In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.
I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.
I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.
I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.
In post 87, DrewVa wrote:Nancy Drew 39
Vanilla Town
Aligned with Town
Nancy Drew in the detective book series didn't need any special powers to solve crimes - all she needed was the powers of her mind, thinking on her feet, and talking her way out of sticky situations. We believe you've got that toolkit without a role.
You will win when you have eliminated all threats to the Town.
In post 109, DrewVa wrote:In post 107, RCEnigma wrote:I accused Elsa of nothing. I accused Drewva of being scum.
I'm not an alt or Hydra of RC.....yet.
Because I posted a role PM from a game, that I wasn’t even in?
I think you’re either scum here or lack a sense of humour. Which would be shocking coming from an Austin Powers’ fan.
In post 140, DrewVa wrote:In shouldn’t say it anyway, according to you, right? If scum don’t actually know what it is, then we can catch them that way.
In post 158, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.
I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.
I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.
I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.
I’m 100% Berserker.
In post 173, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 160, RCEnigma wrote:In post 158, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.
I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.
I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.
I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.
I’m 100% Berserker.
Mafia// Stay Night confirmed?
I was thinking Fire Emblem but okey
In post 184, DrewVa wrote:In post 182, RCEnigma wrote:In post 173, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 160, RCEnigma wrote:In post 158, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 48, Elsa Jay wrote:The Last Knight wrote:Even if I were a mercenary, at least I'd be trusted to do my job. A Remote Controlled Enigma, on the other hand, is a very scummy monicker.RCEnigma wrote:A cypher impossible to crack is invaluable.
I would argue much more than a sword to the highest bidder.
I'm just a Snow Queen from a time when books and documents are what we use. Having "remote-controlled" anything is unwarranted since it doesn't exist.
I believe I'll take the Knight/Mercenary.
I’m 100% Berserker.
Mafia// Stay Night confirmed?
I was thinking Fire Emblem but okey
Oh, dibs on Wyvern rider then.
I feel I’m at a disadvantage, having never played this game before. :/
In post 353, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 351, Almost Chara wrote:i do believe that Cheeky speaks the truth there.
why was Almost obvtown in pregame, Cheeky? :>
~Chara
>.> it's embarrassing but he knows why. Basically the same reason I try to not sort RC until I have to. Luckily you guys are paired though because I find you interact better with my paranoia.
~ C
In post 271, The Last Knight wrote:After waking up and reading through all of this, why am I not surprised to see RCE jumping to defend BEF? Too lazy to quote right now, but I have hard scum reads on both of these acronyms. I already threw my random accusations at the Emperors here but I may be willing to point at one of these two instead. RCE hasn't even bothered to deny being scum up until now either, so we may as well just vote him.
In post 356, The Last Knight wrote:I did smell scum flakes when I read BEF's posts but I also see the chance of it being too much pot stirring to be scum. It's too attention grabbing. So I see this as trolling, at least for now.
I want to return to my original claim and echo Ramcius on ending the monarchy by voting for an Emperor. Preferably the Boon looking imposter. I just think Emperors New Groove is a bit too bold with Boonskiies around.
In post 381, The Last Knight wrote:If you want me to expand on my read for Fish, I will.
I thought it was annoying that BEF was harping on a word choice and then saw you, my main dissenter RCE, side with Fish for no reason. You hadn't said anything in pages and then piped up when Elsa wanted to vote BEF. It seemed all too convenient for BEF that you would defend him so easily and with no real reasoning of your own. BEF was an accessory to my scum read on YOU because why else would you two collude.
The difference between you and Fish is the use of sound evidence. I didn't agree with BEF's reasons but at least they existed. You have no real reason to claim me scum. Just your weird issue with me wanting to kill the Emperors. And you just become more and more suspicious with your half-baked claims.
I'm not afraid of calling out suspicious behavior but I also saw no real reason to go back on my original joke claim... until now. I feel far more confident in voting for RCE to kill with all these desperate claims against me.
In post 386, Elsa Jay wrote:We got too many people. More then 23 including the Hydras. We gotta thin the herd.
I cant remember everyone in this game, especially with the hydra slips. Sigh.BrightEyedFish wrote:Elsa,
Why all the shade? Are you harbouring emotions from a past game?
Reality show biz, my friend. You aren't appealing to the audience. Unfortunately, that means you gotta go.
In post 421, Nero Cain wrote:So ok, I fake daykilled him b/c I was annoyed at him and Else trolling and bloating this thread. That alone is antitown/scummy but then I felt like RCE's threat/promise to ignore me was scummy. Like I can't go into details b/c both our games are ongoing but I have an excellent track record of reading him and I could see scum RCE intentionally not wanting to be in an argument with me.
In post 542, Nev and Max wrote:In post 499, Ramcius wrote:In post 498, Elsa Jay wrote:He's doing better then the other AFK crew that can end the day. Don't grill him for wanting the game to go forward.
oh, i won't, once we agree to your lynch
but as we are now, we have no consensus on lynch, we barely have discussion and your friend here is trying end day without making any effort to find scum, so I feel like I have every right to grill him for it
I kinda dislike saying this, but I agree with the bolded part. Page 30 seems like an arbitrary number pulled out of an ass somewhere. Guy doesnt know where we are as a gamestate yet, and he is saying hes going to stop it in 8 pages (if he gets support from his othe r3) so he can catch up? Seems like an easy way to have all 5 scum votes on one unsuspecting player while the rest of us have our votes scattered and ultimately wasted.
In post 579, davesaz wrote:In post 449, Thanos wrote:In post 440, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Yeah I still don't agree. I'm oblivious as either alignment. I would think it was towny reasoning if they didn't have a myriad of posts and therefore other points you could have sorted them as town for.
Sure, *you* may be oblivious as either alignment -- that doesn't mean it's false that scum would likelier be aware of such a mechanic.
Feel free to disagree with me here, but I'm still sticking by it.
That slot usually has a lot of posts which I don't find AI.
This is also worth noting for review.
In post 588, Nev and Max wrote:In post 575, RCEnigma wrote:Why would having all the scum hard claim day 1 be an issue exactly?
If they have 5 votes to use, all they have to hope for is no one else to have more than 4. I suppose if they put all those votes on the person we all consider to be most likely town that would be paramount to a scum claim, but if it we're me I would pick someone middle of the pack with enough "reasons" to be on them that defending my choice day 2 would be simple.
I get that he is one component out of 4 that needs to decide, 3 if you look at plaurality. I kinda think the ending of the day should still be a group decision and not just theirs.
In post 646, Thanos wrote:In post 607, RCEnigma wrote:That bef was town regardless of thanos alignment. In general an in depth read like that seems tmi given the context. Up to that point it was a pissing match between slots giving vague reads and slots angry at people giving vague reads while not doing anything differently.
It's a good opportunity to seem townie, was my first impression.
Have you looked at any of my previous games?
Would you have preferred I give "vague" reads to blend in?
This is my first large, and my other head's as well *shrug* trying to find a suitable style to adopt here. I thought I had a reasonable basis for starting to town people.
There were other slots being serious and playing the game at that point too; what do you make of them? (Davesaz, Nev&Max)
~Auro
In post 664, Nero Cain wrote:I had wanted to talk about something that I felt was semi-important but I forgot earlier so here we go.
I don't think Alonzo is necessarily scummy for wanting to end the day @ p30. Like, he seems genuine that he's just behind but the stopping the thread a little prematurely is nearsighted.
I think artificially extending the day beyond useful discussion is p anti-town but as long as it's fruitful it's not much of a big deal. I think the strength of this mechanic is that we can vote the scum without them knowing we are voting them...unless we say so. The only minor drawback is we can't really coordinate a lynch. I could do unofficial vote counts if we wanted to do them or we could just vote whomever in our threads and just see how that works.
In post 686, profii wrote:
This thread says the people "JUST" have to vote to end the day. I assume they don't know who we are all voting for
i.e. they can't say like, "between the 4 of us we can see profii is the leading wagon rn and he would be a good lynch so lets end the day"
some people are assuming that Alonzo VC was legit and I don't know if that's because they weren't on it so don't know any better or are they just playing along with random hypothetical scenarios
:S
In post 706, Cheeky Dancer wrote:That interaction between Nero/RCE read like RCE could have reacted to Nero's dayvig in any way and Nero would still scumread him for it.
In post 714, Nero Cain wrote:
no, he's done shit all. Maybe I'll have something later to read him on.In post 710, mcqueen wrote:he asks how it's scummy then calls RCE scummy later
no, I didn't. I called his reaction to my fake dayvig kinda scummy and then Drew asked why and then I explained why I felt the way I did.
In post 820, Alonzo wrote:You said this game, implying you have previous with profii, and some sort of metric on how you form a read on him.
How did you reach scum! Profii?
In post 884, The Last Knight wrote:In post 88, RCEnigma wrote:Hmm, I have reason to believe drewva pulled scum.In post 89, RCEnigma wrote:Maybe not scum, but she isn't town.
This is RCE scum reading DrewVa based on a quote from a different game. RCE based this off of a rule slip only scum would know.
And then claimed not to have read the rules to begin with. Could be playing coy, but it seems like a tonal slip to me.In post 371, RCEnigma wrote:I'm not scumreading drewva. I'm semi-content with what I got out of it. I like Bef pushing there even if it was based on miscommunication. They are both just town here Imo.
Now, unless this is based on a discussion about the ruleslip in question, RCEnigma abandons the DrewVa non-town read with little clarification. Please expand on this if you like, but in your ISO I was unable to find good reason for this change in allegiance.In post 380, RCEnigma wrote:No it's a combination of the omgus read, presenting scumreads on myself and bef as serious reads then backing off when Bef gained support (or at least townreads), and then reverting back to "none of that is serious I'm still RVSing".
It all wreaks of cautious scum and I'm calling back on it.
This is RCEnigma accusing me of what I identified above as a very similar series of actions. Either he is a hypocrite or is scum himself.
I have already explained why I changed views on BEF (me not liking the semantic approach but also finding it too specific to be fake). Would you mind going into detail as to why you read me as scum other than your own "omgus" argument against me?In post 667, RCEnigma wrote:In post 664, Nero Cain wrote:I had wanted to talk about something that I felt was semi-important but I forgot earlier so here we go.
I don't think Alonzo is necessarily scummy for wanting to end the day @ p30. Like, he seems genuine that he's just behind but the stopping the thread a little prematurely is nearsighted.
I think artificially extending the day beyond useful discussion is p anti-town but as long as it's fruitful it's not much of a big deal. I think the strength of this mechanic is that we can vote the scum without them knowing we are voting them...unless we say so. The only minor drawback is we can't really coordinate a lynch. I could do unofficial vote counts if we wanted to do them or we could just vote whomever in our threads and just see how that works.
I agree with this actually. I know I'm going to get scumread for saying we should use day 1 as a test day. I think in regards to how we want to handle votes/votecounts it should be a test day.
And then this statement basically agrees with all of my own points about who I have decided to vote for so far.
Now, don't go saying that me defending myself is inherently scummy here...
In post 911, Elsa Jay wrote:Because if you voted day 2 or 3 IRL and it pops up to show that with the timestamp, clearly something was up. Obviously an exaggeration, but seeing who voted first reveals an agenda a bit. Or it shows you are very stubborn.
In post 916, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah, I said RCE was more likely to be scum earlier because I liked TLK more at that time, but considering he ignored Ramcius point blank saying he was trying to lynch me, and he is trying to guide the lynch, he may possibly be partners with Ramcius.
Clearly you all don't like the idea of someone only having 2/3 votes dying, so lets bring up TLK and RCE again.
TLK literally scrounging for the votes is a way for scum to reestablish controll and take out the factor of the game that scare them.
In post 1184, Nev and Max wrote:In post 1178, Elsa Jay wrote:How do you explain him being so agreeable with the unknown part but pushing back against me for trying to make him use common sense to assume Ramcius was voting me?
I was being kinda snarky because i saw on TLKs update that Ram was on Karm. Tin foil hat theory, what if TLK knew Rams vote wasnt on you?
In post 1418, Thanos wrote:In post 1410, profii wrote:I know this game is tough but I don’t think we need to stop scum hunting and go for a policy lynch just yeti
I'll also add (or re-iterate) that it's pretty damn beneficial for scum to lurk here, since posting naturally potentially attracts votes. Plus it's harder to hold them accountable for their vote.
~A
In post 1660, Thanos wrote:In post 1655, DrewVa wrote:You also keep scumcasing me every game if I do not townread you immediately which has also gotten quite dull
Don't want to be scumread for being wrong? Then stop expecting me to always townread you when you are unwilling to commit to good reads
There's a difference between "good" and "correct" -- even if my early townlean based on a townslip was "correct", it was nowhere near to "good". No good player commits to those.
You're shifting the goalposts. Also, no, I don't scumcase you because you don't townread me.
~A
In post 1656, DrewVa wrote:In post 429, Thanos wrote:In post 426, DrewVa wrote:But it is mentioned in the setup, so the read should be more nuanced, like could they tell, if we made the “townslip” by play or is the townread solely based on just mechanics?
It's mentioned in the setup and yet DVa didn't know that.
It's likelier for town in this scenario not to have read the setup properly and not know that public votes aren't counted.
It's less likely for scum to not know, IMO -- Making your slot likely town.
This is an early read, subject to change if there's stronger evidence.
~AuroIn post 438, Thanos wrote:In post 430, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Your assumption that not reading the game post is towny is unfounded.
It's a bit more nuanced than that.
Not reading the game post isn't inherently towny, I agree.
Scum would have more likely been aware of some of the important mechanics, private votes being one.
Therefore if a slot wasn't aware of that mechanic, it's likelier town than scum.
And at an early stage, fine to toss into a town pool.In post 1653, Thanos wrote:Show me, specifically where I ever began with a townread. I was always scumleaning your slot and even more so now, but the reason I didn't want to VOTE you was because there were other people better at reading your slot, and I reasoned you'd sort yourself over time.
I don't care about my abilities at reading you at the moment. Stop the whole "townread me or you're scum" thing.
~A
In post 1725, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 1705, Alonzo wrote:Who has Gamma had meaningful interaction with?In post 1709, Boonskiies wrote:
Let’s refrain from even mentioning any posts referencing ongoing games, or any posts referencing another post that referenced an ongoing game. Move on from that.In post 1710, RCEnigma wrote:Don't think Gamma is that bad as scum, you gotta come with something more concrete than that.
Is how bad?
In post 1769, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Drewva you are clearly voting thanos despite saying you're unsure who to vote. You've got to be kidding me. This is according to pg 69 vc from TLK.
Also, I dread winter too. The people who advertise it as one of the or the happiest time of the year, I never believe it .
TLK, I think it's alright if you cant update anymore until 12/28 deadline. Not much happening anyway, unfortunately.
Vote stays on alonzo as his posts keep up with continued nonsense about us. I don't hide as any alignment, and my partner doesn't either afaik.
I'm reading thanos v drewva interaction on pg 66 as TvS, in that order. However, knowing both of them can be very verbose and ultra conniving, I wouldn't rule out SvS. Leaning TvS rn , however.
Feeling like GE & Ramicus are probably town for their posts about drewva and alonzo.
PenguinPower, man....are you town![]()
AC, where have you gone??![]()
~ P
In post 1778, Almost Chara wrote:i said i was voting Theta Alpine, the votecount missed it.
it's fine.
if anyone's still saying that's scum busywork they can fight me when i'm back on christmas day. that's a lame argument. it's a neutral action.
~Chara
In post 1784, Something_Smart wrote:It's not completely asinine, if you had a good argument for it. If you don't have a better reason than "he's doing something that helps town" then it's certainly incredibly shallow.
Who based a townread on it?
In post 1787, mcqueen wrote:In post 904, Xtoxm wrote:Elsa is my first townread
Page 37. Not bad
@knight, pls change not voting category to unknown. You are putting fake claims in everyone's mouth. Thanx.
Why is she a townread of yours? Over the last few pages I've been reading, I still don't like her play.
For example, she claims Ram to have his vote on her, but won't reveal her own vote. It's not actually hypocritical, but it's pretty close
I understand we have the right to keep our vote hidden if we choose, but when a large group within the playerbase agrees to out their votes, it just makes you look scummy not to cooperate
In post 1967, Nero Cain wrote:At first, I was like an SS claim makes no sense in this setup (and thus was a gambit) but then I remembered that Boon said there's be timestamps and that being how hammer is decided makes some sense to me. If we really wanted to use him as a double lynch we can have like the people we want dead to vote TLK and everyone else unvote as so not to prevent a TLK lynch.
In post 1967, Nero Cain wrote:At first, I was like an SS claim makes no sense in this setup (and thus was a gambit) but then I remembered that Boon said there's be timestamps and that being how hammer is decided makes some sense to me. If we really wanted to use him as a double lynch we can have like the people we want dead to vote TLK and everyone else unvote as so not to prevent a TLK lynch.
In post 1978, Nero Cain wrote:In post 1976, RCEnigma wrote:Does that ruin the point of keeping votes hidden since it will be manipulated day 1?
y do you care if the hidden votes are not hidden?
like if we are lynching TLK then we just say X, Y, Z votes him and if they aren't we lynch there.
Also, remember that the wagon will be public in the end.
In post 1981, Xtoxm wrote:In post 1975, RCEnigma wrote:In post 1967, Nero Cain wrote:At first, I was like an SS claim makes no sense in this setup (and thus was a gambit) but then I remembered that Boon said there's be timestamps and that being how hammer is decided makes some sense to me. If we really wanted to use him as a double lynch we can have like the people we want dead to vote TLK and everyone else unvote as so not to prevent a TLK lynch.
Scum just have to unvote if they are on the wagon and get another Lynch instead.
Couple mechanical questions for the situation.
If TLK is the Lynch should the rest of the slots unvote to avoid a plurality Lynch on someone else?
Does that ruin the point of keeping votes hidden since it will be manipulated day 1?
I think that's kind of a short term gain long term loss.
theres for sure important mechanical strategy discussion to be had about this
but i dont think we need to start it on d1 with 23 players still alive
In post 2207, DrewVa wrote:In post 2205, mcqueen wrote:Actually gonna read 66*-82 tmrw. I need sleep. Lol
And ftr my vote is still on Elsa
See, this is Elsa like every game. So, ENG did incorrectly assume we tr Nero for that early post but yeah I misunderstood the “butthurt” thing, so ENG is off the table then. So, currently choosing between our current vote, Profil and CD then, or not voting. When there are no VCs and there aren’t since TLK stopped posting them. it’s not exactly easy coming up with a vote.
Please advise us then - if the day hasn’t ended yet, I don’t want to sheep you on Elsa. I didn’t care for Theta’s policy lynch post but DVa’s fine with it, so maybe Profil? I rarely have strong srs on D1, I usually just vote one of the main wagons, except here, I have no clue what they are.
In post 2237, mcqueen wrote:In post 2210, RCEnigma wrote:In post 2207, DrewVa wrote:In post 2205, mcqueen wrote:Actually gonna read 66*-82 tmrw. I need sleep. Lol
And ftr my vote is still on Elsa
See, this is Elsa like every game. So, ENG did incorrectly assume we tr Nero for that early post but yeah I misunderstood the “butthurt” thing, so ENG is off the table then. So, currently choosing between our current vote, Profil and CD then, or not voting. When there are no VCs and there aren’t since TLK stopped posting them. it’s not exactly easy coming up with a vote.
Please advise us then - if the day hasn’t ended yet, I don’t want to sheep you on Elsa. I didn’t care for Theta’s policy lynch post but DVa’s fine with it, so maybe Profil? I rarely have strong srs on D1, I usually just vote one of the main wagons, except here, I have no clue what they are.
Profii is a mighty fine choice.
I wanted to say this in response to DrewVa, but I wanted them to form their own conclusions.
Also, don’t exactly like how RCE just pops in and says this
In post 2534, Alonzo wrote:do you suppose that scum who participate in boonus rounds do or don't get scumchat?
I tried to get some chat going in our room last night (assuming town had been given free night chat essentially) Nancy was very closed about giving any reads away, and as I mentioned just went offline for ten hours having voted for a compromise.
No interest in talking shop at all...
Pedit.. and yeah the way its been claimed today rooms A(bef/alonzo/nancy) and C (gamma +2) got used overnight.
Did room B see any action?
In post 3, Boonskiies wrote:StickyFruit VendorCredit: Boonskiies
Spoiler:
At night, you will give your target a "Sticky Fruit". They will be informed that they have received a Sticky Fruit, but not who they received it from, nor what it does. They will only be informed that they may pass it along the following night. Any player given a Sticky Fruit will be immune to all actions, EXCEPT for killing actions, the night they receive the fruit.
In post 2562, Thanos wrote:In post 2558, mcqueen wrote:@thanos: are those only for N2? Those seem EXTREMELY powerful if they last the entire game
The room is locked and disappeared now but I think they are permanent. Like for the entire game. Because only the prize with the neighbor specifically said "1 shot"
As in you only get 1 shot to set up a neighborhood and have private communication with a player of your choosing. The other two prizes (immune to night actions and immune to tracking) didn't say 1 shot. So must be permanent.
In post 2595, profii wrote:In post 2581, Thanos wrote:In post 2580, BrightEyedFish wrote:tbh, I want all of my posts to talk about how DrewVa is scum and I want all of you to go and faith and believe me but I do feel DrewVa's day will come, the sooner the better... but to progress the game because there are other scum out there I was wondering:
Do you feel we benefited from the hidden votes on D1 and should we continue with hidden votes today and wait for the flip to see the votes or should we all be more transparent today?
No faith needed. I think the hidden votes helped a lot. I feel someone unintentionally bussed.
One one hand - I had no inkling EFN was going to be lynched - I had no feeling that he was getting votes - saying that - DrewVa said she kept it quiet and I was in a daze for most of the day-phase
On the other hand - I don’t see why scum would do this because of plurality but I guess given my perception that EFN want in danger maybe they were rigging the VCA
I think this doesn’t say much right now but a good book mark for reflection later - there is probably shenanigans afoot
In post 2613, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2579, DrewVa wrote:In post 2577, Ramcius wrote:If we assume that there only 5 scum (maybe 6, if 5 scumteam + traitor), we have huge number advantage, so rewards in BOONus rounds being not so useful for town is something reasonable
BOONus round reminds me a bit of Heroes in that respect, except on some days, all abilities were either pro-town or scum and on others, varying degrees of mixed.
yeah this does feel similar, but with a base level of power for everyone it seems
what I'm questioning is how TLK has a passive role when the setup doesn't seem like that's something meant to be started with
In post 2618, BrightEyedFish wrote:In post 2616, Gamma Emerald wrote:In post 2418, BrightEyedFish wrote:
How would you know if I'm in scum chat or not? Perhaps because you have access to it.
***This is the time where I would usually fake a guilty claim on DrewVa.
OK this post is just gross in general, no real defense, just deflecting and tying himself to someone else.
VOTE: BrightEyedFish
Tell me, how would you defend that?
Really look at what DrewVa says: by saying Scum is calling me "Santa" in their PT, then I must not be a part of the Scum PT and that puts me in the town pile.
In post 2626, Emperors New Groove wrote:In post 2620, RCEnigma wrote:
Based on the possible ability gained from his boonus round. But the players involved know who won and can. Speculate from there. It's also one slot so the chances of hitting the night action immune slot isn't enough to discount any cop checks.
ENG do you have any townreads? And what is your read on Nero specifically?
Wasn't really wanting you to answer that. It was specifically directed at Thanos but...ok. Your explanation doesn't clear up why no one can be town confirmed. It explains why a cop possibly wouldn't get results...
I have townreads.
Why do you care about my read on Nero?
In post 2633, Emperors New Groove wrote:In post 2628, RCEnigma wrote:Yes, those would be?
You'll see.In post 2628, RCEnigma wrote:Nero was the only slot I really remember you giving any input on and even that was wishy washy. Therefore I want to know if your interest in Nero was to form a read or if you just interjected to save face.
Almost like we didn't have strong reads D1...shocker. Ari can give you more on that particular read if he wants to.
In post 2637, RCEnigma wrote:
I think Ramcius vote on TLK is interesting and only comes from scum if TLK is a partner fake claiming. I do however recall Ramcius claiming his vote on Elsa but don't recall if it was before or after the 24th.
In post 2671, Nev and Max wrote:
I'm fully aware. And like I said, a 96 page argument over the definition of words isn't something I want to fill my time with. Maybe we can avoid that stupid shit on day 2 and we can see higher participation. If anyone brings up there, their and they're I'm going to lose my shit.
In post 2992, mcqueen wrote:In post 2982, Ramcius wrote:In post 2978, Nev and Max wrote:Ram you are one voice out of more than 20. A lot of us have played together over a number of years. Sometimes your voice just isn't heard. If you aren't enjoying playing, then replace out. If you feel like you aren't being heard make a case. If no one listens move on to the next person. We lynched 1 scumbag out of 5-6, which means we have 4-5 left out there.
Don't get tunneled to deep on one person that you become a target for scum for a mislynch. Work with town to take out the scumbags that aren't him for right now and then revisit TLK.
See, that's the problem, I don't care about scum numbers, we can lynch all scum but one and lose to that last scum. I have other scumreads, yes, but I don't think they would be easier to lynch. People aren't proposing other good lynches - Theta is just a lurker, and me being ML'ed for unlucky rand would be funny, but not really helpful to town.
I'd go for DrewVa and prob Mcqueen today, but TLK is my prime target for associations
And why would you go for me exactly?
In post 3003, Cheeky Dancer wrote:Ram is obv town because he clearly doesn't care about dying - the only world where it would make sense for him to vote a potential Saint as scum is to be scum with him and think the wagon isn't going through. There's probably value in looking back at who wanted TLK dead until their claim.
~ C
In post 3010, davesaz wrote:At bottom of 113.
First why all the speculation that winning BOONus rounds has anything to do with next day reps, and then furthermore why does the day rep who didn't win a BOONus round need to be the scum of the group if there is one?
If Ram is town, someone pushing Ram as the scum dayrep (if there is one) is trying to deflect suspicion from the actual scum among the dayreps, if any.
In post 3135, Cheeky Dancer wrote:You guys can quit trying to get PP to conform to your approved style of play. If you took a moment to meta check him or Ari you'd know being a lurk lazy sack is mostly NAI. The amount of activity today from PP says they're town.
~ C
In post 3171, CheekyTeeky wrote:In post 3165, RCEnigma wrote:In post 3135, Cheeky Dancer wrote:You guys can quit trying to get PP to conform to your approved style of play. If you took a moment to meta check him or Ari you'd know being a lurk lazy sack is mostly NAI. The amount of activity today from PP says they're town.
~ C
Why would activity be town indicative then?
Are you OMGUSing?
In post 3175, Cheeky Dancer wrote:RCE what are your thoughts on SS, McQueen and Thanos? Did you pay much attention to the Drewva/Thanos 1v1?
In post 3285, The Last Knight wrote:In post 2932, BrightEyedFish wrote:The two theories we have right now as to how Ram became a Day Rep is:
1. Scum used their factional ability to place Ram as a day rep.
2. Boon randomly selected him.
So I did have a thought while reading further: what if the number of day reps that can be chosen from BOONus rounds maxes out at 3? So, in this case, the first three winners from groups A and B were chosen and group C got screwed. That would make the 4th slot designated for scum. That way, if they decided not to use it, it is random.
In post 3289, Cheeky Dancer wrote:In post 3287, RCEnigma wrote:If there is a slot designated for scum it outs them at some point. There would be an out of wack rotation where x slot shows up as a rep more often than they should.
That assumes there are less scum than dayphases-1. Which is highly unlikely given there are vig shots as prizes and whatever else we don't know about yet.
~ C
In post 3137, Emperors New Groove wrote:In post 3133, mcqueen wrote:Cheeky Dancer, davesaz, The Last Knight, Karmeleon, Gamma Emerald, and RCEnigma. Those are the players I'm looking at right now.
Town, town, scum, null, town, scum.In post 3134, mcqueen wrote:Auro's Day 1 play looks fine to me.
Haven't seen Auro here today.
Ari is going to show up soon. I'm going to bed.
In post 3613, Elsa Jay wrote:Well it's better then being REC and going "buh, I think I should waste my vote on Elsa after she put herself in a timer with a Miller claim and is literally trying to die today"
In post 3670, DrewVa wrote:In post 3660, RCEnigma wrote:Hopefully Elsa or UL/Kokichi.
I thought Kokichi’s re-entrance in the thread was townie. He made it a point of stating that it was Hebi that voted us, so he isn’t sr us and I think that scum!Kokichi would not hesitate to have jumped on our wagon. So, I’m not currently interested in voting there.
Can you explain the case on Elsa again? Neither DVa or myself have a clue what to make of his recent posting.
In post 3679, profii wrote:In post 3675, RCEnigma wrote:In post 3670, DrewVa wrote:In post 3660, RCEnigma wrote:Hopefully Elsa or UL/Kokichi.
I thought Kokichi’s re-entrance in the thread was townie. He made it a point of stating that it was Hebi that voted us, so he isn’t sr us and I think that scum!Kokichi would not hesitate to have jumped on our wagon. So, I’m not currently interested in voting there.
Can you explain the case on Elsa again? Neither DVa or myself have a clue what to make of his recent posting.
It was mostly around the end of day wagon. So Elsa proposed Theta's Lynch end of day. I assume as a policy thing, she only had two posts about theta before her ultimatum of Lynch or Vig shot.
Several slots voiced their willingness to vote there before it ended up on flippy so if any wagon was a counterwagon I would argue it was Theta with votes swinging off of Theta right at the end.
That's what I gathered from the iso and it all focuses on the 28th if anyone else wants to view the context.
The original argument was the timing of Elsa's vote around the discussion of flippy as the Lynch, which she was active for but didn't participate in. I just don't feel all of the mafia were passive in allowing their partner to go down.
I haven't followed anything involving her claims and volunteering to hammer the SS claim comes a day late to be relevant.
I feel like I've just had a penny dropping moment
I'm on board with the idea that if people are voting Theta instead of Flippy, that says Theta is town and the voters are scum trying to save flippy...
that's out of {AC / Elsa / TLK }
I hadn't really considered how the AC kill fits into that, because previously I'd considered the lurk wagons, so the pool of UL and Thanos maybe blurred my thinking - however, considering the Theta wagon in isolation, makes me consider the AC kill more carefully - if the logic above is theta is the counter wagon, then the fact that scum killed AC straight after really puts a spotlight on Elsa and/or TLK.
you've got to be pretty confident that either your miller or SS claim is going to WIFOM your way through day 2.
I don't see that coming from TLK on his first game actually.
Elsa - possibly but then again, I've whittled that down to 1 scum-spect quite easily
I've just wifom'd myself out of my own cases on these slots.