A bit more confident in
I'd like
VOTE: pinturicchio
Next.
Don't play shit like this. That's intolerant and intolerable.In post 1018, Taly wrote:I want to make sure they actually read it.
I have absolutely no idea where you're going with this except I get the feeling you aren't enjoying our playstyle? It kinda feels like a beginning and a middle with no end. What do you actually make of all this?In post 1018, Taly wrote:You only voice a thought towards me if it's 100% meta-based on something I've done before. You're not removing my play here from anything else, and you're not doing this with anyone else to my understanding.
I'm curious to know, on if you're trying to solve me genuinely, or if you're just withholding your responses about me for when you CAN actively case a lynch against me if I survive later in the game.
You've told me to "play the game" and "wait for your response" and yet you're just now acknowledging posts I've made where I haven't mentioned you.
If you're playing overly scummy what's your angle? Where were you going with the reaction tests & what did you glean? This is the kind of reasoning wolves use when they have a rocky start to day one so I can't afford to take that at face value. Let's go 3 levels deeper in this conversation.In post 1018, Taly wrote:Yes, you're misled. If you actually read me post in 193, you'd have known that ANY post I made in the game before 132 were reaction tests.
And yeah, I'm playing OVERTLY "scummy" right now. (Ugh, that word sucks so much.)
If "playing how I am as scum" gets people to have reads OTHER than town/null and AVOIDS a potential lurker mislynch on D1, then fuck... Mission accomplished.
Apathy defeated. (Or at least mine is.) 1v1s don't go for +10 pages. Weakens a scum-productive narrative.
Lol.In post 1018, Taly wrote:Let's talk about "posturing/positioning" for a second.
How about the next time you quote me, you DIRECTLY respond to me? OK?
This is valid tbhIn post 1022, Taly wrote:This is an incredibly bad VC for town.In post 1003, Krazy wrote:
u r a person 2(2)~ ProFlavor(43), pinturicchio(42)
Shoshin the worst(2)~ NicoRobin(6), Varsoon(143)
Alchemist21(2)~ Mewtaph(5), Taly(61)
pinturicchio(1)~ Tibor and Lumia(75)
Mewtaph(1)~ Alchemist21(52)
Kokichi Oma(1)~ Almost Chara(70)
Michael/STW/UP2, tell me whyNico'sa good lynch today.
URAP2- Already promptedPint/ProFlavorto talk about their vote here.
STW-vars, make town cohesive <3
Alchemist21- Actually wantMewto explain his scumread onAlchemist, it's the only one they've had it seems? In like... 1000 posts?
Pint- A reason to townreadT&Las I'm feeling less impressed each time I readPint'sISO or latest posts.
Kokichi-AC, is this really a worthy lynch? Any active posters you don't townread?
All I can contribute is that he's a pretty sharp, analytical player. Don't have reliable alignment tells on him.In post 1023, Taly wrote:anyone have meta onMew?
like reliable ones? not a 1 game half-assed"this is how someone is as that alignment"?
What do you think we're doing...?In post 1026, Taly wrote:alsoSTWtry to avoid confbias with me. -_-*...
and if I keep hearing"taly's read reversal is scum-indicative of him omg", you're not going to get a rational response.
Why don't you feel the need to empathise with us?In post 1027, Taly wrote:I mean rational, as in calm, where I don't get pissed off by the misrep you've painted me with in your recent posts.
OK.In post 1032, Shoshin the worst wrote:All I can contribute is that he's a pretty sharp, analytical player. Don't have reliable alignment tells on him.In post 1023, Taly wrote:anyone have meta onMew?
like reliable ones? not a 1 game half-assed"this is how someone is as that alignment"?
Calling you out on misrepping me. I'm not "reversing" my read on you, I'm questioning it because you're not actually evaluating any points or concerns I have on my read on you.In post 1033, Shoshin the worst wrote:What do you think we're doing...?In post 1026, Taly wrote:alsoSTWtry to avoid confbias with me. -_-*...
and if I keep hearing"taly's read reversal is scum-indicative of him omg", you're not going to get a rational response.
Because I genuinely am trying to figure out if your lack of explanation, replies to only SPECIFIC posts I make about you, and extremely-cautious attitude on making a stance about me is town-motivated or scum-motivated.In post 1034, Shoshin the worst wrote:Why don't you feel the need to empathise with us?In post 1027, Taly wrote:I mean rational, as in calm, where I don't get pissed off by the misrep you've painted me with in your recent posts.
Seriously... Why are you constructing my posts as unserious and thoughtless?In post 1034, Shoshin the worst wrote:Why are you ridiculing our push on you? If your only answer is "bEcAuSe YoU'rE wRoNg!!!!" please try to meet us at a deeper level. Because we aren't half-assing this read...
I post GIFs NAI.In post 1035, Shoshin the worst wrote:Acrually you haven't used the cat GIF towntell..... Guess you're probably scum.
Also, I'm still waiting for an answer on this. -_-*In post 1022, Taly wrote:Michael/STW/UP2, tell me why Nico's a good lynch today.
GivenIn post 1030, Shoshin the worst wrote:Given TW head has seen you as both powertown, powerwolf, and pocketed you as a scum - what makes you think you're entitled to a townread from us? Help us see it?
I also stated I've been feeling apathy after the page-explosion this past week, namely the back-and-forths.In post 1030, Shoshin the worst wrote:If you're playing overly scummy what's your angle? Where were you going with the reaction tests & what did you glean? This is the kind of reasoning wolves use when they have a rocky start to day one so I can't afford to take that at face value. Let's go 3 levels deeper in this conversation.
Well, you HAVE brushed off some points I've made on you, and you're looking very critically into every post I make with the WIFOM ofIn post 1030, Shoshin the worst wrote:You don't need to be positioned as a lategame lynch and doing that by gently poking you day one would be ridiculous. If we were scum actually gunning for your mislynch why would we alert you to it and force you to produce more alignment indicative content day one? This isn't the conclusion I don't think so talk to me more here.
I answered that. It's not a fair question. We're pressuring her because there are still several days on the clock.In post 1037, Taly wrote:Also, I'm still waiting for an answer on this. -_-*In post 1022, Taly wrote:Michael/STW/UP2, tell me why Nico's a good lynch today.
Again, read every single word of these posts.In post 1036, Taly wrote:I'm not replying to your posts until you read my spoiler wall that was 800 posts ago, AND the recent wall I DIDN'T spoil.
You know, the one you completely disregarded to reply to just now?
This is candidly completely wrong.In post 1041, Taly wrote:GivenIn post 1030, Shoshin the worst wrote:Given TW head has seen you as both powertown, powerwolf, and pocketed you as a scum - what makes you think you're entitled to a townread from us? Help us see it?TWhead HAS seen me in these positions, makes me REALLY wonder why you're posting before talking to him.
Yes ok that's fine..... but why should we be townreading you? I asked that question for a reason....In post 1043, Taly wrote:Well, you HAVE brushed off some points I've made on you, and you're looking very critically into every post I make with the WIFOM ofIn post 1030, Shoshin the worst wrote:You don't need to be positioned as a lategame lynch and doing that by gently poking you day one would be ridiculous. If we were scum actually gunning for your mislynch why would we alert you to it and force you to produce more alignment indicative content day one? This isn't the conclusion I don't think so talk to me more here."this could be Taly as ANY alignment!!!!"
If you wanted me to get frustrated, for us to 1v1, and for you to get material to ACTUALLY lynch me later then here you have it.
I don't know what you're achieving here as town, either, that's why my read has partially faded.