In post 6001, RCEnigma wrote:Can we do something special for Drewva's 1k post??

My main just recently became a joat, now this. \o/
In post 6013, The Last Knight wrote:In post 6006, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 5987, The Last Knight wrote:And SS is scum until they prove otherwise at this point for me. They're coasting too comfortably for me to be okay with it. I do appreciate the dedication to the game when it comes to replacing out, but that just makes me feel like they want to skate by without having to contribute.
I'm mainly just asking for more from them. Then I'll reaS_Sess (reassess).In post 5992, Something_Smart wrote:If TLK is going to be the lynch I'm fine with hammering him if that's what people want.
There are so many people wanting to hammer TLK. Now he scum reads SomethingS but AGAIN TLK is silent on having one of his top SR hammer him (Elsa and I are his other SRs iirc).
I don't know but I think if I were SS I would want my top scum read to hammer me??
I tried to believe, but I just can't believe the SuperSaint claim.
You quoted those in correct order. Maybe I missed it, but that's the first I saw SS offer to hammer me. I've never objected to being a lynch target with designated hammers.
You're just fishing for anything at this point.
In post 6041, mcqueen wrote:In post 6036, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 6034, RCEnigma wrote:In post 6027, mcqueen wrote:because we mislynched off a theory yesterday, why chance the same today? again, elsa’s a great PL regardless.
and i ask once more, what makes tlk scum outside of the fruit fiasco?
TLK's alignment doesn't matter. Even if he's town his role is meant to be lynched
Exactly.
I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt to at least let him nominate the people he wants to hammer. Since he is not answering it makes me feel like his claim is not true.
why are we trusting people to hammer? i’m pretty sure very few actually WANT to die, town or scum, offered or not offered by themselves
In post 6056, Nev and Max wrote:In post 6014, UnaBombaH wrote:Being intelligent isn't the problem in itself.
It's when you realize that people around you are dumb when the social difficulties start.
You learn this lesson very early on in life if you are a fan of Family Fued. Most people forget that the answers are based on surveys done of actual people. You might know all the top answers of every list out there, but it only takes a few Mooks to fuck up the whole category by answering off topic or so obscure that no one's guessing that one.
That might not make total sense in translation to this game, but you have to realize that most everyone is in the same boat as we are. Low info and looking for something to clamp on to. Other people's levels of intelligence and cunning in the game will effect our reads and our interactions.
In post 6068, Nev and Max wrote:In post 6065, DrewVa wrote:In post 6056, Nev and Max wrote:In post 6014, UnaBombaH wrote:Being intelligent isn't the problem in itself.
It's when you realize that people around you are dumb when the social difficulties start.
You learn this lesson very early on in life if you are a fan of Family Fued. Most people forget that the answers are based on surveys done of actual people. You might know all the top answers of every list out there, but it only takes a few Mooks to fuck up the whole category by answering off topic or so obscure that no one's guessing that one.
That might not make total sense in translation to this game, but you have to realize that most everyone is in the same boat as we are. Low info and looking for something to clamp on to. Other people's levels of intelligence and cunning in the game will effect our reads and our interactions.
You lost me after the bolded.
It was more of a side commentary on our own bias and the realization that if we are unable to out ourselves in others shoes than we'll never really understand anything.
In post 6077, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 6065, DrewVa wrote:In post 6056, Nev and Max wrote:In post 6014, UnaBombaH wrote:Being intelligent isn't the problem in itself.
It's when you realize that people around you are dumb when the social difficulties start.
You learn this lesson very early on in life if you are a fan of Family Fued. Most people forget that the answers are based on surveys done of actual people. You might know all the top answers of every list out there, but it only takes a few Mooks to fuck up the whole category by answering off topic or so obscure that no one's guessing that one.
That might not make total sense in translation to this game, but you have to realize that most everyone is in the same boat as we are. Low info and looking for something to clamp on to. Other people's levels of intelligence and cunning in the game will effect our reads and our interactions.
You lost me after the bolded.
Basically he's suggesting you get 4 relatives to play Family Feud, and let us know when your air date will be so we can watch you and your relatives.
![]()
~ P
In post 6103, RCEnigma wrote:Everyone backing out on TLK skeeves me out so bad.
In post 6098, Nero Cain wrote:The way I see things right now are that if TLK is willing to get lynched then fine. If we wanted to not lynch him today and lynch someone scummy (Mcqueen, Creature, UL, SS or Elsa) instead then that's fine too.
Nev and Max had asked me earlier why we couldn't enforce it and my snarky answer is "We can't see votes, noob!" the real answer is "It's not a normal vote mechanic where we can see the votes and tell player X to hammer when they are at L-1. What we can do is lynch from any of the players that said they'd be on the wagon but weren't. We can't really lynch anyone for not hammering b/c we won't know who is going to hammer until the lynch is written up."
In post 6104, DrewVa wrote:In post 6103, RCEnigma wrote:Everyone backing out on TLK skeeves me out so bad.In post 6098, Nero Cain wrote:The way I see things right now are that if TLK is willing to get lynched then fine. If we wanted to not lynch him today and lynch someone scummy (Mcqueen, Creature, UL, SS or Elsa) instead then that's fine too.
Nev and Max had asked me earlier why we couldn't enforce it and my snarky answer is "We can't see votes, noob!" the real answer is "It's not a normal vote mechanic where we can see the votes and tell player X to hammer when they are at L-1. What we can do is lynch from any of the players that said they'd be on the wagon but weren't. We can't really lynch anyone for not hammering b/c we won't know who is going to hammer until the lynch is written up."
In post 6148, DrewVa wrote:Kokichi Oma, BrightEyedFish,Elsa Jay, Nev and Max, Davesaz, Xtoxm, Cheeky Dancer
In post 6179, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also PRs don't seem to be very important here compared to in a normal game
In post 6204, UnaBombaH wrote:Just realized/remembered that I'm a day rep..
VOTE: END DAY
Please be responsible with your day-end-votes - I'm just laying mine down since I'm going to sleep+work next, meaning that I won't be around to vote for the next ~18 or so hours..
In post 6243, Elsa Jay wrote:I unvoted and voted again like you told me too, but sadly a fatal error was made because I unvoted and revoted in the same post: it cancelled each other out and didn't count as a new vote.
You do realize, Drew, that means you were roleblocked or someone healed me, the latter seeming possible since scum ALSO didn't kill.
In post 6254, Thanos wrote:In post 6243, Elsa Jay wrote:I unvoted and voted again like you told me too, but sadly a fatal error was made because I unvoted and revoted in the same post: it cancelled each other out and didn't count as a new vote.
@mod, if I unvote and vote in the same post, does the timestamp change?
In post 6258, DrewVa wrote:In post 6254, Thanos wrote:In post 6243, Elsa Jay wrote:I unvoted and voted again like you told me too, but sadly a fatal error was made because I unvoted and revoted in the same post: it cancelled each other out and didn't count as a new vote.
@mod, if I unvote and vote in the same post, does the timestamp change?
It definitely should.
In post 6298, Jingle wrote:BTW, group A and group C both have weak as prizes. Does group B also have weak?
In post 6309, RCEnigma wrote:We gave SS the option if claiming today and I think it's in their best interest to do so. I'll save my theory for after his claim.
In post 6425, profii wrote:a what? I don't think so? I played a night game thing if that's what you mean
In post 6443, RCEnigma wrote:Nah I take blame, I intended to throw the boonus game so no one won, didn't want multitask out there but you guys convinced me on the leash.
In post 6448, Jingle wrote:
AFAICT, so did SS, so.... :shrug: That's a terrible reason.In post 6443, RCEnigma wrote:Nah I take blame, I intended to throw the boonus game so no one won, didn't want multitask out there but you guys convinced me on the leash.
multitask is comparitively low impact to the town roles I've seen. Even a loud modifier is worth risking scum getting multitasking.
In post 6440, DrewVa wrote:In post 6425, profii wrote:a what? I don't think so? I played a night game thing if that's what you mean
OK so Something_Smart is scum and he gifted multitasking to a scumbuddy then
He was leashed in the boonus to gifting you a 1-shot neighborizer action.
meh, my bad, I didn't think he'd go full open wolf and that he'd try to survive a day.
we probably lynch SS today although we're welcome to let him claim his 'rolecop' result for Xtoxm first cause why not?
Nancy was right, we should have vigged SS. Sorry Nancy
-d
In post 6470, Jingle wrote:Also, if I can get a neighborhood with DrewVa somehow that'd be great. I have a couple out of thread things that probably bear discussion, but shouldn't be discussed in public just yet.
In post 6471, BrightEyedFish wrote:
But yet you are OK with letting EJ get away with his flaking. Do you all of a sudden believe in punishing people for doing negative things?
In post 6481, BrightEyedFish wrote:
It's OK. I'm not bitter about it. I don't expect you to pick me. Just wanted to hear you say it.
But you can't say that I didn't play fair in our BOONus round together.
In post 6482, Thanos wrote:@Dva: Would you want to activate people who are necessarily town? If that's what's required for a plan, I have something to say
In post 6486, DrewVa wrote:In post 6482, Thanos wrote:@Dva: Would you want to activate people who are necessarily town? If that's what's required for a plan, I have something to say
Well of course. Is this a serious question? We sure as hell aren’t responsible for SS getting into the br.
D1: us, Nero, Creature/Karmeleon
D2: Nero, Xtoxm, RCE
D3: Us, Gamma, McQueen
D4: Penguin, Profil, Nero
In post 6488, DrewVa wrote:idk if you guys noticed this but nancy really thinks Nero is town
I basically had to put my foot town that he was going to get nightkilled if we did him every night... and then he got in again anyway lolwat
but yeah I literally cannot stop nancy from activating nero at this point. SHES GOT NERO ON THE BRAIN, GUYS, HALP
-d
In post 6508, Auro wrote:@Jingle that's the plan, but if DrewVa trusts me for that I'd rather be activated.
In post 6646, Nev and Max wrote:Every time I try to make sense of the lynch and it's voting I keep coming back town side on SS and scum on Elsa for motivation.
In post 6657, Something_Smart wrote:I didn't submit it until this morning. I was asleep when the day started.
In post 6661, Cheeky Dancer wrote:If drewva is telling the truth, then well.....I dont recall him activating us yet we went into BOONus room Z.
In post 6686, DrewVa wrote:We switched back to Elsa for the moment.
I still think there's a high chance both SS and Elsa are scum. But as a disloyal rolecop claim, if SS is telling the truth scum might kill him even to avoid the consequences when he flips town despite the mislynch potential later (probably not tho).
Elsa as scum might possibly be a higher value target for the moment. Let's consider the likelihood, rather high, that he got a sticky fruit. We already have a strong indication that the scum have a sticky fruit vendor given the events surrounding TLK. So they vended fruit to Elsa last night, protecting him and asceticizing him.
One of my main concerns here regarding SS was that he emphatically encouraged us to vig Elsa last night; this desire was based on the rolecop claim, but if he was coordinating with the vendor and Elsa it is likely he just wanted us to waste our limited night actions on that slot.
BUT it would also be good to get rid of the fruit, and since Profii has now received the Neighborizor shot there's at least some % chance that SS is actually town. Elsa is probably the more likely red flip. If he's green, then wtf, how does scum have both a sticky fruit vendor and an enchantress? That sounds like bullshit to me.
SS's claim is still kinda garbage, and both of his results tell us almost nothing. Elsa already claimed traitor, Xtoxm was already obviously town. No new info on either of those. Frankly I think if he was town his choices would be better.
I'll talk about it with Nancy some more but for now VOTE: Elsa
-d
In post 6708, UnaBombaH wrote:I'm thinking S_S and Elsa are both reasonable lynches for today.
Probably one of them is the BEST choice, while the other is still likely better than a poor one.
BUT.
Out of the two of them it feels like Elsa is the one who needs to go first.
I dislike the fact that they didn't end up at the end of the wagon.
If it's a mod-decision to not count the vote-unvote when done inside one post, fine. (I disagree with that as a principle, but it's up to the mod)
But even then, if I were to have been in Elsas shoes, I would've made a post that unvoted EARLIER.
I mean, why not?
Then just revote when it was time.
So if they made a mistake, or if we think the mod made a "mistake", it doesn't matter.
They both shat the bed, but we start with Elsa.
My 2,4 cents.
In post 6714, Jingle wrote:Played suboptimally in a way that ensures you have to be lynched before LYLO? No, that's pretty clearly what you did. Even if you are town, you've tainted your slot irreparably.
Also, DrewVa, why would you have unvoted separately from your your revote? If you assume unvoting and revoting in the same post would work, why not just do that? It seems disingenuous to say you would have played around a problem you wouldn't have anticipated.
BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.
In post 6715, PenguinPower wrote:In post 6714, Jingle wrote:BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.
If you count the post the person voted in, would not a higher number post be counted after the preceding posts?
If an unvote occurred, an action of unvoting a player should happen. Just because the next action - voting the same player - occurred in the same post does not nullify the unvote action.
Not reasonable at all imo (especially considering the mechanics of this game), but this can be tabled for after the game.
In post 6718, davesaz wrote:Counting revotes as changing vote position (or not as the case may be) is critically important for plurality lynch, as it re-establishes which tied player takes precedence if there is a tie.
If you aren't counting the revotes in the same post the players need to be informed.
In an open vote game it might be apparent anyway (if VC's happen often enough). It's even worse in a closed vote game to not define what the correct result would be.
In post 6722, davesaz wrote:I think Elsa is trying to use this as an excuse. Either way Boon would be caught in a tough spot by the question as almost any answer other than "not saying" confirms someone's alignment.
In post 6728, Jingle wrote:I was gonna pick these out, but I want a massclaim of what options were available and chosen and who was in each room at night. Scum likely has access to at least the latter, given that players can read previous night's games while in the minigame. What was chosen is of limited usefulness to scum given they don't know who got the power, and is useful for determining motivations. If this information is already available, let me know where.
Room A:
Night 1:
Night 2:
Night 3:
Room B:
Night 1:
Night 2:
Night 3:
Room C
Night 1:
Thanos: Win
Nero: Lose
Gemerald: Lose
Night 2:
CD: Win
N&M: Lose
Penguin: Win
Night 3:
Jingle: Weak to Una
Una: Weak to EJ
Creature: Win {Weak/Ascetic/Mtasking/Charge transfer}
In post 6732, Something_Smart wrote:You know the prizes aren't visible to later people in the room... so by compiling that, you're literally telling scum who has what important power.
And DrewVa it's not confirmed, but we know a killing action failed on him and he isn't bulletproof, so probably.
In post 6744, Something_Smart wrote:From my point of view, I know those disloyal actions were blocked. (Or they're just bullshit.) From Elsa's POV, they wouldn't be blocked, they'd just have failed because he's town. So he'd only have to explain why the vig failed... but that's not what he's doing.
And of the three possibilities, rolestopper is the only one that's normal.
In post 6754, PenguinPower wrote:Some Jailkeepers not only protect their target from all kills, but also render its target untargetable by all other actions during that Night. This variant is also known as Alien.
In post 6761, Something_Smart wrote:In post 6756, Elsa Jay wrote:As a member of the scum alignment, selling out you guys have a Rolestopper is considered bad form.
Okay, is anyone else seeing this?
From Elsa's point of view, me citing a rolestopper should be an excuse for why the disloyal actions failed.
Instead, he's taking the angle that he actually was rolestopped, something which he truly believes because he isn't town.
In post 6764, Elsa Jay wrote:No, I just outted SS and scum and want you to promise me to kill him next if you actually do kill me.
Town Elsa plays exactly like scum Elsa. You should know this by now.
In post 6765, Jingle wrote:So, Dave/Xtoxm/Drewva/Someone else all targeted Elsa. Two were disloyal and failed. Drewva was a vigshot that failed.
EJ argued both that scum tried to save and kill him.
Eh. I'm pretty much back to the same :flip both of them for the additional information: that I've been at all day.
In post 6807, Jingle wrote:In post 6804, RCEnigma wrote:They change each night and you can't see the previous nights prizes.
No, I mean he posted the available prizes in the individual's confessionals. Or at least in mine. Also, iirc no edit tags on what players posted. I took pretty detailed notes because Boon wouldn't let me multiquote the thread into my confessional.
In post 6813, profii wrote:In post 6792, RCEnigma wrote:For SS to fake traitor and both Dave and creature to claim disloyal checks on Elsa would have to come from 4 scum in a situation that's SvS to begin with so I don't...think that's the case?
Would I be correct in saying that a disloyal check on a miller would also provide the same result as on a traitor or not?
In post 6818, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Dva why would you ask what is alien. We had a brief alien discussion in Not Known 15's large normal, only a few months ago. Sephiroth asked me if I was an alien jailkeeper before he flaked .
-------
Uh. Lol.
Huh??In post 6732, Something_Smart wrote:You know the prizes aren't visible to later people in the room... so by compiling that, you're literally telling scum who has what important power.
And DrewVa it's not confirmed, but we know a killing action failed on him and he isn't bulletproof, so probably.
Thing is, at the rate we're going with the kills on AC & alonzo only, it looks like scum has some loose screws going on in terms of targeting prs. So I'm not worried whatsoever
In post 6748, DrewVa wrote:In post 6732, Something_Smart wrote:You know the prizes aren't visible to later people in the room... so by compiling that, you're literally telling scum who has what important power.
And DrewVa it's not confirmed, but we know a killing action failed on him and he isn't bulletproof, so probably.
Whomever rolestopped Elsa, needs to claim because why does town rolestop a claimed miller?
Because of his scummy play & the fact that he lies often. That is very apparent.
~ P
In post 6906, DrewVa wrote:I still have a hard time scumreading Nev when they scumcased Alonzo the same night Alonzo died. I want to think of a case where scum used a neighborhood to scumcase someone they were killing while they were killing them and I don't think I will ever come up with an example.
Jingle I'm still not sure about. Kokichi doing nothing and then replacing out is NAI. If anything the only thing left for Kokichi bingo would have been him claiming IC. In the past I would have said Kokichi doing nothing is slightly town indicative but he basically has just been quasi-site flaking lately so I don't know if that works here.
Anyway Jingle is helpful so if he's scum I'd rather make him the third or fourth scum lynch rather than the second.
And yeah....... me and Nancy have gone back and forth on SS/EJ a lot. There's compelling arguments on either one being the scummier, there's a chance both are scum... if neither are scum then I think I just abandon this game and let Nancy take over LOL
I've kinda hurt my brain trying to decide which was the correct one to lynch first. I really wanted that vig to go through and me and Nancy got in a big fight over it and if Nancy won SS would probably be dead right now and our shot wouldn't be wasted, so frankly I'm still like, just kind of exhausted from the mechanics in this game. We deal with so much bullshit to get a vig shot and then it just goes into the Elsa black hole...
-d
In post 6911, Nero Cain wrote:Even if I'm wrong, Elsa is scummy on her own and is a solid lynch.
Though I just had a thought, what if Nancy was blocked? Did you announce your shot? This might mean scum is in Nancy's room.
In post 6913, Elsa Jay wrote:So I have ample reason for scum to protect me as a "traitor" or a Alien didn't trust me and targeted me. Or an Enchantress wanted to Commute and targetted me so they couldn't die as well.
If SS's slip of a Rolestopper is anything to go by, then perhaps Mafia did rolestop me and someone elsa blocked their real kill from happening elsawhere.
Pedit: She said she gave it away though, Nero. And her actions take place during the day. Seems unlikely she'd be roleblocked.
In post 6936, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Pp, why do you think n&m is scum?
Also, part of felt like ending the day but each time I return, there's something else something brings up...![]()
-------
Iirc the only people remaining alive are GE & I from the limbo large theme where EJ was town & GE was scum. There, GE did exactly what he's doing in this game.
There, EJ sounded different than in this game...EJ at least pushed for people's deaths via vote or otherwise. Here, I've even asked him on d4 about who SS's scum teammates are, he ignored it completely.
--------
Drewva why are you townreading us?
Also I think Cheeky site flaked...I suspect she was in too many games....
-----
@EJ I don't think that's how it works? Whoever is roped depends on what the 4 representatives for the day phase decide, afaik.
~ P
In post 6953, Elsa Jay wrote:What's the chances of me being a negative utility role again in the following Large theme game?
The same as a 1/23 chance of getting my favorite role of Survivor in OK1. My luck is like that sometimes.
In post 6955, Elsa Jay wrote:Elsa counters that point by not acknowledging it and moving on.
Just trust me here though that I'm town and SS is Scum.
In post 6962, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:In post 6958, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Considering no kill happened on n3, it could be that EJ was stopped due to so many folks targeting him (thanks Jingle for the documentation as I included your notes in my personal notes as well).
I'm not sure why your vig shot didn't go through though. Maybe I jailkept you because I had you as an sr (and probably still do ) .![]()
![]()
~ P
You’re joking, right? About the jailkeep thing? Not sure why you’d still be scumreading us, though.
In post 6974, Creature wrote:In post 6973, DrewVa wrote:
But we don’t have a disloyal and our vig on ber failed. How do you account for that, since she isn’t claiming either commuter or bp? And why the same night we vig her, is there a no kill? And what about TLK receiving sticky fruit that no one claimed to send to him? Something’s not adding up here.
But I do wish that DVa would have listened to me and agreed to shoot SS, because we’d be much further along than with a vig fail. :/
Convince us to switch to SS, if it isn’t too late.
Was the vig disloyal?
In post 6977, DrewVa wrote:
It sounds like the only one who has ever gotten a result on elsa was ss. No other night action has worked (that I've heard of)
-d
In post 6978, DrewVa wrote:In post 6977, DrewVa wrote:
It sounds like the only one who has ever gotten a result on elsa was ss. No other night action has worked (that I've heard of)
-d
Has anyone other than - who didn’t have a disloyal - visit her?
And i’m kind of pissed at RCE vetoing gifting Creature a hood now. I just hate that both of our NAs were wasted. :/
In post 6981, Jingle wrote:Xtoxm supposedly visited her with a failed result and no disloyal last night.
In post 6994, Elsa Jay wrote:Well your 2 options are me or Smart, Una. I wish you luck in you desicion.
Btw, we're all confirming we're voting between Me and Smart, correct? No stragglers please.
In post 6999, Cheeky Dancer wrote:
I dont understand. You're saying you disloyal vigged AC on n1??!? If you did a disloyal action on AC, well then I guess my sr on you has been right .![]()
---------In post 6988, RCEnigma wrote:Forgot why I hard scumread creature. I think mostly the interactions with Una whom I hard townread.
Honest revelation moment: I scumread creat partly because RCE was scumreading creat. And I tr RCE.In post 6992, Jingle wrote:@gamma why don’t you want to cooperate with compiling boonus options?
Funny thing is, I began wondering yesterday 1/31, if GE/koki (jingle)/EJ/xtox are actually somehow town. As in, super lazy town. If that's the case, the remaining scum could be in town leaders...but I still have major trouble seeing all of them as town.
In related news, starting to doubt my scumread on drewva . Their list and post where they had us as 2nd highest tr, sounds like it comes from town.
--------In post 6984, DrewVa wrote:If our vig hadn’t of been blocked,
That was a joke from me ...
~ P
In post 7001, Elsa Jay wrote:
... That's kinda why I wanted to know where his vote is going and hoping it's on Smart?
That sounds like you think I said "hang Smart or Una" which is obviously not the case.
In post 7007, Nev and Max wrote:
It's not...
Dave has been pinging me most of the game because he appears to be posting more mechanical stuff then game solvey stuff. And then the thing at end of day yesterday too.
Jingle is a holdover read from his predecessor.
In post 7017, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 7012, Creature wrote:In post 6999, Cheeky Dancer wrote:I dont understand. You're saying you disloyal vigged AC on n1??!? If you did a disloyal action on AC, well then I guess my sr on you has been right .
My revealed actions:
N2: disloyal action on EJ - failed
N3: disloyal action on Una - failed
if that wasn't clear
EJ target history and other things:
Dave N2 with disloyal, no result
Creature N2 with disloyal, no result…disloyal on una, no result
S_S with Disloyal Rolecop n2, Traitor result
DrewVa with Vig N3 (waited all the way until n3 to use it and EJ lived though)
Una prized weak to him on n3
xtox on n1? with no result?
I forget, was disloyal ever a prize in any of the BOONus rooms?
That's also a disturbingly high # of disloyal prs if all town - which doesn't seem plausible.
On top of that, dave/creat/ss waited until n2 to use their disloyal actions - thats a huge coincidence...? And drewva waited into n3 to attempt the vig shot? Sounds like very unsafe dance moves in earthquake weather.
~ P
In post 7018, Cheeky Dancer wrote:
I guess you have one. Great, since I have a vig shot and guess who I will use it on.
Someone who knows Bleach and knows my fave chars from them are Gin and Aizen.![]()
~ P
In post 7019, Jingle wrote:Also if gammas room from last night could claim their identities + potential prizes, that’d be swell.
In post 7022, Jingle wrote:Disloyal was a prize n1 for presumably creat and Dave. Ss’s ‘disloyal’ is unexplained, which is another reason to lynch him.
In post 7028, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Hmm. So if 2 disloyal actions failed on EJ, then EJ could be town - assuming creat & dave are town.
I'm actually starting to think SS is scum then .
But if SS is town, then that means EJ is scum and dave & creat are likely scum.
~ P
In post 7030, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 7024, Jingle wrote:
Because the other options were scum indicative. There is no reason as town to gift ascetic, ninja, or macho, so if they didn’t pick neighbor they’re probably scum. And I’m trying to get that info. Which is ~half of the reason I want you to claim the room last night and potential prizes.
Well I don't remember the prizes. I didn't really look at it much as I wasn't feeling the game then. I pretty much posted once then flaked. I can say Nero and profii were the others, as Nero being in there made me concerned so that stuck with me.
In post 7032, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 7028, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Hmm. So if 2 disloyal actions failed on EJ, then EJ could be town - assuming creat & dave are town.
I'm actually starting to think SS is scum then .
But if SS is town, then that means EJ is scum and dave & creat are likely scum.
~ P
Scratch that, I'm thinking of it too linear. Sometimes thinking aloud is bad.![]()
Because disloyal works on the target if they're opposite alignment - so it roleblocks them .
But who would even know what really went on since they're was no result from dave & creat.
My assumption is if we get EJ (who I still have as sr), we could work off that regarding all that targeting. It's clear to me a claimed disloyal rolecop is less risky than a miller, on top of what's been happening itt.
~ P
In post 7037, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 7018, Cheeky Dancer wrote:
I guess you have one. Great, since I have a vig shot and guess who I will use it on.
Someone who knows Bleach and knows my fave chars from them are Gin and Aizen.![]()
~ P
Dangit P the heck are you doing. These kills are getting out of hand.
If your legit a Vigilante, then shoot Nev when SS flips scum and help us out here.
In post 7049, Elsa Jay wrote:Also, if you really wanted to shoot Gamma or something, why even give them a warning? Seems counterproductive, right?
You can work better as a second lynch tonight since you claimed out the blue.
In post 7073, Jingle wrote:In post 7062, DrewVa wrote:Jingle has ben doing a lot of rolefishing recently. First the mass claim and now this.
I've been doing a lot of Boonus round fishing, yup. That's how we've got a mechanical one of SS/Creat/Dave is scum. Because there's only 2 disloyal gifts N2 and three people claimed to receive them.
Also, don't out mechanical townreads today, we already know who the lynch is.
In post 7077, Cheeky Dancer wrote:
He did the same thing in RC's wild large theme.....so I think it's NAI...
His brilliant memory, super personable approach, and high level of experience are going to be the end of me if he's scum.
~ P
In post 7082, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 7078, DrewVa wrote:In post 7037, Elsa Jay wrote:In post 7018, Cheeky Dancer wrote:
I guess you have one. Great, since I have a vig shot and guess who I will use it on.
Someone who knows Bleach and knows my fave chars from them are Gin and Aizen.![]()
~ P
Dangit P the heck are you doing. These kills are getting out of hand.
If your legit a Vigilante, then shoot Nev when SS flips scum and help us out here.
You want CD to vig a slot that townreads a slot, who claimed to use a “disloyal” on you? Tell me how that makes sense to you?
Have you not noticed his interactions with SS and how hard he defends him now? Just because he townreads Creature doesn't mean he's good. He's picking his battles.
In post 7085, Nev and Max wrote:In post 7049, Elsa Jay wrote:Also, if you really wanted to shoot Gamma or something, why even give them a warning? Seems counterproductive, right?
You can work better as a second lynch tonight since you claimed out the blue.
I mean He could be misdirecting. If he says he's gonna shoot gamma and actually shoots somewhere else scum will protect gamma and leave the other person open to being shot.
In post 7097, Jingle wrote:I'm not. I have no read on Dave. But if SS is town, we should have two consecutive scumlynches as consolation, I'm independently scumreading him, and the claim is complete garbage.
Besides, if you have two overlapping 1v1's, you lynch the overlap. Always.
In post 7108, DrewVa wrote:We’re going to drive poor Boon to drink. I just switched our vote again, back to SS.
Okay, I think you could be town. I townread Kokichi’s re-entrance into the game.