-- this is before RR explained any part of the argument isn't it?
whatIn post 681, Weiss Schnee wrote:Yeah, the mod lied to me when I asked if you had replaced back in so I think that made me a bit more confused
secondedIn post 684, Ruby Red wrote:whatIn post 681, Weiss Schnee wrote:Yeah, the mod lied to me when I asked if you had replaced back in so I think that made me a bit more confused
Why wasn't the game interesting? Looked interesting to me at a glance...In post 675, Weiss Schnee wrote:Spoiler:
tbh if I was to townread Alonzo for one post it would be "how long is left?" LOL
but this slot looks pretty scummy, I think both Bittersweet and Alonzo have pinged me in different ways -- Bittersweet with the FL/rb T/T read which seemed unwarranted, Alonzo with calling the opening "interesting" when... frankly it wasn't?
VOTE: Alonzo
Should we talk about republican candidates then?In post 622, Slaxx wrote:Don’t you startIn post 619, Creature wrote:Tulsi Gabbard is the best democrat candidate.In post 618, Flavor Leaf wrote:Slaxx is just playing a political game. Not sure if I think it’s AI.
What about it makes them not TvT?In post 623, Slaxx wrote:Idk how TTTT flips town if Ruby flips town here.
Ho ho hoIn post 683, Jibril wrote:Having too many town reads sounds like a scum problem
Hows your poker face?In post 50, Flavor Leaf wrote:Clearing it up, I know FlippyNips in real life.In post 47, Persivul wrote:This is probably just bad strategically rather than scummy, but either way it stuck out to me.In post 22, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think he’s already posted more than he normally would have if he was scum.
This looks like he’s excited to be town.only his first game on site he was town in.
I’m sitting in the back of his car as I type this.
Love thisIn post 80, rb wrote:any direction for town is better than no direction
worst towns ever are ones that don't act with conviction. the reason i get killed early as town all the time even if my reads aren't the best is because i make towns be active and play with conviction.
failure to have clear and strong wagons benefits scum. overall town cohesion and tone is much more important to foster on day1 than obsessing for 30 pages over bad early game reads
if you disagree you are a dum and should uninstall the game
I'v played with saudade a few time, this feels like he's holding back on his eccentricity in this one.In post 82, Saudade wrote:what a perfect textbook response rb
or?In post 89, or wrote:saudade can be town for now too
seriously townie
I'm guessing by how quickly you pull out you dont have kids? =)
Like Joges here
You a sheep or a wolf mumble?
Flippy speaking and promising to speak again. Speak Flippy speak!In post 147, Emperor flippyNips wrote:Why are we voting bittersweet? Did I miss something? Or are we just trying to make him talk?
Well I don’t have a read on him in this game yet, I feel like most of what hes said is about me.
I normally just assume he’s scum until proven otherwise.
But I’ll say more about him later when the game progresses as well as other
Seems fair, liking Percivul even if I dont agree with him 100%In post 151, Persivul wrote:Scum aren't trying to get a lynch this early. That mostly happened because people don't pay attention to vote counts this early.
Was just thinking that..In post 176, stan1ey wrote:Its very easy to persuade you to unvote
Or you are going to have to explain how your scale of evil works.In post 177, or wrote:wow my endorsement of jorges really works. how about my condemnation of stanley. this guys a solid 6/10 scum.
Why wouldn't it look like flavour disbanded the RVS wagon?In post 178, joges wrote:VOTE: stan
That's the first time Flavor has unvoted since their unvote of an RVS vote. I don't like the picture you wanted to paint here based on one instance. You didn't word it "It was really easy for you to unvote right now." You said:
Which makes it sound like a thing that has been happening all game.stan1ey wrote:Its very easy to persuade you to unvote
In post 191, Ruby Red wrote:hard changing wagons
VOTE: Thespio
i've decided. this lynches a wolf one hundred percent of the time.
Like I said, classic RR from my 1 game with them. Got their (TvT) lynch through, then got NK'd N1.In post 192, Ruby Red wrote:i will scream this shit down if need be. one hundred percent confident.
if you want a scum lynch day one, sheep this shit.
Ok, now we are getting saucy..In post 198, Flavor Leaf wrote:In post 186, rb wrote:flavor leaf #1 partner suspect if joges flips scum
weak distance followed by unvote
if joges flips scum, flavor leaf gets powerlynched
If i was scum this is exactly what I would want you to think
Now I know, now I know you know I know...In post 199, rb wrote:oh, so we should just lynch flavor leaf first
Again purpose?? I dont wanna bang on about it, but what were you thinking?In post 225, Flavor Leaf wrote:Haven’t been mislynched in over a year.In post 221, rb wrote:yah, which means you want me to tunnel so you can discredit the tunnel as confbias
sorry you rolled scum and sorry you fucked up i guess
You can try if you’d like.
I need to be mislynched a few times tbh. I’ve had some pretty fantastic scum games recently, so people gonna get paranoid.
In post 268, Flavor Leaf wrote:I think we just have countering perspectives.
Wish I read TTTT more town in this one, post like these keep me guessing...In post 303, TTTT wrote:yeah a post is missing
it was mine
it was a really well-thought out and detailed post that laid out a flawless unimpeachable case on the scumteam
it incorporated meta analysis, VCA, wagon heuristics, and other things smart people do
somehow it got deleted and now I can't remember any of it so you'll have to take my word on this one
Its hard to Imagine a scum with people backing him up getting this bent out of shape over a single slot, tentative TR for Rb off the back of this interaction.In post 327, Persivul wrote:OK, I'm out of my mind then for takingalwaysto mean what it means.
mod, please replace me
rb isn't newIn post 694, Alonzo wrote:From meta I know this is exactly how and what Flavour would do as town here, but its way less obvious to new players what ego posts are, and I question the use here beyond looking to trigger someone new.
no, you really don'tIn post 696, Alonzo wrote:If I would accuse Flavour of overdoing it, I gotta cast an accusing eye at RR also.