that either of us said about each other that was deeper than one of us reading the other as town. I never said anything about Gamma at all, unless you mean me asking Alonzo what his vote was. The closest we have come to speaking was me voting to kill Ramcius and him also voting Ramcius later on.
Tldr; Gamma is trying to force a relationship with me in order to make me guilty by association, an association that never existed, in order to build my wagon.
VOTE: Gamma Emerald
In post 1145, Karmeleon wrote:Checked Thanos' ISO. Should I be worried when only one head is posting?
In post 1147, Karmeleon wrote:Only Auro seems to be actually posting though, maybe not even Auro.
In post 1749, Karmeleon wrote:thanos
In post 1916, BrightEyedFish wrote:Spoiler:
Well, I would consider that possibly as WiFOM. I'm not implying that you are scum based on that post but it is irrelevant if you two are voting for each other or not.
In post 1770, Cheeky Dancer wrote:@Thanos why do you think drewva is scum , yet you're not voting?
Who else is scum and who is town?
In post 2457, DrewVa wrote:In post 2450, Alonzo wrote:Iv just been over the Invite to the boonus round in my confessional thread, no mention of multiple games happening...
We specifically asked and were told there was a second one.
I’m assuming there are two each night. I’m not sure how the players are all selected but yeah, Boon confirmed it in our confessional.
There are probably completely different prizes as well. We weren’t informed about anything other than there was 2 rounds.
In post 2544, profii wrote:Oh I might as well claim this
I received a sticky fruit so I’m going to give the fruit to the person I made loyal and then I guess they can cop someone
There is no wiki page on sticky fruit. I assume it just gets passed round but I can use it to get that person to cop people
Maybe we can go loyal person -> target -> back to me -> back to secret loyal person -> cop someone -> back to me
And so on?
In post 2551, profii wrote:how comeIn post 2549, Thanos wrote:In post 2544, profii wrote:Oh I might as well claim this
I received a sticky fruit so I’m going to give the fruit to the person I made loyal and then I guess they can cop someone
There is no wiki page on sticky fruit. I assume it just gets passed round but I can use it to get that person to cop people
Maybe we can go loyal person -> target -> back to me -> back to secret loyal person -> cop someone -> back to me
And so on?
Due to the BOOnus round prizes, no one can be town confirmed by cop or any actions anymore imo.
In post 2558, mcqueen wrote:@thanos: are those only for N2? Those seem EXTREMELY powerful if they last the entire game
In post 2560, DrewVa wrote:In post 2557, Thanos wrote:In post 2551, profii wrote:how comeIn post 2549, Thanos wrote:In post 2544, profii wrote:Oh I might as well claim this
I received a sticky fruit so I’m going to give the fruit to the person I made loyal and then I guess they can cop someone
There is no wiki page on sticky fruit. I assume it just gets passed round but I can use it to get that person to cop people
Maybe we can go loyal person -> target -> back to me -> back to secret loyal person -> cop someone -> back to me
And so on?
Due to the BOOnus round prizes, no one can be town confirmed by cop or any actions anymore imo.
I can't recall the exact wording but one of the prizes was "this prize will cause all night actions to fail" or something like that. I assume a scum taking this prize would be immune to investigations and other role stuff in the game. Not sure though.
Agree with this. I can’t see any town motivation for selecting this. What were the other prizes offered?
In post 2570, DrewVa wrote:In post 2562, Thanos wrote:In post 2558, mcqueen wrote:@thanos: are those only for N2? Those seem EXTREMELY powerful if they last the entire game
The room is locked and disappeared now but I think they are permanent. Like for the entire game. Because only the prize with the neighbor specifically said "1 shot"
As in you only get 1 shot to set up a neighborhood and have private communication with a player of your choosing. The other two prizes (immune to night actions and immune to tracking) didn't say 1 shot. So must be permanent.
No townie would ever pick immune to tracking. You guys got some weirdass prizes. Whoa. I would pick immune to the NK. I wouldn’t want to be immune from anything else.
I think the only prize that only scum would pick in ours is “macho”, for obvious reasons.
In post 2580, BrightEyedFish wrote:tbh, I want all of my posts to talk about how DrewVa is scum and I want all of you to go and faith and believe me but I do feel DrewVa's day will come, the sooner the better... but to progress the game because there are other scum out there I was wondering:
Do you feel we benefited from the hidden votes on D1 and should we continue with hidden votes today and wait for the flip to see the votes or should we all be more transparent today?
In post 2872, Lamees wrote:@BEF , I don't think the winners of BOONus round are the day reps. Because the two winners of round C are not on the list. Also there's a day 1, how were those chosen? Day 2 reps were probably chosen the same as day 1 reps. Town read you though, attempts at solving the day reps thing seems townie and genuine. I do remember reading that there is a pattern that we'll pick up on how the day reps are chosen. So you MIGHT be right. We'll need more samples to make that conclusion though.
@gamma, why are you trying to hide scum benefit prizes?if I there's a possibility you're immune to tracking and night actions. I definitely need to inform town. Wtf is that green post lol.
@mcqueen, your defense of drewva (who seems to have 3 or 4 votes atm) comes off as scum defending scum. Please don't ask "why would I do that as scum".
In post 2885, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’ll go with this, yeah there’s another winner. FYI if people start fishing for their identity I’m going to be displeased
In post 2895, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 2889, Thanos wrote:
If day 3 and 4 we find his theory is correct, you do know this confirms ram as scum right?
Pedit@ram, if we find out later that his theory is correct, how do you explain that? Or would you rather answer this when we find out if he's right or wrong
What's the theory?
~ C
In post 2907, Alonzo wrote:Day end doesn't have such an effect now, but in a scenario where there are fewer remaining players it's gonna be huge. If scum do well in their bonus games and then use their ability they could control 50 percent or more of the day end vote which would be huge..
In post 2963, Nev and Max wrote:In post 2882, Thanos wrote:I still would prefer for day 3 reps and boonus round info though. Also, keep in mind that winning a boonus round doesn't mean town alignment.
Boon mentioning that it would become obvious does make me suspect that you are right about how the 4 are selected. So if later we can confirm that your theory is correct, we know ram is confirmes scum. But for now it's too soon and we might lynch town.
So you want us to hold off on lynching someone the mechanics say have a good chance of being scum because he could not be. The cynic in me is screaming that you are his buddy and are trying to save him for a day, maybe so he can use his ability tonight?
Every game has a number of wrong moves built in as safeties. We also gain info from each push, correct or incorrect. Why is this a push that you disagree with specifically?
In post 2859, Cheeky Dancer wrote:I voted Drewva for how they're reacting to pressure on them around the so called "scum slip" they're more likely to harp on about people being dumb (BEF) when they're scum ime.
In post 3135, Cheeky Dancer wrote:You guys can quit trying to get PP to conform to your approved style of play. If you took a moment to meta check him or Ari you'd know being a lurk lazy sack is mostly NAI. The amount of activity today from PP says they're town.
In post 2400, Boonskiies wrote:Emperor flippyNips [4]: - Alonzo [12/26, 18:53], DrewVa [12/27, 17:01], Xtoxm [12/28, 16:53], Cheeky Dancer [12/28, 17:48] ------ [LYNCH]
In post 3131, Emperors New Groove wrote:Auro is basically absent. Rage-quit threats are lame.
In post 3129, mcqueen wrote:but times where they seem, to me at least (I've never played with either, so if someone wants to meta-correct me, go ahead), are blatantly town. Those times include both heads, btw.
In post 3152, Cheeky Dancer wrote:I don't mind lynching Theta but I don't see the benefit of lynching a no-info slot over letting a vig shot sort it?
In post 3131, Emperors New Groove wrote:Hmm...Thanos isn't town. Null at best.
Auro is basically absent. Rage-quit threats are lame. Stating that cop innos are not reliable are also lame.
In post 4282, Something_Smart wrote:Una's argument is the only one based on hard facts instead of conjecture. And the one assumption he makes is that scum didn't know their day rep power would be revealed... so if that ends up being right, then Una's case will be way more convincing than any of the others.
In post 4802, mcqueen wrote:Just read the BOONus Room C. I don't know what to think at the moment. Right now I'm leaning on TvTvT.
I didn't like Thanos' Night 1 in there, though. I'll re-read it once more, but for now VOTE: Thanos
In post 4827, Gamma Emerald wrote:Tbh Thanos seemed very desperate to win the round. Wonder why that was.
In post 4905, UnaBombaH wrote:What on earth is this post supposed to be?In post 4484, Xtoxm wrote:did someone let una win a prize
Anyone who ends up reading Boonus Room A at any future point should be able to clearly see that I had no selfish agenda last night.
Also wanna play ball with everyone here - apparently some think it's better to not out who won/didn't win, and why.
Why is that?
If Boonus Room B had scum winning the game, their team already knows they won, and WHAT they won.
So why not give the town the same information?
Gives the scum less room later...or am I missing something?
WHY ARE WE THEORIZING ABOUT WHY/WHO GET TO BE DAY-REPS?
Outside of the obvious "scum can choose one day-rep" there's no incentive to do that.
And after D2, I don't think it's worth it to guess how someone became a rep. or not.
It only meant something last gameday, because I'm still arguing that scum couldn't have known that their ability to choose one of themselves was going to be outed.
At least not as soon as it did get outed.
At least one scum in D2 day-reps. I'm not gonna change my view on that even if Ram flipped town.I'm at this post for now.In post 4548, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Also, I have some interesting news I feel like sharing, which could possibly help us. It's regarding the BOONus game.
Have to work a little, and will catch up tonight.