I can agree with this.In post 24, TheGoldenParadox wrote:This puts him at L-2. Those are two blind votes on a bandwagon that has no substance.
VOTE: xwing because that was the L-2, but stillFoSing Doughboy.
VOTE: xwing
I can agree with this.In post 24, TheGoldenParadox wrote:This puts him at L-2. Those are two blind votes on a bandwagon that has no substance.
VOTE: xwing because that was the L-2, but stillFoSing Doughboy.
Why Trivium specifically? Because of last game, or for a different reason?In post 35, profii wrote:I am interested if the following players are interested in pushing the Trivium wagon through to a lynch:
2.Nikk
5.Wagonomics
6.Egix96
9.Robert2424
Exactly . I'll take it you had a different (and presumably more sensible) reason in mind then.In post 38, profii wrote:what would the last game have to do with this game?In post 37, Egix96 wrote:Why Trivium specifically? Because of last game, or for a different reason?In post 35, profii wrote:I am interested if the following players are interested in pushing the Trivium wagon through to a lynch:
2.Nikk
5.Wagonomics
6.Egix96
9.Robert2424
Ehh. Just because a wagon forms on someone very quickly, doesn't necessarily mean the person being wagoned is town.In post 39, Nikk wrote:No, wagon was built too fast.In post 35, profii wrote:I am interested if the following players are interested in pushing the Trivium wagon through to a lynch:
2.Nikk
5.Wagonomics
6.Egix96
9.Robert2424
Yeah, and along with this:In post 52, LolWagons wrote:This post makes my skin crawl.In post 27, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hahaha reason?In post 25, Trivium wrote:Sorry mod, will make note. Whoaa lapsa's in this game?
VOTE: TheGoldenParadox
Like it’s one vote on you and you’re already asking about it, but also the hahaha makes it seem like you’re trying to subtly downplay the vote. It’s hypervigilance of standing with the rest of the players and subtle self-image posturing you see more in mafia than town.
Really gives me that "Why me? Fry me!" vibe.In post 45, TheGoldenParadox wrote:And can you explain to me how I've been scummy, please? I don't really seem to quite get it.
Was it a Normal Game though?In post 212, profii wrote:I’ve been a cop in a Schadd game where it said no cops.
I’ll let you all think about that. I even got a guilty that got a scum lynched
Thing is, for all that's happened so far, there really hasn't been much stuff that I've felt like commenting on tbh.In post 244, TheGoldenParadox wrote:Trivium: He's attacking multiple people with shallow and weak if not nonexistent arguments. However, his attack on me feels genuine. Neutral.
Flubber: His questions are genuine, and it seems like he's making an earnest effort. Townlean.
xwing: I've explained my read on him. Naked vote at the start, worse and worse "content" after that, none of which generated any good content. Feels very artificial. Scumread.
profii: Starts out with fluff and useless posting (see 35) but seems more towny and gives game advancing content that seems earnest. Townlean.
Sashaddin: not a lot of posting, but answering questions well and reads that are well thought out and make sense. Townlean.
Egix: seemed a bit eager to jump onto xwing wagon, and doesn't seem very earnest. I don't really see him making game advancing content.
(also I apologize if I made a pronoun error - I wasn't trying to if I did.)
Problem is, it's likely that at least a few of us will be inactive around 25 Dec (I know I'll be) so IMO we should be ready to lynch someone by next weekend at the latest.In post 262, Robert2424 wrote:with we have till after christmas to get a lynch, and I am in no hurry to see anybody lynched and neither should anybody.
Not the best response...In post 393, Trivium wrote:In post 388, Lapsa wrote:@trivium I find you underwhelmingAw that's... that hurts.In post 390, Sashaddin wrote:Something we agree on.In post 388, Lapsa wrote:@trivium I find you underwhelming
Okey dokeyIn post 397, LolWagons wrote:Egix give me reads please
Why? Is there anyone on the wagon who's giving you the heebie jeebies?
Shhhhh. There is only Boba Tea.In post 420, LolWagons wrote:So that’s a nice list. Gut still saying town on Egix. I’ve been right about his flips so far even though I’ve had trouble articulating why.
- Oh okay. The only problem with that reasoning is that it all falls apart if TGP flips town.In post 428, xwing wrote:see my post 414, latter part..In post 425, Egix96 wrote:Not sure what to make of Flubber's ISO actually... I'll just put him in my nullpile for now.
@lapsa: noted, I'll make sure to consider that if you turn out to be town.
@xwing: I'd be interested in your reasoning for your flubber read.
lemme know if you need more..
@lolwagons: you'll be fine haha..
reason why im not too comfy with egix was mainly coz of the start..didnt like how he joined my wagon, then switched not soon after..unsure if im thinking too much into it..
i still like the fact that he delivered on his word though..
@egix can you expand on your scum leans the same way you expounded on your "no-opinion" slots too?
Yyyyeah that OMGUS from TGP is pretty yucky but you miiight be a teeny bit confbiased.In post 451, LolWagons wrote:The only way it would be advantageous for Profii to be on his wagon as scum, is if TGP were to flip scum.In post 449, xwing wrote:@lol, is this what you meant by the scumslip on post 430? i dont get what you're seeing here..In post 430, TheGoldenParadox wrote:[snip]
Going to go with a SR on profii for trying to get himself on a wagon before it goes to a lynch. VOTE: profii
If TGP flips town, then how is it good for scum-Profii to be on the wagon?
And we know TGP is scumreading Profii because it’s right there in the post.
Rolestopper seems like a weird choice for scum to fakeclaim.In post 706, profii wrote:Yeah apologies to all - my badIn post 703, Egix96 wrote:Wait...
So profii hammered by mistake because he thought Lapsa was unvoting Nomics rather than Robert?
Fuuuuuuuuck
Profii, regardless of your alignment... please try and be more careful next time.
Why my alignment and not wagonomics though - which way is he going to flip?
*Sees N2 flip*In post 709, Wagonomics wrote:Theres no more tprs so you can talk freely
HMMMMMMIn post 710, Wagonomics wrote:Goon goon ascetic goon vs loyal neighbor and 1 shot rolestop + 2 shot bg + vts
Thats why I voted mastina
I really dont see how town ascetic would be balanced
Bolded part seems a bit TMI-ish to me...In post 719, xwing wrote:i'm annoyed with how the last day went..didnt even wait for everyone to have their say before the lynch when we had plenty of time to discuss..i thought we were in agreement that we were going to look at profii slot? how come it changed to wagonomics?
i dont buy the inattentive vote from profii..
also the scumslip from tgp is too glaring to pass..did no one else find it glaring?lolwagons got killed coz of it..
VOTE: profii
also, flubber NK highly suggests robert as scum, unless it's a frame-up job..
so my take is tgp-profii-robert scum team..
Interesting take. In the first Mini Normal I played (2045 aka Boba Tea Mafia) there were only three TPRs (a watcher, a backup watcher, and a 2-shot vig IIRC) so... yeah, make of that what you will.In post 726, Robert2424 wrote:But I doubt that is the last town PR
Oh that's a good point actually (I presume loyal = cannot neighborise scum?)In post 735, profii wrote:A loyal neighborizor is basically a cop so adding a ascetic role in means it balances it up for scum because we might have hit a false guilty
So I’m leaning Mastina town there
Okey dokey thenIn post 891, Nikk wrote:Okay with this hammer.
Okay I get it, you're town. I'm just trying to evaluate where we go from here.In post 913, Trivium wrote:I claimed neighborized. There was no counterclaim. I cannot be scum without some serious shenanigans that I hoped we had already established were neigh impossible especially given this setup. At this point anyone who even acts suspicious of me I consider scummy, because I am a functional IC unless someone can give me a single reason why I'm not. Today is the day we get robert out of the way. There was scum in profii/robert. Profii was town. Robert is that scum.
Uh.... what the heck? Not townreading you for this ftr.
In post 922, Lapsa wrote:that's a peculiar observation. how did you reach such conclusion?In post 921, Egix96 wrote:Also, you seem to be talking to me like you know I'm town.
To me that reads as, "Hello fellow townie, side with me and you'll win, this totally isn't a trick"In post 919, Lapsa wrote:join us and win the gameIn post 917, Egix96 wrote: Uh.... what the heck? Not townreading you for this ftr.
"When I flip scum"In post 935, Robert2424 wrote:Mastina, you realize I've wanted to lynch Lapsa from day 1? I tried to make it the primary wagon. Then 2 town joined in on it. I also hammered once I felt wagonomics wasn't going to commit to the Golden lynch.
So you willing to bet those legs yet Trivium. "This is the some of the most obvious scum". I'll bet you, and throw my arms in as well.
@Nikk, just let them quick lynch me then. When I flip scum, mastina and Lapsa got explaining to do. Mastina and Trivium are so sure that I'm scum that when I flip the minds will be blown.
Haha no. I'm pretty sure you're his buddy despite all the distancing.In post 938, Lapsa wrote:intent to hammer
Ah right, I must have misunderstood you there. BUT he was scumreading you so...?In post 948, Lapsa wrote:@egx you do realize I was referencing rob's scumreads, right?
Okay, so the setup was 10v3 to start with... I honestly didn't notice that part before.In post 950, xwing wrote:@egix: see above..
@mastina: are you still gonna push me as scum and help the scum team? do you want a rebuttal on this? i still want to believe you're town, and expert on setup spec, but apparently your scum!voyeur was wrong..
I'm about 80% confident that Lapsa is scum. If he is, his buddy is probably Nikk, but I want to have a reread of the game before I lock anything in.In post 960, xwing wrote:dang it mastina!
also, im feeling like this game's doomed for town..
@lapsa, @egix, what does your scum pool look like?
I think the interaction between them in posts 15+16 could easily be SvS.In post 981, Lapsa wrote:@egx what do you think about gp and nikk slots?
If you think Lapsa is scum, why ask him to scumhunt?In post 990, xwing wrote:uhhh lapsa, not helping..
it would be helpful if you just straight up answered questions directed at you, and scumhunt..
if you're town i feel like you're not helping your case atm..
who's the two scum for you?
There's also the fact that mastina pointed out the possibility of TGP being bussed by both of his buddies, which FMPOV makes the scumteam you+Nikk in that case.In post 995, xwing wrote:simply coz im not sure who among you 3 are scum..the one who best scum hunts would most likely be town..In post 994, Egix96 wrote:If you think Lapsa is scum, why ask him to scumhunt?In post 990, xwing wrote:uhhh lapsa, not helping..
it would be helpful if you just straight up answered questions directed at you, and scumhunt..
if you're town i feel like you're not helping your case atm..
who's the two scum for you?
Now I'm starting to get vibes that xwing is scum instead of Lapsa and is pushing for the mislynch he needs to win.
this is lazy ass reasoning, egix..anything substantial you'd like to add on the table?
lapsa, your "survival schit" looks even more like scum than town..
stop using mastina cover and AtoE and say your piece..
nikk, your absence is extremely suspicious..
- I've pointed out what I didn't like about your post 990. If you're scum, to me that looks like your mask slipping off.In post 999, xwing wrote:what makes me scummy, egix, aside from mastina's VCA?
why is his absence in double quotes? what are you implying?
The main problem with it is that FMPOV it doesn't get us much closer to solving the game, since I already have Nikk as scum. It does help to settle my paranoia of you being scum instead of Lapsa though.In post 1019, xwing wrote:@egix, @nikk, what do you think of mastina's 1016?
I haven't yet examined everything inside that spoiler box (kinda busy atm) but there are two things I noticed that give me conflicting messages...In post 1030, Nikk wrote:A series of posts that make me want to vote x wing. To me they give off a vibe of bussing scum, someone who knows already what Paradox would flip.
The part I've bolded here is a towny response IMO. I'm thinking scum!xwing would have kept pushing TGP if he knew the claim was false.In post 504, xwing wrote:i can get why you find this icky, but at this point just put it under "noted" section..lolwagon's too far from the global scummy list..In post 500, Trivium wrote:I don't like that lol's talking about why they might be left alive tonight already, but whatever
that said,tgp claim makes me think he might actually really be town..my next scum would be profii too anyway though so should still be fine, i guess..
-snip-
This, though, could be interpreted as TMI.In post 414, xwing wrote:
-snip-
i think flubber might actually be town..if gp is scum, this kind of statement would put flubber in hot water, so i dont think a scum buddy would do this..doesnt clear gp slot though..
gp, please come in and let us know your thoughts..
Riiiight I getcha.In post 1034, Nikk wrote:I think he waffled between pushing people based on ParadoxFlip and trying to pull a subtle save.