In post 157, DrewVa wrote:In post 156, BrightEyedFish wrote:
What do you mean with "if"?
???
What part of that do you not understand?
In post 168, DrewVa wrote:braincells
In post 176, Almost Chara wrote:if doesn't imply uncertainty by itself, and there's a sample town role PM in the opening posts.
further, the colloquial definition of "talk" includes written communication, because no one actually says "we're typing at each other in this mafia thread". ;>
~Chara
In post 155, DrewVa wrote:
So, if town wins with all anti-town dead and 1 townie alive, then scum I assume, would win with the exact opposite wincon.
In post 187, Almost Chara wrote:
and to use a pragmatic instead of semantic argument, why on earth would a mafia member be musing about possible scum wincons while not being sure of the town wincon?
In post 192, Almost Chara wrote:so it's something town doesn't do, but also something scum does do to subtly look town?
that's two assumptions you've made, you'll need some evidence for both to satisfy occam's razor.
In post 232, profii wrote:I really think we should use hurt tags to track "vote counts" ourselves
I mean, if you fake it, you better have a freaking good reason post flip so thats easily dealt with and i think tracking things like "I find such and such and such town" will be very tricky.
otherwise the emperor dudes may as well just lol hammer ?
In post 386, Elsa Jay wrote:We got too many people. More then 23 including the Hydras. We gotta thin the herd.
I cant remember everyone in this game, especially with the hydra slips. Sigh.BrightEyedFish wrote:Elsa,
Why all the shade? Are you harbouring emotions from a past game?
Reality show biz, my friend. You aren't appealing to the audience. Unfortunately, that means you gotta go.
In post 389, Elsa Jay wrote:Being a Grammar Nazi doesn't bring in ratings, and we get more ratings if you get punched in the face or something. We can't do that here, so voting you will have to do.
If You want real drama, TLK and RCE grudge match is where it's at.
In post 770, RCEnigma wrote:
Elsa's get Bef lynched schtick is already old. I encourage slots to continue scumreading me without engaging me or asking my views, specifically my reasoning for townreading BEF.
In post 817, Alonzo wrote:In post 795, profii wrote:Alonzo - have your peers said much about ending the day or not? Are they waiting for anything in particular to happen?
I think they are a lil dissapointed that I have not carried town like I did in the last boonskiies.
No way Max n Nev 'are going down a scummy path with Lonzo without having it out with me first. Very unlikely Town Fish.
Gamma is scum I know it.
Elsa sprung into action attempting to push me after I became active, not sure I was even on their radar before hand.
Il give Drew time to save Nancy
Ultimate Lurkers is the only slot out here playing worse than me.
Re End of Day.
I dont see how telegraphing 1/3 of the votes required to End the day well in advance is scummy, and I simply dont have the data on my phone to play the sniff the fart mafia alot of these players like to play for 100 pages a day everyday. Simple.
In post 821, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 817, Alonzo wrote:In post 795, profii wrote:Alonzo - have your peers said much about ending the day or not? Are they waiting for anything in particular to happen?
I think they are a lil dissapointed that I have not carried town like I did in the last boonskiies.
No way Max n Nev 'are going down a scummy path with Lonzo without having it out with me first. Very unlikely Town Fish.
Gamma is scum I know it.
Elsa sprung into action attempting to push me after I became active, not sure I was even on their radar before hand.
Il give Drew time to save Nancy
Ultimate Lurkers is the only slot out here playing worse than me.
Re End of Day.
I dont see how telegraphing 1/3 of the votes required to End the day well in advance is scummy, and I simply dont have the data on my phone to play the sniff the fart mafia alot of these players like to play for 100 pages a day everyday. Simple.
There are 2 fish in this game. Which one are you referring to?
In post 824, Elsa Jay wrote:
You still seem to not like my style this game. Shame.
I only seem to "hinder" because half the people aren't here and I like to talk.
In post 838, Theta Alpine wrote:i will agree that fish and rce seem like scum
In post 813, Alonzo wrote:Fish is 35 and chiseled like a Greek god, I'v still no idea where 99 came from =P
In post 1279, The Last Knight wrote:By posting the VC, I'm just trying to do something that I believe is helpful for the town.
In post 1435, The Last Knight wrote:Your argument is nitpicky and annoying.
In post 1461, Nero Cain wrote:The only reason to really end the day is if things have stagnated and it kinda seems like it has.
In post 1464, profii wrote:how do we move on from that though?
half the town are for vote counting and half arent - so lets the vote counters are pushing scum, the team mates are surely just going to be like "think ill not say" rather than openly push a counter in the normal fashion.
it's basically impossible to know whats going on. I think I'm going to do what someone mentioned earlier and hunt within the group of people that dont want to openly discuss their vote.
In post 1481, mcqueen wrote:In post 795, profii wrote:Alonzo - have your peers said much about ending the day or not? Are they waiting for anything in particular to happen?
Don't understand this post (maybe it's been addressed)
Our only communication as Day reps together is here. We don't get our own private thread or anything
In post 1489, profii wrote:Thats the point - we are really stuck on day 1 if people don’t participate in a home made vote count
In post 1738, Ramcius wrote:
Anyway, what's your opinion about TLK being so passive despite fact that he's leading wagon? He don't challenge people on his wagon, he don't try push me anymore, he don't try push you either
In post 1872, DrewVa wrote:
If Overkill 2, is any indication, I would argue the converse - BEF underestimated town. He faked a guilty on Hebi and never townread us in that game.
In post 1897, Ramcius wrote:
Sheesh, when you gonna stop misrep me? I want all my scumreads dead, that's town wincon, but I prefer other scumreads lynched over you, cause they have associations between themselves, while you are lone scumread
In post 1905, DrewVa wrote:Why are you still so tunnelled on us, when we aren’t even voting you anymore?
In post 1910, DrewVa wrote:
No, you didn’t. I’m saying he’s not thinking logically. Why wouldn’t scum!me be voting him now?
In post 1913, DrewVa wrote:
That isn’t what I said. I said as scum, fhpov, I should definitely be voting him.
In post 2404, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 2408, mcqueen wrote:@BEF
Not sure what that means because I’ve never been part of a BooneyToonz game before.
Is there actually a BOONus round? How do you know that DrewVa was apart of it?
I’m pretty sure you’re joking, but just to be sure.
In post 2423, DrewVa wrote:In post 2416, mcqueen wrote:In post 2411, DrewVa wrote:In post 2406, BrightEyedFish wrote:DrewVa played a dirty BOONus round and said they were taking the Vig prize.
I was hoping for an AC filled D2 but that won't happen.
Our alignment in the BOOnus round has no relevance in the main game. If I didn’t already know how badly you scumside as town, I’d 100% be scumreading you for the blatantly anti-town post.
FYI, we did in fact select vig but we gifted it to someone you wouldn’t expect and since unlike you, we don’t want to gamethrow, we’ll leave it up to the player we gifted it to, to claim or not if/when they feel like it. I bet in scumchat, they’re calling you, “Santa”.
Can someone explain what the BOONus rounds are and how they work? It’s probably in the first few posts, but I haven’t checked and I’m already typing this
Some players were chosen (and if I had any idea, who was boneheaded enough to chose BEF, I’d want PL both of them). I believe maybe 6? in all. There were two BOOnus rooms, so we don’t know who the other three players are or who won the other prize or what they did with it. We probably won’t find out, since they were most likely fortunate enough, not to have a Dim Eyed Fishie in there’s.
In post 2445, Gamma Emerald wrote:I was in a BOONus round myself (room C) and our game had the possibility of being all one alignment
In post 2461, DrewVa wrote:In post 2458, Alonzo wrote:In post 2457, DrewVa wrote:In post 2450, Alonzo wrote:Iv just been over the Invite to the boonus round in my confessional thread, no mention of multiple games happening...
We specifically asked and were told there was a second one.
I’m assuming there are two each night. I’m not sure how the players are all selected but yeah, Boon confirmed it in our confessional.
There are probably completely different prizes as well. We weren’t informed about anything other than there was 2 rounds.
So its Gamma whos Lying to throw you under the bus...
We specifically asked if there was a second round, so I assumed there were only two. Boon never specifically said that there were only two, only confirmed that there was a second one. So, I actually don’t know how many there are.
In post 2497, DrewVa wrote:In post 2496, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I don't believe Boon told you in your confessional.
And you’ll once again be wrong, just like you were when you scumread us and faked that guilty on Hebi, in Overkill 2.
In post 2497, DrewVa wrote:In post 2496, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I don't believe Boon told you in your confessional.
And you’ll once again be wrong, just like you were when you scumread us and faked that guilty on Hebi, in Overkill 2.
In post 2505, DrewVa wrote:In post 2501, mcqueen wrote:In post 2496, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I don't believe Boon told you in your confessional.
Wanna reread BEF’s posts tomorrow morning. Not sure I agree with his angle of attack, but he seems very genuine today so far. Welcome to the townreads
Yeah, he’s really bad town, similar to Overkill 2, where he got town!hebi mislynched with a fake guilty.
In post 2515, mcqueen wrote:In post 2511, DrewVa wrote:In post 2506, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 2497, DrewVa wrote:In post 2496, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I don't believe Boon told you in your confessional.
And you’ll once again be wrong, just like you were when you scumread us and faked that guilty on Hebi, in Overkill 2.
Also.
DrewVa tried to use my several fake guilties to discredit me in the BOONus round too and they were Scum there.
We would have also done that as town. As far as we were concerned, we were good with either both Alonzo and us winning, us winning or Alonzo winning. We didn’t really care all that much who won, so long as it wasn’t you.
Im pretty sure bef said you were the one who pushed for a concede (right c word? Idk i forgot, too tired to check), and someone else said if everyone concedes the minority wins. How would you and Alonzo both win if you fought for a concede?
In post 2570, DrewVa wrote:In post 2562, Thanos wrote:In post 2558, mcqueen wrote:@thanos: are those only for N2? Those seem EXTREMELY powerful if they last the entire game
The room is locked and disappeared now but I think they are permanent. Like for the entire game. Because only the prize with the neighbor specifically said "1 shot"
As in you only get 1 shot to set up a neighborhood and have private communication with a player of your choosing. The other two prizes (immune to night actions and immune to tracking) didn't say 1 shot. So must be permanent.
No townie would ever pick immune to tracking. You guys got some weirdass prizes. Whoa. I would pick immune to the NK. I wouldn’t want to be immune from anything else.
I think the only prize that only scum would pick in ours is “macho”, for obvious reasons.
In post 2581, Thanos wrote:In post 2580, BrightEyedFish wrote:tbh, I want all of my posts to talk about how DrewVa is scum and I want all of you to go and faith and believe me but I do feel DrewVa's day will come, the sooner the better... but to progress the game because there are other scum out there I was wondering:
Do you feel we benefited from the hidden votes on D1 and should we continue with hidden votes today and wait for the flip to see the votes or should we all be more transparent today?
No faith needed. I think the hidden votes helped a lot. I feel someone unintentionally bussed.
In post 2583, DrewVa wrote:In post 2580, BrightEyedFish wrote:tbh, I want all of my posts to talk about how DrewVa is scum and I want all of you to go and faith and believe me but I do feel DrewVa's day will come, the sooner the better... but to progress the game because there are other scum out there I was wondering:
Do you feel we benefited from the hidden votes on D1 and should we continue with hidden votes today and wait for the flip to see the votes or should we all be more transparent today?
Coming from someone who faked a guilty on town, why shouldn’t everyone believe you? Stop pushing this. You were wrong about hebi and me in Overkill 2, who you also sr there too, remember?
If you are even thinking about doing to me here what you did to hebi in THIS game, I promise it won’t be pretty. So I don’t know if you’re thinking of pulling that shit here or not but I wouldn’t recommend it.
In post 2583, DrewVa wrote:In post 2580, BrightEyedFish wrote:tbh, I want all of my posts to talk about how DrewVa is scum and I want all of you to go and faith and believe me but I do feel DrewVa's day will come, the sooner the better... but to progress the game because there are other scum out there I was wondering:
Do you feel we benefited from the hidden votes on D1 and should we continue with hidden votes today and wait for the flip to see the votes or should we all be more transparent today?
Coming from someone who faked a guilty on town, why shouldn’t everyone believe you? Stop pushing this. You were wrong about hebi and me in Overkill 2, who you also sr there too, remember?
If you are even thinking about doing to me here what you did to hebi in THIS game, I promise it won’t be pretty. So I don’t know if you’re thinking of pulling that shit here or not but I wouldn’t recommend it.
In post 2588, Thanos wrote:Wait, BEF faked a result this game? Where? And why lol. Who fakes results...
In post 2590, DrewVa wrote:In post 2418, BrightEyedFish wrote:
How would you know if I'm in scum chat or not? Perhaps because you have access to it.
***This is the time where I would usually fake a guilty claim on DrewVa.
I don’t and if I had no meta knowledge of how embarrassingly off your reads were in Overkill 2, you’d probably be one of my top scumreads rn but BECAUSE of that game, I KNOW that you really ARE this bad.
You’re just damned lucky I gifted our vig prize because had I not had to foresight to do that, our ultimate NK, would sit squarely on YOUR head for helping scum know exactly, who to target.
Fortunately, I took into account how atrociously bad and anti-town a player you are and town won’t suffer the consequences of your poor judgement.
In post 2601, DrewVa wrote:In post 2598, BrightEyedFish wrote:*Do you SR me this game
I don’t know your scumgame but if you could link me to one of your scumgames, that would be awesome.
All I have to go on is Overkill 2. You seem to be sincere but I just got completely bamboozled by scum!Dunn in Excalibur, who I had been hard townreading for sincerity. \_0_/
In post 2604, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 2601, DrewVa wrote:In post 2598, BrightEyedFish wrote:*Do you SR me this game
I don’t know your scumgame but if you could link me to one of your scumgames, that would be awesome.
All I have to go on is Overkill 2. You seem to be sincere but I just got completely bamboozled by scum!Dunn in Excalibur, who I had been hard townreading for sincerity. \_0_/
My latest ones are Mini 2038 and Mini 2041
I can't remember the rest but on my wiki are all of my games.
In post 2616, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2418, BrightEyedFish wrote:
How would you know if I'm in scum chat or not? Perhaps because you have access to it.
***This is the time where I would usually fake a guilty claim on DrewVa.
OK this post is just gross in general, no real defense, just deflecting and tying himself to someone else.
VOTE: BrightEyedFish
In post 2400, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 2659, Nev and Max wrote:
And you didn't because he is town and you don't want to fake a guilty on town?
Or because you are scum and you don't want to bring that kind of heat on yourself?
Or because you really don't think Drew is scum.
Why didn't you fake a guilty in a situation where you admit you normally would?
In post 2706, davesaz wrote:Wow, that's amazing that almost nobody posted during my catchup. Maybe I'll be able to keep up...
I was in BOONus room B, with Almost Chara and Karm. Karm and I "won" the minigame, and got a +1 and choice of (Disloyal, Loud, and a 3rd thing that I can't remember offhand). We had the option of keeping or gifting, same as the other BOONus rooms. Hopefully Karm will remember the 3rd modifier. It seems that the game will end up with a good number of us having roles that resemble the way that Boon plays the game in every setup -- wild!!![]()
In post 2751, Xtoxm wrote:I suppose I missed out on these rounds for being a day rep yesterday
In post 2, Boonskiies wrote:• Because of the Confessionals Thread mechanic, there will be 4 players per day chosen to be the Day Representatives. At the beginning of each Round (Day), these players will be posted upon the opening Day post. These players can VOTE: End Day. If 3 out of the 4 vote to end the day, then the day will end. Players will have until Twilight ends to cast their votes in their Confessionals Thread. Plurality Lynch Rule will come into play, and there will be a final vote count placed in the thread to end the day. I won't be explaining how the Day Representatives are chosen, but throughout the game, it will become obvious. There will still be the natural deadline for the game, and Plurality Lynch Rule will still come into play.
In post 2751, Xtoxm wrote:I suppose I missed out on these rounds for being a day rep yesterday
In post 2820, profii wrote:Why is the 4th end of day person scum?
Why can’t it be that scum just didn’t use that power and Boon has to fill the slot ?!
In post 2840, Ramcius wrote:BEF, are you have strong townread on other 3 day reps?
In post 2842, Nev and Max wrote:In post 2840, Ramcius wrote:BEF, are you have strong townread on other 3 day reps?
Ram, this sentence is put together in an odd way, but I think it might explain something. Is English your first language? Totally cool if it's not, just would help me understand your posts a little better since I feel like I'm missing a tiny thing each time.
In post 2870, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2868, BrightEyedFish wrote:
Definition of coincidence in English:
coincidence
NOUN
1A remarkable concurrence of events or circumstances without apparent causal connection.
Here we have an APPARENT CONNECTION.
And the argument for the connection bring valid is? Like, there’s nothing actually pointing to what you guys are arguing beyond speculation. No thanks.
In post 2872, Lamees wrote:@BEF , I don't think the winners of BOONus round are the day reps. Because the two winners of round C are not on the list. Also there's a day 1, how were those chosen? Day 2 reps were probably chosen the same as day 1 reps. Town read you though, attempts at solving the day reps thing seems townie and genuine. I do remember reading that there is a pattern that we'll pick up on how the day reps are chosen. So you MIGHT be right. We'll need more samples to make that conclusion though.
In post 2876, Ramcius wrote:You using Occam's razor, when you can't prove anything? Either of other 3 can be scum, scum might chose not to use their ability (I don't see any advantage for scum having their day rep, especially, if this ability is public), there no confirmation that all 4 is from BOONus rounds. In short, you try to lynch me on some unconfirmed speculations
So, can we get TLK today? We need to deal with SS claim. No one want discuss his last second vote on Theta D1 either
In post 2880, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2872, Lamees wrote:@BEF , I don't think the winners of BOONus round are the day reps. Because the two winners of round C are not on the list. Also there's a day 1, how were those chosen? Day 2 reps were probably chosen the same as day 1 reps. Town read you though, attempts at solving the day reps thing seems townie and genuine. I do remember reading that there is a pattern that we'll pick up on how the day reps are chosen. So you MIGHT be right. We'll need more samples to make that conclusion though.
@gamma, why are you trying to hide scum benefit prizes?if I there's a possibility you're immune to tracking and night actions. I definitely need to inform town. Wtf is that green post lol.
@mcqueen, your defense of drewva (who seems to have 3 or 4 votes atm) comes off as scum defending scum. Please don't ask "why would I do that as scum".
I mean since everyone hates pants I’ll claim what I picked, which was the Neighborizer. I definitely didn’t feel like being Ascetic and while I could see utility to it, Ninja doesn’t work with my ability very well imo
In post 2888, Ramcius wrote:In post 2877, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 2876, Ramcius wrote:You using Occam's razor, when you can't prove anything? Either of other 3 can be scum, scum might chose not to use their ability (I don't see any advantage for scum having their day rep, especially, if this ability is public), there no confirmation that all 4 is from BOONus rounds. In short, you try to lynch me on some unconfirmed speculations
So, can we get TLK today? We need to deal with SS claim. No one want discuss his last second vote on Theta D1 either
Occams Razor is a method used to prove and/or explain something. And we do have confirmation on 3 of the Day Reps also being BOONus round winners.
"Occam's razor is the problem-solving principle that essentially states that the simplest solution tends to be the correct one."
Your solution isn't simplest, you just want easy mechanical lynch
In post 2890, Thanos wrote:So tomorrow I guess we need players not to be tight lipped about the BOOnus rounds.
In post 2897, Ramcius wrote:In post 2889, Thanos wrote:
If day 3 and 4 we find his theory is correct, you do know this confirms ram as scum right?
Pedit@ram, if we find out later that his theory is correct, how do you explain that? Or would you rather answer this when we find out if he's right or wrong
Let me hammer TLK and it will give us a lot - if he's scum, i'll be pretty much conf town, if he's town SS, we both gonna be dead and 2 questionable slots out of the picture. If people don't trust me to hammer, just set couple scummy people before me and lynch me tomorrow, if I don't follow with hammer
In post 2899, Xtoxm wrote:"opportunity to pick one of themselves"
could you highlight the part that precludes using it on someone that isnt themselves?
In post 2904, Thanos wrote:
Can scum nominate anyone of the 23 players or does it have to be scum? Does it specifically say so? I dont think scum would pick non scum as a day rep though, UNLESS, they knew how the day reps are chosen, which is doubtful.
In post 2926, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 2903, Thanos wrote:In post 2895, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 2889, Thanos wrote:
If day 3 and 4 we find his theory is correct, you do know this confirms ram as scum right?
Pedit@ram, if we find out later that his theory is correct, how do you explain that? Or would you rather answer this when we find out if he's right or wrong
What's the theory?
~ C
In short:
The four day reps are chosen from the winners of the BOONus rounds. Ramcius is the only one in the four who wasnt even in a BOOnus round (the other 3 won BOOnus rounds). So that hints that the scum used their ability to select one scum player to be on the four day representatives.
We'll need more info from tomorrows boonus round to confirm. But Boon did say that "it would become obvious as the game progresses" on how the 4 day reps are chosen. So this theory isn't exactly a stretch.
Oh this makes more sense. I don't see why the mod would do that though?
Where does it say that the winners from the boonus round become the day reps? If there are only 3 boonus rounds then it makes sense that one of the reps will be choosen randomly.
Were the winners told that was part of the prize?
In post 2927, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Another thing is that there was one round where there were 2 winners - so how was that decided? Do they get the option of being a rep or are they just selected without their knowledge.
In post 2934, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Ok so say we lynched him - what would we learn from his flip as either alignment?
In post 3166, profii wrote:In post 2293, The Last Knight wrote:I think a proper wagon/scumlean is profii. I am obviously not voting for myself because I don't want to be my own hammer on accident. So I just want to be on a reasonable wagon when the day ends. And profii isn't pinging my towndar at all.
VOTE: profii
Can someone in the right time zone check this for me because it’s bugging me and I want to make sure I’m doing it right
It appears TLK said he would vote me half an hour after voting Theta according to the Boon vca
It could be because I’m GMT and adding +5 to all time stamps to find juicy posts near when people actually voted that I’ve infact messed this up
Help???
In post 3265, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 3263, Nev and Max wrote:Only way scum says "I claim SS" is if they are betting on there not being one in the game.
Then it's a win-win to claim it for your comrades to know who to avoid hammering. He wasn't in a good position before his claim. He was literally keeping the VC pointing to his death.
In post 3327, Gamma Emerald wrote:You know what I’ll roll with this theory until it’s busted. Get this:
BOONus round cycle so everyone gets equal opportunity
So people should not be day rep consecutive days if the BOONus round winner = day rep theory is true
So if one person who was in a BOONus round last night is a day rep tomorrow I say that’s a solid lynch. If more than one show up the theory is busted.
And FYI I have little qualms about being lynched by my own logic. Helps prove the theory is bullshit anyway in that case.
In post 2, Boonskiies wrote:
• Along with the night phase, there will be the BOONus Rounds. When there are more than 18 players alive, 9 players will be chosen for this, more than 12, 6 players, and more than 6 players alive, 3 players. These BOONus Rounds will give potential Prizes to players, which you can then choose to keep for yourself, or anonymously give to other players. To make it fair, PRIORITY will be given to players who have not been involved in these rounds as the game goes on.
In post 3351, Karmeleon wrote:
I'm not joking. When there are too many players alive, the correct play to do is settle on someone we agree in and focus on nightplay.
In post 3380, Ramcius wrote:Also, I just want to note that if scum was one of the other 3 reps, their ability might had no effect too
In post 3386, Ramcius wrote:In post 3383, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3380, Ramcius wrote:Also, I just want to note that if scum was one of the other 3 reps, their ability might had no effect too
This is an odd thought seemingly out of nowhere.
If Ram flips scum. Then I suspect there is another scum on the current day rep team. Looks like he is trying to cover some bases.
All 4 reps are maf, just don't tell anyone, ok?
In post 3424, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 3333, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 3274, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Traitor and Miller aren't the same thing. Optimal play for a miller is to claim in your first post...at least before the first night phase...seriously wtf?
~ C
This is Elsa Jay we’re talking about. Nothing is sacred to him when it comes to claiming shit.
Yepperoni. Though I don't think I'll ever claim a fake Daycop guilty iday 1 in a Mini Normal anytime soon...
In post 3426, Elsa Jay wrote:I didn't say I wouldn't CC a fake claim, did I? I just said I wouldn't claim it naturally. Clearly it worked out more for me then it did for you that game.
In post 3507, Ramcius wrote:In post 3498, BrightEyedFish wrote:Here are my current scum reads:
Ram
TLK
Karm
Drew
I would be willing to lynch any of these players today in this order.
Does anyone think that it is IMPROBABLE for these 4 to on the scum team? Because the more I look at it, the more it just all makes sense. I think Ram is scum due to my Day Rep theory. I think TLK is scum because RAM is scum and was more than happy to hammer a SS (I don't believe the SS claim) AND I think TLK is scum because it was the 2nd top wagon on D1 where we got a scum lynch (imo a counter wagon to a scum lynch is also cum more often than not)
The other 2 of my SRs are dependent on the flips of Ram or TLK.
How your theory holds against fact that suddenly people decided wagon me after TLK wagon become a thing D1? Or fact that I changed my vote to TLK before his claim, never announced it and stayed on him till the end?
In post 3509, Ramcius wrote:In post 3508, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3507, Ramcius wrote:In post 3498, BrightEyedFish wrote:Here are my current scum reads:
Ram
TLK
Karm
Drew
I would be willing to lynch any of these players today in this order.
Does anyone think that it is IMPROBABLE for these 4 to on the scum team? Because the more I look at it, the more it just all makes sense. I think Ram is scum due to my Day Rep theory. I think TLK is scum because RAM is scum and was more than happy to hammer a SS (I don't believe the SS claim) AND I think TLK is scum because it was the 2nd top wagon on D1 where we got a scum lynch (imo a counter wagon to a scum lynch is also cum more often than not)
The other 2 of my SRs are dependent on the flips of Ram or TLK.
How your theory holds against fact that suddenly people decided wagon me after TLK wagon become a thing D1? Or fact that I changed my vote to TLK before his claim, never announced it and stayed on him till the end?
It has nothing to do with YOUR VOTE. it has to do with the competing wagon when the leading wagon flips scum. TLK was the competing wagon when EFN flipped scum.
I'm speaking about your theory that me and TLK are scumbuddies
In post 3513, Ramcius wrote:In post 3512, Ramcius wrote:I voted TLK long before his claim (you have timestamps, so go and check) and yes, I said I'm ok to hammer him after claim to ensure his lynch as I saw people got scared by that claim
Profil, I didn't announced my vote on TLK, i wanted him (and his team) to be less aware on how many votes he had
oops
In post 3517, Ramcius wrote:In post 3516, BrightEyedFish wrote:You could have just kept unvoting and then re-vote TLK to update your timestamp to ensure that you stayed on the hammer position. I think either you knew TLK wasn't a SS and had knowledge that EFN would be the lynch.
I'm bored, but not that bored to fight this...
In post 3519, Ramcius wrote:In post 3518, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3517, Ramcius wrote:In post 3516, BrightEyedFish wrote:You could have just kept unvoting and then re-vote TLK to update your timestamp to ensure that you stayed on the hammer position. I think either you knew TLK wasn't a SS and had knowledge that EFN would be the lynch.
I'm bored, but not that bored to fight this...
It's hard to argue against the truth.
Hm, let's see, I suggest you ask other people to explain you difference between "I can" and "I will". Jokes aside, there was no reason for me to revote TLK as no one claimed vote on him, only unvotes, so in event of someone else catching up on TLK (he was top wagon for most of D1), I wanted him to get lynched.
Yes, Cheeky and Xtoxm are my scumbuddies and they told me they gonna vote EFN, is this truth you wanted to see?
In post 3634, Alonzo wrote:Who's voting Nero Rn?
In post 3657, Gamma Emerald wrote:Not super recent.
Why are you asking this now DrewVa?
In post 3702, The Last Knight wrote:Yeah, well, with the circumstances with the day reps, Ramcius offering to kill me, and the absence of a consistent vig, I think that he's a better hammer vote. But I hear you, Elsa, if Ramcius proves suboptimal, then you would be my second choice of hammer.
In post 3719, Ramcius wrote:In post 3718, BrightEyedFish wrote:The only things that can stop me from pushing this agenda are:
Ram hammers TLK
Or
Ram makes a believable claim that can be verified.
No to second part (it's not that I don't want, I simply can't), and also, your "case" have so many holes that it's not even funny
In post 3721, Ramcius wrote:In post 3720, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3719, Ramcius wrote:In post 3718, BrightEyedFish wrote:The only things that can stop me from pushing this agenda are:
Ram hammers TLK
Or
Ram makes a believable claim that can be verified.
No to second part (it's not that I don't want, I simply can't), and also, your "case" have so many holes that it's not even funny
name 1 hole. or 2. or 3.
You have no idea how exactly day reps are chosen, you have no idea, if scum used their ability, you have no idea about other 3 reps - one of then can be scum pick
Is that enough? In short, whole your case is just a big speculation
In post 3725, Ramcius wrote:
I would like to hear what else you have besides this day rep thing (also, it's funny how you have 3 day reps in your scumreads, yet you're dead set on me being scum pick for day rep and not Karm or Drew)
In post 3739, Nero Cain wrote:
@ BEF- I could see Ram as scum but that day rep thing you are pushing is dumb.
In post 3752, Something_Smart wrote:I think the timing's just funny, they obviously hadn't read and it's not reflective of anything else
In post 3754, Nev and Max wrote:In post 3753, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3752, Something_Smart wrote:I think the timing's just funny, they obviously hadn't read and it's not reflective of anything else
But still.
It had been 4 days since Nev last posted and all of a sudden they come on an leave a comment on on this topic a few mins after the mod post. They were either active lurking or they found nothing else interesting in four days of posts.
I've been keeping up more on my main profile, and I keep stopping myself from main slipping. I didn't feel like adding much and have been waiting on Max. I popped in the thread and saw the replace, commented on it and then finished catching up.
Not sure what you are pushing towards here...
In post 3841, Xtoxm wrote:well tbh the lack of activity from town at the end of yesterday was a bad sign for this game
In post 3847, profii wrote:do you think if the day reps ended the day right now there is a good chance of Ram getting lynched?
In post 3854, Ramcius wrote:
True, but day reps have only vote to end day, they have no other powers, so what's your point?
In post 3856, DrewVa wrote:In post 3852, profii wrote:
exactly the point I was about to make but I was leading BEF down the path a bit first.
you literally said on the last page you had 5 vote (from memory) on you
now you (currently) are certainly right with me and I also agree with your logic - we have more votes than yesterdays lynch in a smaller pool of players, so given the relatively stagnant/disjointed state of the game I think if the day voters end now, you go.
so BEF says the day reps can do something - there is literally one thing they can do - end the day. On the LAST PAGE you pointed out you think you have 5 votes so there is a case that BEF knows this and if the day reps took his encouragement you die and BEF isn't on the wagon.
I think it's obvious what that looks like - any one else see that?
BEF wants to rush ETD to get McQueen lynched over Ram, who he claims is his #1 scumread?
In post 3853, profii wrote:I just went and put a
VOTE: BEF
in my PT
If people don't see that case, I think I'll go TLK but I need to consider BEF / RAM / TLK are all intertwined before I do that. Something stinks.
In post 3865, Ramcius wrote:In post 3857, BrightEyedFish wrote:You are the one who said the game was stagnant. The day reps can end the game or at least put pressure that everyone gets their vote lined up in case of the day reps end the day before the deadline. That's what I meant by suggesting the day rep's involvement can get things "unstagnant".
Also I said that people should start plan ahead, when they decide for lynches and not lynch lurkers like D1, but you decided that part wasn't important and telling us that we should put pressure and have rushed lynch. This fear to take responsibility that turns into apathy drives me crazy every time I have to play town. Why people need stick like deadline to start doing things?
In post 3889, profii wrote:I guess that would make ram bef and TLK scum- that seems outrageous haha I'm probably off the mark here
In post 3895, Ramcius wrote:My read on TLK isn't that strong anymore, cause I had forgotten that early SS soft form him (thx Una to bring it back for us) and Profil with RCE bailing from his wagon after SS claim (too lazy to go check times, but they were on last TLK's VC and disappeared in final VC)
In post 3900, Ramcius wrote:In post 3896, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3895, Ramcius wrote:My read on TLK isn't that strong anymore, cause I had forgotten that early SS soft form him (thx Una to bring it back for us) and Profil with RCE bailing from his wagon after SS claim (too lazy to go check times, but they were on last TLK's VC and disappeared in final VC)
I mentioned it a couple of days ago and you responded to my post. Don't act you forgot it...
Posts 3724 and 3725 for reference.
What "it"? You didn't mentioned TLK soft SS - TLK saying that scum can vote him all they want and town shouldn't vote
In post 3724, BrightEyedFish wrote:Unless, perhaps, you know somehow that TLK isn't SS.
In post 3917, Cheeky Dancer wrote:BEF I thought you were town until I didn't.
Scum shade not to do 101:
"It's strange you haven't said anything for a long time"
"Are you still grasping to your idea"
~ C
In post 3931, Cheeky Dancer wrote:No I'm not offended just confused about you bringing it up specifically about us when - we have talked about Ram and I don't see how anything could have changed our opinion since then. Also the way you're phrasing your wondering looks more like you're trying to shade us than you actually being interested in anything we have to say. It makes me think that us attacking Una or possibly Nero has triggered you to start pushing us. *dear diary BEF started shading us when we were pushing on Nero/Una. Not sure what that means yet*
~ C
In post 3934, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Well BEF to clarify our stance on Ram - we have already agreed with the sore thumb theory - he could be scum however as we only have a sample size of 1 to determine how the dayreps are chosen then we would like to see if scum!ram is outted down the line when it becomes obvious he is the scum placement. For now I think it's unlikely for aforementioned reasons.
I also liked his vote on TLK so it's enough for me to try and find scum through scumhunting instead of unconfirmed tinfoil theories. If a new reason has been discussed to suspect scum Ram then you should present it again because we've probably missed it.
~ c
In post 3942, RCEnigma wrote:The vote on SS claim, the willingness to hammer the SS claim, the possibility he is outed by the day rep selection process. If he's outed by the day rep selection process TLK is probably also scum so it's two for 1 and 3 for 1 if Karmeleon turns out scum.
In post 2604, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 2601, DrewVa wrote:In post 2598, BrightEyedFish wrote:*Do you SR me this game
I don’t know your scumgame but if you could link me to one of your scumgames, that would be awesome.
All I have to go on is Overkill 2. You seem to be sincere but I just got completely bamboozled by scum!Dunn in Excalibur, who I had been hard townreading for sincerity. \_0_/
My latest ones are Mini 2038 and Mini 2041
I can't remember the rest but on my wiki are all of my games.
In post 3964, DrewVa wrote:In post 3961, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I had a totally different role than I have here. And besides I was on the defensive for most of that game due to my fake guilty.
How would you differentiate my play between these 2 games?
You only wanted to sheep wagons for the most part and that was right from the beginning of that game - well before you made your fake guilty.
And actually, your play in that game really made no sense wrt your role. Why does a town PGO act the way you did? I would think the optimal play for a town PGO would be to blatantly obvtown it, in order to draw out the NK - not to play so suspiciously that you got nullread at best. So, you playing so very differently here wrt to that makes 0 sense. Also, you tunneling us over NAI shit and ignoring any obvious towntells, doesn’t really inspire me with confidence but it’s your vote pressure argument, that has me wondering the most. You said Profil was way off on that and I read your reaction to that as townie but it really doesn’t make sense. So, I’m wondering if I’ve been misreading what I believed was sincerity for something else? I confess, I never checked out those links you gave me. Would you mind giving them to me again? Thanks.
In post 3970, DrewVa wrote:In post 3966, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 3964, DrewVa wrote:In post 3961, BrightEyedFish wrote:
I had a totally different role than I have here. And besides I was on the defensive for most of that game due to my fake guilty.
How would you differentiate my play between these 2 games?
You only wanted to sheep wagons for the most part and that was right from the beginning of that game - well before you made your fake guilty.
And actually, your play in that game really made no sense wrt your role. Why does a town PGO act the way you did? I would think the optimal play for a town PGO would be to blatantly obvtown it, in order to draw out the NK - not to play so suspiciously that you got nullread at best. So, you playing so very differently here wrt to that makes 0 sense. Also, you tunneling us over NAI shit and ignoring any obvious towntells, doesn’t really inspire me with confidence but it’s your vote pressure argument, that has me wondering the most. You said Profil was way off on that and I read your reaction to that as townie but it really doesn’t make sense. So, I’m wondering if I’ve been misreading what I believed was sincerity for something else? I confess, I never checked out those links you gave me. Would you mind giving them to me again? Thanks.
As you suggested my play in OK was sub par at best. I learned a few things and I am trying to progress my play. Thst being said, I had fun playing in OK but since that style didn't work out as good as it should have, why should I not try to up my game.
I’m not saying you shouldn’t but the contrast beween your play in those two games, is EXTREMELY different. Don’t you agree?
In post 3978, DrewVa wrote:
You gave me the wrong number btw. 2045 is your scumgame, not 2041. Anyway, after reviewing your games, I now have a weak scumlean on you since in one of those games - 2038 I think? You were similarly tunnelly like you are here and were not at like that in any of the towngames, I compared and contrasted them with. Also, one of those games you played with Profil and he correcly scumread you and he’s also scumreading you here.
In post 3978, DrewVa wrote: Also, one of those games you played with Profil and he correcly scumread you and he’s also scumreading you here.
In post 4239, UnaBombaH wrote:..and then it would be dave or drewVa..
Nah, I take that last part back then.
I'll be disappointed if we lynch anyone other than Creature/Ramcius.
In post 4253, Xtoxm wrote:PP isnt happening today
thats a wasted vote
In post 4257, The Last Knight wrote:I'll vote Ramcius but I also think it's a better vote for a later day.
What's the wagon on you, BEF or DrewVa, looking like right now?
In post 4490, Nero Cain wrote:Aren't we not supposed to be outting winners though?
In post 4495, RCEnigma wrote:Well scum didn't go for any night 1 winners so it seems they aren't too worried about it. Whatever floats their boat.
In post 4505, RCEnigma wrote:I'm fine with Bef as town. The logic behind his theory made sense. Lynching Ramcius didn't but I'm sure scum was content with letting him push that narrative.
In post 4513, profii wrote:
over night i cross referenced the posts people on the RAM wagon made nearest to their timestamp on their vote... this was BEFs
So he is in my lynch pool too for day rep shenanigans and the above i think
Infact - I'll start off with a BEF vote and see how it goes... voting now...
In post 4521, Creature wrote:In post 4515, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 4505, RCEnigma wrote:I'm fine with Bef as town. The logic behind his theory made sense. Lynching Ramcius didn't but I'm sure scum was content with letting him push that narrative.
The first 3 people who quickly threw doubt out about my Day Rep theory were:
Xt
Gamma
Profii.
Cool, is any of them scum?
In post 4524, Creature wrote:In post 4523, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 4521, Creature wrote:In post 4515, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 4505, RCEnigma wrote:I'm fine with Bef as town. The logic behind his theory made sense. Lynching Ramcius didn't but I'm sure scum was content with letting him push that narrative.
The first 3 people who quickly threw doubt out about my Day Rep theory were:
Xt
Gamma
Profii.
Cool, is any of them scum?
Haven't decided on that. Scum knew Ram wasn't one of them so I could see my theory being an opportune time for scum to deny the theory for town cred.
I actually find more likely for scum to deny the theory if the theory is actually false.
In post 4527, davesaz wrote:
All the dayrep stuff is noise. Let's just scumhunt.
In post 4813, mcqueen wrote:In post 4803, BrightEyedFish wrote:Yeah, I think TLK made up that whole fruit thing. Just like the SS thing.
Can you stop tunnelling TLK for a minute and focus on somebody else? Why would he make up the fruit thing? I want him gone, too, but very few others are worried about that right now. Even if they were, discussions are happening about N&M, CD, Elsa, and others that you rarely comment on.
In post 4814, profii wrote:I kinda want someone to hard claim the sticky fruit to see where it went at this point so we will see