Maybe TLK got a little stressed out form the pressure from PP about receiving something last night and just went out on a limb to say he received fruit.
In post 4938, DrewVa wrote:In post 4911, BrightEyedFish wrote:
Maybe TLK got a little stressed out form the pressure from PP about receiving something last night and just went out on a limb to say he received fruit.
But it seems an odd thing to fakeclaim, especially when he couldn’t have guessed what Penguin would have given him.
In post 4943, RCEnigma wrote:In post 4940, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 4938, DrewVa wrote:In post 4911, BrightEyedFish wrote:
Maybe TLK got a little stressed out form the pressure from PP about receiving something last night and just went out on a limb to say he received fruit.
But it seems an odd thing to fakeclaim, especially when he couldn’t have guessed what Penguin would have given him.
Well, profii had the fruit and he said he didn't pass it along to TLK. So either there is some mechainc/role that is redirecting or TLK lied. I would ask profii to say who he intended to give the fruit to but that would out his loyal gift as well so we can forget that from now.
Is it possible for there to be 2 fruit vendors?
There can be 2 fruit vendors but only 1 sticky fruit vendor.
Also Profii shouldn't claim who he gave it to. The recipient should claim it.
In post 3, Boonskiies wrote:,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸ BooneyToonz Guidelines ,.-~*´¨¯¨`*·~-.¸(¯`·._.·(¯`·._.·(¯`·._.· BooneyToonz RoleBook ·._.·´¯)·._.·´¯)·._.·´¯)
Town Only
Vanilla Townie, Friendly Neighbor, Innocent Child, Mason, Miller, Named Townie, Super Saint, Vigilante, Vengeful,
Mafia Only
Mafia Goon, Traitor
Any Alignment
Babysitter, Bunyip, Commuter, Cop, Detective, Doctor, Follower, Fruit Vendor, Gunsmith, Hider, Jack of All Trades, Jailkeeper, Motion Detector, Neapolitan, Neighbor, Neighborizer, Psychologist, Roleblocker, Rolecop, Rolestopper, Tracker, Universal Backup, Vanilla Cop, Visitor, Voyeur, Watcher
Third Party
Serial killer
Modifiers
Ascetic, Backup, Bulletproof, Enabler, Macho, Neighbor, Non-Consecutive Night, Weak, X-Shot, Ninja, Compulsive, Loyal, Disloyal, Loud, Informed, Activate, Strongman, Night Specific (Any form, Even/Odd/Novice included)(¯`·._.·(¯`·._.·(¯`·._.· Boon Bank ·._.·´¯)·._.·´¯)·._.·´¯)
SymbioticCredit: BoonskiiesSpoiler:
EnchantressCredit: BoonskiiesSpoiler:
StickyFruit VendorCredit: BoonskiiesSpoiler:
ClericCredit: AssemblerotwsSpoiler:
WillboosterCredit: Gamma EmeraldSpoiler:❚█══█❚ ContraBoon'd ❚█══█❚
Non-Sane Cop, Blank Vig, Non-Sane or Quack Doctor, Cultist, Jester, Mafia Mason, Vanillaizer, Beloved Princess, Governor, Godfather, Percentage{இ}ڿڰۣ-ڰۣ~— BooneyToonz Checklist {இ}ڿڰۣ-ڰۣ~—
In post 4977, mcqueen wrote:but for real tlk and elsa both need to die. No ones willing to hammer tlk, and no ones shot elsa yet. These are both actual problems.
In post 5070, DrewVa wrote:In post 4996, UnaBombaH wrote:Just to comment on this briefly - I felt comfortable with you/me not winning, only because then pink winning would've required Elsa to play "dirty".In post 4954, mcqueen wrote:I should’ve won, but Una ruined it.
So I was more or less giving Elsa the chance to bone me/us (assuming they were pink) if they felt like being selfish.
Therefore "Elsa solo-winning only by showing their "true colors" < "no one winning" > "you solo-winning" (as I couldn't be sure about your alignment either)
That is also why I made sure to draw the line so that I'd handle our actions as a direct extension of the actual game.
I dislike the way Dva took their "victory" N1. I don't think it outright pins them as scum obviously, but I still think their approach to the game wasn't townlike.
We didn’t trust BEF with the vig, we’ve already said this, D2.
In post 5287, Nero Cain wrote:Just to be clear here, TLK somehow got the sticky fruit but someone else has the loyal mod right?
In post 5600, The Last Knight wrote:In post 5272, RCEnigma wrote:
Idk I think he's scum. But like I said BoonBank could be a scum role. So there's a world where a scum stickyfruit vendor won night 1 and passed Profii a fruit night one then passed another night 2.
It still doesn't explain what happened to Profiis fruit which is why I'm content with thinking TLK is lying.
Profii didn't pass his fruit because he had plans to pass it to his loyal target. They won't get it until tonight.
The original fruit passer gave me the fruit.
In post 5618, The Last Knight wrote:
But I really dislike BEF claiming I faked the fruit when he didn't even know what it did. He was just so eager to point and yell "scum!" that he didn't bother to do the research. It feels like he knows that someone is trying to frame me with the fruit and wants to bring a lot of attention to it. I've been scum reading BEF ever since he made that word choice argument early D1. So, not omgus.
In post 5624, RCEnigma wrote:Since Profii had the fruit he couldn't be targeted by actions right? Or could he be affected by actions since he was giving it away?
In post 5632, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hi, what is the relevance of the current discussion?
In post 5634, Gamma Emerald wrote:2 things: first, it determines whether the current discussion is important, as from what I’ve seen it’s a lot of theory talk with little conclusions. Second it helps me get a foothold in the conversation if I want to talk about it by giving an overview of what’s going on.
In post 5636, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well my overview is you guys have been going on about Stucky fruit for a while with 0 actual attempt to draw impactful conclusions from it. So unless you can counter that, good day.
In post 5659, DrewVa wrote:
A redirect onto TLK could also possibly be a frame? .
In post 5688, Nev and Max wrote:In post 2464, DrewVa wrote:Oh wait, can confirm, there’s at least three rooms. Boon just made mention of other rooms - plural. That obviously means, at least 3.
This pinged me again on a dive for boonus round prizes. I need to remind myself to look at who was in each room as well, we could have glazed over this and not realized that the slip was that 1 scum was in 2 of A B or C that night, so scum would know that at least 2 rooms existed, but without a scum in the last room they wouldn't have known about more than 2.
In post 5693, DrewVa wrote:In post 5690, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 5688, Nev and Max wrote:In post 2464, DrewVa wrote:Oh wait, can confirm, there’s at least three rooms. Boon just made mention of other rooms - plural. That obviously means, at least 3.
This pinged me again on a dive for boonus round prizes. I need to remind myself to look at who was in each room as well, we could have glazed over this and not realized that the slip was that 1 scum was in 2 of A B or C that night, so scum would know that at least 2 rooms existed, but without a scum in the last room they wouldn't have known about more than 2.
On N1, I was in Group A with Alonzo and DrewVa.
Alonzo flipped Town, I am town... Drewva, I don't know.
We’re town, I think that should be kind of obvious now, even to you.
In post 5703, DrewVa wrote:In post 5701, Nev and Max wrote:So drew, dave, creature, gamme and nero all won.
Thanos pointed out when they outed the prizes how scum sided they were. I think that we need to take a look at these, especially if we can coordinate between those and the ones town got last night to help push us forward.
I don’t think there’s any correlation between who won and alignment. I think it kind of odd that scum!TLK would never have got to play once. Because I think the choosing of the players is probably not random.
In post 5712, DrewVa wrote:In post 5708, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 5703, DrewVa wrote:In post 5701, Nev and Max wrote:So drew, dave, creature, gamme and nero all won.
Thanos pointed out when they outed the prizes how scum sided they were. I think that we need to take a look at these, especially if we can coordinate between those and the ones town got last night to help push us forward.
I don’t think there’s any correlation between who won and alignment. I think it kind of odd that scum!TLK would never have got to play once. Because I think the choosing of the players is probably not random.
I was not told why I was selected for the BOONus round, were you? And it says priority will be given to players who have not completed in a BOONus round.
You think you were selected at random?
In post 5721, DrewVa wrote:In post 5717, BrightEyedFish wrote:Is it possible that someone has a role or modifier that allows them to select the BOONus players?
Or
maybe the selection could come from the Dead/spectator PT?
Dead chat being able to directly influence a game, would be a really novel mechanic.
In post 5781, The Last Knight wrote:Or we could wait a day so that I can give Profii his fruit back. In that case, we could lynch Elsa or BEF today.
In post 5795, mcqueen wrote:
The entire reason we’re even considering TLK as a lynch - besides/before the fruit fiasco - is because he was deemed a scummy slot. If he’s town, and truly is SS, he is a literal 1-for-1 deal with scum, and is best to keep him alive. I’m moving away from him and trusting my gut. TLK is town.
Therefore, this post and Penguin blatantly asking TLK if he received his gift when no one else has done that seems like a way for scum!PP to bait TLK. PP could be a scum sticky fruit vendor (there was one of these in another booneytoonz game), knew TLK had a potential second fruit, and got him to out that he had a fruit by asking him if he received PP’s gift. Of course PP said he didn’t send him a fruit. He’s scum.
VOTE: PenguinPower
“I’ll answer tomorrow” ... the issue has been brought up today. I think you know your time is limited but wanted your biggest threat out of the game with time to figure out how to evade death.
In post 5804, mcqueen wrote:No i’m pretty sure u win a +1 along with a prize elsa. What ur describing was a potential prize
In post 5925, UnaBombaH wrote:If TLK ever turns out to be town, I'd argue that it's weird how easily scum gave up on that wagon!
Like, assume he is town.
Assume Elsa is town.
Scum wouldn't want to keep that wagon alive and get mislynch on a SuperSaint + a kill on a Miller?
There's a case to "stick" to (hehahe), so the wagon can easily be argued to be town tomorrow, and Elsa is more or less universally agreed upon to be a "Vig-target" with the Miller-claim.
I think one or both of them are scum.
Or I think it shouldn't be hard to look for the scum who were eager to jump/stay on TLK after the StickyFruitiasco.
In post 5987, The Last Knight wrote:And SS is scum until they prove otherwise at this point for me. They're coasting too comfortably for me to be okay with it. I do appreciate the dedication to the game when it comes to replacing out, but that just makes me feel like they want to skate by without having to contribute.
I'm mainly just asking for more from them. Then I'll reaS_Sess (reassess).
In post 5992, Something_Smart wrote:If TLK is going to be the lynch I'm fine with hammering him if that's what people want.
In post 6013, The Last Knight wrote:In post 6006, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 5987, The Last Knight wrote:And SS is scum until they prove otherwise at this point for me. They're coasting too comfortably for me to be okay with it. I do appreciate the dedication to the game when it comes to replacing out, but that just makes me feel like they want to skate by without having to contribute.
I'm mainly just asking for more from them. Then I'll reaS_Sess (reassess).In post 5992, Something_Smart wrote:If TLK is going to be the lynch I'm fine with hammering him if that's what people want.
There are so many people wanting to hammer TLK. Now he scum reads SomethingS but AGAIN TLK is silent on having one of his top SR hammer him (Elsa and I are his other SRs iirc).
I don't know but I think if I were SS I would want my top scum read to hammer me??
I tried to believe, but I just can't believe the SuperSaint claim.
You quoted those in correct order. Maybe I missed it, but that's the first I saw SS offer to hammer me. I've never objected to being a lynch target with designated hammers.
You're just fishing for anything at this point.
In post 6027, mcqueen wrote:because we mislynched off a theory yesterday, why chance the same today? again, elsa’s a great PL regardless.
and i ask once more, what makes tlk scum outside of the fruit fiasco?
In post 6027, mcqueen wrote:because we mislynched off a theory yesterday, why chance the same today? again, elsa’s a great PL regardless.
and i ask once more, what makes tlk scum outside of the fruit fiasco?
In post 6034, RCEnigma wrote:In post 6027, mcqueen wrote:because we mislynched off a theory yesterday, why chance the same today? again, elsa’s a great PL regardless.
and i ask once more, what makes tlk scum outside of the fruit fiasco?
TLK's alignment doesn't matter. Even if he's town his role is meant to be lynched
In post 6082, The Last Knight wrote:In post 6036, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 6034, RCEnigma wrote:In post 6027, mcqueen wrote:because we mislynched off a theory yesterday, why chance the same today? again, elsa’s a great PL regardless.
and i ask once more, what makes tlk scum outside of the fruit fiasco?
TLK's alignment doesn't matter. Even if he's town his role is meant to be lynched
Exactly.
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt to at least let him nominate the people he wants to hammer. Since he is not answering it makes me feel like his claim is not true.
This was posted 2:41 am in my time zone. This guy smears me every chance he gets. Big cahones.
In post 6093, The Last Knight wrote:That post wasn't even a question. It was so redundant that it felt unnecessary to answer. You failed to point out that my first two posts after 5786 were responses, the second being addressed to you.
But yeah I agree that the people who I want to die are people that I scum read. It would be rather anti-town to suggest anyone who I don't think is scum to hammer me. Thank you for catching up to the super saint show, where two die for the price of one, but only if you also want the TOWN super saint to die too. Otherwise, you can always settle for just the scum.
In post 6096, The Last Knight wrote:Very good. I am also okay with being lynched if it means taking down scum. I've never disputed that. Only in light of other things.
I also want to get all of my thoughts out there now so that when I flip SS you all can read back on me and those who didn't want to hammer me.
In post 6149, DrewVa wrote:
A bit surprised I can't figure out where BEF, N&M, and CD are voting given they've been active-ish.
-d
In post 6243, Elsa Jay wrote:I unvoted and voted again like you told me too, but sadly a fatal error was made because I unvoted and revoted in the same post: it cancelled each other out and didn't count as a new vote.
You do realize, Drew, that means you were roleblocked or someone healed me, the latter seeming possible since scum ALSO didn't kill.
In post 6254, Thanos wrote:In post 6243, Elsa Jay wrote:I unvoted and voted again like you told me too, but sadly a fatal error was made because I unvoted and revoted in the same post: it cancelled each other out and didn't count as a new vote.
@mod, if I unvote and vote in the same post, does the timestamp change?
In post 6298, Jingle wrote:BTW, group A and group C both have weak as prizes. Does group B also have weak?
In post 6484, DrewVa wrote:
You outed us having vig. That was anti-town!
In post 6490, DrewVa wrote:
Because we were pink, there was no way to compromise with Alonzo and keep you from possibly getting vig and shooting us. You had just voted us, remember?
In post 6493, DrewVa wrote:
We were pink, you and Alonzo were blue, so there was no way to have him win and you lose. It was either us or you. \_0_/
In post 6495, DrewVa wrote:I don't regret shooting scum just cause they lived lol -d
In post 6496, DrewVa wrote:You would have preferred we let you have it to vig town? -d
In post 6500, Jingle wrote:This 1v1 is boring AND unimportant.
@BEF why is EJ not being Hammer-1 more damning than SS not being hammer?
In post 6504, DrewVa wrote:
Ask RCE. He can back us up. SS claimed to offer Profil a hood. Profil never received said hood, which confirms that SS lied to me and RCE about what he was going to do with his prize.
In post 6514, profii wrote:so we lynch S_S
someone does the unvote / vote trick
and we deal with elsa tomorrow?
hurrah
In post 6555, Something_Smart wrote:It doesn't matter if it's an orchestration. If you think I'm scum it STILL makes Elsa scum. So hang him first so I can get my last check in tonight.
In post 6686, DrewVa wrote:Let's consider the likelihood, rather high, that he got a sticky fruit. We already have a strong indication that the scum have a sticky fruit vendor given the events surrounding TLK. So they vended fruit to Elsa last night, protecting him and asceticizing him.
In post 6702, DrewVa wrote:First I was a bit confused because I thought sticky fruit was also a protective
That aside, I guess I'm still kinda confused about the sticky fruit. Who did profii try to send it to originally?
-d
In post 6927, DrewVa wrote:Thougt that’s occured to me. Could Elsa possibly be a nexus or something? We know that TLK got sticky fruit but no one claimed to give it to him, right? So, maybe the actual NK was the one doccd/rolestopped? Because TLK receiving sticky fruit is proof of some kind of redirect in the setup.
In post 7199, Elsa Jay wrote:Oh the Fish exists! Is it bad I thought you died night 2 for some reason?
In post 7201, Elsa Jay wrote:I wanted to lynch you day 1 for no other reason then just cuz. You tell me if I'd miss someone I'd do that too.
I do miss Almost and Chara though, even if they talked very little day 1.
In post 7171, Cheeky Dancer wrote:For some reason after reading through drewva's post Jan 31 posts, I imagined a jingle/drewva/n&m team.![]()
~ P
In post 7331, Elsa Jay wrote:With so many people here wanting me dead, I'm beginning to think both town and scum are targetting me...
Also one last reminder that Jingle did the revote thingy.
In post 7339, PenguinPower wrote:Bad vote tho.
In post 7341, Elsa Jay wrote:Preferring town to go before scum is considered bad form in most parts, Fishy.
In post 7357, Jingle wrote:Damn. I really was hoping to draw the nightkill there.
Okay. Who do we lynch today?
In post 7400, Xtoxm wrote:In post 7396, BrightEyedFish wrote:I don't see any connections right now but I will dive a little deeper and see if something pops out? Anyone else have and theories?
theres still a strong correlation between boonus winners and day reps unless im missing something? and i'd guess now that we're down to 2 rooms, it would be 2 slots for winners and 2 slots random.
either way its not important
In post 7396, BrightEyedFish wrote:Day Reps:
Day 1:
Emperor flippyNips
Alonzo
Mcqueen
Xtoxm
Day 2:
Davesaz
Ramcius
DrewVa (Nancy Drew 39/DVa)
Karmeleon
Day 3:
Nev and Max
Cheeky Dancer
Nero Cain
UnaBombah
Day 4:
Creature
Cheeky Dancer
Profii
PenguinPower
Day 5:
PenguinPower
Jingle
DrewVa
Gamma Emerald
I don't see any connections right now but I will dive a little deeper and see if something pops out? Anyone else have and theories?
In post 7432, Elsa Jay wrote:Well I'm a Miller. That's my fucking job to be suspicious.
As town though I'm highly against you wasting time only on me today and letting scum have a free day.
Can't we do what we did yesterday and keep going under the assumption I'm only a Traitor, who, by the way, is Weak and useless?
Finding Smart's partners take precedent. Atleast scumhunt today.
In post 7435, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 7433, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 7432, Elsa Jay wrote:Well I'm a Miller. That's my fucking job to be suspicious.
As town though I'm highly against you wasting time only on me today and letting scum have a free day.
Can't we do what we did yesterday and keep going under the assumption I'm only a Traitor, who, by the way, is Weak and useless?
Finding Smart's partners take precedent. Atleast scumhunt today.
I can't trust you if I wanted to this game.
Even goes out the way to not mention "I guess we should also keep scumhunting instead of tunneling Elsa again today". Why would a townie be in such a grudge holding mindset that lets them not even scumhunt elsawhere?
Please for the love of everything scumhunt other people as well if your all locked onto me dying today. Don't waste the day.
In post 7437, Elsa Jay wrote:Your Also ignoring the fact you have been tunneling me since yesterday.
Also to reiterate the 3 votes on me from yesterday: You, Smart, and Nev.
Nev is scummy, and Smart is flipped Scum now. You and Nev literally went all in with Smart and it backfired since only you 3 were on me.
Kindly explain how you and Nev aren't scum.
In post 7440, Elsa Jay wrote:The Fishy wrote:I have no 100% evidence that you are scum. Also, the way my reads have played out this game, statistically there is a good chance you are town solely because I SR you.
Morals doesn't trump logic here, my bro.
When it's a Policy Lynch day 5 vs finding scum, of course you go for finding scum. It's always the town's best interest to actually scumhunt.
I'll go quiet for now and wait for everyone elsa to be here then. As long as we Also look in other areas and consult the possibilities, I'll be happy even if I die today.
In post 7457, DrewVa wrote:In post 7384, DrewVa wrote:@everyone: did you get messages from the mod about alignments, fruit, sticky fruit, other bullshit?
btw, answering this question should also not be an excuse to prodge, I want people giving updated lists after the second flip, that preferably include more people than the black hole of Elsa Jay which is not an interesting read to me rn despite the remaining mech questions there
-d
still doing this btw
-d
In post 7409, BrightEyedFish wrote:Testing a theory:
Can anyone confirm if Jingle and Gamma won a BOONus round last night?
In post 7781, Creature wrote:I miss when we would scumhunt normally, not mechanically.
In post 7783, Creature wrote:Jingle
Davesaz
Gamma Emerald
Xtoxm
DrewVa
BrightEyedFish
Nev and Max
PenguinPower
RCEnigma
Nero Cain
In post 7180, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Yeah I am changing my read on nero and n&m after an ISO of ram.
Notes to self:
reread dead people posts of alonzo/mcqueen/AC posts, read UL's posts
~ P
In post 7168, DrewVa wrote:
Yes. We actually have a full mechanical solve of the game so long as elsa jay is alive tomorrow. That's right, if scum do not shoot elsa they are 100% doomed.
-d
In post 7171, Cheeky Dancer wrote:For some reason after reading through drewva's post Jan 31 posts, I imagined a jingle/drewva/n&m team.![]()
~ P
In post 7792, Jingle wrote:
@BEF: Penguin was the only Boonus winner last night. Results have been outed. I was in neither room.
In post 7968, DrewVa wrote:P.edit. @BEF, why Dave over N & M?
In post 7972, RCEnigma wrote:In post 7970, DrewVa wrote:In post 7941, RCEnigma wrote:I dunno, I'm bad so take this with a grain of salt. Dave was absent a lot of OK2 as well and I have townread him there I thought his inputs were well thought out and meaningful when he did post. That was fmpov where I could objectively read slots without a lot of consequence.
It's like 2 different players when I compare it to this game. I'll probably never be one for mechanical play so this is just, gut and limited meta so.
Dave, jingle, Bef, and Elsa I could still go for. But I'm probably just voting Bef today.
You think BEF is a better lynch than N & M? Convince me.
I don't have a case for one over the other, I haven't had a townlean for either since day 2 so.
In post 8015, Jingle wrote:In post 8012, Nero Cain wrote:Why are you guys pushing BEF?
Wouldn't say I've pushed him yet, but he IS probably scum.
He's pushing EJ for lying but seems to think EJ is town and he's pushing "Day Reps have scum" despite the Ramcius mislynch and multiple arguments about why that's not a helpful path to go down that he hasn't responded to.
Additionally, he's not attempted to sort anyone that I've seen today.
In post 2693, Boonskiies wrote:
Scum can still be able to become a Day Rep without using that ability, however using the ability can let them pick one of their teammates to become automatically one of the Day Reps.
In post 7408, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 4563, the worst wrote:
In post 7530, Jingle wrote:Yeah. But the similarity between this push and the Ram push is that it's based on speculation. My speculation is that the scum team has the ability to force any player to be a day rep, not just one of their own. Which means that based on the fact that you guys lynched Ram because of the argument day rep implies scum and the fact that day reps are largely irrelevant, they would have used it on not them and the repeated day rep status implies town.
Of course, because that's simply speculation, I'm not basing any of my reads on it. Basing your reads on the speculation that they would choose one of their own is just as lazy as townreading people for being dayreps would be, unless you have evidence to support the idea that they would repeatedly choose the same scum player to be a day rep. Or, in fact, evidence that there is actually causation between Day reps and Boonus rooms, rather than just correlation.
PEdit: I'd guess that only scum can answer that question.
In post 8033, Jingle wrote:In post 8031, BrightEyedFish wrote:Boon answered this, they can only put one of their scum teammates as a Day Rep not anyone they wish.
Quote?
More importantly, why would scum choose to put themselves on the day rep list when it's been proven to be considered scummy and has no utility for them?
In post 2693, Boonskiies wrote:
Scum can still be able to become a Day Rep without using that ability, however using the ability can let them pick one of their teammates to become automatically one of the Day Reps.
In post 8036, profii wrote:Have you factored in which players were activated via DrewVa
In post 8041, Jingle wrote:
First, that quote tells us only that scum can (but doesn't have to) choose a player to be a day rep. It doesn't tell us scum can't choose a town player. It does in fact tell us scum can choose not to choose a player to be a day rep.
Where did you get the bolded information?
In post 8050, Jingle wrote:Okay. Now explain why they'd use it. Or continue using it.
In post 8052, Jingle wrote:It really isn't extra power.
It's a way scum can out themselves if they want, but it's not extra power. And any halfway intelligent player would have seen that D1.
In post 8054, Jingle wrote:Because they can't end the day.
It takes 3/4. If half of the day reps aren't scum, scum doesn't have any real influence to end the day prematurely.
If three day reps vote to end the day while discussion is still happening, they become obvious scum because the mechanic is public. Normally, that means they'd only do it when ending the day wins them the game, but they still can't do that here, because we can still vote in twilight. It's literally a completely useless role.
In post 8057, Jingle wrote:I agree. If they want the scum team can choose to out themselves using the day rep mechanic. They could also claim, so we should probably just wait for them to claim and not scumhunt til then.
And arguing that the scumteam is going to use the day rep mechanic for WIFOM is itself introducing WIFOM about the mechanic.
In post 8059, Elsa Jay wrote:Still wondering who we're lynching between Nev or Fishy. My vote is still on Nev.
In post 8061, Creature wrote:Are Nev and Fish our only scum candidates?
In post 8069, Nev and Max wrote:
That's an interesting answer to another question. Could we get an answer to the question that was asked?
In post 8116, Nero Cain wrote:hey fish, talk about how Jingle couldn't push the way he is as scum.
In post 8132, Jingle wrote:4 with no claim information.
You said you've hinted at your role and the people you've affected should know what it is, which implies targeting role. Creat and Dave are targeting via their disloyal action claims. GE, Nero, X, and PP are the only other players who haven't claimed outright. And PP probably isn't protective, by virtue of giving his charges away.
In post 8134, RCEnigma wrote:GE hinted at a targeting role already, PP's is ambiguous because his gift could have just been from a boonus round but since it's a separate mechanic, it shouldn't have been affected by the stickyfruit.
In post 8289, DrewVa wrote:If the only person willing to add their name to a vote count on a line other than N&M is nero on elsa then it sure sounds like a consensus lynch to me
-d
In post 8291, Jingle wrote:Oh. Add BEF to the possible protective list. I keep thinking he's the bunyip.
In post 8340, DrewVa wrote:This may sound like a strange question but why would you use any shots at all. If you vend to scum it can severely disrupt town investigative results, especially if you die and there is no known start point for the fruit.
Related question did you vend to profii because you townread him? What was your reasoning there?
-d
In post 8342, Nev and Max wrote:Do we know if it died with TLK?
In post 8345, DrewVa wrote:what bothers me is I don't see redirectors explicitly banned or allowed in this setup. It has to be some jank scum variant role; or profii lied about sending it to tlk.
Like does profii make that play as scum? I have a very hard time seeing it. But I have also occasionaly forgotten he is in this game lately lol
I'm not even sure if we have enough unaccounted for boonus actions that you could have stickied elsa the night he was double copped iirc
If you feel confident that elsa was not fruited then what do you think? Enchantress?
-d
In post 8346, RCEnigma wrote:I still can't wrap my head around how tlk ended up with the fruit.
In post 8353, DrewVa wrote:what did you want from that round I don't even remember the other prizes
-d
In post 8358, Jingle wrote:Cool, so one of BEF and profi is scum.
In post 8382, Jingle wrote:Profii- inventor
Drewva- activator
BEF- SFVendor
There are only 3 non whitelisted roles possible.
In order for a redirector to be in the setup, one of those has to not be. DrewVa's role is funtionally confirmed by the fact that the activations did actually happen.
BEF's role is confirmed by the existence of sticky fruit.
If profii made up his role he could be a redirector. It would be incredibly bad play to fakeclaim a role that was going to be mechanically confirmed as scum later in the game, so profii almost certainly has a variant role.
In post 8415, RCEnigma wrote:Add to that I don't know why scum activator would ever activate town. From there based on how Xtoxm played the boonus round openly claiming to start leads me to believe he's not scum with drewva. He didn't try to manipulate the boonus round in any way which would be a priority with a scum activator imo.
In post 8426, RCEnigma wrote:In post 8421, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 8415, RCEnigma wrote:Add to that I don't know why scum activator would ever activate town. From there based on how Xtoxm played the boonus round openly claiming to start leads me to believe he's not scum with drewva. He didn't try to manipulate the boonus round in any way which would be a priority with a scum activator imo.
DrewVa ABSOLUTELY manipulated our N1 BOONus round under their theory that I would win and vig them. Read Alonzo's ISO and it confirms DrewVa played dirty that round.
Small sample size. Also I was in OK2 and see why Nancy would play a boonus round with you night 1 that way knowing what kind of player Nancy is.
In post 8480, Thanos wrote:Page 1 says we can have one Boon Bank role and two variants; so BEF is the boon bank one, Profii and DrewVa are variants.
BEF targeted Profii and Profii received fruit N1.
Who did Profii attempt to send fruit to, N2?
In post 8483, Thanos wrote:Yes, I know that. So since Profii confirmed he didn't send it to TLK, either he's lying or there is necessarily a redirector which is a variant role, therefore making one of you three a liar.
In post 8485, Jingle wrote:Or, alternatively BEF had another shot and used it night two on TLK.
In post 8487, Thanos wrote:True. Profii seems like a logical lynch today then, do you feel the same @BEF?
@Jingle: We all start out with one shot. He didn't win the Boonus, right? So you'd need someone to have gifted him a +1 for him to have done that.
In post 8491, DrewVa wrote:Sure wish it didn't take profii 25 minutes to look up his night actions
-d
In post 8505, Thanos wrote:Hmm, N&M seem to have slid away now.
In post 8519, RCEnigma wrote:In post 8512, DrewVa wrote:In post 8502, BrightEyedFish wrote:I gave profii the fruit because I tr him. If I was scum do you think I would pass it to town!profii?
if you are scum, you only passed to profii because your action was locked before night ended and you didn't realize you were not winning in the boonus round.
I have to consider it given what else I know about what profii will eventually claim; I had some pretty good reasons to think he was town ngl
Boon also does occasionally do really weird bullshit. One of the two of you could be withold part of your claim; you could be a disloyal sticky fruit vendor; profii could be a disloyal inventor.
disloyal scum sticky fruit vendor would theoretically explain why you would eventually plan to cross-claim profii
like either way there had to be some pretty wifomy plays made this game
I still find it mindblowing that profii would try to generate a lynch on TLK by lying about who he gave fruit 0.o
-d
I have yet to see anything that indicates roles have permanent modifiers to start the game.
You have until end of boonus games to change night targets, if he saw he was going to lose I don't see why he couldn't change his target to a partner.
Profii and Bef could still be partners, not likely.
In post 8529, DrewVa wrote:In post 8524, profii wrote:so then it was REALLY weird for me that PP had given a gift to TLK - because the loyal apparently doesn't kick in until the following day, so it was irrelevant from that perspective, but TLK claimed Sticky fruit which obviously means whatever PP claimed didn't make it to TLK.
I still have no idea how in the flying fuck profii as scum would come up with a convoluted mess of night actions like this
doesn't the sticky fruit description say that it does other shit that you don't know about?
like what did the sticky fruit say when you got it?
-d
In post 8538, DrewVa wrote:n1: BEF vends sticky fruit to profii, profii loyalizes PP -- WHERE IS THE STICKY FRUIT D2?
n2: PP sends fruit to TLK -- WHERE IS THE STICKY FRUIT D3?
d3: TLK ONLY ends up with sticky fruit and not other fruit
what
You weren't in a boonus room n1 right, profii? The loyalization on PP came from your rolecard?
-d
In post 8563, Creature wrote:I see we're still going circular.
In post 4634, The Last Knight wrote:If that wasn't you, I didn't get any other notifications in my confessional other than receiving a sticky fruit.
In post 8623, Jingle wrote:In post 8617, BrightEyedFish wrote:How would a town!me flip help the rest solve the problems with the fruit. Because you will have the exact same info you have now--just one less town.
A town you flip neccessarily means profii is scum. A town profii flip necessarily means you are scum. Thus, dichotomy.
In post 8633, Jingle wrote:Oh yeah. Creature confirmation and profii townflip incriminates Penguin. BEF scumflip incriminates one of the day 1 winners.
In post 8648, Thanos wrote:Oh yeah, he targeted me lol. Checked PMs and there's nothing. He can't be loud.
In post 8654, Thanos wrote:In post 8524, profii wrote:I then went creature -> Loud - he said something about probably being a PR so I figured it made sense to make him more checkable - there was a discussion between me and someone (McQueen?) as I said to creature 'you're basically PR claiming' and he chastised me for it but it seemed like a good way to crumb I am going to do that
Waiiiit a minute. This was done on a previous night to Creature's action on me - does this imply one of Creature and Profii are lying?
In post 8655, RCEnigma wrote:Then we would have to assume SS had multiple shots by night 3. Which would mean one scum with night 1/night 2 winners.
In post 5244, PenguinPower wrote:In post 5240, Cheeky Dancer wrote:So to get down to the bottom of the delicious sticky fruit mess...
N1 - x gave fruit to Profii | Profii makes y loyal.
N2 - Profii gives fruit to TLK
TLK received the fruit meaning he's town if loyal BUT TLK never got made loyal. Where did the loyal go?
Profii didn't even target TLK?
Penguin knows about this how?
I'm confused. Someone straighten this out for me.
N1 - x gave fruit to Profii | Profii makes y loyal
N2 - Profii gives fruit to y
D3 - PP asks TLK if he liked the gift PP gave him; TLK says he got Sticky Fruit. PP/Profii did not send Sticky Fruit to TLK
In post 8695, PenguinPower wrote:Drew can't be scum unless you can explain to me how my loyal neighborizer shot worked on scum.
In post 8708, profii wrote:So we are theorising that there is more than 1 sticky fruit in play and BEF didn’t admit it?
He won the n1 game right? So possibly got an extra charge to do that?
That actually does make sense - so i am guessing Creature isn’t going to be loud as that really fits so yeah we wait
Assuming my fruit vanished in Jail :-/