In post 5624, RCEnigma wrote:Since Profii had the fruit he couldn't be targeted by actions right? Or could he be affected by actions since he was giving it away?
In post 5600, The Last Knight wrote:In post 5272, RCEnigma wrote:
Idk I think he's scum. But like I said BoonBank could be a scum role. So there's a world where a scum stickyfruit vendor won night 1 and passed Profii a fruit night one then passed another night 2.
It still doesn't explain what happened to Profiis fruit which is why I'm content with thinking TLK is lying.
Profii didn't pass his fruit because he had plans to pass it to his loyal target. They won't get it until tonight.
The original fruit passer gave me the fruit.
In post 5618, The Last Knight wrote:
But I really dislike BEF claiming I faked the fruit when he didn't even know what it did. He was just so eager to point and yell "scum!" that he didn't bother to do the research. It feels like he knows that someone is trying to frame me with the fruit and wants to bring a lot of attention to it. I've been scum reading BEF ever since he made that word choice argument early D1. So, not omgus.
In post 5624, RCEnigma wrote:Since Profii had the fruit he couldn't be targeted by actions right? Or could he be affected by actions since he was giving it away?
In post 5632, Gamma Emerald wrote:Hi, what is the relevance of the current discussion?
In post 5634, Gamma Emerald wrote:2 things: first, it determines whether the current discussion is important, as from what I’ve seen it’s a lot of theory talk with little conclusions. Second it helps me get a foothold in the conversation if I want to talk about it by giving an overview of what’s going on.
In post 5636, Gamma Emerald wrote:Well my overview is you guys have been going on about Stucky fruit for a while with 0 actual attempt to draw impactful conclusions from it. So unless you can counter that, good day.
In post 5634, Gamma Emerald wrote:2 things: first, it determines whether the current discussion is important, as from what I’ve seen it’s a lot of theory talk with little conclusions. Second it helps me get a foothold in the conversation if I want to talk about it by giving an overview of what’s going on.
In post 5600, The Last Knight wrote:In post 5272, RCEnigma wrote:
Idk I think he's scum. But like I said BoonBank could be a scum role. So there's a world where a scum stickyfruit vendor won night 1 and passed Profii a fruit night one then passed another night 2.
It still doesn't explain what happened to Profiis fruit which is why I'm content with thinking TLK is lying.
Profii didn't pass his fruit because he had plans to pass it to his loyal target. They won't get it until tonight.
The original fruit passer gave me the fruit.
In post 5642, profii wrote:is it worth saying:
if my sticky fruit didnt go to loyal dude and una's quack didnt go to creature as intended - should someone claim if they heard the quack? or not? idk
In post 5631, RCEnigma wrote:I think all of this is semi irrelevant since it's being used to determine TLK's alignment and we are lynching him regardless of that because supersaint needs to be resolved.