we always need to lynch the obvious scum right?
who is more obvious than the mod in the game
I really hope your joking lmfao
In post 14, Ruby Red wrote:let's not.
understandable have a nice afternoon
pichu is betterIn post 22, Donempire wrote:I want to know your thoughts on this first
why is that post towny out of all the other RvS posts?In post 25, Ruby Red wrote:nahIn post 19, Clemency wrote:ruby stop replacing into all my games
towny
In post 42, PenguinPower wrote:To be clear: This post was a joke (except for voting Ruby). For all newer players who may not have understood that this was done with humorous intent, please note that I will not break site rules. This means that I won't be editing, deleting, or otherwise modifying posts, and you are free to wagon/lynch me if you so desire. My Listmod status has no bearing on this game.In post 26, PenguinPower wrote:I am banning everyone who is currently on my wagon.
edit: I have been informed by implosion that I am not allowed to do that. So...
VOTE: Ruby
whats this "serious" sheeple onto S_S?In post 45, Ruby Red wrote:man not sure what it is about this game that has me in an extended RVS mood like this
anyways, let's get serious
VOTE: S_S
OwO whats this
I mean it’s obviously becuase I main Ike and everyone knows ike is best character.In post 63, rosterfoster wrote:Hmm. Try again. (Hint: How did they act which was townie)
Urgh I Would have loved to be on computer right nowIn post 62, Something_Smart wrote:But why not?
I believe there's a higher chance they act the way they did as town than as scum.
Oh I thought t was my stoic personality and strong formIn post 66, Something_Smart wrote:Mostly, it's just spitballing trying to get the game moving though. Which seems to have worked.
Ew tell your lover that marth has an overpowered sword but still lost to chrom, a weaker version of Ike.In post 69, Something_Smart wrote:Also I don't play Smash or FE but my lover wants you to know that Marth is far superior to Ike
In post 71, Robert2424 wrote:here I thought he was trying to guess me and Eragon are lovers.
im not against it, but only because his lover thinks marth is better than Ike.
hey dont call us stupid Penguin Powah PalIn post 85, PenguinPower wrote:Eragon and I both have two votes. Why are we better wagons? Or, are they also stupid?
Also, disagree that S_S posts are non AI. But, that's another discussion at this point.
"all this other nonsese is rediculous"In post 92, glowball wrote:Didn't say YOU were the better wagon. I said Eragon is scum. Scum = Always the better wagon.In post 85, PenguinPower wrote:Eragon and I both have two votes. Why are we better wagons? Or, are they also stupid?That's nice, but you asked ME to explain. That's MY explanation whether or not you agree with my explanation is kinda irrelevant. Your question was answered.Also, disagree that S_S posts are non AI. But, that's another discussion at this point.
If you don't wanna lynch Eragon that's whatever. That's where my vote is now. All this other nonsense is ridiculous.
Whoever Robert2424 is is not reading the thread because I'm certainly not the least active, but again let's bs instead of getting anything done like most games.
im getting like a really... flowery... vibe from Joan and im not really liking it.In post 94, Joan of Arc wrote:I am a Millipede
I am astounding
Wisdom floats from my personage like lace
In post 98, Ruby Red wrote:tired of this game being stalled
lover setups are usually broken by randomness. i'm going to go to random.org, pick a number from 1-9, and will tunnel that slot to its death.
this is proabably more likely to win us this game than trying any other strategy.
this is absolutely retarded.In post 101, Ruby Red wrote:i am not joking when i say that sheeping me on this vote and doing the exact same thing in future days will win us the game nearly 50% of the time
fuck happened to the quoteIn post 103, Something_Smart wrote:It seems like an improvement to allow the player chosen to be lynched to make the next random roll, for somewhat of an obvious reason.
Or.In post 106, Something_Smart wrote:Not necessarily. It might still be a good idea to play D1, or at least play D1 until we get to a consensus townread to start off the random lynching. (That way town can feel comfortable with that person excluding themself and their lover from the first random pool.)
The plan could be improved further with a consensus locktown read picking every random lynch and excluding themself and their lover from every pool, though the EV of that is obviously dependent on the chance that the player selected for this would be scum.
which you still havent explained a scrap of.In post 108, glowball wrote:Why sign up to play a game of mafia and not want to actually hunt scum?
I... I... I just don't understand.
Count me out of that if you're looking for votes. I'm satisfied with Eragon for now.
so...In post 109, Something_Smart wrote:I usually townhunt more than scumhunt, especially D1. I like the version of this strategy that requires town to come up with a consensus townread.
because it shows a lack of incentive to solve and a laziness that doesnt come from town.In post 111, PenguinPower wrote:Why do you scum read Ruby? Seems like she's doing something you don't agree with, but why is it scum indicative?
In post 112, Ruby Red wrote:who said i don't want to hunt scumIn post 108, glowball wrote:Why sign up to play a game of mafia and not want to actually hunt scum?
I... I... I just don't understand.
Count me out of that if you're looking for votes. I'm satisfied with Eragon for now.
why does that make me scumIn post 110, Robert2424 wrote:Actually I don't like it.
Vote Ruby Red
Sounds more lazy then anything. I didn't sign up to play a numbers game, and allow a machine to tell me what to do. I'd rather scum read and lynch that person. Otherwise, we should play some number game instead of Mafia.
if shes a strong town player why doesnt she show it and actually play the game.In post 127, PenguinPower wrote:Ruby is a strong town player so you're going to do more than insult her intelligence to accomplish anything...
What is it that you are trying to accomplish?
p-edit
That question was not directed at you - which should have been obvious because I quoted who it was directed towards. I'm not sure why you feel qualified to answer that question.
who says the game would stagnate?In post 129, Ruby Red wrote:yeah dude, wowIn post 125, Eragon wrote:because it shows a lack of incentive to solve and a laziness that doesnt come from town.
By "random lynching" you prove that you have no motivation to actually scumhunt, and that you'd rather just not play the game and let RNG decide the lynch(not a towny thought)
i'm so lazy as scum that instead of not posting, or naked voting someone, or continuing to sheep penguinpower, ornot posting and just letting the game stagnate
i decided to describe to everyone publicly my plan to vote someone randomly
:thonking:
how different would "outside influence" be if i made that post not quoting it?In post 133, PenguinPower wrote:Because it was directed at a specific individual in the hopes that said individual would answer it without outside influence.In post 132, Eragon wrote:why dont i respond to that post?
Thought that was obvious given that it was specifically directed at an individual who made a statement.
because if someone pushed you on it, then you could say this ^, and say that it was just "a joke" and "i made a show of it so its not scummy" and instead of just naked voting or doing nothing, both wolfy options, you decide to do something that you can easily back out of.In post 131, Ruby Red wrote:let me ask you a very simple, very straightforward question:
why do you think i voted someone using a literal random number generator and then made a show of doing so?
In post 138, PenguinPower wrote:But you did quote it. And you did answer it.
How about don't do either since it wasn't directed toward you. K? Fun.
p-edit
Holy...
In post 142, PenguinPower wrote:Expressing your read on Ruby does not require to you to quote or answer my question to another player directly.In post 140, Eragon wrote:so i cant express my reads on Ruby?
In post 144, PenguinPower wrote:A lot, since you wouldn't be directly answering a specifically phrased question.
In post 210, Trekkie99 wrote:Don't see why not.In post 209, Clemency wrote:you sure you wanna state thatIn post 208, Trekkie99 wrote:That's what I thought as well, but turns out Ruby is not my lover.In post 176, Something_Smart wrote:well she kind of just gave away who her lover is... so I think we have nothing to lose by lynching her now.In post 174, Ruby Red wrote:(because he's town being shitwagoned)
Are we celebrating alliteration prod day?In post 225, implosion wrote:Prodding Ruby Red, Something_Smart, and PenguinPower.